1. 内蒙古科技大学能源与环境学院,内蒙古,包头,014010
2. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院,呼和浩特,010011
3. 内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特,010018
4. 内蒙古科技大学矿业与煤炭学院,内蒙古,包头,014010
[ "秦健杰(1998—), 男, 在读硕士研究生, 主要从事盐渍化土壤固碳减排研究。E-mail: qjj112358@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
秦健杰, 杨威, 张如鑫, 等. 生物炭与菌肥联用改良盐碱地的减排增产效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):274-283.
QIN Jianjie, YANG Wei, ZHANG Ruxin, et al. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Yield Response to Biochar-Microbial Amendment in Saline-Alkali Soil[J]. 2025, 39(1): 274-283.
秦健杰, 杨威, 张如鑫, 等. 生物炭与菌肥联用改良盐碱地的减排增产效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):274-283. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.038.
QIN Jianjie, YANG Wei, ZHANG Ruxin, et al. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Yield Response to Biochar-Microbial Amendment in Saline-Alkali Soil[J]. 2025, 39(1): 274-283. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.038.
目的为探讨生物炭和微生物菌肥联合施用对盐碱地覆膜滴灌葵花田土壤温室气体排放和葵花产量的影响。方法通过设置生物炭(0、7.5、15 t/hm2)和微生物菌肥(0、112.5、225 kg/hm2)的不同施用量组合,在内蒙古河套灌区盐碱地开展田间试验。利用静态暗箱-气相色谱法监测温室气体排放,分析土壤理化性质变化、综合增温潜势(GWP)及葵花产量。结果1) 与对照处理(0 t/hm2生物炭+0 kg/hm2微生物菌肥)相比,7.5 t/hm2生物炭+225 kg/hm2微生物菌肥处理下,土壤有机碳、速效磷、速效钾质量分数分别增加63.9%、155.7%和46.8%。2)与对照处理相比,7.5 t/hm2生物炭+225 kg/hm2微生物菌肥处理下,CO2累积排放量由4 373 kg/hm2降至-394.3 kg/hm2,CH4累积排放量由-0.08 kg/hm2增至0.1 kg/hm2,N2O累积排放量由0.23 kg/hm2降至-0.09 kg/hm2,GWP由4 438.3 kg/hm2降低至-417.2 kg/hm2。3)15 t/hm2生物炭+225 kg/hm2微生物菌肥处理下,葵花产量达到4 137.5 kg/hm2,较对照处理(2 968.7 kg/hm2)增加39.4%。4)Mantel test分析显示,葵花产量与土壤理化性质呈极显著相关(p<0.01);CO2排放与铵态氮、含水率、N2O排放与硝态氮、CH4排放与硝态氮均呈显著或极显著相关(p<0.05)。结论生物炭和微生物菌肥联合施用能够同时改良盐碱土壤、减少温室气体排放和提高葵花产量,其中,7.5 t/hm2生物炭+225 kg/hm2微生物菌肥是最佳组合。此技术为盐碱地农业生产中的温室气体减排和作物增产提供新策略。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of combined application of biochar and microbial fertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions and sunflower yield in saline-alkali soil under plastic film mulching and drip irrigation.MethodsField experiments were conducted in saline-alkali soil in the Hetao Irrigation Area of Inner Mongolia
with different combinations of biochar (0
7.5
15 t/hm2) and microbial fertilizer (0
112.5
225 kg/hm2). Greenhouse gas emissions were monitored using static chamber-gas chromatography method. Changes in soil physicochemical properties
global warming potential (GWP)
and sunflower yield were analyzed.Results1) Compared with the control (0 t/hm2 biochar+0 kg/hm2 microbial fertilizer)
the treatment of 7.5 t/hm2 biochar+225 kg/hm2 microbial fertilizer increased soil organic carbon
available phosphorus
and available potassium contents by 63.9%
155.7%
and 46.8%
respectively. 2) Compared to the control
the treatment with 7.5 t/hm2 biochar +225 kg/hm2 microbial fertilizer reduced cumulative CO2 emissions from 4 373 kg/hm2 to -394.3 kg/hm2
increased cumulative CH4 emissions from -0.08 kg/hm2 to 0.1 kg/hm2
reduced cumulative N2O emissions from 0.23 kg/hm2 to -0.09 kg/hm2
and decreased GWP from 4 438.3 kg/hm2 to -417.2 kg/hm2. 3) Under the treatment of 15 t/hm2 biochar+225 kg/hm2 microbial fertilizer
sunflower yield reached 4 137.5 kg/hm2
which was increased by 39.4% compared with the control (2 968 kg/hm2). 4) Mantel test analysis revealed that sunflower yield was extremely significantly correlated with soil physicochemical properties (p < 0.01); CO2 emissions were significantly correlated with ammonium-nitrogen content and soil moisture
N2O emissions were significantly correlated with nitrate-nitrogen content
and CH4 emissions were extremely significantly correlated with nitrate-nitrogen content (p < 0.05).ConclusionCombined application of biochar and microbial fertilizer can simultaneously improve saline-alkali soil
reduce greenhouse gas emissions
and increase sunflower yield
with 7.5 t/hm2 biochar+225 kg/hm2 microbial fertilizer being the optimal combination. This technique provides a new strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural production and increasing crop yields on saline-alkali soils.
FAO. 2021. Global Soil Salinity Map(GSSmap)-Technical report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
HUANG W, SUN H Y, LIU J B, et al. Current situation, problems and suggestions for comprehensive utilization of saline-alkali soil in Hebei Province[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 1-9. [2024-12-02].
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/13.1432.S.20241008.1411.001.html
. 黄伟, 孙宏勇, 刘建兵, 等. 河北省盐碱地综合利用的现状、问题及建议[J/OL]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 1-9[2024-12-02].
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/13.1432.S.20241008.1411.001.html
.
ZHANG X C, DIPPOLD M A, KUZYAKOV Y, et al. Spatial pattern of enzyme activities depends on root exudate composition[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 133: 83-93.
WANG C, LIU D W, BAI E. Decreasing soil microbial diversity is associated with decreasing microbial biomass under nitrogen addition[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 120: 126-133.
SCHIMEL, J P. Life in dry soils: Effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2018: 409-432.
ZHANG R X, QU Z Y, YANG W, et al. Evaluating annual soil carbon emissions under biochar-added farmland subjecting from freeze-thaw cycle[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 365: e121506.
LI H D, LIU Y, JIAO X Y, et al. Response of soil nutrients retention and rice growth to biochar in straw returning paddy fields[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 312(Pt 1): e137244.
WANG Y L, GENG Z C, WANG Q, et al. Influence of biochar on greenhouse gases emissions and physico-chemical properties of loess soil[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(9): 3634-3641. 王月玲, 耿增超, 王强, 等. 生物炭对塿土土壤温室气体及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(9): 3634-3641.
EGAMBERDIEVA D, WIRTH S, BELLINGRATH-KIMURA S D, et al. Salt-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for enhancing crop productivity of saline soils[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10: e2791.
DE O NUNES P S, DE MEDEIROS F H V, DE OLIVEIRA T S, et al. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis promote tomato growth[J]. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2023, 54(1): 397-406.
YU H W, ZOU W X, CHEN J J, et al. Biochar amendment improves crop production in problem soils: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 232: 8-21.
DUAN M L, LIU G H, ZHOU B B, et al. Effects of modified biochar on water and salt distribution and water-stable macro-aggregates in saline-alkaline soil[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2021, 21(6): 2192-2202.
PALANSOORIYA K N, WONG J T F, HASHIMOTO Y, et al. Response of microbial communities to biochar-amended soils: A critical review[J]. Biochar, 2019, 1(1): 3-22.
LIU Y X, LONAPPAN L, BRAR S K, et al. Impact of biochar amendment in agricultural soils on the sorption, desorption, and degradation of pesticides: A review[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 645: 60-70.
ROMERO-TRIGUEROS C, DÍAZ-LÓPEZ M, VIVALDI G A, et al. Plant and soil microbial community responses to different water management strategies in an almond crop[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 778: e146148.
EL-NAGGAR A, EL-NAGGAR A H, SHAHEEN S M, et al. Biochar composition-dependent impacts on soil nutrient release, carbon mineralization, and potential environmental risk: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 241: 458-467.
DAVID C, LEMKE R, HELGASON W, et al. Current inventory approach overestimates the effect of irrigated crop management on soil-derived greenhouse gas emissions in the semi-arid Canadian Prairies[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 208: 19-32.
CHEN W F, MENG J, HAN X R, et al. Past, present, and future of biochar[J]. Biochar, 2019, 1(1): 75-87.
WU P, WANG Z Y, WANG H L, et al. Visualizing the emerging trends of biochar research and applications in 2019: A scientometric analysis and review[J]. 浂畩湯楣瑨祡?愬渠搲‰攲渰稬礠洲攨猲?愺挠琱椳瘵椭琱礵‰椮渼?桲放慛瘲礰?洠敚瑈慁汎?挠潃測琠慚浅楎湇愠瑇攠摍?猠效摕楁济敇渠瑄嬠?崬???栠敡浬漮猠灂桩敯牣敨??㈠て??????????????????扡牮?孧??嵥?坴?丠????奧??塩?佧丠??婥?兮???啳婥夠??佳嘠?奭???楩潯据桳愬爠?獯瑮慴扡業汩楮瑡祮?椠湴?獥潡楴汭???攬琠慡?慤渠慰汯祴獥楮獴?潡晬?摮敥捧潡浴灩潶獥椠瑩業潰湡?慴湳摛?灝爮椠浃楨湥杭?散晡晬攠捅瑮獧孩?嵥???????楯潵敲湮敡牬本礠?‰㈱??????????′??有??监???扛爲?孝?が嵉???啃?娠?????商??乃??????匠????佴??????敩瑯?慨污???浥灤慵捣瑥獳?潳景?扬椠潨捥桴慥牲?捴潲湯捰敨湩瑣爠慲瑥楳潰湩?慡湴摩?灮愠物瑮椠捡氠敳?獢楴穲敯?潩湣?桬礠摰牬慡畮汴楡捴?捯潮渠摴畨捲瑯極癧楨琠祩?慣湲摥??佩??氠敳慯捩桬椠湯杲?潡普?扣椠潣捡桲慢牯?猠慲湥摣?浬楣硩瑴畲牡敮獣孹?嵡???潤略牣湲慥污?潩普??祣摡牲潢汯潮札祤???ち?????????????????tivity[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 122: 173-185.
YUAN P, WANG J Q, PAN Y J, et al. Review of biochar for the management of contaminated soil: Preparation, application and prospect[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 659: 473-490.
ZAMA E F, REID B J, SUN G X, et al. Silicon (Si) biochar for the mitigation of arsenic (As) bioaccumulation in spinach (Spinacia oleracean) and improvement in the plant growth[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 189: 386-395.
CHEN Z H, SHI M X, LIU Y G, et al. Effects of different amounts of biochar on reducing soil N
2
O emission and increasing nitrogen use efficiency under intensive vegetable production in South China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2024, 30(6): 1053-1063. 陈宗海, 石梦玄, 刘一戈, 等. 不同用量生物质炭降低华南集约化菜地土壤N
2
O排放和提高氮肥利用率的效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(6): 1053-1063.
NAEEM M A, KHALID M, AON M, et al. Combined application of biochar with compost and fertilizer improves soil properties and grain yield of maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2018, 41(1): 112-122.
ZHU X M, CHEN B L, ZHU L Z, et al. Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: A review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 227: 98-115.
EL-NAGGAR A, LEE S S, RINKLEBE J, et al. Biochar application to low fertility soils: A review of current status, and future prospects[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 337: 536-554.
HUANG D L, LIU L S, ZENG G M, et al. The effects of rice straw biochar on indigenous microbial com
0
浏览量
28
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621