黄土塬区土壤饱和导水率对果园还耕的响应特征

李舒怡; 袁遥遥; 张晨晨; 乔江波; 朱元骏; 贾小旭; 邵明安

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄土塬区土壤饱和导水率对果园还耕的响应特征

更新时间：2025-03-14

- 黄土塬区土壤饱和导水率对果园还耕的响应特征
- Response Characteristics of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity after Returning Orchard to Farmland on the Loess Plateau
- 水土保持学报 2025年39卷第1期页码：66-72
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所), 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 陕西省林业科学院,西安,710082
  3. 中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室,西安,710061
  4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,北京,100101
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李舒怡(1999—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要从事旱区土壤水文过程研究。E-mail: 2022051529@nwafu.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42307412, 42377316);中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室开放资助项目(SKLLQG2207);陕西林业科技创新青年人才培育专项(SXLK2023-06-7)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.017
  中图分类号： S157.2
- 纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李舒怡, 袁遥遥, 张晨晨, 等. 黄土塬区土壤饱和导水率对果园还耕的响应特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):66-72.

LI Shuyi, YUAN Yaoyao, ZHANG Chenchen, et al. Response Characteristics of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity after Returning Orchard to Farmland on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2025, 39(1): 66-72.
李舒怡, 袁遥遥, 张晨晨, 等. 黄土塬区土壤饱和导水率对果园还耕的响应特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):66-72. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.017.

LI Shuyi, YUAN Yaoyao, ZHANG Chenchen, et al. Response Characteristics of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity after Returning Orchard to Farmland on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2025, 39(1): 66-72. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.017.

摘要

目的为探明果园还耕后土壤饱和导水率(Ks)变化规律及影响因素。方法选取黄土塬区衰老期果园(AO)和果园不同还耕年限(2 a、4 a、6 a、10 a)农田为研究对象，纯农田(CK)作为对照，测定不同样地0~200 cm土层Ks和土壤基本性质，利用Pearson相关性分析，揭示黄土塬区Ks对果园还耕的响应特征及影响因素。结果随着还耕年限增加，农田0~200 cm土层黏粒和粉粒质量分数平均值呈减小趋势；砂粒质量分数平均值呈增大趋势。不同样地Ks平均值大小为(2.25±1.19) cm/h(6 a)＞(1.60±0.71) cm/h(AO)＞(1.49±0.29) cm/h(4 a)＞(1.46±0.44) cm/h(2 a)＞(1.40±0.40) cm/h(CK)＞(1.04±0.61) cm/h(10 a)，整体上随还耕年限的增加，Ks平均值呈先升高后降低趋势。随着土层深度增加，不同样地Ks均呈减小趋势。0~40 cm土层Ks影响因素是有机质质量分数，40~100、100~200 cm土层Ks影响因素是土壤体积质量和有机质质量分数。结论果园还耕显著影响Ks的时空分布特征，且不同深度影响因素不同，具有深度依赖性。研究结果可为黄土高原果园还耕后土壤水循环研究提供数据基础及理论依据。

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the change rule and influencing factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) after returning orchard to farmland.MethodsAging apple orchards (AO) and orchards with different tillage years (2 a

4 a

6 a

10 a) on the Loess Plateau were selected as the research objects

and the pure farmland (CK) was used as the control. The Ks and soil basic properties of the 0—200 cm layer in different plots were measured. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the response characteristics and influencing factors of Ks after returning orchard to farmland on the Loess Plateau.ResultsWith the increase of returning years

the average clay and silt content in 0—200 cm soil layer of farmland showed a decreasing trend

the average sand content showed an increasing trend. The order of the mean values of Ks in different plots was (2.25±1.19) cm/h (6 a) > (1.60±0.71) cm/h (AO) > (1.49±0.29) cm/h (4 a) > (1.46±0.44) cm/h (2 a) > (1.40±0.40) cm/h (CK) > (1.04±0.61) cm/h (10 a). On the whole

with the increase of returning years

the average value of Ks increased first and then decreased. With the increase of soil depth

Ks in different plots showed a decreasing trend. The influencing factor of Ks in the 0—40 cm soil layer was organic matter content

and the influencing factors of Ks in the 40—100 and 100—200 cm soil layers were soil bulk density and organic matter content.ConclusionReturning orchard to farmland significantly affected the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of Ks

and the influencing factors were different at different depths

which were depth-dependent. The results can provide a data basis and theoretical basis for the study of soil water cycle after returning orchard to farmland on the Loess Plateau.

关键词

Keywords

references

YU H, FENG T J, WEI W, et al. Response of soil physicochemical characteristics to long-term vegetation in loess region of western Shanxi province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(7): 2873-2885. 于航, 冯天骄, 卫伟, 等. 晋西黄土区土壤理化特征对长期植被恢复的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(7): 2873-2885.

DUAN X Q, DENG Y S, TAO Y, et al. Variation in soil saturated hydraulic conductivity along the hillslope of collapsing granite gullies[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2018, 63: 803-817.

WANG W L, HE K N, ZHANG T, et al. Effects of mechanical components and physical and chemical properties of soil in water conservation forests in cold highland area of Qinghai on its saturated hydraulic conductivity and water holding capacity[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2020, 29(2): 69-77. 王玮璐, 贺康宁, 张潭, 等. 青海高寒区水源涵养林土壤机械组成和理化性质对其饱和导水率和持水能力的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(2): 69-77.

WANG Y Q, SHAO M A, HORTON R, et al. Regional scale variation and distribution patterns of soil saturated hydraulic conductivities in surface and subsurface layers in the loessial soils of China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 487(2): 13-23.

TOMMASO P, RENATO M, ALESSIAN F, et al. A pedotransfer function for field-scale saturated hydraulic conductivity of a small watershed[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2019, 18(1): 1-15.

FU B J, WANG S, LIU Y, et al. Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2017, 45: 223-243.

LIU G B, SHANGGUAN Z P, YAO W Y, et al. Ecological effects of soil conservation in Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy Sciences, 2017, 32(1): 11-19. 刘国彬, 上官周平, 姚文艺, 等. 黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(1): 11-19.

ZHENG J Y, SHAO M A, ZHANG X C. Spatial variation of surface soil's bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity on slope in Loess Region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004, 18(3): 53-56. 郑纪勇, 邵明安, 张兴昌. 黄土区坡面表层土壤容重和饱和导水率空间变异特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(3): 53-56.

GU C J, MU X M, GAO P, et al. Influence of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Nature Review Cancer, 2019, 19(2): 716-728.

WANG C G, CAO W H, MA B, et al. Analysis and simulation of factors affecting soil saturated hydraulic conductivity by combinations of grasses and shrub with different root configurations[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 10-16. 王晨光, 曹文华, 马波, 等. 不同根系构型草本与灌木复合对土壤饱和导水率的影响因素分析及模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023, 43(4): 10-16.

WANG Z L, ZHAO Y G, ZHAO S W, et al. Study on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors in typical grassland of farmland conversion[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(6): 1254-1262. 王子龙, 赵勇钢, 赵世伟, 等. 退耕典型草地土壤饱和导水率及其影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1254-1262.

XV X M. Soil ecohydrological effects of different vegetation restoration patterns in the Loess Hilly Region[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University, 2022. 许小明. 黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复方式的土壤生态水文效应[D]. 陕西杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2022.

LIANG X F, ZHAO S W, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of vegetation rehabilitation on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in Ziwuling Forest Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(2): 636-642. 梁向锋, 赵世伟, 张扬, 等. 子午岭植被恢复对土壤饱和导水率的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(2): 636-642.

LI Z, LIU W Z, WANG Q X. Effects of land use type and slope position on soil physical properties in loess tableland area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(6): 1303-1308. 李志, 刘文兆, 王秋贤. 黄土塬区不同地形部位和土地利用方式对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(6): 1303-1308.

NIU H H, ZHAO X N, GAO X D, et al. Variation characteristics of the deep soil water and nitrogen in orchards in Weibei dry plateau after replanting food crops[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(14): 5926-5936. 牛虎虎, 赵西宁, 高晓东, 等. 苹果园改种粮食作物渭北旱塬深层土壤水氮变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(14): 5926-5936.

Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Measurement of physical properties of soil[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1978: 25-26. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所物理研究室. 土壤物理性质测定[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978: 25-26.

YU D X, JIA X X, HUANG L M. Spatial variation and influencing factors of saturated hydraulic conductivity in different soil layers of the loess area[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 49(5): 1073-1079. 于冬雪, 贾小旭, 黄来明. 黄土区不同土层饱和导水率空间变异与影响因素[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(5): 1073-1079.

LIU Z Q, JIA G D, YU X X. Water uptake and WUE of apple tree-corn agroforestry in the loess hilly region of China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 234: e106138.

TRANTER G, minASNY B, MCBRATNEY A B, et al. Building and testing conceptual and empirical models for predicting soil bulk density[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2007, 23(4): 437-443.

WU G L, LIU Y, YANG Z, et al. Root channels to indicate the increase in soil matrix water infiltration capacity of arid reclaimed mine soils[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 546: 133-139.

GUO L, LIU Y, WU G L, et al. Preferential water flow: Influence of alfalfa(

Medicago sativa

L.)decayed root channels on soil water infiltration[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 578: e124019.

YANG Z, HUANG X, SHE D L. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in the loess hilly region of Northwestern Shanxi[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(6): 178-184. 杨震, 黄萱, 佘冬立. 晋西北黄土丘陵区土壤饱和导水率的空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6): 178-184.

MAO N, HUANG L M, SHAO M A. Profile distribution of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and controlling factors under different vegetations on slope in loess region[J]. Soils, 2019, 51(2): 381-389. 毛娜, 黄来明, 邵明安. 黄土区坡面尺度不同植被类型土壤饱和导水率剖面分布及影响因素[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(2): 381-389.

ZOU W X, HAN X Z, LU X C, et al. Effect of land use types on physical properties of black soil profiles[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(5): 187-193. 邹文秀, 韩晓增, 陆欣春, 等. 不同土地利用方式对黑土剖面土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(5): 187-193.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黑土切沟沟头土壤特性分异及其对K值影响

黄土高原切沟汇水区植被恢复模式对土壤饱和导水率的影响及机制

阻沙固沙带不同治沙措施对土壤理化性质和酶活性的影响

喀斯特峰丛洼地小流域不同景观位置土壤饱和导水率特征及其影响因素

三峡库区经果林地生物结皮发育对土壤饱和导水率的影响