1. 桂林理工大学广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室,广西,桂林,541004
2. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,长沙,410125
3. 中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 广西 环江,547100
[ "余欣芮(1997—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要从事土壤水文过程研究。E-mail: 609564704@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
余欣芮, 李学章, 张帅普, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地小流域不同景观位置土壤饱和导水率特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):30-37.
YU Xinrui, LI Xuezhang, ZHANG Shuaipu, et al. Characteristics of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Its Influencing Factors at Different Landscape Positions in a Small Peak-Cluster Depression Watershed of the Karst Region[J]. 2025, 39(1): 30-37.
余欣芮, 李学章, 张帅普, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地小流域不同景观位置土壤饱和导水率特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):30-37. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.013.
YU Xinrui, LI Xuezhang, ZHANG Shuaipu, et al. Characteristics of Soil Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Its Influencing Factors at Different Landscape Positions in a Small Peak-Cluster Depression Watershed of the Karst Region[J]. 2025, 39(1): 30-37. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.013.
目的 峰丛洼地是重要的喀斯特地貌类型之一,探明不同景观位置对Ks的影响规律可为深入理解该区水文过程提供参考。方法 通过测定2种景观位置不同土层Ks和土壤理化性质,采用方差分析、回归分析和通径分析等方法研究不同景观位置Ks的分布特征及其影响因素。结果 景观位置和土层对Ks分布有显著的影响(p<0.05),景观位置的影响主要体现在0~10、20~30 cm土层,土层的影响主要发生在坡地,而土地利用的影响不显著(p>0.05)。景观位置对土壤颗粒组成和全磷影响不明显(p>0.05),而有机碳、全氮和体积质量随景观位置不同发生明显变化(p<0.05)。坡地Ks与粉粒、砂粒、有机碳和全磷呈显著正相关(p<0.05),与黏粒和体积质量呈显著负相关(p<0.05);洼地Ks与体积质量呈显著正相关(p<0.05)。通径分析表明,体积质量和有机碳是影响坡地和洼地Ks的主要因素。利用多元逐步回归建立坡地和洼地Ks的回归方程,其影响因素方差解释率分别为76.2%和32.6%。结论 地貌特征分异对土壤水文参数分布有重要影响,可为喀斯特峰丛洼地小流域水土过程研究提供科学依据。
Objective Peak-cluster depression is one of the important karst landform types. Exploring the influence of different landscape positions on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) can provide a reference for further understanding of the hydrological processes in this area.Methods Saturated hydraulic conductivity and the corresponding soil physical and chemical properties of different soil depths on the slope and in the depression were measured. By measuring Ks and soil physical and chemical properties at different soil depths on the slope and in the depression
the distribution characteristics of Ks and the corresponding influencing factors were studied according to variance analysis
regression analysis and path analysis.Results Landscape position and soil depth had a significant influence on Ks distribution (p < 0.05). The influence of landscape position was mainly identified at 0—10 and 20—30 cm soil depths
and the influence of soil depth was primarily occurred found on the slope. The effect of land use on Ks was not significant (p > 0.05). The influence of landscape position on soil particle composition and total phosphorus was not obvious (p > 0.05)
but organic carbon
total nitrogen and bulk density changed significantly with landscape position (p < 0.05). For the slope
Ks was significantly positively correlated with silt
sand
organic carbon and total phosphorus (p < 0.05)
and significantly negatively correlated with clay and bulk density (p < 0.05). For the depression
there was a significant positive correlation between Ks and bulk density (p < 0.05). Path analysis indicated that bulk density and organic carbon were the primary factors affecting Ks for both the slope and depression. The regression equations of Ks for the slope and depression were established based on multiple stepwise regression
and the variance explanation rates of the influencing factors were 76.2% and 32.6%
respectively.Conclusion The results showed that the difference in geomorphic features had a major impact on the distribution of soil hydrological parameters
and can provide a scientific basis for the study of soil and water processes in small peak-cluster depression watershed of the karst region.
ZHU P Z, ZHANG G H, ZHANG B J. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity of typical revegetated plants on steep gully slopes of Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Geoderma, 2022, 412: e115717.
WANG Y Q, SHAO M A, LIU Z P, et al. Regional-scale variation and distribution patterns of soil saturated hydraulic conductivities in surface and subsurface layers in the loessial soils of China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 487: 13-23.
JARVIS N, KOESTEL J, MESSING I, et al. Influence of soil, land use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 17(12): 5185-5195.
XU Z X, DENG Y S, LIN L W, et al. Characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors of typical plantations in South Subtropical Zone[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(4): 100-107. 许振欣, 邓羽松, 林立文, 等. 南亚热带典型人工林土壤饱和导水率特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(4): 100-107.
ZHANG Y, LIN Y Y, JIA G D, et al. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and its influencing factors of typical vegetation types in Beijing mountainous area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(6): 171-178. 张益, 林毅雁, 贾国栋, 等. 北京山区典型植被类型土壤饱和导水率及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(6): 171-178.
MAO N, HUANG L M, SHAO M A. Profile distribution of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and controlling factors under different vegetations on slope in loess region[J]. Soils, 2019, 51(2): 381-389. 毛娜, 黄来明, 邵明安. 黄土区坡面尺度不同植被类型土壤饱和导水率剖面分布及影响因素[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(2): 381-389.
YANG Z, HUANG X, SHE D L. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in the Loess Hilly Region of Northwestern Shanxi[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(6): 178-184. 杨震, 黄萱, 佘冬立. 晋西北黄土丘陵区土壤饱和导水率的空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6): 178-184.
CHEN H S, LIU J W, WANG K L, et al. Spatial distribution of rock fragments on steep hillslopes in karst region of northwest Guangxi, China[J]. Catena, 2011, 84(1/2): 21-28.
FU T G, CHEN H S, WANG K L. Vertical distribution of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in a small karst catchment[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(3): 538-546. 付同刚, 陈洪松, 王克林. 喀斯特小流域土壤饱和导水率垂直分布特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(3): 538-546.
CAI L L, LIU Z Q, LI Y, et al. Effect of different land use types on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in karst areas[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 119-125. 蔡路路, 刘子琦, 李渊, 等. 喀斯特地区不同土地利用方式对土壤饱和导水率的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 119-125.
MENG F D, PENG T, WANG S J, et al. Comparative study on saturated hydraulic conductivity of limestone and dolomite slope[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 85-89. 孟凡德, 彭韬, 王世杰, 等. 石灰岩与白云岩坡地土壤饱和导水率对比研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(1): 85-89.
LI X Z, XU X L, WANG K L, et al. Estimation of root zone soil moisture at point scale based on soil water measurements from cosmic-ray neutron sensing in a karst catchment[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 289: e108511.
ZHANG Y X, SHI C Q, YANG H, et al. Saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils of typical forests of the south coast of Guanting Reservoir in Yongding River Watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(18): 6681-6689. 张一璇, 史常青, 杨浩, 等. 永定河流域官厅水库南岸典型林分土壤饱和导水率研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(18): 6681-6689.
ZHAO W J, LI X P, FAN Y W, et al. Spatial-temporal stability distribution characteristics of soil moisture in gravel-sand mulched field in northwestern arid area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(17): 144-151. 赵文举, 李晓萍, 范严伟, 等. 西北旱区压砂地土壤水分的时空分布特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(17): 144-151.
WANG W W, CHAI X H, PALIXIATI G M, et al. Soil water repellency and its influencing factors in the enclosed grasslands in Yunwu Mountain in Ningxia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2068-2076. 王维维, 柴晓虹, 帕力夏提·格明, 等. 宁夏云雾山封育草地的土壤斥水性及影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2068-2076.
YAN Y J, DAI Q H, JIN L, et al. Geometric morphology and soil properties of shallow karst fissures in an area of Karst rocky desertification in SW China[J]. Catena, 2019, 174: 48-58.
FU Z Y, CHEN H S, XU Q X, et al. Role of epikarst in near-surface hydrological processes in a soil mantled subtropical dolomite karst slope: Implications of field rainfall simulation experiments[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2016, 30(5): 795-811.
ZHAO Y L, WANG Y Q, ZHANG X C. Distribution characteristics of bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity in intensive land restoration project areas on the Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19): 83-89. 赵亚丽, 王云强, 张兴昌. 黄土高原生态工程区土壤体积质量及饱和导水率的分布特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(10): 83-89.
DING G H, REN Z Z, HU W, et al. Effects of erosive rainfall on soil erosion characteristics of black sloping farmland[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 38(2): 47-56. 丁贵惠, 任忠政, 胡伟, 等. 侵蚀性降雨对黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(2): 47-56.
LI Y Q, DAI Q H, REN Q Q, et al. Vertical permeability of karst shallow fissure and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(3): 150-155. 李焱秋, 戴全厚, 任青青, 等. 喀斯特浅层裂隙土壤垂向渗透性及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3): 150-155.
WEN J, WANG Y B, GAO Z Y, et al. Soil hydrological characteristics of the degrading meadow in permafrost regions in the beiluhe river basin[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2013, 35(4): 929-937. 文晶, 王一博, 高泽永, 等. 北麓河流域多年冻土区退化草甸的土壤水文特征分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(4): 929-937.
LADO M, PAZ A, BEN-HUR M. Organic matter and aggregate-size interactions in saturated hydraulic conductivity[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004, 68(1): 234-242.
WANG Z W, SHAO M A, HUANG L M, et al. Distribution and influencing factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity under different land use patterns in Eastern Qinghai Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(3): 150-155. 王紫薇, 邵明安, 黄来明, 等. 青海省东部不同土地利用方式下土壤饱和导水率分布及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3): 150-155.
ZHAO P P, SHAO M A, WANG T J. Spatial distributions of soil surface-layer saturated hydraulic conductivity and controlling factors of dam farmlands[J]. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(10): 2247-2260.
0
浏览量
29
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621