白云岩坡地土壤与表层岩溶带强风化层耦合结构特征

唐旭芳; 付智勇; 黄钰涵; 王升; 赵杰; 陈洪松

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

白云岩坡地土壤与表层岩溶带强风化层耦合结构特征

更新时间：2025-03-14

- 白云岩坡地土壤与表层岩溶带强风化层耦合结构特征
- Spatial Coupling Pattern of Soil Layer and Upper Epikarst Zone on a Dolomite Hillslope
- 水土保持学报 2025年39卷第1期页码：56-65
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广西大学林学院广西森林生态与保育重点实验室,南宁,530004
  2. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,长沙,410125
  3. 中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站, 广西环江,547100
  4. 南宁师范大学地理与海洋研究院北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室,南宁,530001
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "唐旭芳(1999—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要从事自然保护地管理与生态修复研究。E-mail: tangxufang0705@foxmail.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U21A20189);广西重点研发项目(桂科AB22035058);国家自然科学基金面上项目(42077077);广西科技基地和人才专项青年创新人才科研专项(桂科AD22035032)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.007
  中图分类号： S152
- 纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
唐旭芳, 付智勇, 黄钰涵, 等. 白云岩坡地土壤与表层岩溶带强风化层耦合结构特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):56-65.

TANG Xufang, FU Zhiyong, HUANG Yuhan, et al. Spatial Coupling Pattern of Soil Layer and Upper Epikarst Zone on a Dolomite Hillslope[J]. 2025, 39(1): 56-65.
唐旭芳, 付智勇, 黄钰涵, 等. 白云岩坡地土壤与表层岩溶带强风化层耦合结构特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):56-65. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.007.

TANG Xufang, FU Zhiyong, HUANG Yuhan, et al. Spatial Coupling Pattern of Soil Layer and Upper Epikarst Zone on a Dolomite Hillslope[J]. 2025, 39(1): 56-65. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.007.

摘要

目的喀斯特区白云岩坡地植被恢复困难，石漠化治理难度大，其浅薄土层下伏的表层岩溶带深度参与生态系统过程，然而土壤与表层岩溶带二者的耦合发育关系尚不明确。方法选择典型白云岩山坡，在全坡面尺度上开展深入表层岩溶带强风化层底部的岩土探槽开挖试验，结合Kriging插值、地理加权回归分析等方法对土壤和表层岩溶带强风化层空间特征进行分析，初步探明白云岩坡地土壤与表层岩溶带强风化层间的空间耦合发育特征。结果1) 白云岩坡地土壤和表层岩溶带强风化层厚度沿坡向下逐渐增加，坡地尺度上表层岩溶带强风化层平均厚度为50 cm，平均体积为0.47 m3/m2，占土壤全剖面总体积的43.9%，说明喀斯特区表层岩溶带的生态功能极其重要；2)白云岩坡地岩土结构呈极强的空间异质性，下伏表层岩溶带强风化层空间异质性(C+C0=18.88)显著高于上覆土壤层(C+C0=15.84)；3)土壤总厚度，尤其是土壤B层厚度，与表层岩溶带风化程度呈显著正相关，说明土壤厚度的增加促进下伏表层岩溶带的风化，土壤和表层岩溶带强风化层间呈明显的耦合协同发育关系。结论喀斯特地区土壤和表层岩溶带强风化层协同演化，土壤层下伏的表层岩溶带可能是支撑喀斯特生态系统的重要介质，喀斯特水土资源的评估需要考虑除土壤以外的基岩风化层。土壤厚度及土壤发生层B层厚度可能成为预测喀斯特坡地表层岩溶带厚度的关键参数。

Abstract

ObjectiveRestoring vegetation and combating rocky desertification on dolomite slopes in karst regions face significant challenges. The upper epikarst zone

which underlies the shallow soil layer

plays a crucial role in ecosystem processes. Nevertheless

the coupling relationships between the soil and the upper epikarst zone remain poorly understood.MethodsA representative dolomite hillslope was chosen for detailed soil-epikarst system structure investigation through trench excavation method. By integrating Kriging interpolation with geographically weighted regression analysis

the spatial distribution characteristics of different medium layers in the soil-epikarst system were analyzed. The study preliminarily proved the co-evolving feature of the soil and the underlying upper epikarst zone on dolomite hillslopes.Results1) The thickness of soil and upper epikarst zone on the dolomite hillslope gradually increased down the slope. The average thickness of the upper epikarst zone on a hillslope scale was 50 cm

with an average volume of 0.47 m3/m2

accounting for 43.9% of the total volume of the soil profile

indicating that the ecological function of epikarst in karst regions is extremely important. 2) The soil-epikarst system's structure of the dolomite hillslope exhibited strong spatial heterogeneity. The spatial heterogeneity of the underlying upper epikarst zone (C+C0=18.88) was significantly higher than that of the overlying soil layer (C+C0=15.84); 3) The overall soil thickness

especially the B horizon's thickness

was significantly positively correlated with the upper epikarst zone's weathering degree

indicating that the increase of soil thickness promoted the weathering of the underlying upper epikarst zone

and there was a clear coupling and collaborative development relationship between soil and upper epikarst zone.ConclusionThe soil and upper epikarst zone in karst regions have evolved in a mutually reinforcing manner. The upper epikarst zone acts as an essential substrate for supporting the karst ecosystem. The soil thickness

especially the B horizon' thickness

may be critical parameters for predicting epikarst depth on karst hillslopes. In karst areas

the underlying carbonate rocks can not be ignored when carrying out soil and water resources evaluation.

关键词

Keywords

references

PENG T, ZHOU C S, NING M Q, et al. Study on spatial distribution of epikarst zone on Plateau karst slope based on ground-penetrating radar[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2017, 37(6): 1262-1270. 彭韬, 周长生, 宁茂岐, 等. 基于探地雷达解译的喀斯特坡地表层岩溶带空间分布特征研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2017, 37(6): 1262-1270.

JIANG Z C, LIAN Y Q, QIN X Q. Rocky desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, causes, and restoration[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2014, 132: 1-12.

WANG S J, LI Y B. Problems and development trends about researches on karst rocky desertification[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2007, 22(6): 573-582. 王世杰, 李阳兵. 喀斯特石漠化研究存在的问题与发展趋势[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(6): 573-582.

FORD D C, PW W. Karst geomorphology and hydrology[M]. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.

CHEN X, ZHANG Z C. An overview on the development of science and ecological hydrology of the earth critical zones in karst area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2022, 41(3): 356-364. 陈喜, 张志才. 喀斯特地区地球关键带科学与生态水文学发展综述[J]. 中国岩溶, 2022, 41(3): 356-364.

SUN C X, WANG S J, ZHOU D Q, et al. Differential weathering and pedogenetic characteristics of carbonate rocksand their effect on the development of rock desertification in karst regions[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2002, 22(4): 308-314. 孙承兴, 王世杰, 周德全, 等. 碳酸盐岩差异性风化成土特征及其对石漠化形成的影响[J]. 矿物学报, 2002, 22(4): 308-314.

LIU H Y, JIANG Z H, DAI J Y, et al. Rock fractures determine the coverage of woody and herbaceous plants on the surface of key karst zones[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2019, 49(12): 1974-1981. 刘鸿雁, 蒋子涵, 戴景钰, 等. 岩石裂隙决定喀斯特关键带地表木本与草本植物覆盖[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2019, 49(12): 1974-1981.

ZHANG Z G. Origin of karst-theoretical works on karst[M]. Guilin, Guangxi: Guangxi Normal University Presss, 2006. 张之淦. 岩溶发生学: 理论探索[M]. 广西桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2006.

BUCHER K. Metamorphism of Dolomites and limestones[M]//Petrogenesis of Metamorphic Rocks. Cham: Springer, 2023: 249-282.

PENG T, XING X G, CAI X L, et al. Pot experiment research on the effects of water retaining agent and activated carbon as soil amendments for plant growing on dolomitic rocky desertification slopes[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016, 35(5): 525-532. 彭韬, 邢学刚, 蔡先立, 等. 保水剂与活性炭改良白云岩石漠化坡地土壤促进植物生长的盆栽试验研究[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016, 35(5): 525-532.

WANG S, YAN Y, ZHAO Y J, et al. Co-evolution among soil thickness, epikarst weathering degree, and runoff characteristics on a subtropical karst hillslope[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 628: e130499.

FU Z Y, CHEN H S, XU Q X, et al. Role of epikarst in near-surface hydrological processes in a soil mantled subtropical dolomite karst slope: Implications of field rainfall simulation experiments[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2016, 30(5): 795-811.

ZHANG J, CHEN H S, NIE Y P, et al. Research progress on structure and hydrological processes in the karst critical zone of southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(4): 985-996. 张君, 陈洪松, 聂云鹏, 等. 西南喀斯特关键带结构及其水文过程研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 985-996.

BAO S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. 2000. 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.

The Ministry of Construction, P.R.C. Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering[GB 50021—2001]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2004. 中华人民共和国建设部. 岩土工程勘察规范: GB 50021—2001[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2004.

CAMBARDELLA C A, MOORMAN T B, NOVAK J M, et al. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58(5): 1501-1511.

MENG Q M, FU Z Y, DENG Y S, et al. Spatial variations and the key driving factors of soil losses on dolomite slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(2): 377-386. 蒙清梅, 付智勇, 邓羽松, 等. 白云岩坡地土壤流失空间分布特征及关键影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 377-386.

LI H, ZHANG X B, WANG K L, et al.

137

Cs distribution characteristics at a talus-type karst slope in northwestern Guangxi[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(3): 42-47. 李豪, 张信宝, 王克林, 等. 桂西北倒石堆型岩溶坡地土壤的

137

Cs分布特点[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(3): 42-47.

BERTHELIN R, HARTMANN A. The shallow subsurface of karst systems: review and directions[M]//Bertrand C, Denimal S, Steinmann M, et al, Eds. Advances in Karst Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 61-68.

ZHANG J, CHEN H S, FU Z Y, et al. Investigation on the aquifer structure of small watershed critical zone on karst dolomite in southwest China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 60(4): 969-982. 张君, 陈洪松, 付智勇, 等. 西南喀斯特小流域关键带含水介质分布特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(4): 969-982.

COVINGTON M D, MARTIN J B, TORAN L E, et al. Carbonates in the critical zone[J]. Earth'S Future, 2023, 11(1): e167214495.

LI X Y. Opportunity and challenges for hydropedology[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27(5): 557-562. 李小雁. 水文土壤学面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(5): 557-562.

DONG X L, COHEN M J, MARTIN J B, et al. Ecohydrologic processes and soil thickness feedbacks control limestone-weathering rates in a karst landscape[J]. Chemical Geology, 2019, 527: e118774.

ZHAO Z M, SHEN Y X, JIANG R H, et al. Rock outcrops change infiltrability and water flow behavior in a karst soil[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2020, 19(1): e20002.

KLIMCHOUK A B. Towards defining, delimiting and classifying epikarst: Its origin, processes and variants of geomorphic evolution[J]. Epikarst. Special Publication, 2004, 9: 23-35.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黑色岩系成壤过程中镉和硒的形态转变与迁移特征