采伐剩余物不同处理方式对杉木林土壤酸解有机碳及土壤微生物群落的影响

郎彩芳; 吴传敬; 许恩兰; 林伟盛; 刘小飞; 郭剑芬

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

采伐剩余物不同处理方式对杉木林土壤酸解有机碳及土壤微生物群落的影响

更新时间：2025-03-14

- 采伐剩余物不同处理方式对杉木林土壤酸解有机碳及土壤微生物群落的影响
- Effects of Different Logging Residue Treatments on Acid Hydrolyzed Soil Organic Carbon Fractions and Soil Microbial Communities in a Chinese Fir Plantation
- 水土保持学报 2025年39卷第1期页码：170-177
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福建省植物生理生态重点实验室,福州,350117
  2. 福建三明森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,福建,三明,365002
  3. 福建师范大学地理研究所,福州,350117
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "郎彩芳(2000—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要从事亚热带森林碳循环研究。E-mail: 2074831884@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0600304)福建省科技厅对外合作项目(2022I0012)福建师范大学碳中和研究院自然科学基金项目(TZH2022-01)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.002
  中图分类号： S714.6
- 纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郎彩芳, 吴传敬, 许恩兰, 等. 采伐剩余物不同处理方式对杉木林土壤酸解有机碳及土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):170-177.

LANG Caifang, WU Chuanjing, XU Enlan, et al. Effects of Different Logging Residue Treatments on Acid Hydrolyzed Soil Organic Carbon Fractions and Soil Microbial Communities in a Chinese Fir Plantation[J]. 2025, 39(1): 170-177.
郎彩芳, 吴传敬, 许恩兰, 等. 采伐剩余物不同处理方式对杉木林土壤酸解有机碳及土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025,39(1):170-177. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.002.

LANG Caifang, WU Chuanjing, XU Enlan, et al. Effects of Different Logging Residue Treatments on Acid Hydrolyzed Soil Organic Carbon Fractions and Soil Microbial Communities in a Chinese Fir Plantation[J]. 2025, 39(1): 170-177. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.01.002.

摘要

目的酸解有机碳是土壤中重要的有机碳组分，其质量分数变化将影响土壤微生物群落组成，为探讨土壤酸解有机碳和微生物群落对森林采伐剩余物不同处理方式的响应。方法对福建三明格氏栲自然保护区杉木成熟林的采伐剩余物进行清除(R)、火烧(RB)和保留(RR)3种处理，在种植杉木3 a后采集不同土层(0~10、10~20 cm)土壤，对土壤酸解有机碳组分(活性组分Ⅰ、Ⅱ及惰性组分)和微生物群落进行研究。结果1) 采伐剩余物处理对0~10 cm土层土壤酸解有机碳组分无显著影响。10~20 cm土层，RR和R处理下活性组分Ⅰ(LPⅠ)质量分数(7.2、6.8 g/kg)明显高于RB(4.7 g/kg)处理，RB处理活性组分Ⅱ(LPⅡ)和惰性组分(RP)质量分数(1.06、3.59 g/kg)显著低于R(1.32、7.79 g/kg)处理。RB处理0~10 cm土层土壤酸解有机碳组分质量分数均明显高于10~20 cm土层。2)0~10 cm土层RB处理微生物生物量碳质量分数(335.1 mg/g)显著低于RR和R(540，453.7 mg/g)处理，不同处理各土层土壤微生物生物量氮均无显著性差异。各土层RR处理土壤微生物生物量磷和总PLFAs质量分数都显著高于RB处理。0~10 cm土层RB处理F∶B显著高于RR和R处理，RR处理GP∶GN显著高于RB和R处理。3)土壤酸解有机碳组分与总微生物生物量及各微生物类群PLFAs质量分数均呈正相关。结论保留采伐剩余物处理有利于将不同土壤有机碳组分质量分数维持在较高水平，并对土壤微生物生物量和土壤微生物群落组成具有积极作用。研究结果对于采取合理的杉木林经营措施和提高土壤生产力有重要意义。

Abstract

ObjectiveAcid hydrolyzed soil organic carbon fractions are important in soil

and the changes of their contents will affect soil microbial community composition. The study aimed to investigate the response of acid hydrolyzed soil organic carbon fractions and soil microbial communities to different logging residue treatments.MethodsThree treatments

including residue removed (R)

residue burnt (RB) and residue retained (RR)

were applied to a Chinese fir plantation in the Castanopsis kawakamii Nature Reserve in Sanming

Fujian

and soils in different soil layers (0—10

10—20 cm) were collected three years after planting young Chinese fir to study acid hydrolyzed soil organic carbon fractions (labile fraction Ⅰ

Ⅱ and recalcitrant fraction) and microbial community.Results1) Different logging residue treatments had no significant effect on acid hydrolyzed soil organic carbon fractions in the 0—10 cm soil layer. In the 10—20 cm soil layer

the content of labile fraction Ⅰ (LPⅠ) was significantly higher in the RR (7.2 g/kg) and R (6.8 g/kg) treatments than in the RB (4.7 g/kg) treatment

and the contents of labile fraction Ⅱ (LPⅡ

1.06 g/kg) and recalcitrant fraction (RP

3.59 g/kg) in the RB treatment were significantly lower than those in the R treatment (1.32 and 7.79 g/kg

respectively). The contents of acid hydrolyzed soil organic carbon fractions in the 0—10 cm soil layer of the RB treatment were all significantly higher than those in the 10—20 cm soil layer. 2) The microbial biomass carbon content of the RB treatment in the 0—10 cm soil layer (335.1 mg/g) was significantly lower than that of the RR (540 mg/g) and R (453.7 mg/g) treatments

but there was no significant difference in soil microbial biomass nitrogen in each soil layer among different treatments. Soil microbial biomass phosphorus content and total PLFAs in the two soil layers were significantly higher in the RR treatment than in the RB treatment. In the 0—10 cm soil layer

the F∶B ratio was significantly higher in the RB treatment than in the RR and R treatments

while GP∶GN ratio was significantly higher in the RR treatment than in the RB and R treatments. 3) There were positive correlations between acid hydrolyzed soil organic carbon fractions and total microbial biomass and PLFAs content of each microbial taxon.ConclusionRetention of logging residue treatments facilitated the maintenance of different soil organic carbon fractions at high levels and had a positive effect on soil microbial biomass and soil microbial community composition. This study is of great significance for taking reasonable management measures of Chinese fir plantations and improving soil productivity.

关键词

Keywords

references

WANG H L, WANG J C, ZHANG Y, et al. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and its response to forest growth and soil layer in

Cunninghamia lanceolata

plantations in mid-subtropical China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 545: e121302.

REN C J, WANG T, XU Y D, et al. Differential soil microbial community responses to the linkage of soil organic carbon fractions with respiration across land-use changes[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 409: 170-178.

LI Y, AJLOON F H, WANG X F, et al. Temporal effects of thinning on soil organic carbon and carbon cycling-related enzyme activities in oak-pine mixed forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 545: e121293.

OSBURN E D, AYLWARD F O, BARRETT J E. Historical land use has long-term effects on microbial community assembly processes in forest soils[J]. Isme Communications, 2021, 1(1): e48.

YE Y Q. Thinning caused differences of microbial characteristics in rhizosphere soil of Chinese fir plantation[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2019. 叶钰倩. 间伐导致的杉木人工林根际土壤微生物学特性差异[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2019.

XIANG H M, LUO X Z, ZHANG L L, et al. Forest succession accelerates soil carbon accumulation by increasing recalcitrant carbon stock in subtropical forest topsoils[J]. Catena, 2022, 212: e106030.

THROCKMORTON H M, BIRD J A, DANE L, et al. The source of microbial C has little impact on soil organic matter stabilisation in forest ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2012, 15(11): 1257-1265.

GUO X W, LUO Z K, SUN O J. Long-term litter type treatments alter soil carbon composition but not microbial carbon utilization in a mixed pine-oak forest[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2021, 152(2): 327-343.

QIU H S, LIU J Y, BOORBOORI M R, et al. Effect of biochar application rate on changes in soil labile organic carbon fractions and the association between bacterial community assembly and carbon metabolism with time[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 855: e158876.

RODRIGUEZ-RAMOS J C, CALE J A, CAHILL J F Jr, et al. Changes in soil fungal community composition depend on functional group and forest disturbance type[J]. New Phytologist, 2021, 229(2): 1105-1117.

WU C J, GUO J F, XU E L, et al. Effects of logging residue on composition of soil carbon and activity of related enzymes in soil of a young Chinese fir plantation as affected by residue handling mode[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2019, 56(6): 1504-1513. 吴传敬, 郭剑芬, 许恩兰, 等. 采伐残余物不同处理方式对杉木幼林土壤有机碳组分和相关酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(6): 1504-1513.

JIANG Z K, JI Y, LIU Y H, et al. Composition and diversity of understory vegetation of 50 years old Chinese fir plantation[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2020, 15(3): 32-38. 蒋宗垲, 籍烨, 刘雨晖, 等. 老龄杉木人工林林下植被组成与多样性特征[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2020, 15(3): 32-38.

ZHANG G H, NIU J, Y L, et al. Ecological soil and microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in tea plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(4): 969-976. 张冠华, 牛俊, 易亮, 等. 不同植茶年限土壤-微生物生物量碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 969-976.

SONG Y D, FAN H X, YAO H Y. Response characteristics of soil microbial phospholipid fatty acids under silver nanoparticles stress[J]. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology, 2023, 45(6): 655-662. 宋宇迪, 樊昊心, 姚槐应. 纳米银胁迫下土壤微生物磷脂脂肪酸的响应特征[J]. 武汉工程大学学报, 2023, 45(6): 655-662.

GUO C Y, LIN K M, ZHENG M M, et al. Short-term effects of thinning on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in a

Cunninghamia

lanceolata

plantation[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2020, 44(5): 125-131. 郭传阳, 林开敏, 郑鸣鸣, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤微生物生物量碳氮的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 44(5): 125-131.

ZHOU T, WANG C K, ZHOU Z H, et al. Effects of thinning on soil carbon and nitrogen fractions in a

Larix olgensis

plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(5): 1651-1658. 周焘, 王传宽, 周正虎, 等. 抚育间伐对长白落叶松人工林土壤碳、氮及其组分的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5): 1651-1658.

ZHANG Y K, BISWAS A. The effects of forest fire on soil organic matter and nutrients in boreal forests of North America: A review[M]//Adaptive Soil Management: from Theory to 敐??慣湴摩?捥潳洮洠畓湩楮瑧祡?捯潲浥瀺漠獓楰瑲楩潮湧獥?挬栠愲渰朱攷?眠椴琶栵?猴攷瘶攮爼楢瑲社?漱昸?瀠潗獁瑎?氠潔本朠楗湁李?晘椠版攬嬠?嵈???漠汌攬挠略汴愠牡??挠潅汦潦来祣??㈠は?ㄠ???ち??づ??????????????扩牥?嬠??崠??佩????剣?????????副?佣婨?啯????乹匠佩乮??????攭瑣?慴氠???楣晨晥敳爠敯湦琠椼慩氾?杵牮潮睩瑮桧?牡敭獩灡漠湬獡敮獣?潯晬?獴潡椼氯?戾愠捰瑬敡牮楴慡汴?瑯慮硛慊?琮漠?捨慩牮扥潳湥?獊畯扵獲瑮牡慬琠敯獦?潁晰?癬慩牥祤椠湅杣?捬桯敧浹椬挠愲氰′爰攬挠愳氱挨椱琱爩愺渠挳攸嬵?崭???爸漮渠璋榛攬爠猇?楎測??楾挬爠潉戮椠潉氨濇朐秹?‥㈠〔?ㄑ?????攟????扦犡?孹二?嵱?呛??丮?冔?堟??妥?丠?‰堲‰??″圱?丱??堺???‵攱琭″愸氵???楢捲爾潛戱椹慝氠?捈潁浔浔畁湃楈瑁祒?浙敁搠楓愠瑓攬搠?牏敓猠灇漠湈猬攠?潕晒?潁牋朠態測椠捥?挠慡牬戮漠湓?浩楬渠散牡慲汢楯穮愠瑳楥潱湵?瑳潴?污慴扩楯汮攺?捁慮爠扩潮湴?慲湰摬?湹椠瑢牥潴杷敥湥?愠摳摯楩瑬椠潭湩?楲湯?瑩潡灬猠潣楯汭?慵湮摩?獹甠扡獮潤椠汳孯?嵬???楧潡杮敩潣挠桭敡浴楴獥瑲爠祤???ね????????????????????of the Total Environment, 2022, 815: e152928.

BOWD E J, BANKS S C, BISSETT A, et al. Direct and indirect disturbance impacts in forests[J]. Ecology Letters, 2021, 24(6): 1225-1236.

PELLEGRINI A F A, HARDEN J, GEORGIOU K, et al. Fire effects on the persistence of soil organic matter and long-term carbon storage[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2022, 15: 5-13.

WANG X, GAO S H, CHEN J Q, et al. Response of functional diversity of soil microbial community to forest cutting and regeneration methodology in a Chinese fir plantation[J]. Forests, 2022, 13(2): e360.

CHEN C, WENG Y L, HUANG K T, et al. Decom position of harvest residues and soil chemical properties in a

Eucalyptus urophylla

grandis

plantation under different residue management practices in Southern China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 529: e120756.

DOOLEY S R, TRESEDER K K. The effect of fire on microbial biomass: A meta-analysis of field studies[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 109(1): 49-61.

LIU S Z. Preliminary response of rhizosphere microbial community characteristics of

Pinus massoniana

to thinning and its environmental driving factors[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agriculture University, 2021. 刘思泽. 马尾松根际微生物群落特征对间伐的初期响应及其环境驱动因子研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2021.

JENKINSON D. Measuring soil microbial biomass[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(1): 5-7.

AMMITZBOLL H, JORDAN G J, BAKER S C, et al. Diversity and abundance of soil microbial communities declin

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

外源碳酸钙和温度对黄壤活性有机碳组分及微生物群落组成的影响