基于多源地理数据的西南高山峡谷区生态系统服务评估及权衡与协同关系

刘静; 项嘉仪; 张东海; 兰梦瑶; 关颖慧

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于多源地理数据的西南高山峡谷区生态系统服务评估及权衡与协同关系

更新时间：2025-02-18

- 基于多源地理数据的西南高山峡谷区生态系统服务评估及权衡与协同关系
- Evaluation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoff and Synergy in the Alpine and Canyon[JP] Region of Southwest China Based on Multi-source Geographic Data
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第6期页码：214-223
- 作者机构：
  
  北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "刘静(1998—),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事生态系统服务、水土保持效益评估研究。E-mail:liujingx77@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1302905,2022YFF1302900)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.021
  中图分类号： K903
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘静, 项嘉仪, 张东海, 等. 基于多源地理数据的西南高山峡谷区生态系统服务评估及权衡与协同关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(6):214-223.

LIU Jing, XIANG Jiayi, ZHANG Donghai, et al. Evaluation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoff and Synergy in the Alpine and Canyon[JP] Region of Southwest China Based on Multi-source Geographic Data[J]. 2024, 38(6): 214-223.
刘静, 项嘉仪, 张东海, 等. 基于多源地理数据的西南高山峡谷区生态系统服务评估及权衡与协同关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(6):214-223. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.021.

LIU Jing, XIANG Jiayi, ZHANG Donghai, et al. Evaluation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoff and Synergy in the Alpine and Canyon[JP] Region of Southwest China Based on Multi-source Geographic Data[J]. 2024, 38(6): 214-223. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.021.

摘要

[目的] 西南高山峡谷区是国家"三区四带"重要生态安全屏障

对保障国家生态安全和区域高质量发展具有重要作用

但目前尚不明确该区生态系统服务及其权衡与协同关系。[方法] 基于InVEST模型、RUSLE模型和WR指数

结合多源地理数据集

系统评估了西南高山峡谷区2000—2020年3种典型生态系统服务

并揭示其权衡与协同关系。[结果] (1)2000—2020年

西南高山峡谷区固碳和水源涵养服务稳步提升

年均固碳服务由1 927 g/(m2·a)增加到1 985 g/(m2·a)

WR指数从0.062升至0.067。空间上固碳从西北向东南逐渐递增

水源涵养呈较强的空间异质性;土壤保持服务整体处于恶化态势

从263.50 t/(km2·a)降至226.25 t/(km2·a)

其中滇西北高山峡谷生态维护区降幅达27.50%。(2)2000—2020年

生态系统服务热点区面积占比增加5.41%

整体呈"一类热点区>非热点区>二类热点区>三类热点区"的分布规律。(3)固碳服务与水源涵养服务、固碳服务与土壤保持服务整体表现为协同关系

协同关系面积占比分别为54.91%

44.46%

主要位于藏东南高寒高山峡谷生态维护区和藏东_川西高山峡谷生态维护水源涵养区;水源涵养服务与土壤保持服务整体表现为权衡关系

协同关系面积占比仅为20.14%。[结论] 研究结果可为西南高山峡谷区科学制定和实施生态保护政策

优化资源管理策略提供必要参考。

Abstract

[Objective] The alpine and canyon region of Southwest China is a crucial ecological security barrier within the national "Three Zones and Four Belts" strategy

and it plays an essential role in ensuring national ecological security and promoting regional high-quality development. However

the ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies in this area remain unclear. [Methods] Three typical ecosystem services in the alpine and canyon region of southwest China from 2000 to 2020 were systematically evaluated using the InVEST model

RUSLE model

and WR index

in combination with multi-source geographic datasets. [Results] (1) From 2000 to 2020

carbon sequestration and water retention services in the alpine and canyon region of southwest China were steadily improved

with annual carbon sequestration increasing from 1 927 g/(m2·a) to 1985 g/(m2·a)

and the WR index rising from 0.062 to 0.067. Spatially

carbon sequestration gradually increased from northwest to southeast

while water retention exhibited strong spatial heterogeneity. In contrast

soil retention services was overall deteriorated

decreasing from 263.50 t/(km2·a) to 226.25 t/(km2·a)

with a reduction of 27.50% in the northwest Yunnan alpine canyon ecological maintenance zone. (2) The proportion of the area of ecosystem service hotspot areas increased by 5.41%

following a distribution pattern of the first-class hotspot areas> the non-hot spot areas> the second-class hotspot areas> the third-class hotspot areas form 2000 to 2020. (3) Carbon sequestration services exhibited a synergistic relationship with both water retention services and soil retention services

with synergy areas accounting for 54.91% and 44.46% of the total area

respectively. These synergies were mainly located in the southeastern Tibetan alpine canyon ecological maintenance zone and the eastern Tibetan-western Sichuan alpine canyon ecological maintenance and water retention zone. However

water retention and soil retention services displayed a trade-off relationship

with the synergy area accounting for only 20.14% of the total area. [Conclusion] The results can provide necessary references for scientifically formulating and implementing ecological protection policies and optimizing resource management strategies in the alpine and canyon region of Southwest China.

关键词

Keywords

references

DAILY G C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M].Washington DC: IslandPress, 1997: 3-6.

COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Ecological Economics,1998,25(1):3-15.

庞彩艳,文琦,丁金梅,等.黄河上游流域生态系统服务变化及其权衡协同关系[J].生态学报,2024,44(12):5003-5013. PANG C Y, WEN Q, DING J M, et al. Ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies in the upper reaches of the Yellow River Basin[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2024,44(12):5003-5013.

林子雁,肖燚,饶恩明,等.中国西南地区不同类型生态系统服务的关系[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(3):978-986. LIN Z Y, XIAO Y, RAO E M, et al. Relationships among different types of ecosystem service in Southwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(3):978-986.

谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746. XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J].Resources Science,2015,37(9):1740-1746.

谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J].山地学报,2003,21(1):50-55. XIE G D, LU C X, XIAO Y, et al. The economic evaluation of grassland ecosystem services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Journal of Mountain Research,2003,21(1):50-55.

余新晓,鲁绍伟,靳芳,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2005,25(8):2096-2102. YU X X, LU S W, JIN F, et al. The assessment of the forest ecosystem services evaluation in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(8):2096-2102.

崔丽娟.鄱阳湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估研究[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(4):47-51. CUI L J. Evaluation on functions of Poyang Lake ecosystem[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2004,23(4):47-51.

辛琨,肖笃宁.盘锦地区湿地生态系统服务功能价值估算[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1345-1349. XIN K, XIAO D N. Wetland ecosystem service valuation:A case researches on Panjin area[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2002,22(8):1345-1349.

杨志新,郑大玮,文化.北京郊区农田生态系统服务功能价值的评估研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(4):564-571. YANG Z X, ZHENG D W, WEN H. Studies on service value evaluation of agricultural ecosystem in Beijing Region[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2005,20(4):564-571.

XUE C L, CHEN X H, XUE L R, et al. Modeling the spatially heterogeneous relationships between tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and potential drivers considering geographic scale in Bairin Left Banner, China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2023,855:e158834.

XIA H, YUAN S F, PRISHCHEPOV A V. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their social-ecological drivers: Implications for spatial planning and management[J].Resources, Conservation and Recycling,2023,189:e106767.

TIAN Y C, WANG S J, BAI X Y, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,566:1297-1308.

李悦,李晓青.长江经济带生态系统服务时空变化及权衡/协同关系研究[J].人民黄河,2024,46(5):104-110. LI Y, LI X Q. Study on spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services and trade-off/synergy relationships in the Yangtze River economic belt[J].Yellow River,2024,46(5):104-110.

赖金林,齐实,廖瑞恩,等.2000—2019年西南高山峡谷区植被变化对气候变化和人类活动的响应[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(14):155-163. LAI J L, QI S, LIAO R E, et al. Vegetation change responses to climate change and human activities in southwest alpine canyon areas of China from 2000 to 2019[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2023,39(14):155-163.

赖金林,齐实,崔冉冉,等.西南高山峡谷区植被变化及影响因素分析[J].环境科学,2023,44(12):6833-6846. LAI J L, QI S, CUI R R, et al. Analysis of vegetation change and influencing factors in southwest alpine canyon area[J].Environmental Science,2023,44(12):6833-6846.

丁琳,黄婷婷,秦伟,等.西南高山峡谷区土壤侵蚀空间分异特征[J].泥沙研究,2023,48(6):51-58. DING L, HUANG T T, QIN W, et al. Spatial variation of soil erosion in southwest alpine canyon area[J].Journal of Sediment Research,2023,48(6):51-58.

陈心盟,王晓峰,冯晓明,等.青藏高原生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].地理研究,2021,40(1):18-34. CHEN X M, WANG X F, FENG X M, et al. Ecosystem service trade-off and synergy on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Geographical Research,2021,40(1):18-34.

赵俊彦,刘国华,李佳佳,等.生态系统服务权衡强度与生态恢复优先区的空间差异:以怒江流域施甸县为例[J].生态学报,2024,44(11):4517-4526. ZHAO J Y, LIU G H, LI J J, et al. Spatial difference between ecosystem service tradeoff intensity and priority areas for ecological restoration: A case study of Shidian County, Nu River Basin[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2024,44(11):4517-4526.

张欣蓉.西南喀斯特区生态系统服务权衡与供需平衡分析[D].西安:长安大学,2020. ZHANG X R. Analysis on balance of ecosystem services and supply and demand in southwest Karst area[D].Xi’an: Changan University,2020.

中华人民共和国水利部.水利部办公厅关于印发《全国水土保持区划(试行)》的通知...http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zwgk/gknr/201212/t20121214_1442828.html. Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Notice from the General Office of the Ministry of Water Resources on Issuing the "National Soil and Water Conservation Zoning (Trial)".. http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zwgk/gknr/201212/t20121214_1442828.html.

黄韬,刘素红.基于PLUS-InVEST模型的福建省土地利用变化与碳储量评估[J].水土保持学报,2024,38(2):246-257. HUANG T, LIU S H. Evaluation of land use change and carbon storage in Fujian Province based on PLUS-InVEST model[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,38(2):246-257.

宋子衿.基于InVEST模型土地利用变化下的甘孜州2000—2020年陆地碳储量时空特征[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2022. SONG Z J. Spatial and temporal characteristics of land carbon storage in Ganzi prefecture from 2000 to 2020 under land use change based on InVEST model[D].Yaan, Sichuan: Sichuan Agricultural University,2022.

伍丹,朱康文,张晟,等.基于PLUS模型和InVEST模型的成渝经济区碳储量演化分析[J].三峡生态环境监测,2022,7(2):85-96. WU D, ZHU K W, ZHANG S, et al. Evolution analysis of carbon stock in Chengdu-Chongqing economic zone based on PLUS model and InVEST model[J].Ecology and Environmental Monitoring of Three Gorges,2022,7(2):85-96.

张美琪,陈波,赵敏.贵州省湿地碳储量与碳中和潜力分析[J].地质科技通报,2023,42(2):315-326. ZHANG M Q, CHEN B, ZHAO M. Analysis of the carbon stock and carbon neutral potential of wetlands in Guizhou Province[J].Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2023,42(2):315-326.

徐丽,何念鹏,于贵瑞.2010s中国陆地生态系统碳密度数据集[J].中国科学数据,2019,4(1):90-96. XU L, HE N P, YU G R. A dataset of carbon density in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems (2010s)[J].China Scientific Data,2019,4(1):90-96.

中华人民共和国生态环境部.关于印发《生态保护红线划定技术指南》的通知..https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bwj/201505/t20150518_301834.htm. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of C9.na. Notice on the Issuance of the "Technical Guidelines for Ecological Protection Red Line Delineation".. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bwj/201505/t20150518_301834.htm.

黎猛,李雅琪,樊敏,等.基于"水-土-碳"动态耦合的甘孜州生态系统服务综合评估. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202405240. LI M, LI Y Q, FAN M, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecosystem Services in Garzê Prefecture Based on the Dynamic Coupling Relationship of Water-soil-carbon. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202405240.

陈文华,徐娟,李双成.滇西山地城市水源涵养功能研究:以保山市为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(6):1153-1160. CHEN W H, XU J, LI S C. Water conservation function of mountainous city in western Yunnan:A case study of Baoshan City[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2021,57(6):1153-1160.

戴雪,余钟波.藏东高原-藏东南高山峡谷过渡区多角度生态系统综合评估:以西藏昌都为例[J].地理研究,2023,42(7):1971-1984. DAI X, YU Z B. Integrated ecosystem assessment for the transition areas between the east plateau zone and the southeast mountain-canyon zone of the Tibetan Plateau: A case study in Qamdo city, Tibet, China[J].Geographical Research,2023,42(7):1971-1984.

肖继兵,孙占祥,蒋春光,等.辽西地区农耕坡地土壤侵蚀影响因素及相关关系[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):13-19. XIAO J B, SUN Z X, JIANG C G, et al. Influencing factors and their correlations of soil erosion on sloping farmland in western Liaoning[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,29(5):13-19.

徐勇,黄雯婷,窦世卿,等.2000—2020年西南地区植被NDVI对气候变化和人类活动响应特征[J].环境科学,2022,43(6):3230-3240. XU Y, HUANG W T, DOU S Q, et al. Responding mechanism of vegetation cover to climate change and human activities in Southwest China from 2000 to 2020[J].Environmental Science,2022,43(6):3230-3240.

耿垭鑫,易桂花,张廷斌,等.青藏高原气候变化对草地碳汇/源格局的影响[J].自然资源学报,2024,39(5):1208-1221. GENG Y X, YI G H, ZHANG T B, et al. Impacts of climate change on grassland carbon sink/source patterns in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2024,39(5):1208-1221.

CHEN H, ZHANG X P, ABLA M, et al. Effects of vegetation and rainfall types on surface runoff and soil erosion on steep slopes on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2018,170:141-149.

DUAN J, LIU Y J, TANG C J, et al. Efficacy of orchard terrace measures to minimize water erosion caused by extreme rainfall in the hilly region of China: Long-term continuous in situ observations[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2021,278:e111537.

陈田田,王钰茜,曾兴兰,等.西南地区生态系统服务关系特征及其与植被覆盖的约束效应[J].生态学报,2023,43(6):2253-2270. CHEN T T, WANG Y X, ZENG X L, et al. Characteristics and the constraint relationship between ecosystem services and vegetation coverage in the Southwest China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(6):2253-2270.

何刘洁,郑博福,万炜,等.长江经济带生态系统服务权衡与协同及其驱动因素[J].环境科学,2024,45(6):3318-3328. HE L J, ZHENG B F, WAN W, et al. Trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River economic belt and its driving factors[J].Environmental Science,2024,45(6):3318-3328.

韩磊,杨梅丽,刘钊,等.黄土高原典型退耕区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究:以延安市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(20):8115-8125. HAN L, YANG M L, LIU Z, et al. Ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies in typical farmland conversion area of the Loess Plateau: Taking Yan’an City as an example[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(20):8115-8125.

王耕,冯妍.辽宁太子河流域生态系统服务权衡/协同关系时空变化与情景预测[J].生态学报,2024,44(1):96-106. WANG G, FENG Y. Spatio-temporal variation and scenario prediction of ecosystem service tradeoffs/synergies in the Taizi River Basin, Liaoning Province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2024,44(1):96-106.

陈登帅,李晶,杨晓楠,等.渭河流域生态系统服务权衡优化研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3260-3271. CHEN D S, LI J, YANG X N, et al. Trade-offs and optimization among ecosystem services in the Weihe River basin[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(9):3260-3271.

FENG Q, DONG S, DUAN B. The effects of land-use change/conversion on trade-offs of ecosystem services in three precipitation zones[J].Sustainability,2021,13(23):e13306.

徐铭璟,冯强,吕萌.生态系统服务权衡及其影响因素:以黄河流域山西段为例[J].干旱区研究,2024,41(3):467-479. XU M J, FENG Q, LYU M. Tradeoffs of ecosystem services and their influencing factors: A case study of the Shanxi Section of the Yellow River Basin[J].Arid Zone Research,2024,41(3):467-47

浏览量

335

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

洱海流域水源涵养与土壤保持功能时空演变及权衡协同关系

延河流域生态系统服务时空演变特征及权衡协同关系

基于XGBoost-SHAP的三峡库区生态屏障区生态系统服务权衡及驱动力分析

雅鲁藏布江流域生态系统服务评估及其权衡/协同关系

中国西南喀斯特水源涵养特点及其生态333功能