大别山区不同水土保持措施配置模式的效益评价

周杰; 田培; 吴宜进; 贾婷惠; 沈晨竹

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

大别山区不同水土保持措施配置模式的效益评价

更新时间：2025-02-18

- 大别山区不同水土保持措施配置模式的效益评价
- Benefit Evaluation of Different Allocation Modes of Soil and Water Conservation Measures in Ta-pieh Mountains Area
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第6期页码：61-69
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,武汉,430079
  2. 华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,武汉,430079
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "周杰(2001—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:2034796237@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金面上项目"RUSLE模型P因子修正及其在湖北省典型山丘区的适用性研究"(42377354);湖北省自然科学基金面上项目"水保持措施因子算法优化及其对区域土壤侵蚀模拟精度的影响"(2024AFB951)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.001
  中图分类号： S157.2
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
周杰, 田培, 吴宜进, 等. 大别山区不同水土保持措施配置模式的效益评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(6):61-69.

ZHOU Jie, TIAN Pei, WU Yijin, et al. Benefit Evaluation of Different Allocation Modes of Soil and Water Conservation Measures in Ta-pieh Mountains Area[J]. 2024, 38(6): 61-69.
周杰, 田培, 吴宜进, 等. 大别山区不同水土保持措施配置模式的效益评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(6):61-69. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.001.

ZHOU Jie, TIAN Pei, WU Yijin, et al. Benefit Evaluation of Different Allocation Modes of Soil and Water Conservation Measures in Ta-pieh Mountains Area[J]. 2024, 38(6): 61-69. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.06.001.

摘要

[目的] 为揭示大别山区不同水土保持措施的减流减沙效益

优化大别山区水土保持措施的配置模式。[方法] 基于黄冈市石桥铺、红安县、英山县和团风县4个站点径流小区的侵蚀观测数据

对比分析不同水土保持措施配置模式下的水土保持效益。[结果] (1)正常农耕种植无明显水保效益

梯田+耕作配置模式下水保效益得到提高

均取得正向的水保效益

其中石坎梯田+花生油菜综合效益最好

土壤侵蚀削减率达到55%;(2)生物措施结合工程措施的配置模式有着良好的水保效益

但其减流减沙效益存在差异

如石坎梯田+板栗的减沙效益要优于减流效益;(3)香根草、香根草等高绿篱是研究中水保效益最优异的措施

香根草等高绿篱的综合效益达到70%。[结论] 香根草、香根草等高绿篱适宜在黄冈市和大别山区进行推广

同时多种措施结合的配置模式相较单一措施更具有优势。研究结果可为湖北省大别山区水保措施的优化配置提供参考。

Abstract

[Objective] In order to reveal the effect of different soil and water conservation measures on reducing runoff and sediment in Ta-pieh Mountains

optimize the allocation mode of soil and water conservation measures in Ta-pieh Mountains. [Methods] Based on the erosion observation data of four runoff plots in Shiqiaopu

Hongan

Yingshan and Tuanfeng

the water and soil conservation benefits under different water and soil conservation measures were compared and analyzed. [Results] (1) There was no obvious benefit of soil and water conservation in normal farming

but the benefit of soil and water conservation was improved under terraced field + tillage mode

and the comprehensive benefit of stone ridge terraced field + peanut-rape was the best

and the reduction rate of soil erosion reached 55%; (2) The allocation mode of biological measures combined with engineering measures has good water and soil conservation benefits

but there are differences in the benefits of runoff and sediment reduction. For example

the benefits of sediment reduction in stone ridge terrace + chestnut were better than those of runoff reduction; (3) Vetiver and vetiver contour hedgerow were the best measures for soil and water conservation in this study

and the comprehensive benefit of vetiver contour hedgerow reached 70%. [Conclusion] Vetiver and vetiver contour hedge are suitable to be popularized in Huanggang and Ta-pieh mountainous areas

and the combination of multiple measures has more advantages than a single measure. The research results can provide reference for regional soil and water conservation measures allocation.

关键词

Keywords

references

田培,王哲,喻海军,等.鄂西北山丘区水土流失时空格局及影响因子定量评价[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(3):76-85. TIAN P,WANG Z,YU H J,et al.Quantitative evaluation of spatiotemporal pattern and influencing factors of soil and water loss in hilly areas of northwestern Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(3):76-85.

WANG F, TIAN P, GUO W, et al. Effects of rainfall patterns, vegetation cover types and antecedent soil moisture on run-off and soil loss of typical Luvisol in southern China[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2024.DOI:10.1002/esp.5871

BOIX-FAYOS C, MARTÍNEZ-MENA M, ARNAU-ROSALÉN E, et al. Measuring soil erosion by field plots:Understanding the sources of variation[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2006,78(3/4):267-285.

朱燕琴,赵志斌,齐广平,等.陇中黄土高原丘陵沟壑区不同植被恢复模式下次降雨产流产沙特征[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(4):920-927. ZHU Y Q, ZHAO Z B, QI G P, et al. Characteristics of slope runoff and sediment of different vegetation restoration patterns under individual rainfall events in hilly and gully loess region in middle Gansu Province[J].Arid Land Geography,2020,43(4):920-927.

尹婧,康必均,李菲,等.川东丘陵区柏木林水土保持措施径流调控效果对比[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(15):6022-6032. YIN J, KANG B J, LI F, et al. Runoff regulation effect of soil and water conservation measures in cupressus funebris plantation in the hilly region of East Sichuan[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2022,22(15):6022-6032.

YU P Z, YANG T Q, ZHANG Z X, et al. Soil and water conservation effects of different tillage measures on phaeozems sloping farmland in Northeast China[J].Land Degradation and Development,2024,35(5):1716-1733.

姚冲,黄少燕,查轩,等.暴雨条件下典型红壤区不同恢复方式侵蚀过程与特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):58-63. YAO C, HUANG S Y, ZHA X, et al. Processes and characteristics of erosion of different vegetation restoration under simulated rainstorm condition in a typical red soil in China[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,32(5):58-63.

李桂静,崔明,周金星,等.南方红壤区林下土壤侵蚀控制措施水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):1-5. LI G J, CUI M, ZHOU J X, et al. Research of soil and water conservation benefits from forests soil erosion control measures in red soil region of Southern China[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,28(5):1-5.

ANACHE J A A, WENDLAND E C, OLIVEIRA P T S, et al. Runoff and soil erosion plot-scale studies under natural rainfall: A meta-analysis of the Brazilian experience[J].Catena,2017,152:29-39.

TIAN P, ZHU Z L, YUE Q M, et al. Soil erosion assessment by RUSLE with improved P factor and its validation:Case study on mountainous and hilly areas of Hubei Province,China[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2021,9(3):433-444.

田昌园,张红丽,汪军红,等.近30年皖西大别山土壤侵蚀时空变化及其对景观格局的响应[J].水土保持学报,2024,38(3):1-9. TIAN CY, ZHANG H L, WANG J H, et al. Temporal and spatial changes of soil erosion and its response to land scape pattern in Dabie Mountains of Western Anhui in recent 30 years[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,38(3):1-9.

江雯,胡玉乾,汪军红,等.安徽大别山区天然降雨对典型植被水土流失影响研究[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(2):265-273. JIANG W, HU Y Q, WANG J H, et al. Natural rainfall affects soil erosion of typical vegetation in Dabie Mountains, Anhui Province[J].Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science),2021,57(2):265-273.

杨伟,李璐,欧阳曙光,等.大别山区板栗林地水土流失特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(2):259-263. YANG W, LI L, OUYANG S G, et al. Characteristics of soil and water loss at

Castanea mollissima

woodlands in Dabie Mountain Area[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,42(2):259-263.

黄冈市水利和湖泊局.水土保持公报[R].2013—2022. Huanggang Municipal Water Resources and Lake Authority. Soil and Water Corservation Bulletion[R].2018—2022.

英山县水利与湖泊局.水土保持公报[R].2018—2022. Hongan Water Resources and Lake Authority. Soil and Water Corservation Bulletion[R].2018—2022.

杨润泽,冯天骄,肖辉杰,等.京郊强降雨条件下不同水土保持治理措施配置模式效益评价[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):8-17. YANG R Z, FENG T J, XIAO H J, et al. Evaluating the benefits of different soil and water conservation measures under heavy rainfall conditions in the suburban areas of Beijing[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(1):8-17.

付世琳,姚冲,余倩,等.不同坡度和不同生育期的谷子坡耕地入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(4):23-30. FU S L, YAO C, YU Q, et al. Infiltration characteristics of millet slope farmland with different slope gradient and different growth period[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,37(4):23-30.

陈诚,郝治邦.模拟降雨下不同坡度土壤坡面产流产沙特征及磷和钾素流失研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):70-76. CHEN C, HAO Z B. Research on slope runoff,sediment and P and K loss characteristics on slopes with different gradients under artificial simulation of rainfall[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(2):70-76.

韩旭,田培,黄建武,等.基于2009—2018年径流小区观测数据的武汉市土壤侵蚀因子定量评价[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):3878-3890. HAN X, TIAN P, HUANG J W, et al. Quantitative evaluation of soil erosion factors in Wuhan based on observation data of runoff plots during 2009—2018[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(10):3878-3890.

ZHAO J L, YANG Z Q, GOVERS G. Soil and water conservation measures reduce soil and water losses in China but not down to background levels: Evidence from erosion plot data[J].Geoderma,2019,337:729-741.

FANG N, WANG L, SHI Z. Runoff and soil erosion of field plots in a subtropical mountainous region of China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,552:387-395.

WANG G B, LIU B H, HENDERSON M, et al. Effe祣?愠獯獦攠獴獥浲敲湡瑣?潮晧?獯潮椠汳?敩牬漠獭楯潩湳?極湲?猠潯畦琠桳睬敯獰瑥攠牦湡??畬扡敮楤?偩牮漠癎楯湲捴敨?扡慳獴攠摃?潩湮?则啳匠???浣潫搠敳汯?慬渠摲?杧敩潯杮牛慊灝栮楁捧?摩散瑵敬捴瑵潲牥嬬?崰??漬由爳渨愱氰?漺晥?匸漷椶氮?慢湲搾?圲愳瑝攠犋??漮溢珤攰爺瘴感瑁椱澻渆??え??????ㄆ??????い???扉爺?嬭㎜?崧?倬?丰??央????呇??丠?倮???啭佰????敮瑳?慶汥??卥潮楥汦?整牳漠獥楶潡湬?獡整湩獯楮琠楯癦椠瑳祯?慬渠摥?灯牳敩摯楮挠瑣楯潮湴?景潬爠?桯楤汥汬祳?慡牮敤愠獥?潴晡??畩扳敨楩?偧爠潴癨楥渠捣敯???桯楬渠慰??畡獤楩湧杭?捩潮洠扲楥湤攠摳?剩啬匠???慩湯摮??卝吮??浨潡摮攺氠獈孵?嵺??潮畧爠湁慧汲?潣晵?却潵楲污獬?慕湮摩?卥敲摳楩浴敹測琲猰?劳?监??资??名???代???????戨牖?孡??嶻????堨?塈????佊?刮????卢佢亥?′?‰堹?′收琨″愩氺??刱攲献瀠潍湁猠敇?潌昮?牁異湰潬晩晣?捴桩慯湮朠敡?瑤漠?獥潮楥汦?慴渠摡?睡慬瑹敳物?挠潯湦猠敨牥癤慧瑥楲潯湷?洠整慥獣畨牮敯獬?楧湹?瑩桮攠??楯湰杩?剧椠癦敡牲?捬慡瑮捤栠浩敭湰瑲?潶晥??桮楴渠慯学?嵈??慥湩搠??は?????????敊????al of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2009,26(3):9-12.

CHEN J, XIAO H B, LI Z W, et al. How effective are soil and water conservation measures (SWCMs) in reducing soil and water losses in the red soil hilly region of China? A meta-analysis of field plot data[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,735:e139517.

贺军,刘卫敏,南宏伟,等.基于小区观测的坡改梯工程水保效应机理研究[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(1):32-43. HE J, LIU W M, NAN H W, et al. A study on effect mechanism of soil and water conservation of slope-to-terrace engineering based on runoff plots[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,43(1):32-43.

陈芳,高宝林,李杰,等.湖北省坡耕地现状分析及宜耕性评价[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(1):418-422. CHEN F, GAO B L, LI J, et al. Status analysis and evaluation of cultivability for sloping farmland in Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(1):418-422.

JARRAY F, HERMASSI T, MECHERGUI M, et al. Long-term impact of soil and water conservation measures on soil erosion in a Tunisian semi-arid watershed[J].Land,2023,12(8):e1537.

NIU Y H, WANG L, WAN X G, et al. A systematic review of soil erosion in citrus orchards worldwide[J].Catena,2021,206:e105558.

DAYAKAR P, KAVI KUMAR K S. Soil and water conservation measures and rainfed agriculture in Telangana, India: Role of community and neighborhood conservation measures[J].Land Use Policy,2024,137:e107011.

杨严攀,田培,沈晨竹,等.基于RUSLE模型和地理探测器的鄂西南土壤侵蚀脆弱性评价[J].水土保持学报,2024,38(1):91-103. YANG Y P, TIAN P, SHEN C Z, et al. Vulnerabilit

浏览量

291

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于径流小区实测的干热河谷土壤侵蚀荟萃分析

海南屯昌砂质壤土橡胶林水土保持措施生态产品能值分析

黄土丘陵区不同水土保持措施坡面小区侵蚀性降雨标准

黄土坡面溶解性碳流失特征及其对水土保持措施的响应

水土保持措施识别与提取方法的研究进展