山地都市区景观生态风险:时空动态及SSPs-RCPs流转情景

魏梦雨; 卞鸿雁; 高洁; 张路金; 贾润熙; 李昊霖; 王琳涌

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.023

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

山地都市区景观生态风险:时空动态及SSPs-RCPs流转情景

更新时间：2025-02-18

- 山地都市区景观生态风险:时空动态及SSPs-RCPs流转情景
- Ecological Risk in the Mountainous Metropolis of Chongqing: Historical Assessment and Flows of SSPs-RCPs Scenarios
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第5期页码：353-363
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西南大学地理科学学院,重庆,400715
  2. 重庆金佛山喀斯特生态系统野外科学观测研究站,重庆,400715
  3. 岩溶环境重庆市重点实验室,重庆,400715
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "魏梦雨(2001—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事景观可持续科学研究。E-mail:1843405659@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(42101296);重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0041);西南大学先导计划青年团队项目(SWU-XDJH202306)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.023
  中图分类号： X826
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
魏梦雨, 卞鸿雁, 高洁, 等. 山地都市区景观生态风险:时空动态及SSPs-RCPs流转情景[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(5):353-363.

WEI Mengyu, BIAN Hongyan, GAO Jie, et al. Ecological Risk in the Mountainous Metropolis of Chongqing: Historical Assessment and Flows of SSPs-RCPs Scenarios[J]. 2024, 38(5): 353-363.
魏梦雨, 卞鸿雁, 高洁, 等. 山地都市区景观生态风险:时空动态及SSPs-RCPs流转情景[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(5):353-363. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.023.

WEI Mengyu, BIAN Hongyan, GAO Jie, et al. Ecological Risk in the Mountainous Metropolis of Chongqing: Historical Assessment and Flows of SSPs-RCPs Scenarios[J]. 2024, 38(5): 353-363. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.023.

摘要

[目的] 重庆是位于西南丘陵腹地的特大都市区

人口集聚及粗放的经济发展导致城市景观的快速爬坡和蔓延

城乡二元及立体的空间结构

直接影响景观的结构、功能及可持续性

亟待开展生态风险的时空动态、坡谱特征及未来流转情景的预测。[方法] 基于1990—2020年及SSPs-RCPs的土地利用/覆被数据

整合景观生态风险评估模型

刻画重庆市的景观生态风险的时空动态及爬坡规律

预测2035年和2050年SSPs-RCPs 5种情景的生态风险及空间流转特征。[结果] (1)重庆生态风险指数由1990年的0.14下降到2020年0.12

生境质量总体提升

呈自然景观(除林地)＞人造景观的生态风险

其中城市景观随着城-乡的密度递减

生态风险呈递增趋势

草地的生态风险呈反向梯度;(2)渝东北和东南的大巴山及武陵山生态屏障区的风险低

渝西南及河谷丘陵区高

低和较低风险占全域面积90%以上;(3)89.4%的景观分布于坡度≥5°的地区

分布于坡度＞7.5°的生态屏障区的修复工程

显著降低高坡度水土流失或石漠化等风险;(4)比较2035年和2050年SSPs-RCPs的生态风险及空间流转情景

SSP1的发展路径最可持续

城市景观爬坡及蔓延区的生态风险将继续增加

长江沿岸消落带和武陵山、大娄山的陡坡区和矿山的治理及修复将有效降低风险。[结论] 山地都市区的景观可持续亟待科学-实践-政策的协同治理、科学的景观规划及管理与跨部门和公众的协作。

Abstract

[Objective] Chongqing is a mega-metropolis located in the southwestern hilly region. The rising population and extensive economic development have led to rapid urban landscape ascent and expansion

resulting in a dual urban-rural and 3D spatial structure directly influencing the landscape's configuration

functionality

and sustainability. It is urgent to conduct spatiotemporal dynamics

sloping characteristics

and future scenario predictions for regional ecological risk. [Methods] Based on the use of land use/cover data from 1990-2020 and SSPs-RCPs (2035 and 2050)

integrate the landscape ecological risk assessment model

portray the time and space dynamics and climbing laws of landscape ecological risks in Chongqing

predict the ecological risk and the flows of 5 SSPs-RCPs in 2035 and 2050. [Results] (1) The ecological risk index in Chongqing decreased from 0.14 in 1990 to 0.12 in 2020

indicating an overall improvement in habitat quality. Ecological risk was higher in natural landscapes (excluding forests)

compared to artificial landscapes (cultivated land and built-up land)

with urban landscapes showing an increasing ecological risk trend as urban-rural density decreased. Notably

grasslands exhibited an inverse ecological risk gradient. (2) The ecological risk was low in the northeast and southeast regions of Chongqing

including the Daba and Wuling Mountainous regions. In contrast

the southwestern region and hilly river valleys had high ecological risk. Low and moderately low-risk areas accounted for over 90% of the entire region. (3) Approximately 89.4% of landscapes were distributed in areas with a slope of ≥5°

and ecological restoration efforts in ecological barrier zones with a slope of >7.5° significantly reduced risks associated with steep slope erosion or rocky desertification. (4) Comparing ecological risks and spatial transition scenarios for 2035 and 2050 under different SSPs-RCPs

SSP1 demonstrated the most sustainable development pathway. The climbing and spreading of urban landscapes would lead to increased ecological risk

while effective risk reduction can be achieved through the management and restoration of the Yangtze River riparian zone

steep slope areas in the Wuling and Dalou Mountains

and mining sites. [Conclusion] The landscapes of the mountainous metropolis are sustainable which requires science-practice-policy collaborative governance

planning and management of scientific landscapes

and cross-department and public collaboration.

关键词

Keywords

references

NDP. Sustainable Development Goals. . https: //www.undp.org/content/ undp/en /home/sustainable-developmentgoals.html.

ENGSTRÖM G, GARS J, KRISHNAMURTHY C, et al. Carbon pricing and planetary boundaries[J].Nature Communications,2020,11(1):e4688.

赵文武,房学宁.景观可持续性与景观可持续性科学[J].生态学报,2014,34(10):2453-2459. ZHAO W W, FANG X N. Landscape sustainability and landscape sustainability science[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(10):2453-2459.

彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677. PENG J, DANG W X, LIU Y X, et al. Review on landscape ecological risk assessment[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(4):664-677.

邬建国,郭晓川,杨稢,等.什么是可持续性科学?[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(1):1-11. WU J G, GUO X C, YANG Y, et al. What is sustainability science?[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2014,25(1):1-11.

刘焱序,王仰麟,彭建,等.基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价[J].地理学报,2015,70(7):1052-1067. LIU Y X, WANG Y L, PENG J, et al. Urban landscape ecological risk assessment based on the 3D framework of adaptive cycle[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(7):1052-1067.

Brondizio E S, Settele J, Díaz S, et al. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019)[R/OL]. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.383188.

EXPOSITO-ALONSO M, BOOKER T R, CZECH L, et al. Genetic diversity loss in the Anthropocene[J].Science,2022,377(6613):1431-1435.

RICHARDSON K, STEFFEN W, LUCHT W, et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries.Science Advances,2023,9(37). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh2458.

ZENG W, TANG H, LIANG X, et al. Using ecological security pattern to identify priority protected areas: A case study in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area, China[J].Ecological Indicators,2023,148:e110121.

周启刚,张晓媛,王兆林.基于正态云模型的三峡库区土地利用生态风险评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(23):289-297. ZHOU Q G, ZHANG X Y, WANG Z L. Land use ecological risk evaluation in Three Gorges Reservoir Area based on normal cloud model[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2014,30(23):289-297.

贺桂珍,于名召.2022年冬奥会崇礼赛区多重压力下生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2023,43(17):7072-7082. HE G Z, YU M Z. Multiple stressors ecological risk assessment in Chongli, a host site of the 2022 Winter Olympics[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(17):7072-7082.

张学斌,石培基,罗君,等.基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析:以石羊河流域为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(3):410-419. ZHANG X B, SHI P J, LUO J, et al. The ecological risk assessment of arid inland river basin at the landscape scale: A case study on Shiyang River Basin[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(3):410-419.

王娟,崔保山,姚华荣,等.纵向岭谷区澜沧江流域景观生态安全时空分异特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(4):1681-1690. WANG J, CUI B S, YAO H R, et al. The temporal and spatial characteristic of landscape ecological security at Lancang River Watershed of longitudinal range gorge region in Southwest China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(4):1681-1690.

袁雪.基于PLUS模型的武汉市土地利用变化情景模拟与景观生态风险研究[D].江西抚州:东华理工大学,2022. YUAN X.Scenario simulation of land use change and landscape ecological risk esearch in Wuhan based on PLUS model[D].Fuzhou, Jiangxi: East China Institute of Technology,2022.

吕乐婷,张杰,孙才志,等.基于土地利用变化的细河流域景观生态风险评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5952-5960. LV L T, ZHANG J, SUN C Z, et al. Land scapeecological risk assessment of Xi River Basin based on land-use change[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(16):5952-5960.

RIAHI K, VAN VUUREN D P, KRIEGLER E, et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview[J].Global Environmental Change,2017,42:153-168.

VAN VUUREN D P, EDMONDS J, KAINUMA M, et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview[J].Climatic Change,2011,109(1):e5.

O’NEILL B C, CARTER T R, EBI K, et al. Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework[J].Nature Climate Change,2020,10:1074-1084.

VAN VUUREN D P, KRIEGLER E, O’NEILL B C, et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: Scenario matrix architecture[J].Climatic Change,2014,122(3):373-386.

CHEN G Z, LI X, LIU X P. Global land projection based on plant functional types with a 1-km resolution under socio-climatic scenarios[J].Scientific Data,2022,9(1):e125.

LUO M, HU G H, CHEN G Z, et al. 1 km land use/land cover change of China under comprehensive socioeconomic and climate scenarios for 2020—2100[J].Scientific Data,2022,9(1):e110.

BIAN H Y, ZHAO Y X, GAO J, et al. Sustainability under policy transitions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: Historical and the shared socio-economic pathways[J].Habitat International,2024,148:e103091.

BIAN H Y, GAO J, WU J G, et al. Hierarchical analysis of landscape urbanization and its impacts on regional sustainability: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,279:e123267.

BIAN H Y, GAO J, LIU Y X, et al. China’s safe and just space during 40 years of rapid urbanization and changing policies[J].Landscape Ecology,2024,39(4):e74.

陈维灯.重庆市生态环境保护"十四五" 规划.重庆日报,2022-02-16(3). CHEN W D.Chongqing's 14th five year plan for ecological environment protection.Chongqing Daily.2022-02-16(3).

胡云锋,高戈.城市景观生态风险评估框架与实践:以北京天坛地区为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7805-7815. HU Y F, GAO G. Framework and practice of urban landscape ecological risk assessment: A case study of the Tiantan Region in Beijing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(21):7805-7815.

YANG J, HUANG X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J].Earth System Science Data,2021,13(8):3907-3925.

周亮,党雪薇,周成虎,等.中国建设用地的坡谱演化规律与爬坡影响[J].地理学报,2021,76(7):1747-1762. ZHOU L, DANG X W, ZHOU C H, et al. Evolution characteristics of slope spectrum and slope-climbing effects of built-up land in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2021,76(7):1747-1762.

YE Y, QIU H F. Using urban landscape pattern to understand and evaluate infectious disease risk[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2021,62:e127126.

KRIEGLER E, O’NEILL B, HALLEGATTE S, et al. Socio-economic scenario development for climate change analysis[J].Global Invironmental Change,2012,22:807-822.

姜彤,苏布达,王艳君,等.共享社会经济路径(SSPs)人口和经济格点化数据集[J].气候变化研究进展,2022,18(3):381-383. JIANG T, SU B D, WANG Y J, et al. Gridded datasets for population and economy under shared socioeconomic pathways for 2020—2100[J].Climate Change Research,2022,18:381-383.

XIAO Y, XIAO Q. Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City, southwest China[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2018,190(4):e258.

GAO J, BIAN H Y, ZHU C J, et al. The response of key ecosystem services to land use and climate change in Chongqing: Time, space, and altitude[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2022,32(2):317-332.

赵文斌,高明清,徐奥.广阳岛护山策略与技术[J].风景园林,2021,28(增刊2):37-43. ZHAO W B, GAO M Q, XU A. Strategies and technologies for mountain protection in Guangyang Island[J].Landscape Architecture,2021,28(S2):37-43.

浏览量

283

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

松嫩典型黑土分布区侵蚀沟对耕地破碎化的影响

基于生态风险评价的黑龙江省生态安全格局构建