1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 吴起县气象局,陕西,延安,717600
[ "张旭东(1998—),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事生物结皮水文过程研究。E-mail:zhangxudong2021@yeah.net" ]
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
张旭东, 杨光, 赵允格, 等. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区生物结皮对[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(5):184-191.
ZHANG Xudong, YANG Guang, ZHAO Yunge, et al. Effects of Biocrusts on Water Evapotranspiration of Shrub-Grass Ecosystem in Water-Wind Erosion Crisscross Region of Loess Plateau[J]. 2024, 38(5): 184-191.
张旭东, 杨光, 赵允格, 等. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区生物结皮对[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(5):184-191. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.003.
ZHANG Xudong, YANG Guang, ZHAO Yunge, et al. Effects of Biocrusts on Water Evapotranspiration of Shrub-Grass Ecosystem in Water-Wind Erosion Crisscross Region of Loess Plateau[J]. 2024, 38(5): 184-191. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.003.
[目的] 为研究生物结皮对灌草生态系统水分耗散的影响。[方法] 采用原状土柱试验
以裸土为对照
设置灌草(单株灌木-20%盖度草本)、灌草-30%生物结皮和灌草-50%生物结皮3个处理
研究生物结皮对灌草生态系统水分耗散的影响。[结果] 模拟30 mm降水12 h后
灌草-生物结皮处理0—20 cm土层水分含量较裸土处理平均提高15.4%
较灌草处理平均提高12.8%。与裸土相比
灌草及灌草与2个盖度生物结皮处理显著增加土壤水分耗散
其中灌草处理较裸土增加120.3%
灌草-生物结皮较裸土平均增加116.5%。生物结皮降低灌草生态系统的水分耗散。与灌草处理相比
灌草-生物结皮水分耗散平均降低1.7%
降低程度与生物结皮盖度、时段及土层深度有关。其中
灌草-50%生物结皮的水分耗散量较灌草-30%生物结皮处理降低13.4%。生物结皮对灌草生态系统水分耗散的降低作用在雨后1~4天表现明显。生物结皮对灌草生态系统水分耗散的降低主要取决于20—45 cm土层耗散的降低。与灌草处理相比
灌草-生物结皮的0—20 cm土层水分蒸散损耗平均提高14.4%
而20 cm以下土层水分耗散平均降低15.5%。[结论] 30 mm降雨量条件下生物结皮降低灌草生态系统的水分耗散
有利于缓解风蚀水蚀交错区灌草植被的水分亏缺。研究结果揭示生物结皮对灌草生态系统水分耗散影响
可为旱区生态恢复提供理论依据。
[Objective] To determine the effect of biological soil crusts (biocrusts) on water evapotranspiration of the shrub-grass ecosystem. [Methods] The effect of biocrusts on water evapotranspiration of the shrub-grass ecosystem in water-wind erosion crisscross region of Loess Plateau was investigated by using original soil columns of field condition. In the study
the bare soil column was used as control
and three treatments were set up. The three treatments were shrub-grass (single plant shrub-20% grass)
shrub-grass-30% biocrusts and shrub-grass-50% biocrusts. [Results] The results showed that after 12 hours of simulated 30 mm precipitation infiltration
water content of 0—20 cm soil layer in the shrub-grass-biotic crust treatment was 15.4% higher than that in the bare soil treatment and 12.8% higher than that in the shrub-grass treatment. Compared with bare soil
soil water evapotranspiration of shrub-grass and shrub-grass with two level of biocrusts’ coverage significantly increased. Among them
soil water evapotranspiration of shrub-grass treatment increased by 120.3% compared to bare soil
while shrub-grass-biocrusts increased by 116.5% on average. Biocrusts reduced soil water evapotranspiration of the shrub-grass ecosystem. Compared with the shrub-grass treatment
soil water evapotranspiration of the shrub-grass-biocrusts decreased by 1.7% on average. The degree of reduction of evapotranspiration was related to the coverage of biocrusts
period and soil depth. Among them
the water evapotranspiration of shrub-grass-50% biocrusts was 13.4% lower than that of shrub-grass-30% biocrusts. The reduction of water evapotranspiration of shrub-grass ecosystem caused by biocrusts was obvious during the first 1~4 days after rain. The reduction of water evapotranspiration of shrub-grass ecosystem caused by biocrusts mainly related to the evapotranspiration of 20—45 cm soil layer. Compared with the shrub-grass treatment
the water evapotranspiration loss of the 0—20 cm soil layer of the shrub-grass-biocrust treatment increased by 14.4% on average
while the water dissipation below 20 cm decreased by 15.5% on average. [Conclusion] Under the condition of 30 mm rainfall
biocrusts reduced the water evapotranspiration of shrub-grass ecosystem
which may beneficial the water deficit of shrub-grass vegetation in the wind-water erosion crisscross area. The study provides a reference for revealing the effect of biocrusts on water evapotranspiration in shrub-grass ecosystems.
JUNG M, REICHSTEIN M, CIAIS P, et al. Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply[J].Nature,2010,467(7318):951-954.
SCHLESINGER W H, JASECHKO S. Transpiration in the global water cycle[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2014,189:115-117.
CHEN Y P, WANG K B, LIN Y S, et al. Balancing green and grain trade[J].Nature Geoscience,2015,8:739-741.
SONG Y, WANG Y Q, JIN L, et al. Quantitative contribution of the Grain for Green project to vegetation greening and its spatiotemporal variation across the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Land Degradation and Development,2022,33(11):1878-1891.
WANG K C, DICKINSON R E. A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, nd climatic variability[J].Reviews of Geophysics,2012,50(2):eRG2005.
LIU Y B, QIU G Y, ZHANG H S, et al. Shifting from homogeneous to heterogeneous surfaces in estimating terrestrial evapotranspiration: Review and perspectives[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2022,65(2):197-214.
邓景成,高鹏,穆兴民,等.黄土高原退耕还林工程对生态环境的影响及对策建议[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(5):63-68. DENG J C, GAO P, MU X M, et al. Impacts and advice of the grain for green project to ecological environment on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(5):63-68.
FENG X M, FU B J, PIAO S L, et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J].Nature Climate Change,2016,6:1019-1022.
SHAO R, ZHANG B Q, SU T X, et al. Estimating the increase in regional evaporative water consumption as a result of vegetation restoration over the Loess Plateau,China[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres,2019,124(22):11783-11802.
WEBER B, BELNAP J, BVDEL B, et al. What is a biocrust :A refined,contemporary definition for a broadening research community[J].Biological Reviews,2022,97(5):1768-1785.
赵允格,许明祥,王全九,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮对土壤理化性状的影响[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(3):441-448. ZHAO Y G, XU M X, WANG Q J, et al. Impact of biological soil crust on soil physical and chemical properties of rehabilitated grassland in hilly Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2006,21(3):441-448.
BELNAP J, WILCOX B P, VAN SCOYOC M W, et al. Successional stage of biological soil crusts:An accurate indicator of ecohydrological condition[J].Ecohydrology,2013,6(3):474-482.
XIAO B, SUN F H, HU K L, et al. Biocrusts reduce surface soil infiltrability and impede soil water infiltration under tension and ponding conditions in dryland ecosystem[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,568:792-802.
孙福海,肖波,李胜龙,等.黄土高原藓类生物结皮对表层土壤水分运动参数的影响[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(14):79-88. SUN F H, XIAO B, LI S L, et al. Effects of moss-dominated biocrusts on surface soil-water movement parameters in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2021,37(14):79-88.
岳艳鹏,成龙,孙迎涛,等.毛乌素沙地生物结皮覆盖区土壤水分收支变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1861-1870. YUE Y P, CHENG L, SUN Y T, et al. Changes of soil water budget in the area covered by biological soil crusts in Mu Us sandy land, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(7):1861-1870.
石薇,王新平,张亚峰.腾格里沙漠人工固沙植被区浅层土壤水分对降水和生物结皮的响应[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(3):600-609. SHI W, WANG X P,ZHANG Y F. Response of soil moisture in shallow depth to stochastic rainfall and biological crust in revegetated sand dunes in the tengger desert, China[J].Journal of Desert Research,2018,38(3):600-609.
周丽芳,阿拉木萨.生物结皮发育对地表蒸发过程影响机理研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(4):193-200. ZHOU L F, A L. Influence mechanism of development of biological soil crust on evaporation process[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2011,25(4):193-200.
LI S L, BOWKER M, XIAO B. Biocrust impacts on dryland soil water balance: A path towards the whole picture[J].Global change biology,2022,28(21):6462-6481.
GYPSER S, VESTE M, FISCHER T, et al. Infiltration and water retention of biological soil crusts on reclaimed soils of former open-cast lignite mining sites in Brandenburg,north-east Germany[J].Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics,2016,64(1):1-11.
SUN J Y, LI X R. Role of shrubs in the community assembly of biocrusts: The biotic and abiotic influences along a biocrust succession gradient[J].Plant and Soil,2021,460(1):163-176.
ZHANG S J, ZHANG Q, LI Y G, et al. Shrubs have a greater influence on the nonstructural carbohydrates of desert mosses along precipitation decreased[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2023,216:e105530.
YADAV P, SINGH R P, HASHEM A, et al. Enhancing biocrust development and plant growth through inoculation of desiccation-tolerant cyanobacteria in different textured soils[J].Microorganisms,2023,11(10):e2507.
李新荣,谭会娟,回嵘,等.中国荒漠与沙地生物土壤结皮研究[J].科学通报,2018,63(23):2320-2334. LI X R, TAN H J, HUI R, et al. Researches in biological soil crust of China: A review[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2018,63(23):2320-2334.
CHEN N, WANG X P, ZHANG Y F, et al. Ecohydrological effects of biological soil crust on the vegetation dynamics of restoration in a dryland ecosystem[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,563:1068-1077.
王一贺,赵允格,李林,等.黄土高原不同降雨量带退耕地植被-生物结皮的分布格局[J].生态学报,2016,36(2):377-386. WANG Y H, ZHAO Y G, LI L, et al. Distribution patterns and spatial variability of vegetation and biocrusts in revegetated lands in different rainfall zones of the Loess Plateau Region,China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(2):377-386.
查轩,唐克丽.水蚀风蚀交错带小流域生态环境综合治理模式研究[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(1):97-100. ZHA X, TANG K L. Study on comprehensive control model of small watershed eco environment in water and wind crisscrossed erosion zone[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2000,15(1):97-100.
赵允格,吉静怡,张万涛,等.黄土高原生物土壤结皮分布时空分异特征[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(3):739-748. ZHAO Y G, JI J Y, ZHANG W T, et al. Characteristics of spatial and temporal variability in the distribution ofbiological soil crusts on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2024,35(3):739-748.
FISCHER T, VESTE M, WIEHE W, et al. Water repellency and pore clogging at early successional stages of microbiotic crusts on Inland Dunes, Brandenburg, NE Germany[J].Catena,2010,80(1):47-52.
SHI W, WANG X P, ZHANG Y F, et al. The effect of biological soil crusts on soil moisture dynamics under different rainfall conditions in the Tengger Desert, China[J].Hydrological Processes,2018,32(10):1363-1374.
KIDRON J G, BVDEL B. Contrasting hydrological response of coastal and desert biocrusts[J].Hydrological Processes,2014,28(2):361-371.
关红杰.毛乌素沙地生物土壤结皮对油蒿水分吸收的影响模拟[J].生态学报,2023,43(14):5875-5889. GUAN H J. Biocrust effects on root water uptake of shrubs in the MU Us Desert[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(14):5875-5889.
ELDRIDGE D J, REED S C, TRAVERS S K, et al. The pervasive and multifaceted influence of biocrusts on water in the world's drylands[J].Global Change Biology,2020,26(10):6003-6014.
马启民,李永山,王海兵,等.鄂尔多斯沙地人工柠条林能量平衡与蒸散研究[J].高原气象,2022,41(6):1511-1521. MA Q M, LI Y S, WANG H B, et al. Study on energy balance and evapotranspiration of an artificial
Caragana korshinskii
shrub land in Ordos Plateau[J].Plateau Meteorology,2022,41(6):1511-1521.
邓建才,卢信,陈效民,等.封丘地区土壤水分扩散率的研究[J].土壤通报,2005,36(3):317-320. DENG J C, LU X, CHEN X M, et al. Soil moisture diffusivity in fengqu region[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2005,36(3):317-320.
刘立超,李守中,宋耀选,等.沙坡头人工植被区微生物结皮对地表蒸发影响的试验研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(2):191-195. LIU L C, LI S Z, SONG Y X, et al. Effect of microbiotic crust on evaporation process in vegetated area in Shapotou Region[J].Journal of Desert Research,2005,25(2):191-195.
张志山,何明珠,谭会娟,等.沙漠人工植被区生物结皮类土壤的蒸发特性:以沙坡头沙漠研究试验站为例[J].土壤学报,2007,44(3):404-410. ZHANG Z S, HE M Z, TAN H J, et al. Evaporation from soils covered with biological crusts in revegetated desert: A case study in Shapotou Desert research and experiment station[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2007,44(3):404-410.
淡晨希,张琼,刘畅,等.生物结皮与草本植物共生坡面的产流-入渗过程特征[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1853-1860. DAN C X, ZHANG Q, LIU C, et al. Characteristics of runoff and infiltration processes on slope with intergrown biocrusts and herbs[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(7):1853-1860.
祝晨佳,高吉喜.土壤蒸发影响因素及抑制途径研究综述[J].环境保护科学,2024,50(4):19-26. ZHU C J, GAO J X. A review of the factors affecting soil evaporation and its inhibition methods[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2024,50(4):19-26.
0
浏览量
301
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621