黄河中游典型流域林草生境适宜性及提质潜力评价

刘壮壮; 焦鹏; 肖培青; 姚志宏

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.04.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄河中游典型流域林草生境适宜性及提质潜力评价

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黄河中游典型流域林草生境适宜性及提质潜力评价
- Evaluation of Forest and Grass Habitat Suitability and Quality Improvement Potential in Typical Watersheds in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第4期页码：267-278
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 华北水利水电大学测绘与地理信息学院,郑州,450045
  2. 黄河水利科学研究院水利部黄土高原水土保持重点实验室,郑州,450003
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "刘壮壮(2000—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:lzz1140769957@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(U2243210,42041006);国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1300805)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.04.013
  中图分类号： S157.2
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘壮壮, 焦鹏, 肖培青, 等. 黄河中游典型流域林草生境适宜性及提质潜力评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(4):267-278.

LIU Zhuangzhuang, JIAO Peng, XIAO Peiqing, et al. Evaluation of Forest and Grass Habitat Suitability and Quality Improvement Potential in Typical Watersheds in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J]. 2024, 38(4): 267-278.
刘壮壮, 焦鹏, 肖培青, 等. 黄河中游典型流域林草生境适宜性及提质潜力评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(4):267-278. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.04.013.

LIU Zhuangzhuang, JIAO Peng, XIAO Peiqing, et al. Evaluation of Forest and Grass Habitat Suitability and Quality Improvement Potential in Typical Watersheds in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J]. 2024, 38(4): 267-278. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.04.013.

摘要

[目的] 为定量评价黄河中游复杂下垫面典型流域的林草生境适宜性及提质潜力。[方法] 综合地理探测器、空间分析、数理统计等多种方法

构建三川河流域林草生境适宜性评价指标体系及评价方法

评价流域现状土地利用条件下的林草适宜度及其提质潜力。[结果] (1)三川河流域影响林地适宜分布的主导因子包括光合有效辐射分量、海拔、土壤侵蚀强度和土壤类型等

影响草地适宜分布的主导因子包括海拔、光合有效辐射分量、土壤类型和土壤湿度等。(2)林地不同适宜度的面积由大到小依次为高度适宜、中高度适宜、不适宜、中度适宜

中度适宜以上面积占林地总面积的81.9%

流域林地布局较为合理;草地不同适宜度的面积由大到小依次为不适宜、中度适宜、中高度适宜、高度适宜

中度适宜以上面积占草地总面积的55.3%

流域草地布局仍有较大优化空间。(3)林地提质面积为223.2 km2

占中度适宜及以上区域总面积的15.4%

区域内大部分林地已达覆盖度阈值水平;各适宜度区域的林地Ⅰ级提质潜力面积占比均在89.0%以上

提质难度较低。草地提质面积为222.3 km2

占中度适宜及以上区域总面积的43.1%

区域内近四成草地仍未达覆盖度阈值水平;各适宜度区域草地Ⅰ级提质潜力的面积占比随适宜度增高而减小

提质难度随适宜度增高而增大。(4)林地可通过加强封禁管控

实施以自然恢复为主的弱干预措施;草地需针对不同适宜度的潜力等级

采取分区适度干预措施

实现草地覆盖度水平的总体提升。[结论] 三川河流域林地格局优于草地

草地提质潜力高于林地。研究构建的林草生境适宜性评价方法

可为黄河中游植物措施合理配置和提质增效提供科技依据。

Abstract

[Objective] In order to quantitatively evaluate the suitability and quality improvement potential of forest and grass in typical watersheds of complex underlying surface in the middle reaches of the Yellow River. [Methods] The evaluation index system and evaluation method of forest and grass suitability in Sanchuan River Basin were constructed by means of geographical detector

spatial analysis

mathematical statistics and other methods

and the forest and grass suitability and its potential for quality improvement under the current land use conditions in the basin were evaluated. [Results] (1) The dominant factors affecting the suitable distribution of forest land in the Sanchuan River Basin include the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR)

elevation

soil erosion intensity and soil type. The dominant factors affecting the suitable distribution of grass land include elevation

FPAR

soil type and soil moisture

etc. (2) The area of forest land with different suitability degrees was from large to small high suitability

unsuitable

mid-height suitability

moderate suitability

and the area above moderate suitable accounted for 81.9% of the total area of forest land. The area of grassland with different suitability degree was in order from large to small: moderate suitability

unsuitable

mid-height suitability

and high suitability

and area above moderate suitability accounts for 55.3% of the total area of grassland

and there was still a large space for optimization layout of grassland in the basin. (3) The area of forest land improvement was 223.2 km2

accounting for 15.4% of the total area of moderate suitability and above areas

and most of the forest land in the area had reached the coverage threshold level. The area of grade I upgrading potential of forest in each suitability area accounted for more than 89.0%

and the difficulty of upgrading was low. The area of grassland improvement was 222.3 km2

accounting for 43.1% of the total area of moderate suitability and above areas

and nearly half of the grassland in the area have not yet reached the coverage threshold; The area proportion of grade I upgrading potential of grassland in each suitability area decreased with the increase of suitability

and the difficulty of upgrading increased with the increase of suitability. (4) The forest land can implement weak intervention measures based on natural restoration by strengthening the control of closure; grassland needs to take appropriate intervention measures according to the potential zoning of different suitability to achieve the overall improvement of grassland coverage. [Conclusion] In the Sanchuan River Basin

the pattern of forest land was better than that of grassland and the potential of grassland improvement is higher than that of forest land. The evaluation method of forest and grass habitat suitability constructed in this study can provide a scientific basis for the rational allocation of plant measures and the improvement of quality and efficiency in the middle reaches of the Yellow River.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘静,温仲明,刚成诚.黄土高原不同植被覆被类型NDVI对气候变化的响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):678-691. LIU J, WEN Z M,GANG C C. Normalized difference vegetation index of different vegetation cover types and its responses to climate change in the Loess Plateau[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(2):678-691.

WANG C, WANG S, FU B J, et al. Integrating vegetation suitability in sustainable revegetation for the Loess Plateau, China[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2021,759:e143572.

邵明安,贾小旭,王云强,等.黄土高原土壤干层研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2016,31(1):14-22. SHAO M A, JIA X X, WANG Y Q, et al. A review of studies on dried soil layers in the Loess Plateau[J].Advances in Earth Science,2016,31(1):14-22.

唐克丽.黄土高原生态环境建设关键性问题的研讨[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(1):2-8,26. TANG K L. Discussion on key problems of ecological environment construction in Loess Plateau[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,18(1):2-8,26.

张文辉,刘国彬.黄土高原地区植被生态修复策略与对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(3):114-118. ZHANG W H, LIU G B. Countermeasures and strategy to vegetation rehabilitation in Loess Plateau, China[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,7(3):114-118.

高健翎,高燕,马红斌,等.黄土高原近70年水土流失治理特征研究[J].人民黄河,2019,41(11):65-69,84. GAO J L, GAO Y, MA H B, et al. Study on characteristics of soil and water loss control in Loess Plateau in recent 70 years[J].Yellow River,2019,41(11):65-69,84.

刘丹,李玉堂,洪玲霞,等.基于最大熵模型的吉林省主要天然林潜在分布适宜性[J].林业科学,2018,54(7):1-15. LIU D, LI Y T, HONG L X, et al. The suitability of potential geographic distribution of natural forest types in Jilin Province based on maximum entropy models[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2018,54(7):1-15.

YU D, XIE P, DONG X H, et al. The development of land use planning scenarios based on land suitability and its influences on eco-hydrological responses in the upstream of the Huaihe River Basin[J].Ecological Modelling,2018,373:53-67.

赖文豪,席沁,武海龙,等.内蒙古兴和县低山丘陵立地类型划分与林草适宜性评价[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(2):331-339. LAI W H, XI Q, WU H L, et al. Site classification type and vegetation suitability evaluation for hilly land in Xinghe, Inner Mongolia[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&F University,2018,35(2):331-339.

杨扬,刘雨鑫,金平伟,等.坡面水土保持措施效益评价: 以贵州省冗雷河小流域为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):64-71. YANG Y, LIU Y X, JIN P W, et al. Benefit evaluation on soil and water conservation practices: A case study on Rongleihe Watershed in Guizhou Province[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,13(5):64-71.

代富强,刘刚才.紫色土丘陵区典型水土保持措施的适宜性评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(4):23-30. DAI F Q, LIU G C. Suitability evaluation of typical soil and water conservation measures in hilly areas of purple soil[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,9(4):23-30.

李情,聂小飞,谢颂华,等.基于生态与生产功能权衡的赣南水土流失综合治理模式适宜性评价[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):54-61,74,2. LI Q, NIE X F, XIE S H, et al. Suitability evaluation of comprehensive control model of soil and water loss in southern Jiangxi Province based on the balance of ecological and production functions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(4):54-61,74,2.

张秦岭,李占斌,王星.陕西省丹汉江流域重点水土保持工程适宜性评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(10):225-234. ZHANG Q L, LI Z B, WANG X. Suitability evaluation of key soil and water conservation projects in Dan-Han River watershed of Shaanxi Province[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition),2014,42(10):225-234.

顾剑红.广西石漠化地区小流域水土保持综合效益评价.北京:北京林业大学,2016. GU J H. Assessment on comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation at small watersheds in the rocky aesertification region, Guangxi. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University,2016.

金贵,王占岐,胡学东,等.基于模糊证据权模型的青藏高原区土地适宜性评价[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(18):241-250. JIN G, WANG Z Q, HU X D, et al. Land suitability evaluation in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on fuzzy weight of evidence model[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2013,29(18):241-250.

陈小林,徐伟铭,肖桂荣.基于模糊证据权模型的长汀县水土保持措施适宜性评价[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(11):33-38. CHEN X L, XU W M, XIAO G R. Suitability evaluation of soil and water conservation measures in Changting County based on Fuzzy Weight-of-evidence Model[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2017,34(11):33-38.

LIU G C, DAI F Q, NAN L, et al. Assessing the suitability of soil and water conservation practices in Southwestern China[J].Land Use Policy,2013,30(1):319-327.

翟慧敏,张子莺,颜伟,等.基于GIS与主成分分析法的信阳市茶树种植用地适宜性评价[J].信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),2022,35(1):56-62. ZHAI H M, ZHANG Z Y, YAN W, et al. Land suitability evaluation of Xinyang tea planting area based on GIS and principal component analysis[J].Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2022,35(1):56-62.

YANG T, WANG X R. Evaluation of the plant landscape suitability in mountain parks based on principal component analysis: A case study of Guiyang City[J].Agronomy Journal,2021,113(2):760-773.

张敏.基于GIS的冀西北间山盆地区林地适宜性评价.石家庄:河北师范大学,2006. ZHANG M. Evalution on forestry suitability of rsource in the Basin of Northwest Hebei Mountains on GIS. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University,2006.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134. WANG J F, XU C D.Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(1):116-134.

雷泽鑫,傅健宇,罗俊杰,等.景观格局视角下晋西三川河流域径流变化归因分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(12):4946-4958. LEI Z X, FU J Y, LUO J J, et al. Attribution analysis of runoff changes in the Sanchuan River Basin of Shanxi Province from the perspective of landscape patterns[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(12):4946-4958.

张宏鸣,杨勤科,李锐,等.基于GIS和多流向算法的流域坡度与坡长估算[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(10):159-164. ZHANG H M, YANG Q K, LI R, et al. Estimation methods of slope gradient and slope length in watershed based on GIS and multiple flow direction algorithm[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(10):159-164.

刘雨亭,王磊,李谢辉,等.西南地区2000—2020年植被覆盖度时空变化与影响因素分析[J].高原气象,2024,43(1):264-276. LIU Y T, WANG L, LI X H, et al. Analysis on spatio-temporal variability of fractional vegetation cover and influencing factors from 2000 to 2020 in southwestern China[J].Plateau Meteorology,2024,43(1):264-276.

赵慧芳,曹晓云.三江源国家公园植被覆盖时空变化及其气候驱动因素[J].高原气象,2022,41(2):328-337. ZHAO H F, CAO X Y. Vegetation cover changes and its climate driving in Three-River-Source National Park[J].Plateau Meteorology,2022,41(2):328-337.

ZHANG X, LIU L Y, CHEN X D, et al. GLC_FCS30: Global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery[J].Earth System Science Data,2021,13(6):2753-2776.

刘晓燕,杨胜天,王富贵,等.黄土高原现状梯田和林草植被的减沙作用分析[J].水利学报,2014,45(11):1293-1300. LIU X Y, YANG S T, WANG F G, et al. Analysis on sediment yield reduced by current terrace and shrubs-herbs-arbor vegetation in the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2014,45(11):1293-1300.

张龙齐,贾国栋,吕相融,等.黄土高原典型地区不同植被覆盖下坡面土壤侵蚀阈值研究[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):187-198. ZHANG L Q, JIA G D, LÜ X R, et al. Research of soil erosion thresholds on the lower slopes of different vegetation cover in typical areas of Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,37(2):187-198.

WEN Z M, LEES B G, JIAO F, et al. Stratified vegetation cover index: A new way to assess vegetation impact on soil erosion[J].Catena,2010,83(1):87-93.

HOU J, FU B J, WANG S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of relationship between vegetation attributes and soil erosion on hillslopes in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2014,72(5):1721-1731.

郭建晓,桑会勇,翟亮.青藏高原植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其驱动因素[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(11):2665-2674. GUO J X, SANG H Y, ZHAI L. Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of vegetation coverage on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2023,42(11):2665-2674.

陈树人,胡鹏,胡均万,等.谷物产量分布图生成系统的开发研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(8):182-184. CHEN S R, HU P, HU J W, et al. Research and development of one grain yield map generating system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(8):182-184.

廖建华,许炯心,杨永红.黄土高原区高含沙水流发生频率空间分异及其影响因素[J].水科学进展,2008,19(2):160-170. LIAO J H, XU J X, YANG Y H. Study of the spatial differentiation of hyperconcentrated flows frequency in the Loess Plateau[J].Advances in Water Science,2008,19(2):160-170.

ZHANG J J, ZHANG X P, LI R, et al. Did streamflow or suspended sediment concentration changes reduce sediment load in the middle reaches of the Yellow River?[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,546:357-369.

黄婷婷,史扬子,曹琦,等.黄土高原六道沟小流域近30年来土壤侵蚀变化评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(1):8-17. HUANG T T,SHI Y Z,CAO Q, et al. Soil erosion evaluation of Liudaogou catchment in the Loess Plateau during the past 30 years[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,18(1):8-17.

韩磊,曹鑫鑫,朱会利,等.基于特征分区的陕北黄土高原植被覆盖变化及其驱动因素[J].生态学报,2023,43(20):8564-8577. HAN L, CAO X X, ZHU H L, et al. Change of vegetation coverage and driving factor in the North Shaanxi Loess Plateau based on characteristic zoning[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(20):8564-8577.

FENG X M, FU B J, PIAO S L, et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J].Nature Climate Change,2016,6:1019-1022.

SHAO R, ZHANG B Q, SU T X, et al. Estimating the increase in regional evaporative water consumption as a result of vegetation restoration over the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres,2019,124(22):11783-11802.

张宝庆,邵蕊,赵西宁,等.大规模植被恢复对黄土高原生态水文过程的影响[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(3):594-606. ZHANG B Q, SHAO R, ZHAO X N, et al. Effects of large-scale vegetation restoration on eco-hydrological processes over the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2020,28(3):594-606.

WANG Y Q, SHAO M A, SHAO H B. A preliminary investigation of the dynamic characteristics of dried soil layers on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2010,381(1):9-17.

李燕,乌兰图雅.科尔沁沙地林地适宜性评价:以科尔沁左翼后旗为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6),236-239,244. LI Y, WULAN T Y, Evaluation on forestry suitability in the Horqin sandy land: A case study in Horqinzuoyihouqi Banner[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(6),236-239,244.

浏览量

617

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

坡耕地植烟土壤养分资源特征及适宜性综合评价