1. 中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院, 农业农村部华北耕地保育重点实验室,北京,100193
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "陈钧儒(1997—),男,江苏句容人,博士研究生,主要从事土壤物理与水土保持研究。E-mail:Chenjunru@cau.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
陈钧儒, 江子昊, 肖波, 等. 黄土丘陵区人工移植生物结皮集雨面的集雨效率及其抗侵蚀破损能力[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(3):29-36.
CHEN Junru, JIANG Zihao, XIAO Bo, et al. Performance of Artificially Transplanted Biocrusted Soil-surfaces in Rainwater Harvesting and Their Capability to Resist Erosion in the Hilly Region of Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. 2024, 38(3): 29-36.
陈钧儒, 江子昊, 肖波, 等. 黄土丘陵区人工移植生物结皮集雨面的集雨效率及其抗侵蚀破损能力[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(3):29-36. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.03.038.
CHEN Junru, JIANG Zihao, XIAO Bo, et al. Performance of Artificially Transplanted Biocrusted Soil-surfaces in Rainwater Harvesting and Their Capability to Resist Erosion in the Hilly Region of Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. 2024, 38(3): 29-36. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.03.038.
[目的] 为探讨黄土丘陵区不同类型人工生物结皮集雨面的集雨效果及抗侵蚀破损能力。[方法] 以人工移植培养的藻类和藓类生物结皮为研究对象
以裸土为对照
分别对其进行野外模拟降雨和抗侵蚀试验(坡面冲刷、土壤静水崩解和单雨滴溅蚀试验)
分析不同类型集雨面的集雨效率与土壤抗冲系数、土壤崩解速率和溅蚀量等抗侵蚀能力指标的差异。[结果] (1)生物结皮集雨面显著提高集雨效率。当雨强为100 mm/h时
相较于裸土
生物结皮集雨面的集雨效率显著提高33.3%(F=300.12
p<0.001)。(2)生物结皮显著降低产沙量并提高抗冲系数。与裸土相比
藻结皮和藓结皮的产沙量分别减少178.8%和364.6%
藓结皮和藻结皮的最大抗冲系数分别是裸土的4.6
2.8倍。(3)生物结皮显著降低土壤崩解速率和最大崩解率
且不同生物结皮类型差异显著。与裸土(6.46 g/min)相比
藻结皮和藓结皮的土壤崩解速率分别降低35.0%和60.2%;生物结皮平均最大崩解率较裸土降低23.8%。(4)生物结皮显著提高临界击穿雨滴动能并降低土壤溅蚀量。藓结皮和藻结皮的临界击穿雨滴动能分别是裸土(0.5 J)的3.9
21.9倍。同时
生物结皮较裸土(0.156 g)的单雨滴溅蚀量平均减少75.3%。[结论] 人工移植培养的生物结皮集雨面显著提高集雨效率和表层土壤的抗侵蚀能力
对旱区集雨措施的可持续利用和水土保持方面具有重要意义。
[Objective] The purpose of the study was to explore the rainwater harvesting effect and erosion damage resistance of different types of artificial biocrusted soil surfaces in the hilly region of Chinese Loess Plateau. [Methods] The biocrusted soil surfaces were taken as the research object
and the bare soil surfaces as the control. The study conducted field simulated rainfall and erosion resistance experiments (slope scouring
soil disintegration
and single raindrop splash erosion experiments) on them
respectively. Differences in the erosion resistance among different types of soil surfaces were analyzed. [Results] (1) Biocrusted soil surfaces significantly improved rainwater harvesting efficiency. At a rainfall intensity of 100 mm/h
the rainwater harvesting efficiency of the biocrusted soil surfaces was significantly increased by 33.3% compared to bare soil (F = 300.12
p < 0.001). (2) Biocrusted soil surfaces significantly reduced the sand production and increased the coefficient of erosion resistance. Compared with bare soil
the sand production of cyano and moss biocrusted soil surfaces was reduced by 178.8% and 364.6%
respectively. Compared to bare soil
moss and cyano biocrusts had 4.6 and 2.8 times
respectively
the maximum coefficients of resistance to washout. (3) Biocrusts significantly reduced the soil disintegration rate and maximum disintegration rate
and the differences were significant. Compared with bare soil (6.46 g/min)
the disintegration rates of cyano and moss biocrusts were reduced by 35.0% and 60.2%
respectively and the maximum disintegration rate of biocrusts was reduced by 23.8%. (4) Biocrusts significantly increased the raindrop kinetic energy and reduced soil spallation. The critical kinetic energy of moss and cyano biocrusts was 3.9 and 21.9 times higher than that of bare soil (0.5 J)
respectively. Meanwhile
the soil splash erosion of the biocrusts was reduced by 75.3% on average compared to bare soil (0.156 g). [Conclusion] Biocrusted soil surfaces significantly improved the erosion resistance and rainwater harvesting effect
which is of great significance in terms of sustainable utilization and soil and water conservation in dry areas.
ZHENG K, WEI J Z, PEI J Y, et al. Impacts of climate change and human activities on grassland vegetation variation in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2019,660:236-244.
FENG X M, FU B J, PIAO S L, et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J].Nature Climate Change, 2016,6:1019-1022.
成六三,李小雁,高前兆.干旱半干旱区集雨绿化系统研究现状及其发展趋势[J].干旱区地理,2005,28(6):781-788. CHENG L S, LI X Y, GAO Q Z. Actuality and development trend of afforestation by rainwater-gathering in arid and semiarid regions[J].Arid Land Geography,2005,28(6):781-788.
徐振远,徐振,邢尚军,等.半干旱地区雨水高效收集利用技术研究综述[J].山东林业科技,2012,42(5):91-95,46. XU Z Y, XU Z, XING S J,et al. Summary of research on efficient rainwater collection and utilization technology in semi-arid areas[J].Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology,2012,42(5):91-95,46.
肖国举,王静.黄土高原集水农业研究进展[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):1003-1011. XIAO G J, WANG J. Research on progress of rainwater harvesting agriculture on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2003,23(5):1003-1011.
冯学赞,张万军,赵艳敏,等.生物集雨面营建技术及其集雨效率的研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(1):145-149. FENG X Z, ZHANG W J, ZHAO Y M, et al. Construction technology and rainwater harvesting efficiency of biological rainwater catchment[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,29(1):145-149.
QIU D X, BOWKER M A, XIAO B, et al. Mapping biocrust distribution in China’s drylands under changing climate[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2023,905:e167211.
WEBER B, BELNAP J, BVDEL B, et al. What is a biocrust? A refined, contemporary definition for a broadening research community[J].Biological Reviews,2022,97(5):1768-1785.
XIAO B, SUN F H, HU K L, et al. Biocrusts reduce surface soil infiltrability and impede soil water infiltration under tension and ponding conditions in dryland ecosystem[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,568:792-802.
GAO L Q, BOWKER M A, XU M X, et al. Biological soil crusts decrease erodibility by modifying inherent soil properties on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,105:49-58.
GAO L Q, SUN H, XU M X, et al. Biocrusts resist runoff erosion through direct physical protection and indirect modification of soil properties[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2020,20(1):133-142.
XIAO B, BOWKER M A, ZHAO Y G, et al. Biocrusts: Engineers and architects of surface soil properties, functions, and processes in dryland ecosystems[J].Geoderma,2022,424:e116015.
CHAMIZO S, MUGNAI G, ROSSI F, et al. Cyanobacteria inoculation improves soil stability and fertility on different textured soils: Gaining insights for applicability in soil restoration[J].Frontiers in Environmental Science,2018,6:e49.
KHEIRFAM H, ASADZADEH F. Stabilizing sand from dried-up lakebeds against wind erosion by accelerating biological soil crust development[J].European Journal of Soil Biology,2020,98:e103189.
郭雅丽,赵允格,高丽倩,等.黄土丘陵区草本植物覆盖下生物结皮对坡面径流流速的削减作用[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1871-1877. GUO Y L, ZHAO Y G, GAO L Q, et al. Reduction of flow velocity by biological soil crust of revegetated grassland in the hilly Loess Plateau, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(7):1871-1877.
许欢欢,张宝琦,汪建芳,等.黄土高原典型生物结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(6):8-13. XU H H, ZHANG B Q, WANG J F, et al. Effects of typical biological crusts on slope runoff and sediment load in Loess Plateau region[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,40(6):8-13.
LAN S B, WU L, ADESSI A, et al. Cyanobacterial persistence and influence on microbial community dynamics over 15 years in induced biocrusts[J].Environmental Microbiology,2022,24(1):66-81.
DAVIS D D, HORTON R, HEITMAN J L, et al. Wettability and hysteresis effects on water sorption in relatively dry soil[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2009,73(6):1947-1951.
张晨晖,肖波,李胜龙,等.东北黑土区农田生物结皮的特征及其对表层土壤崩解的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1773-1782. ZHANG C H, XIAO B, LI S L, et al. Characteristics of biocrusts in croplands and their effects on surface soil disintegration in the black soil region of northeast China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(7):1773-1782.
李聪会,朱首军,陈云明,等.黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤抗蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):6-10. LI C H, ZHU S J, CHEN Y M, et al. Effects of biological crusts on soil anti-erodibility in loess hilly areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(3):6-10.
李金峰,孟杰,叶菁,等.陕北水蚀风蚀交错区生物结皮的形成过程与发育特征[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(1):67-79. LI J F, MENG J, YE J, et al. The development characteristics and formation process of biological soil crusts in wind-water erosion crisscross region, northern Shaanxi Province, China[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(1):67-79.
ROCHA B, PAÇO T, LUZ A, et al. Are biocrusts and xerophytic vegetation a viable green roof typology in a Mediterranean climate? A comparison between differently vegetated green roofs in water runoff and water quality[J].Water,2021,13(1):e94.
KIDRON G J, STARINSKY A, XIAO B. The enigmatic enrichment of potassium and magnesium in runoff and floodwater in the Negev: Do biocrusts hold the key?[J].Science of the Total Environment,2024,911:e168753.
JIA R L, ZHAO Y, GAO Y H, et al. Antagonistic effects of drought and sand burial enable the survival of the biocrust moss
Bryum argenteum
in an arid sandy desert[J].Biogeosciences,2018,15(4):1161-1172.
赵燕翘,连煜超,许文文,等.人工培育生物结皮形成和发育对单次降雨量变化的响应[J].生态学报,2024,44(2):723-732. ZHAO Y Q, LIAN Y C, XU W W, et al. Response of formation and development of artificial biocrusts to changes in single rainfall[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2024,44(2):723-732.
0
浏览量
4164
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621