基于InVEST模型的蒲河流域景观格局及生境质量时空演变分析

刘佳依; 许大为; 徐嘉

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.024

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于InVEST模型的蒲河流域景观格局及生境质量时空演变分析

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 基于InVEST模型的蒲河流域景观格局及生境质量时空演变分析
- Analysis of Landscape Patterns and Spatio-temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in the PU River Basin Based on the InVEST Model
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第2期页码：258-267
- 作者机构：
  
  东北林业大学园林学院,哈尔滨,150040
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42171246)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.024
  中图分类号： Q149;TV212.4
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘佳依, 许大为, 徐嘉. 基于InVEST模型的蒲河流域景观格局及生境质量时空演变分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(2):258-267.

LIU Jiayi, XU Dawei, XU Jia. Analysis of Landscape Patterns and Spatio-temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in the PU River Basin Based on the InVEST Model[J]. 2024, 38(2): 258-267.
刘佳依, 许大为, 徐嘉. 基于InVEST模型的蒲河流域景观格局及生境质量时空演变分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(2):258-267. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.024.

LIU Jiayi, XU Dawei, XU Jia. Analysis of Landscape Patterns and Spatio-temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in the PU River Basin Based on the InVEST Model[J]. 2024, 38(2): 258-267. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.024.

摘要

[目的] 通过对景观生态格局和生境质量的时空动态分析

深入研究沈阳市蒲河流域实施水土保持措施前后的生境质量响应情况

旨在为小型流域的水土保持策略提供科学依据

以促进生态经济的协同增长和区域生态的持续健康发展。[方法] 基于蒲河流域2000年、2010年、2020年的土地利用数据和数字高程模型(DEM)等数据

结合FRAGSTATS和InVEST模型

运用土地利用转移矩阵、景观格局指数、生境质量及生境退化度对土地利用变化进行分析

探究响应机理。[结果] (1)在2000—2010年期间

蒲河流域的耕地开发活动频繁

导致森林、草地等土地类型的比例显著下降;在2010—2020年期间

蒲河生态廊道的建设推动土地利用的变化

耕地面积流向人造地表、森林和草地。(2)在2000—2020年期间

蒲河流域的整体景观格局经历先趋于完整后破碎化的演变过程

蒲河两岸景观形成多种要素集合的密集格局

城市中心北部边缘地区生境持续破碎化。(3)从流域整体分析

2000年、2010年、2020年的生境平均质量分别为0.349

0.329

0.354

呈现出先降后升的趋势。生境退化平均值分别为0.098

0.112

0.086

与生境质量变化趋势一致。随着蒲河生态廊道建设

2020年生境质量明显改善

生态系统受到的威胁减少。从空间格局分析

东北部与西南部呈现出明显的空间分布特征;东北山区、西南湿地等区域生境质量总体较好

但有着生境退化的威胁。[结论] 在水土保持措施的影响下

蒲河流域的景观生态格局得以改善

有效抑制了生境的退化现象。

Abstract

[Objective] Through the spatio-temporal dynamic analysis of landscape ecological pattern and habitat quality

the response of habitat quality before and after the implementation of soil and water conservation measures in PU River Basin of Shenyang City was deeply studied

aiming to provide scientific basis for soil and water conservation strategies in small river basins

so as to promote the coordinated growth of the eco-economy and the sustainable and healthy development of regional ecology. [Methods] Based on the land use data and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of PU River Basin in 2000

2010 and 2020

combined with the FRAGSTATS and InVEST models

land use transfer matrix

landscape pattern index

habitat quality and habitat degradation degree were used to analyze land use change and explore quality response situation. [Results] (1) During the period from 2000 to 2010

the cultivated land development activities in the PU River Basin were frequent

resulting in a significant decline in the proportion of forest

grassland and other land types; In the period from 2010 to 2020

the construction of the PU River ecological corridor will promote the change of land use

and the cultivated land area will flow to artificial surfaces

forests and grasslands. (2) During 2000 to 2020

the overall landscape pattern of the PU River Basin experienced a process of first becoming complete and then fragmentary. The landscape on both sides of the Puhe River formed a dense pattern of multiple elements

and the habitat in the northern edge of the urban center continued to fragment. (3) From the overall analysis of the basin

the average habitat quality in 2000

2010

and 2020 was 0.349

0.329

and 0.354

respectively

showing a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. The mean values of habitat degradation were 0.098

0.112

and 0.086

which were consistent with the trend in habitat quality. With the construction of the PU River Ecological Corridor

the quality of habitat will be improved significantly in 2020

and the threats to the ecosystem will be reduced. From the analysis of spatial pattern

the northeast and southwest show obvious spatial distribution characteristics. The quality of habitat in the mountainous areas of northeast China and the wetlands of southwest China is generally good

but there is a threat of habitat degradation. [Conclusion] Under the influence of soil and water conservation measures

the ecological pattern of the PU River Basin can be and the degradation of habitat can be effectively inhibited.

关键词

Keywords

references

LIANG X, GUAN Q F, CLARKE K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: A case study in Wuhan, China[J].Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,2021,85:e101569.

宋卫信,张锋,刘荣堂.生境破坏的模式对集合种群动态和续存的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):4815-4819. SONG W X, ZHANG F, LIU R T. The effect of habitat destruction pattern on the dynamics and persistence of metapopulation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,29(9):4815-4819.

DENG Y H, WANG S J, BAI X Y, et al. Relationship among land surface temperature and LUCC, NDVI in typical Karst area[J].Scientific Reports,2018,8(1):e641.

陈伊多,杨庆媛.西藏自治区土地利用/覆被变化时空演变特征及驱动因素[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(5):173-180. CHEN Y D, YANG Q Y. Temporal and spatial characteristics and driving factors of land use/cover change in Tibet Autonomous Region[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(5):173-180.

黄安东,赵明松,郜敏,等.1980—2020年安徽省土地利用时空演化特征[J].科学技术与工程,2022(11):4627-4635.HUANG A D, ZHAO M S, GAO M, et al. Characteristics of spatio-temporal evolution of land use in Anhui Province from 1980 to 2020[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2022(11):4627-4635.

曾辉,刘国军.基于景观结构的区域生态风险分析[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(5):454-457. ZENG H, LIU G J. Analysis of regional ecological risk based on landscape structure[J].China Environmental Science,1999,19(5):454-457.

汪东川,张威,王志恒,等.拉西瓦水电站建设对区域景观格局与生境质量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):200-205. WANG D C, ZHANG W, WANG Z H, et al. Impact of Laxiwa hydropower station construction on the regional landscape pattern and habitat quality[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,35(3):200-205.

涂雯,吴静雯,马理辉,等.水土保持措施驱动村域土地利用景观格局变化:以米脂县高西沟村为例[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(3):147-154. TU W, WU J W, MA L H, et al. Soil and water conservation measures drive the change of land use landscape pattern in the village: A case study of Gaoxigou Village in Mizhi County[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(3):147-154.

奥勇,蒋嶺峰,白召弟,等.基于格网GIS的黄河流域土地生态质量综合评价[J].干旱区地理,2022,45(1):164-175.AO Y, JIANG L F, BAI Z D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land ecological quality in the Yellow River Basin based on Grid-GIS[J].Arid Land Geography,2022,45(1):164-175.

马月伟,潘健峰,蔡思青,等.生态系统服务社会价值与生态价值的权衡与协同关系:以普达措国家公园为例[J].地理科学,2022,42(7):1283-1294. MA Y W, PAN J F, CAI S Q, et al. Trade-offs and synergies between social value and ecological value of ecosystem services: A case study of the Potatso National Park[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2022,42(7):1283-1294.

HU W M, LI G, GAO Z H, et al. Assessment of the impact of the Poplar Ecological Retreat Project on water conservation in the Dongting Lake wetland region using the InVEST model[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2020,733:e139423.

XIAO P N, ZHOU Y, LI M Y, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of habitat quality and its topographic gradient effects of Hubei Province based on the InVEST model[J].Environment, Development and Sustainability,2023,25(7):6419-6448.

HUANG C, ZHANG C C, LI H. Assessment of the impact of rubber plantation expansion on regional carbon storage based on time series remote sensing and the InVEST model[J].Remote Sensing,2022,14(24):e6234.

高庆彦,潘玉君,刘化.基于InVEST模型的大理州生境质量时空演化研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(3):402-408. GAO Q Y, PAN Y J, LIU H. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality in the Dali Bai autonomous prefecture based on the InVEST model[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2021,37(3):402-408.

龙花楼,王文杰,翟刚,等.安徽省土地利用变化及其驱动力分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(6):526-530. LONG H L, WANG W J, ZHAI G, et al. Analysis on land use changes and their driving forces in Anhui Province[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2002,11(6):526-530.

戚丽萍,栾兆擎,魏勉,等.基于土地利用的江苏省各市生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(4):200-208. QI L P, LUAN Z Q, WEI M, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service values in Jiangsu Province based on land-use change[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition),2023,47(4):200-208.

王立阳,李斌,李佳熹,等.沈阳市典型城市河流优先控制污染物筛选及生态环境风险评估[J].环境科学研究,2019,32(1):25-34. WANG L Y, LI B, LI J X, et al. Priority pollutants and their ecological risk in typically urbanized river of Shenyang[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2019,32(1):25-34.

张译珊,范婷婷.新型城镇化与乡村振兴融合下的沈阳近郊城乡空间发展评估与建议:以沈阳蒲河生态经济带为例[J].住宅与房地产,2019(36):238-239. ZHANG Y S, FAN T T. Evaluation and suggestions on spatial development of urban and rural areas in Shenyang suburbunder the integration of new urbanization and rural revitalization: A case study of Puhe ecological economic belt in Shenyang[J].Housing and Real Estate,2019(36):238-239.

韩博,周丽丽,范昊明,等.蒲河流域径流模拟与模型评价[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2012,43(5):615-618. HAN B, ZHOU L L, FAN H M, et al. Runoff simulation and model evaluation in the Puhe River Basin[J].Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University,2012,43(5):615-618.

姜永伟.蒲河流域大型底栖无脊椎动物群落结构及水质评价[J].现代农业科技,2015(9):207-209. JIANG Y W. Community structures of macrozoobenthos and assessment of water quality in Pu river basin[J].Modern Agricultural Science and Technology,2015(9):207-209.

刘美娟,仲俊涛,王蓓,等.基于InVEST模型的青海湖流域产水功能时空变化及驱动因素分析[J].地理科学,2023,43(3):411-422. LIU M J, ZHONG J T, WANG B, et al. Spatiotemporal change and driving factor analysis of the Qinghai Lake Basin based on InVEST model[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2023,43(3):411-422.

钱凤魁,逄然然,于洋,等.辽宁省不同地貌区耕地景观格局与耕地质量空间关联特征及作用机制[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2023,31(1):113-124. QIAN F K, PANG R R, YU Y, et al. Spatial correlation characteristics and mechanism of cultivated land landscape pattern and cultivated land quality in different geomorphic areas of Liaoning Province[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2023,31(1):113-124.

WANG A, ZHANG M M, AL KAFY A, et al. Predicting the impacts of urban land change on LST and carbon storage using InVEST, CA-ANN and WOA-LSTM models in Guangzhou, China[J].Earth Science Informatics,2023,16(1):437-454.

RAJASEKAR A, PILLAI A R, ELANGOVAN R, et al. Risk capacity and investment priority as moderators in the relationship between big-five personality factors and investment behavior: A conditional moderated moderated-mediation model[J].Quality and Quantity,2023,57(3):2091-2123.

潘韬,吴绍洪,戴尔阜,等.基于InVEST模型的三江源区生态系统水源供给服务时空变化[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(1):183-189. PAN T, WU S H, DAI E F, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of water source supply service in Three Rivers Source Area of China based on InVEST model[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2013,24(1):183-189.

WANG B X, CHENG W M. Effects of land use/cover on regional habitat quality under different geomorphic types based on InVEST model[J].Remote Sensing,2022,14(5):e1279.

刘树锋,陈记臣,关帅,等.基于InVEST 模型的杨溪河流域土地利用变化对水源涵养功能的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(12):4746-4751. LIU S F, CHEN J C, GUAN S, et al. Influence of land use change on water conservation function in Yangxi River Basin based on InVEST model[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2022,22(12):4746-4751.

CHU L, SUN T C, WANG T W, et al. Evolution and prediction of landscape pattern and habitat quality based on CA-markov and InVEST model in Hubei section of Three Gorges Reservoir area (TGRA)[J].Sustainability,2018,10(11):e3854.

岳文泽,夏皓轩,吴桐,等.浙江省生境质量时空演变与生态红线评估[J].生态学报,2022,42(15):6406-6417. YUE W Z, XIA H X, WU T, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of habitat quality and ecological red line assessment in Zhejiang Province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(15):6406-6417.

齐常清,杨滨章.绿色基础设施理念下蒲河廊道生态建设研究[J].山西建筑,2014,40(7):209-211. QI C Q, YANG B Z. Research on ecological construction of Puhe corridor under green infrastructure idea[J].Shanxi Architecture,2014,40(7):209-211.

王阳.蒲河生态廊道建设初探[J].科技资讯,2012,10(7):e137. WANG Y. Preliminary study on the construction of ecological corridor in Puhe River[J].Scienceand Technology Information,2012,10(7):e137.

荆勇,崔涤尘.蒲河水生态修复工程与功效评估[J].环境保护科学,2017,43(4):85-89. JING Y, CUI D C. Puhe river water ecological restoration projects and efficacy evaluation[J].Environmental Protection Science,2017,43(4):85-89.

蒙莎莎,陆汝成,庞晓菲.2000—2020年广西陆地边境地区生境质量演变[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(6):376-385.MENG S S, LU R C, PANG X F. Evolution of habitat quality in the land border areas of Guangxi from 2000 to 2020[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(6):376-385.

杜峯屹,陈松林,蒲佳豪.2000—2020年闽东南地区土地利用变化及生境质量时空演变[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(6):345-356. DU F Y, CHEN S L, PU J H. Land use change and spatiotemporal evolution of habitat quality in southeastern Fujian from 2000 to 2020[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(6):345-356.

郭玉佳,刘世梁,董玉红,等.基于景观格局和生态系统服务的生态廊道修复成效评估指标体系[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2023,31(10):1525-1538. GUO Y J, LIU S L, DONG Y H, et al. An indicator system for effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor restoration based on landscape patterns and ecosystem services[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2023,31(10):1525-1538.

浏览量

575

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于InVEST模型的西柳沟流域生境质量现状

基于InVEST模型的乌江流域生境质量时空演变及其驱动因素分析

生境质量对气候变化与人类活动的空间响应——以青藏高原为例

喀斯特流域水源涵养功能时空分异及其对景观格局的响应

耦合InVEST-PLUS模型的榆林市生境质量