干热河谷冲沟系统土壤团聚体对优先路径的影响

李珠宇; 李志成; 徐贵迁; 段旭; 张广贺; 赵洋毅

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

干热河谷冲沟系统土壤团聚体对优先路径的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 干热河谷冲沟系统土壤团聚体对优先路径的影响
- Effect of Soil Aggregate on Preferential Path in Gully Systemof Dry-hot Valley
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第2期页码：304-315
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西南林业大学生态与环境学院,昆明,650224
  2. 国家林业和草原局云南玉溪森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,昆明,650224
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42067005);云南省农业联合专项面上项目(202101BD070001-075);云南省基础研究计划面上项目(202001AT070136);云南省青年人才专项(YNWR-QNBJ-2019-215,YNWR-QNBJ-2019-226);云南省自然生态监测网络项目(2022-YN-13)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.012
  中图分类号： S152.4
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李珠宇, 李志成, 徐贵迁, 等. 干热河谷冲沟系统土壤团聚体对优先路径的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(2):304-315.

LI Zhuyu, LI Zhicheng, XU Guiqian, et al. Effect of Soil Aggregate on Preferential Path in Gully Systemof Dry-hot Valley[J]. 2024, 38(2): 304-315.
李珠宇, 李志成, 徐贵迁, 等. 干热河谷冲沟系统土壤团聚体对优先路径的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(2):304-315. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.012.

LI Zhuyu, LI Zhicheng, XU Guiqian, et al. Effect of Soil Aggregate on Preferential Path in Gully Systemof Dry-hot Valley[J]. 2024, 38(2): 304-315. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.02.012.

摘要

[目的] 为探究金沙江干热河谷冲沟系统土壤团聚体结构对优先路径形成的影响

深化对冲沟系统土壤水分和溶质运移的认识。[方法] 选取金沙江干热河谷活跃和稳定冲沟不同部位(集水区、沟头、沟床和沟底)为研究对象

基于染色示踪和形态学图像解析技术

提取土壤水平剖面优先路径。采用RDA、灰色关联和耦合协调度等分析方法探究土壤团聚体结构与优先路径的关系。[结果] (1)稳定冲沟土壤团聚体稳定性高于活跃冲沟。除个别土层外

活跃冲沟＞0.25 mm机械稳定性团聚体(DR0.25)、水稳定性团聚体(WR0.25)、平均质量直径(MWD)含量均显著小于稳定冲沟(p＜0.05)

团聚体破坏率(PAD)和不稳定团粒指数(ELT)则呈相反趋势。冲沟系统由集水区向沟底延伸

土壤大团聚体占比减少

团聚体稳定性下降。(2)活跃冲沟优先路径数量和连通性优于稳定冲沟

冲沟系统由集水区向沟底延伸优先路径连通性变差。各部位以＞10 mm优先路径为主要通道。活跃冲沟Simpson指数较稳定冲沟增加3.12%

不同径级的优先路径丰富度高于稳定冲沟。(3)优先路径的形成和分布受土壤团聚体稳定性的影响

MWD和WR0.25与优先路径数量达到极强关联且影响最为显著(p＜0.01)。(4)冲沟系统由集水区向沟底延伸

土壤团聚体结构与优先路径的耦合协调性降低

整体上表现为沟头＞集水区＞沟底＞沟床。[结论] 土壤团聚体结构是优先路径形成的重要驱动因素之一

优先路径的分布对干热河谷冲沟系统发育具有重要影响。

Abstract

[Objective] To investigate the impact of soil aggregate structure on the formation of preferential pathways in the gully system of the dry-hot valley of the Jinsha River to enhance our understanding of soil moisture and solute transport in the gully system. [Methods] We selected different sections (i.e.

catchment area

gully head

gully bed

and gully bottom) of both active and stable gullies in the dry-hot valley of the Jinsha River as our research subjects. We used staining tracers and morphometric image analysis techniques to extract the preferential pathways from the soil level profile. RDA (Redundancy Analysis)

gray correlation

and coupled coordination were used to explore the relationship between soil aggregate structure and preferential pathways. [Results] (1) The stability of soil aggregates in stable gullies were higher than those in active gullies. Except for specific soil layers

the contents of mechanically stable aggregates (＞0.25 mm

[QX(Y12#]DR[QX)]0.25)

water-stable aggregates (＞0.25 mm

[QX(Y12#]WR[QX)]0.25) and average mass diameter (MWD) in active gully were significantly lower than those in the stable gully ([QX(Y12#]p[QX)]＜0.05). The aggregate destruction rate (PAD) and unstable aggregate index ([QX(Y12#]E[QX)]LT) showed the opposite trend. As the gully system extends from the catchment towards the gully bottom

the fraction of large soil and the stability of aggregates all decreased. (2) The number and connectivity of preferential pathways in active gullies were higher than those in stable gullies. However

the connectivity of the preferential pathways in the gully system deteriorated as it extended from the catchment to the bottom of the gully. The preferential pathways with a diameter＞10 mm served as primary channel. The Simpson index of active gullies exhibited an increase by 3.12% compared to stable gullies

indicating a higher richness of preferential pathways across different diameter classes. (3) The formation and distribution of preferential pathways were affected by the stability of soil aggregates

and MWD and WR0.25 were strongly correlated with the number of preferential pathways and had the most significant influence ([QX(Y12#]p[QX)]＜0.01). (4) As the gully system extended from the catchment to the bottom of the gully

the coupling coordination between the soil aggregate structure and the preferential pathways decreased. Overall

the order of performance was as follows: gully head＞catchment area＞gully bottom＞gully bed. [Conclusion] Soil aggregate structure is an of the important driving factors for the formation of preferential paths

and the distribution of preferential paths has significant impact on the development of gully systems in dry-hot valleys.

关键词

Keywords

references

YANG D, XIONG D H, ZHANG B J. Impacts of grass basal diameter on runoff erosion force and energy consumption in gully bed in dry-hot valley region, Southwest China[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2022,22(7):2048-2061.

徐婷,杨丹,舒成强,等.干热河谷陷穴形态特征及成因分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2023,37(2):142-149. XU T, YANG D, SHU C Q, et al. Analysis of morphological characteristics and causes of the sink holes in dry-hot valley[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2023,37(2):142-149.

冉红,蒋婷,杨晓,等.干热河谷区冲沟侵蚀研究进展[J].绿色科技,2017(16):125-127. RAN H, JIANG T, YANG X, et al. A review on the study of gully erosion in dry-hot valley[J].Journal of Green Science and Technology,2017(16):125-127.

张斌艳,熊东红,刘琳,等.干热河谷冲沟沟床土壤水分时空分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(1):83-90. ZHANG B Y, XIONG D H, LIU L, et al. Spatial and temporal variability of soil moisture in gully bed of dry-hot valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(1):83-90.

子桂才,李庆华,赵丽芳,等.干热河谷区生态修复研究进展[J].广西林业科学,2023,52(1):141-145. ZI G C, LI Q H, ZHAO L F, et al. Study progress of ecological restoration in dry-hot river valleys[J].Guangxi Forestry Science,2023,52(1):141-145.

徐贵迁,赵洋毅,王克勤,等.金沙江干热河谷冲沟系统优先流影响下的土壤可蚀性[J].北京林业大学学报,2023,45(4):101-113. XU G Q, ZHAO Y Y, WANG K Q, et al. Soil erodibility under the influence of preferential flow in the gully system of the Jinsha River Dry Hot Valley[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2023,45(4):101-113.

牛凤娇,潘成忠,崔永生,等.晋西黄土区土地利用对降雨入渗产流模式和优先流分布的影响试验研究[J].生态学报,2023,43(10):4154-4166. NIU F J, PAN C Z, CUI Y S, et al. Experimental investigation to the effect of different land-use on rainfall infiltration runoff patterns and preferential flow distribution in the loess area of western Shanxi Province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(10):4154-4166.

陈思婕,李美骏,罗雅婕,等.优先流对土壤水文及滑坡触发的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(23):9698-9705. CHEN S J, LI M J, LUO Y J, et al. The impact of preferential flow on soil hydrology and landslide-triggering[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(23):9698-9705.

潘网生,胡向红,卢玉东,等.黄土孔隙、裂隙及其优先流研究进展[J].科学技术与工程,2018,18(8):163-169. PAN W S, HU X H, LU Y D, et al. Research progress of pore, fracture and preferential flow for loess[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2018,18(8):163-169.

陶禹.崩岗坡面壤中流及其水动力特征与崩岗侵蚀的关系[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2020.TAO Y. The effect of subsurface flow along a hillslope of benggang and its hydrodynamic characteristics on benggang erosion[D].Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University,2020.

艾力夏提·库尔班.黑龙江省东部山地针叶人工林土壤优先流及影响因素研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2022.AILIXIATI·K. Study on soil preferential flow and its influencing factors of coniferous plantation at Eastern Mountain in Heilongjiang Province[D].Harbin: Northeast Forestry University,2022.

程金花,张洪江,张晓晖,等.重庆四面山根系及土壤特性对优先路径分布的影响[J].世界科技研究与发展,2011,33(4):519-523. CHENG J H, ZHANG H J, ZHANG X H, et al. Effect of roots and soil properties on preferential flow paths distribution in Simian Mountains, Chongqing[J].World Sci-Tech R&D, 2011,33(4):519-523.

QIN X, CAI J, WANG G. Pore-scale modeling of pore structure properties and wettability effect on permeability of low-rank coal[J].International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2023,33(5):573-584.

MENG A X, TAN Y Q, XING C, et al. Investigation on preferential path of fluid flow by using topological network model of permeable asphalt mixture[J].Construction and Building Materials,2020,242:e118163.

JARVIS N J. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: Principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2020,71(3):279-302.

TANG Y B, LI M, BERNABE Y, et al. Viscous fingering and preferential flow paths in heterogeneous porous media[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,2020,125(3):35-48.

王佩佩,苏雪萌,周正朝,等.黄土丘陵区典型植被群落坡面土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):16-23. WANG P P, SU X M, ZHOU Z C, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of soil preferential flow on slope of typical vegetation communities in loess hilly region[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,35(5):16-23.

卢华兴,赵洋毅,段旭,等.滇中亚高山林地土壤团聚体结构及其对优先路径的影响[J].林业科学研究,2022,35(6):23-34. LU H X, ZHAO Y Y, DUAN X, et al. Soil aggregate structure of subalpine woodland and its influence on priority path in central Yunnan[J].Forest Research,2022,35(6):23-34.

欧阳田甜,段旭,赵洋毅,等.元江干热河谷典型林草地优先流区和基质流区土壤团聚体特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(3):146-153. OUYANG T T, DUAN X, ZHAO Y Y, et al. Characteristics of soil aggregates in the preferential flow area and matrix flow area of typical forest-grassland in Yuanjiang dry-hot valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(3):146-153.

任泽莹,赵勇钢,吕银彦,等.汾河流域下游不同土地利用方式下优先流区与基质流区土壤团聚体稳定性分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):59-64. REN Z Y, ZHAO Y G, LÜ Y Y, et al. Analysis on soil aggregate stability of preferential flow and matrix flow domains under different land use types in the lower reaches of Fen River watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(6):59-64.

张素,熊东红,校亮,等.冲沟不同部位土壤机械组成及抗冲性差异[J].土壤,2016,48(6):1270-1276. ZHANG S, XIONG D H, XIAO L, et al. The difference of soil mechanical composition and soil anti-scourability on different positions of gullies[J].Soils,2016,48(6):1270-1276.

张素,熊东红,杨丹,等.干热河谷不同活跃度冲沟土体抗剪强度分异及理化性质[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):124-129,160. ZHANG S, XIONG D H, YANG D, et al. Soil shear strength and its related physical properties on different active degree type of gullies in dry-hot valley[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,28(6):124-129,160.

徐贵迁,赵洋毅,王克勤,等.金沙江干热河谷冲沟区优先流影响下的土壤力学特性[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):100-110. XU G Q, ZHAO Y Y, WANG K Q, et al. Soil mechanical properties under the influence of preferential flow in the gully area of Jinsha River's dry-hot valley[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,37(2):100-110.

李志成,赵洋毅,王克勤,等.金沙江干热河谷活跃和稳定冲沟集水区土壤优先流特征[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(6):119-127. LI Z C, ZHAO Y Y, WANG K Q, et al. Soil preferential flow characteristics in active and stable gully catchment areas of the dry-hot valleys of the Jinsha River[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(6):119-127.

杨淏舟,何光熊,王艳丹,等.干热河谷燥红土坡面水分时空分布特征及其对覆被类型的响应[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(5):90-98. YANG H Z, HE G X, WANG Y D, et al. Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of moisture on dry red soil slope in dry-hot valley and its response to cover type[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,19(5):90-98.

SU Z G, XIONG D H, DONG Y F, et al. Simulated headward erosion of bank gullies in the Dry-Hot Valley Region of southwest China[J].Geomorphology,2014,204:532-541.

YAZIE T, MEKONNEN M, DEREBE A. Gully erosion and its impacts on soil loss and crop yield in three decades, northwest Ethiopia[J].Modeling Earth Systems and Environment,2020,7(4):2491-2500.

孙文泰,马明,牛军强,等.陇东雨养苹果覆膜对土壤团聚体结构稳定性与细根分布的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(4):1582-1593. SUN W T, MA M, NIU J Q, et al. Effects of film mulching on soil aggregate structure stability and fine root distribution of rain-fed apple in eastern Gansu[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(4):1582-1593.

杨洪炳,肖以华,许涵,等.城乡梯度下不同林分类型土壤团聚体分布及其稳定性[J].林业科学研究,2022,35(3):82-92. YANG H B, XIAO Y H, XU H, et al. Distribution and stability of soil aggregates in different forest types under an urban-rural gradient[J].Forest Research,2022,35(3):82-92.

王志康,祝乐,许晨阳,等.秦岭天然林凋落物去除对土壤团聚体稳定性及细根分布的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(13):5493-5503. WANG Z K, ZHU L, XU C Y, et al. Effects of litter removal on soil aggregate stability and distribution of fine roots in natural forests of Qinling Mountains[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(13):5493-5503.

张相,李肖,林杰,等.南方红壤丘陵区侵蚀沟道内土壤团聚体及有机碳特征[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(19):115-123. ZHANG X, LI X, LIN J, et al. Characteristics of soil aggregates and organic carbon in eroded gully in red soil region of Southern China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(19):115-123.

陈晓冰,吴晗,姜波,等.广西岩溶区稻田土壤优先路径的空间分布[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(12):4099-4108.CHEN X B, WU H, JIANG B, et al. Spatial distribution of preferential flow paths in paddy field in the Karst Area of Guangxi[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(12):4099-4108.

林立文,邓羽松,王金悦,等.南亚热带人工林种植对赤红壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(11):3647-3656. LIN L W, DENG Y S, WANG J Y, et al. Effects of plantation on aggregate distribution and stability of lateritic red soil in south subtropical China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(11):3647-3656.

吴小龙.半干旱区放牧管理草地土壤水分-溶质运移与优先流响应机制[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2022.WU X L. Mechanism of soil water-solute transport and preferential flow characteristic in a semi-arid grassland[D].Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2022.

刘子玥,王祎宸,骆丕昭,等.湘西石漠化地区植物多样性与土壤因子的耦合关系[J].森林与环境学报,2021,41(5):471-477. LIU Z Y, WANG Y C, LUO P Z, et al. Coupling relationships between plant diversity and soil characteristics in rocky desertification areas of Western Hunan[J].Journal of Forest and Environment,2021,41(5):471-477.

高燕.黑土区不同侵蚀方式对土壤团聚体和泥沙颗粒流失的影响研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.GAO Y. Impacts of soil erosion on soil aggregates and particles losses in the black soil region[D].Yangling,Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University,2014.

张钦弟,刘剑荣,杨磊,等.半干旱黄土区植被恢复对土壤团聚体稳定性及抗侵蚀能力的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(22):9057-9068. ZHANG Q D, LIU J R, YANG L, et al. Effect of vegetation restoration on stability and erosion resistance of soil aggregates in semi-arid loess region[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(22):9057-9068.

SUKHIJA B S, REDDY D V, NAGABHUSHANAM P, et al. Recharge processes: Piston flow vs preferential flow in semi-arid aquifers of India[J].Hydrogeology Journal,2003,11(3):387-395.

万艳萍,赵洋毅,段旭,等.干湿交替对红河干旱河谷区土壤优先流形成特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(7):2397-2406. WAN Y P, ZHAO Y Y, DUAN X, et al. Influence of alternated drying and wetting on the characteristics of soil preferential flow formation in Honghe Arid Valley[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2021,32(7):2397-2406.

管凝,程金花,侯芳,等.西南喀斯特地区典型林分土壤优先流特征及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(1):31-38. GUAN N, CHENG J H, HOU F, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of soil preferential flow in typical stands of Karst area in southwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2023,34(1):31-38.

浏览量

691

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

金沙江干热河谷冲沟区优先流影响下的土壤力学特性

干热河谷不同土地利用类型坡面土壤水分时空变异

干热河谷冲沟发育区土壤细沟可蚀性及主要影响因素

元谋干热河谷冲沟发育区植被恢复对土壤碳氮的影响

干热河谷区耕作侵蚀作用下坡面水力侵蚀特性