双排高立式尼龙网阻沙障与草方格固沙障的优化配置及防沙效益

王茂林; 宋玲; 刘杰; 王云飞; 井文云

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.035

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

双排高立式尼龙网阻沙障与草方格固沙障的优化配置及防沙效益

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 双排高立式尼龙网阻沙障与草方格固沙障的优化配置及防沙效益
- Optimized Configuration and Sand Control Benefits of Double-row High Vertical Nylon Mesh Sand Barrier and Grass Lattice Sand Barrier
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第1期页码：368-377
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 石河子大学水利建筑工程学院,新疆,石河子,832003
  2. 新疆交通规划勘察设计研究院有限公司,乌鲁木齐,830000
  3. 中交三公局第三公路工程有限公司,武汉,430056
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王茂林(1998—),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事风沙物理研究。E-mail:15283902571@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  交通运输行业科技项目(2022-ZD-007);新疆交通运输厅科技项目(KY2020050701);国家自然科学基金项目(51669031)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.035
  中图分类号： X169
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王茂林, 宋玲, 刘杰, 等. 双排高立式尼龙网阻沙障与草方格固沙障的优化配置及防沙效益[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):368-377.

WANG Maolin, SONG Ling, LIU Jie, et al. Optimized Configuration and Sand Control Benefits of Double-row High Vertical Nylon Mesh Sand Barrier and Grass Lattice Sand Barrier[J]. 2024, 38(1): 368-377.
王茂林, 宋玲, 刘杰, 等. 双排高立式尼龙网阻沙障与草方格固沙障的优化配置及防沙效益[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):368-377. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.035.

WANG Maolin, SONG Ling, LIU Jie, et al. Optimized Configuration and Sand Control Benefits of Double-row High Vertical Nylon Mesh Sand Barrier and Grass Lattice Sand Barrier[J]. 2024, 38(1): 368-377. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.035.

摘要

[目的] 针对双排高立式尼龙网阻沙障与草方格固沙障联合应用

开展风洞试验研究

以优化联合沙障中尼龙网阻沙障孔隙度配置及探究各孔隙度下联合沙障的防沙效益。[方法] 基于风洞模拟试验数据

开展不同孔隙度(40%

45%

55%)联合沙障

在不同风速下的风速流场、空气动力学粗糙度、摩阻风速、输沙率随高度和阻沙率方面的变化特征研究。[结果] (1)相同风速下尼龙网阻沙障孔隙度40%时

联合沙障弱风区面积最大;(2)随着尼龙网阻沙障孔隙度的增大

空气动力学粗糙度和摩阻风速减小

相同风速和相同位置时

40%孔隙度下联合沙障空气动力学粗糙度和摩阻风速值最大;(3)风速增加地表输沙率也增加

联合沙障内部与背风侧输沙率随高度增加呈指数型递减

输沙主要集中在0~12 cm高度内;(4)风速大小与沙障阻沙率呈现负相关变化;阻沙率与孔隙度之间也呈负相关关系

孔隙度为40%的联合沙障具有较高阻沙率;双排高立式尼龙网阻沙措施与草方格固沙措施联合之间还存在阻沙率叠加。[结论] 40%孔隙度的双排高立式尼龙网和草方格的阻固联合可以实现较优的配置与防沙效益。

Abstract

[Objective] For the joint application of double-row high vertical nylon mesh sand barriers and grass checkerboard sand barriers

wind tunnel experimental studies were conducted to optimize the configuration of nylon mesh sand barriers porosity in the joint sand barriers and investigate the sand control benefits of the joint sand barriers under each porosity. [Methods] Based on the wind tunnel simulation experimental data

we carried out the characterization of the changes in the wind velocity flow field

aerodynamic roughness

friction wind velocity

sand transport rate with height

and sand blocking rate of the joint sand barriers with different porosities (40%

45%

and 55%) at different wind speeds. [Results] (1) The area of wind shadow zone of the joint sand barrier was the largest at 40% porosity of nylon mesh sand barrier under the same wind speed. (2) As the porosity of the nylon mesh sand barrier increases

the aerodynamic roughness and friction wind speed decreased

and the values of aerodynamic roughness and friction wind speed of the joint sand barrier at 40% porosity were the largest at the same wind speed and the same location. (3) The sand transport rate on the surface increased with the increase of wind speed. Inside and on the leeward side of the joint sand barriers

the sand transport rate decreased exponentially with the increase of height

and the sand transport was mainly concentrated at the height of 0~12 cm. (4) Wind speed and sand barrier rate showed a negative correlation; sand barrier rate and porosity also showed a negative correlation

the porosity of 40% of the joint sand barriers had a better sand barrier rate; double rows of high vertical nylon mesh sand barriers and grass checkerboard sand fixation measures combined with the sand barrier rate superposition also existed. [Conclusion] Therefore

the combination of double-row vertical nylon mesh with 40% porosity and grass checkerboards can realize better configuration and sand control benefits.

关键词

Keywords

references

2021年度《中国水资源公报》发布[J].水资源开发与管理,2022,8(7):85. China water resources bulletin for 2021[J].Water Resources Development and Management,2022,8(7):85.

吴雨晴,郑春莲,李科江,等.咸水灌溉对麦-玉两熟制农田土壤水稳性团聚体的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):288-294. WU Y Q, ZHENG C L, LI K J, et al. Effects of saline water irrigation on soil water-stable aggregates in wheat-maize crop double cropping system[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,35(2):288-294.

王艺乔,郑春莲,李科江,等.施用有机肥对咸水灌溉农田耕层土壤有机质及水稳性团聚体的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):268-274. WANG Y Q, ZHENG C L, LI K J, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer application on soil organic matter and water-stable aggregates of plow layer in farmland with saline water irrigation[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(2):268-274.

张美桃,杨培岭,任树梅,等.灌溉水盐分及灌水量对土壤水盐分布与春玉米生长的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(4):290-298. ZHANG M T, YANG P L, REN S M, et al. Effects of irrigation water salinity and irrigation amount on soil water and salt distribution and spring maize growth[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(4):290-298.

高聪帅,邵立威,闫宗正,等.不同矿化度微咸水灌溉冬小麦对下季作物产量和周年土壤盐分平衡的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021,29(5):809-820. GAO C S, SHAO L W, YAN Z Z, et al. Annual soil salt balance and crop performance under brackish water irrigation during the winter wheat season[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2019,29(5):809-820.

刘宗潇,朱成立,翟亚明,等.微咸水灌溉对土壤

值及冬小麦产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(3):59-64. LIU Z X, ZHU C L, ZHAI Y M, et al. Influence of brackish water irrigation on soil

and yield of winter wheat[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2017,36(3):59-64.

苏寒,王金涛,董心亮,等.不同质量浓度咸水灌溉对冬小麦产量和生理生化特性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报, 2021,40(8): 1-9. SU H, WANG J T, DONG X L, et al. Effects of different saline water irrigation on yield, physiological and biochemical traits of winter wheat[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage,2021,40(8):1-9.

乔若楠,程煜,闫思慧,等.不同阳离子组成微咸水灌溉对生菜光合和离子吸收特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):378-384. QIAO R N, CHENG Y, YAN S H, et al. Effects of saline water irrigation with different cations compositions on lettuce photosynthesis and ions uptake characteristics[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(2):378-384.

王罕博,张栓堂,焦艳平,等.不同氮肥与矿化度水平微咸水喷灌对冬小麦光合特征及产量的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2022,39(1):99-106. WANG H B, ZHANG S T, JIAO Y P, et al. Effects of brackish water sprinkling irrigation with different nitrogen and salinity levels on photosynthesis characteristics and yield of winter wheat[J].Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment,2022,39(1):99-106.

ZHANG T B, JI X X, ZHAN X Y, et al. Maize is stressed by salt rather than water under drip irrigation with soil matric potential higher than -50 kPa in an arid saline area[J].Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science,2021,207(4):654-668.

AYERS R S, WESTCOT D W. Water quality for agriculture[M].USA:UN-FAO,1985:29.

刘小媛,高佩玲,张晴雯,等.微咸水矿化度对重度盐碱土壤入渗特征的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(1):102-107. LIU X Y, GAO P L, ZHANG Q W, et al. Effect of mineralization degree of infiltration water on infiltration characteristics of severely saline-alkali soil[J].Agricultural Research in Arid Areas,2018,36(1):102-107.

YUAN C F, FENG S Y, HUO Z L, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation with saline water on soil water-salt distribution and water use efficiency of maize for seed production in arid northwest China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2019,212:424-432.

杨培岭,王瑜,任树梅,等.咸淡水交替灌溉下土壤水盐分布与玉米吸水规律研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(6):273-281. YANG P L, WANG Y, REN S M, et al. Soil moisture and saline distribution characteristics and maize stem water uptake under alternate irrigation between saline water and groundwater[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2020,51(6):273-281.

WANG T Y, XU Z H, PANG G B. Effects of irrigating with brackish water on soil moisture, soil salinity, and the agronomic response of winter wheat in the Yellow River Delta[J].Sustainability,2019,11(20):e5801.

WANG Y Q, LI Z, XIE L M, et al. Brackish water promote the ecological restoration of estuarine wetland[J].Ecological Engineering,2023,187:e106843.

ZHU J J, MAO Y, SUN J N, et al. Response of water-salt migration to brackish water irrigation with different Irrigation intervals and sequences[J].Water,2019,11(10):e2089.

乔若楠.不同离子组成微咸水灌溉对盆栽土壤理化性质和生菜生长的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2023. QIAO R N. Effects of saline water irrigation with different ionic composition on physical and chemical properties of potting soil and growth of lettuce[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University,2023.

闫思慧,汪楠楠,孟玉婷,等.不同钠钾比微咸水对土壤入渗性能和水盐分布的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(3):150-158. YAN S H, WANG N N, MENG Y T, et al. Effects of saline water with different sodium-to-potassium ratios on water infiltration and distribution of water and salt[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2023,41(3):150-158.

贺文君.微咸水灌溉对滨海盐碱土水盐分布和金银花生长的影响[D].山东烟台:中国科学院大学(中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所),2022. HE W J. Effect of brackish water irrigation on soil water and salt distribution and honeysuckle(

Lonicera japonica

Thunb.) growth in coastal saline land[D]. Yantai, Shandong: Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022.

许大全.光合作用效率[J]. 植物生理学通讯,1988,1(5):1-7. XUN D Q. Photosynthetic efficiency[J].Plant Physiology Communication,1988,1(5):1-7.

CONG X, PANG G B, XU Z H, et al. Physiological responses of winter wheat (

Triticum Aestivum

L.) to alternate irrigation with fresh and brackish water[J].Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2021,19(4): 3137-3152.

王天宇.微咸水灌溉下土壤水盐动态与冬小麦胁迫调节机制[D].济南:济南大学,2018. WANG T Y. Soil salt dynamic and winter wheat stress regulation mechanism under brackish water irrigation[D].Jinan:University of Jinan,2018.

王海霞,徐征和,庞桂斌,等.微咸水灌溉对土壤水盐分布及冬小麦生长的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):291-297. WANG H X, XU Z H, PANG G B, et al. Effects of brackish water irrigation on water-salt distribution and winter wheat growth[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,31(3):291-297.

王佺珍,刘倩,高娅妮,等.植物对盐碱胁迫的响应机制研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(16):5565-5577. WANG Q Z, LIU Q, GAO Y N, et al. Review on the mechanisms of the response to salinity-alkalinity stress in plants[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(16):5565-5577.

SOOTHAR R K, ZHANG W Y, LIU B H, et al. Sustaining yield of winter wheat under alternate irrigation using saline water at different growth stages: A case study in the north China plain[J].Sustainability,2019,11(17):1-16.

龚雨田,孙书洪,闫宏伟.微咸水灌溉对冬小麦产量及农艺性状的影响[J].节水灌溉,2017(9):33-37. GONG Y T, SUN S H, YAN H W. Study on the impact of saline water with different materialization degree on growth characteristics and yield of winter wheat[J].Water Saving Irrigation,2017(9):33-37.

马玉诏,党红凯,李科江,等.咸水灌溉对冬小麦籽粒品质特性和产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(4):1063-1068. MA Y Z, DANG H K, LI K J, et al. Effects of brackish water irrigation on grain quality characteristics and yield of winter wheat[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(4):1063-1068.

ORS S, SUAREZ D L. Spinach biomass yield and physiological response to interactive salinity and water stress[J].Agricultural Water Management,2017,190:31-41.

浏览量

739

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

南方典型第四纪红黏土物理结皮发育过程和结构特征

黑龙江省水源地优先流区与基质流区土壤特性分析