黄河流域两大区域的土地生态安全动态评价及比较

韩琭; 陶德鑫; 史鲁彦

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄河流域两大区域的土地生态安全动态评价及比较

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黄河流域两大区域的土地生态安全动态评价及比较
- Dynamic Evaluation and Comparison of Land Ecological Security in the Two Regions of the Yellow River Basin
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第1期页码：255-266
- 作者机构：
  
  山东财经大学公共管理学院,济南,250014
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "韩琭(1982—),女,博士,副教授,主要从事城市可持续发展与土地政策研究。E-mail:hanlu0816@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家社会科学基金项目(18BJY087);国家自然科学基金项目(71704094)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.013
  中图分类号： F301.24
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
韩琭, 陶德鑫, 史鲁彦. 黄河流域两大区域的土地生态安全动态评价及比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):255-266.

HAN Lu, TAO Dexin, SHI Luyan. Dynamic Evaluation and Comparison of Land Ecological Security in the Two Regions of the Yellow River Basin[J]. 2024, 38(1): 255-266.
韩琭, 陶德鑫, 史鲁彦. 黄河流域两大区域的土地生态安全动态评价及比较[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):255-266. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.013.

HAN Lu, TAO Dexin, SHI Luyan. Dynamic Evaluation and Comparison of Land Ecological Security in the Two Regions of the Yellow River Basin[J]. 2024, 38(1): 255-266. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.013.

摘要

[目的] 探究山东半岛与黄河几字弯两大区域的土地生态安全水平差异

为实现黄河流域生态保护与高质量发展

推动"共同抓好大保护

协同推进大治理"战略提供现实依据。[方法] 运用熵值法、核密度估计、马尔科夫链与障碍因子模型等方法

对黄河流域两大区域的土地生态安全进行动态评价。[结果] (1)在水平变化上

两大区域的土地生态安全增速均呈"倒U"形态势

山东半岛的土地生态安全水平明显高于黄河几字弯

但黄河几字弯的增长速度更快。(2)在时间上

两大区域土地生态安全均呈现"单核"演变特征

山东半岛区域差异有扩大态势

几字弯区域差异则有缩小态势。在空间上

两大区域均呈现出"东中部高—西部低"的空间分布态势。(3)动态演化特征上

两大区域土地生态安全等级演变具有"路径依赖"与"自身锁定"效应。(4)山东半岛土地生态安全受人均耕地面积、地均化肥农药施用量等影响;黄河几字弯土地生态安全受景观破碎度、森林覆盖率等影响。[结论] 未来山东半岛与黄河几字弯既要根据区域优势分类施策

也要从流域全局出发

协同提升黄河流域土地生态安全水平。

Abstract

[Objective] This study intends to comprehensively explore the land ecological security situation of the Shandong Peninsula and Jiziwan of the Yellow River

provide a realistic basis for realizing the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin and promoting the strategy of "jointly grasping the great protection and jointly promoting the great governance". [Methods] The entropy method

kernel density estimation

Markov chain and obstacle factor model

and other methods were applied. [Results] (1) In terms of level change

the growth rate of land ecological security in the two regions was "inverted U" type. The level of land ecological security in Shandong Peninsula was obviously higher than that Jiziwan of the Yellow River

but the growth rate of Jiziwan of the Yellow River was faster. (2) In terms of time

the land ecological security of the two regions had the characteristics of "single core" evolution. The regional differences in Shandong Peninsula were expanding

while the regional differences in Jiziwan were narrowing. In space

the two regions showed a spatial distribution trend of "high in the middle east and low in the west". (3) On the evolution characteristics

the evolution of land ecological security level in the two regions had the effects of "path dependence" and "self-locking". (4) The ecological security of land in Shandong Peninsula was affected by the per capita cultivated land area and the average application amount of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The ecological security of land in Jiziwan of the Yellow River was affected by landscape fragmentation and forest coverage. [Conclusion] In the future

Shandong Peninsula and Jiziwan of the Yellow River should not only classify and implement policies according to regional advantages

but also proceed from the overall situation of the basin to jointly improve the land ecological security level of the Yellow River Basin.

关键词

Keywords

references

袁俊芳,卞正富,闫庆武,等.西部典型矿业城市土地利用效益耦合协调度研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(8):709-716. YUAN J F, BIAN Z F, YAN Q W, et al. Coupling coordination degree of urban land use efficiency in typical mining cities in western China[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2018,34(8):709-716.

徐维祥,徐志雄,刘程军.黄河流域地级城市土地集约利用效率与生态福利绩效的耦合性分析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(1): 114-130. XU W X, XU Z X, LIU C J. Coupling analysis of land intensive use efficiency and ecological well-being performance of cities in the Yellow River Basin[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2021,36(1):114-130.

朱文娟,孙华.江苏省城市土地利用效益时空演变及驱动力研究[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(4):103-112. ZHU W J, SUN H. study on spatio-temporal evolution and driving forces of urban land use benefits in Jiangsu Province[J].China Land Science,2019,33(4):103-112.

江汶静,刘明,何汇域.成渝地区双城经济圈土地利用效益综合评估[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(18):222-227. JIANG W J, LIU M, HE H Y. Comprehensive evaluation of land use efficiency in the Chengdu Chongqing Shuangcheng Economic Circle[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Science,2021,49(18):222-227.

赵浩楠,赵映慧,宁静,等.基于TOPSIS法的长三角城市群土地利用效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(5):355-361. ZHAO H N, ZHAO Y H, NING J, et al. Evaluation of land use efficiency in Yangtze River Delta based on TOPSIS method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(5):355-361.

刘云青.京津冀城市群产业结构、土地利用效益与碳排放的耦合协同发展研究[J].江西农业科学,2023,35(1):145-151. LIU Y Q. Research on the coupling and collaborative development of industrial structure, land use efficiency, and carbon emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration[J].Jiangxi Agricultural Science,2023,35(1):145-151.

王筱明.基于熵权法的济南市土地利用效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):96-98. WANG X M. Research on the evaluation of land use efficiency in Jinan City based on entropy weight method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(2):96-98.

闫岩,雷国平,谢英楠.基于AHP和熵权法的土地利用生态效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):134-139. YAN Y, LEI G P, XIE Y N. Research on ecological benefits of land use based on AHP and entropy weight method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(6):134-139.

段佩利,刘曙光,尹鹏,等.中国沿海城市开发强度与资源环境承载力时空耦合协调关系[J].经济地理, 2018,38(5):60-67. DUAN P L,LIU S G,YIN P, et al. Spatial-temporal coupling coordination relationship between development strength and resource environmental bearing capacity of coastal cities in China[J].Economic Geography,2018,38(5):60-67.

张韦萍,石培基,尹君锋.兰西城市群土地利用效益时空演变及耦合协调关系[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(11):2226-2235. ZHANG W P, SHI P J, YIN J F. Spatio-temporal evolution and coupling coordination of land use benefits in Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2022,41(11):2226-2235.

吴熙铭.基于DEA方法的土地利用经济效益评价研究[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2012. WU X M. Research on land use economic benefit evaluation based on DEA method[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University of Technology,2012.

宫继萍,石培基,潘竟虎.基于DEA方法的兰州市城市土地利用经济效益分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(5):163-166. GONG J P, SHI P J, PAN J H. Economic benefit analysis of urban land use in Lanzhou city based on DEA method[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,31(5):163-166.

HOSSEIN K, HALIL A. A land use suitability model for rainfed farming by multi-criteria decision-making analysis (MCDA) and geographic information system (GIS)[J].Ecological Engineering,2018,116:1-6.

SELSSHI G Y, ANN G, MAELOUS L M, et al. Landsuitability analysis for agriculture in the Abbay basin using remote sensing, GIS and AHP techniques[J].Modeling Earth Systems and Environment,2016(2):e101.

四川省统计局.四川省统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2011,2021. Sichuan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Sichuan statistical yearbook[M].Beijing:China Statistical Publishing House,2011,2021.

阿坝州地方志编委会.阿坝州统计年鉴[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2011,2021. Aba Prefecture Local Chronicle Editorial Committee. Aba Prefecture statistical yearbook[M]. Chengdu: Bashu Bookstore,2011,2021.

甘孜州年鉴编委会.甘孜州统计年鉴[M].北京:方志出版社,2011,2021. Ganzi Prefecture Yearbook Editorial Committee. Ganzi prefecture statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: Fangzhi Publishing House,2011,2021.

凉山治州人民政府.凉山州统计年鉴[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2011,2021. Liangshan Zhizhou People's government. Liangshan Prefecture statistical yearbook[M].Chengdu:Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 2011,2021.

杨志,李才文,任正龑,等.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的宁夏土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].地球科学与环境学报,2023,45(4):1-10. YANG Z, LI C W, REN Z Y, et al. Evaluation of land use performance and diagnosis of obstacle factors in Ningxia based on entropy weighted TOPSIS model[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2023,45(4):1-10.

金丽娟,许泉立.基于SRP模型的四川省生态脆弱性评价[J].生态科学, 2022, 41(2): 156-165. JIN L J, XU Q L. Ecological vulnerability assessment of Sichuan Province based on SRP model[J].Ecological Science,2022,41(2):156-165.

游翔,陈锐银,廖睿智.2018年度四川省级监测区水土流失动态监测研究[J].中国水土保持,2019(12):23-25. YOU X, CHEN R Y, LIAO R Z. Research on dynamic monitoring of soil and water loss in Sichuan Provincial monitoring areas in 2018[J].China Soil and Water Conservation,2019(12):23-25.

周磊,黄秋昊.基于灰色关联TOPSIS的城市土地效益评价及障碍因子诊断[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):39-44. ZHOU L, HUANG Q H. Urban land efficiency evaluation and obstacle factor diagnosis based on grey correlation TOPSIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(4):39-44.

浏览量

691

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

高质量发展导向下安徽省土地利用效益时空格局演变与耦合协调关系

基于降水距平百分率的陕西省干旱时空分布特征