1982—2020年黄河流域多时间尺度气象干旱对植被影响

李阳阳; 董国涛; 薛华柱; 郑岩超; 廉耀康

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

1982—2020年黄河流域多时间尺度气象干旱对植被影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 1982—2020年黄河流域多时间尺度气象干旱对植被影响
- Effects of Multi-time Scale Meteorological Drought on Vegetation in the Yellow River Basin from 1982 to 2020
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第1期页码：187-196
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院,河南,焦作,454000
  2. 黄河水利委员会黄河水利科学研究院,郑州,450003
  3. 黑河水资源与生态保护研究中心,兰州,730030
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李阳阳(1998—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水文水资源遥感研究。E-mail:lyyjy0627@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(51779099);河南省科技攻关项目(232102320247);甘肃省陇原青年英才专项
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.007
  中图分类号： Q948.1
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李阳阳, 董国涛, 薛华柱, 等. 1982—2020年黄河流域多时间尺度气象干旱对植被影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):187-196.

LI Yangyang, DONG Guotao, XUE Huazhu, et al. Effects of Multi-time Scale Meteorological Drought on Vegetation in the Yellow River Basin from 1982 to 2020[J]. 2024, 38(1): 187-196.
李阳阳, 董国涛, 薛华柱, 等. 1982—2020年黄河流域多时间尺度气象干旱对植被影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):187-196. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.007.

LI Yangyang, DONG Guotao, XUE Huazhu, et al. Effects of Multi-time Scale Meteorological Drought on Vegetation in the Yellow River Basin from 1982 to 2020[J]. 2024, 38(1): 187-196. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.007.

摘要

[目的] 深入研究黄河流域不同时间尺度的气象干旱对植被的时空响应特征

为生态保护、水资源管理和气候变化适应性提供宝贵信息

能够减轻干旱引发的环境和经济问题。[方法] 基于黄河流域1982—2020年的标准化降水蒸散指数SPEI和归一化植被指数NDVI

采用逐像元线性回归模型、Sen’s趋势分析和Mann-Kendall检验等方法研究黄河流域不同时间尺度气象干旱的时空分布特征及其对植被影响。[结果] (1)1982—2020年黄河流域呈不显著的变干趋势

不同时间尺度SPEI变化趋势为负值的区域主要集中在黄河流域的西部龙羊峡至兰州区域、黄河流域的南部及河套平原周围区域。(2)黄河流域多年平均植被覆盖度的空间分布特征呈南高北低、由东南向西北递减的趋势

研究区内植被覆盖度呈显著增加的区域(61.94%)大于植被覆盖度呈显著减少的区域(5.43%)。(3)黄河流域大部分地区干旱状况与植被状态呈正相关

流域内呈显著正相关区域主要集中在黄河流域西北部和最北端区域

说明这些区域的植被受干旱的影响最为严重。(4)草地和耕地对6个月时间尺度的干旱响应最强

林地和未利用地较其他土地类型更易受长期干旱影响。4种地貌类型都容易受到中长期缺水的影响

其中丘陵地区的植被最易受干旱影响。[结论] 研究结果为黄河流域防灾减灾及生态环境建设提供有效的科学依据

为黄河流域的生态保护、水资源管理和气候变化适应性提供重要的信息

有助于制定更加精准的政策和措施

以减轻干旱对环境和经济带来的潜在影响

促进可持续发展。

Abstract

[Objective] Intensive research on the spatial and temporal response characteristics of meteorological drought to vegetation at different time scales in the Yellow River Basin provides valuable information for ecological conservation

water resource management

and climate change adaptation

and can mitigate the environmental and economic problems caused by drought. [Methods] Based on the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and normalized vegetation index (NDVI) for the Yellow River Basin during the period of 1982—2020

image-by-image metric linear regression models

Sen’s trend analysis and Mann-Kendall test were used to study the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of meteorological droughts at different time scales in the Yellow River Basin

as well as their impacts on vegetation. [Results] (1) From 1982 to 2020

the Yellow River Basin showed an insignificant increasing trend in aridity

with regions exhibiting negative trends in SPEI mainly concentrated in the western region from Longyangxia to Lanzhou

the southern part of the Yellow River Basin

and the surrounding areas of the Hetao Plain. (2) The spatial distribution pattern of average vegetation coverage in the Yellow River Basin demonstrated a decreasing trend from south to north and from southeast to northwest. The proportion of regions with a significant increase in vegetation coverage (61.94%) was greater than that of those with a significant decrease (5.43%). (3) In most areas of the Yellow River Basin

drought conditions were positively correlated with vegetation status. Regions exhibiting significant positive correlations were mainly concentrated in the northwest and northernmost areas of the Yellow River Basin

indicating that vegetation in these areas was severely affected by drought. (4) Grassland and cultivated land showed the strongest response to drought at a six-month time scale

while forests and unused land were more vulnerable to long-term drought compared to other land types. All four landform types were susceptible to medium- to long-term water shortages

with vegetation in hilly areas being the most affected by drought. [Conclusion] The results of the study provide an effective scientific basis for disaster prevention and mitigation as well as ecological environment construction in the Yellow River Basin

and provide important information for ecological protection

water resource management and climate change adaptation in the Yellow River Basin

which will help to formulate more precise policies and measures to mitigate the potential impacts of drought on the environment and the economy

and to promote sustainable development.

关键词

Keywords

references

禹久泓,武传浩.环境规制、碳减排如何助推经济高质量发展:基于中国省域面板的空间计量分析[J].生态经济, 2022,38(7):48-55. YU J H, WU C H. How can environmental regulation and carbon emission reduction promote high-quality economic development:Based on the spatial measurement analysis of China's provincial panel[J].Ecological Economy,2022,38(7):48-55.

魏媛,简小玉.基于碳达峰碳中和的贵州省土地利用碳排放演变及预测研究[J].生态经济,2022,38(4):108-114. WEI Y, JIAN X Y. Research evolution of carbon emissions from land use in Guizhou Province based on carbon peak and carbon neutrality and the according predictions[J].Ecological Economy,2022,38(4):108-114.

李璐,董捷,徐磊,等.功能区土地利用碳收支空间分异及碳补偿分区:以武汉城市圈为例[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(5):1003-1015. LI L, DONG J, XU L, et al. Spatial variation of land use carbon budget and carbon compensation zoning in functional areas: A case study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2019,34(5):1003-1015.

ZHAO Y B, WANG S J. The relationship between urbanization, economic growth and energy consumption in China: An econometric perspective analysis[J].Sustainability,2015,7(5):5609-5627.

王政强,覃盟琳,唐世斌,等.北部湾城市群土地利用碳收支时空分异及碳补偿分区[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(5):348-359. WANG Z Q, QIN M L, TANG S B, et al. Spatio-temporal variation of landuse carbon budget and carbon compensation zoning in beibu gulf urban agglomeration area[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,42(5):348-359.

夏四友,杨宇.基于主体功能区的京津冀城市群碳收支时空分异与碳补偿分区[J].地理学报,2022,77(3):679-696. XIA S Y, YANG Y.Spatio-temporal differentiation of carbon budget and carbon compensation zoning in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration based on the Plan for Major Function-oriented Zones[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2022,77(3):679-696.

WANG W X, WANG W J, XIE P C, et al. Spatial and temporal disparities of carbon emissions and interregional carbon compensation in major function-oriented zones: A case study of Guangdong Province[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,245:e118873.

WHITE E D, RIGBY M, LUNT M F, et al. Quantifying the UK's carbon dioxide flux: An atmospheric inverse modelling approach using a regional measurement network[J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2019,19(7):4345-4365.

PIAO S L, HE Y, WANG X H, et al. Estimation of China's terrestrial ecosystem carbon sink: Methods, progress and prospects[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2022,65(4):641-651.

孙赫,梁红梅,常学礼,等.中国土地利用碳排放及其空间关联[J].经济地理,2015,35(3):154-162. SUN H, LIANG H M, CHANG X L, et al. Land use patterns on carbon emission and spatial association in China[J]. Economic Geography,2015,35(3):154-162.

武娜,沈镭,钟帅,等.晋陕蒙地区经济增长与碳排放时空耦合关系[J].经济地理,2019,39(9):17-23. WU N, SHEN L, ZHONG S, et al.Spatio-temporal coupling relationship between economic growth and carbon emission in Shanxi-Shaanxi-Inner Mongolia[J].Economic Geography,2019,39(9):17-23.

赵荣钦,刘英,马林,等.基于碳收支核算的河南省县域空间横向碳补偿研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(10):1675-1687. ZHAO R Q, LIU Y, MA L, et al. County-level carbon compensation of Henan Province based on carbon budget estimation[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2016,31(10):1675-1687.

HUANG H Q, ZHOU J. Study on the spatial and temporal differentiation pattern of carbon emission and carbon compensation in China's provincial areas[J].Sustainability,2022,14(13):e7627.

张苗,吴萌.土地利用对碳排放影响的作用机制和传导路径分析:基于结构方程模型的实证检验[J].中国土地科学,2022,36(3):96-103. ZHANG M, WU M. Analysis on the mechanism and transmission path of the impact of land use on carbon emissions: Empirical test based on structural equation model[J].China Land Science,2022,36(3):96-103.

HUTYRA L R, YOON B, HEPINSTALL-CYMERMAN J, et al. Carbon consequences of land cover change and expansion of urban lands: A case study in the Seattle metropolitan region[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2011,103(1):83-93.

张玥,代亚强,陈媛媛,等.土地利用隐性转型与土地利用碳排放空间关联研究[J].中国土地科学,2022,36(6):100-112. ZHANG Y, DAI Y Q, CHEN Y Y, et al. The study on spatial correlation of recessive land use transformation and land use carbon emission[J]. China Land Science,2022,36(6):100-112.

中国环境文化促进会.首部《中国碳平衡交易框架研究》报告在京发..http://www.zhb.gov.cn/zhxx/hjyw/200811/t20081106_130915.htm. China Environmental Culture Promotion Association.The first report of "Research on China carbon balance trading framework" issued in Beijing.. http://www.zhb.gov.cn/zhxx/hjyw/200811/t20081106_130915.htm.

伍国勇,刘金丹,杨丽莎.中国农业碳排放强度动态演进及碳补偿潜力[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(10):69-78. WU G Y, LIU J D, YANG L S. Dynamic evolution of China's agricultural carbon emission intensity and carbon offset potential[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2021,31(10):69-78.

南锡康,靳利飞.市域工业企业碳补偿额度核算:以武汉市为例[J].生态经济,2022,38(8):20-23. NAN X K, JIN L F. Calculation of carbon compensation amount of municipal industrial enterprises: Taking Wuhan as an example[J].Ecological Economy, 2022,38(8):20-23.

周嘉,王钰萱,刘学荣,等.基于土地利用变化的中国省域碳排放时空差异及碳补偿研究[J].地理科学,2019,39(12):1955-1961. ZHOU J, WANG Y X, LIU X R, et al. Spatial temporal differences of carbon emissions and carbon compensation in China based on land use change[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2019,39(12):1955-1961.

孔凡斌,曹露丹,徐彩瑶.县域碳收支核算与碳综合补偿类型分区:以钱塘江流域为例[J].经济地理,2023,43(3):150-161. KONG F B, CAO L D, XU C Y. Measurement of carbon budget and type partition of carbon comprehensive compensation in the Qiantang River Basin[J].Economic Geography,2023,43(3):150-161.

BARUA S K, LINTUNEN J, UUSIVUORI J, et al. On the economics of tropical deforestation: Carbon credit markets and national policies[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2014,47:36-45.

王立国,丁晨希,彭剑峰,等.森林公园旅游经营者碳补偿意愿的影响因素比较[J].经济地理,2020,40(5):230-238. WANG L G, DING C X, PENG J F, et al. Comparison of factors affecting tourism operators' carbon offset willingness of forest parks[J].Economic Geography,2020,40(5):230-238.

康宝怡,朱明芳.生态旅游视域下旅游者碳补偿支付意愿影响因素研究:以中国大熊猫国家公园为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(7):16-22. KANG B Y, ZHU M F. Tourists' willingness to pay for carbon offsets in view of ecotourism: Case study of China Giant Panda National Park[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2022,36(7):16-22.

王正淑,王继军,刘佳.基于碳汇的县南沟流域退耕林地补偿标准研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(5):779-788. WANG Z S, WANG J J, LIU J. Study on the compensation standard of returning farmland to forest in Xiannangou watershed from the perspective of carbon sink[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2016,31(5):779-788.

李璐,夏秋月,董捷,等.武汉城市圈县域空间横向碳生态补偿研究:基于土地利用碳收支差异[J].生态学报,2023,43(7):2627-2639. LI L, XIA Q Y, DONG J, et al. County-level carbon ecological compensation of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration under carbon neutrality target:Based on the difference in land use carbon budget[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2023,43(7):2627-2639.

张梅,赖力,黄贤金,等.中国区域土地利用类型转变的碳排放强度研究[J].资源科学,2013,35(4):792-799. ZHANG M, LAI L, HUANG X J, et al. The carbon emission intensity of land use conversion in different regions of China[J].Resources Science, 2013,35(4):792-799.

周萍,陈松林,李晶,等.福建省土地利用变化碳排放时空差异与碳补偿[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):356-365,372. ZHOU P, CHEN S L, LI J, et al. Temporal and spatial differences in carbon emissions and carbon neutrality caused by land use changes in Fujian Province[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,42(3):356-365,372.

李金昌.生态价值论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1999. LI J C. Discussion on ecological value[M].Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 1999.

广东省统计局.广东统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2011—2021. Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Statistics.Guangdong statistical yearbook[M].Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House,2011—2021.

杨国清,朱文锐,文雅,等.20年来广东省土地利用碳排放强度与效率空间分异研究[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(2):332-340. YANG G Q, ZHU W R, WEN Y, et al. Spatial differentiation in the intensity and efficiency of carbon emission from land use in Guangdong Province in past two decades[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2019,28(2):332-340.

任峰,龙定洪.广东省碳排放量测算、影响因素分析及预测模型选择[J].生态经济,2022,38(5):21-27,32. REN F, LONG D H. Measurement of carbon emissions, analysis of influencing factors and selection of forecasting models in Guangdong Province[J].Ecological Economy,2022,38(5):21-27,32.

浏览量

790

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄河流域植被变化和产水服务的时空特征分析

西南地区植被NPP对多尺度气象干旱的响应

2001-2020年贵州省气候变化及人类活动对植被变化的影响

气候变化及人类活动对黄河流域植被覆盖变化的影响