拉萨河下游湿地土壤养分特征与肥力评价

熊健; 赵茜芮; 李伟; 杨博; 孙晶; 杨崛园; 张强英; 吕学斌

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

拉萨河下游湿地土壤养分特征与肥力评价

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 拉萨河下游湿地土壤养分特征与肥力评价
- Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Fertility Evaluation of Wetland in the Lower Reaches of the Lhasa River
- 水土保持学报 2024年38卷第1期页码：328-336
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 青藏高原生物多样性与生态环境保护教育部重点实验室, 西藏大学生态环境学院,拉萨,850000
  2. 天津大学环境科学与工程学院,天津,300350
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "熊健(1987—),女,博士,副教授,主要从事森林生态研究。E-mail:568284825@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  西藏自治区科技计划项目(XZ202101ZD14G,XZ202202YD0027C,XZ202101ZY0012G);第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0603);国家重点研发计划"固废资源化"重点专项(2019YFC1904100);中央支持地方高校专项(藏财预指〔2021〕01,〔2022〕01,〔2023〕01);西藏大学人才发展激励计划—青年学者项目。
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.001
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
熊健, 赵茜芮, 李伟, 等. 拉萨河下游湿地土壤养分特征与肥力评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):328-336.

XIONG Jian, ZHAO Xirui, LI Wei, et al. Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Fertility Evaluation of Wetland in the Lower Reaches of the Lhasa River[J]. 2024, 38(1): 328-336.
熊健, 赵茜芮, 李伟, 等. 拉萨河下游湿地土壤养分特征与肥力评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024,38(1):328-336. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.001.

XIONG Jian, ZHAO Xirui, LI Wei, et al. Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Fertility Evaluation of Wetland in the Lower Reaches of the Lhasa River[J]. 2024, 38(1): 328-336. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.001.

摘要

[目的] 为探索拉萨河下游湿地土壤的养分特征和肥力状况。[方法] 选取甘曲湿地、巴嘎雪湿地、拉鲁湿地和茶巴朗湿地4个代表性区域的土壤为研究对象

共采集69份土壤样本

测定样品的pH、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、总钾(TK)、全盐、电导率、氧化还原电位(redox potential)、阳离子交换量(CEC)和有机质(OM)值

并利用改进内梅罗综合指数法对湿地土壤肥力进行全面的评价。[结果] (1)研究区土壤的pH范围为5.77~7.78

均值为6.62

呈中性;有机质和总氮的相关性强

分布特征相似

含量分别为61.82

3.13 g/kg

均为很丰富的状态

属于一级水平;总磷和总钾含量分别为0.75

18.05 g/kg

为适中的状态

属于三级水平;全盐含量为0.92 g/kg

电导率为2.97 mS/m

整体来看

研究区土壤具有较强的保肥能力。(2)湿地土壤综合肥力系数(P)顺序为茶巴朗湿地(2.01)>巴嘎雪湿地(1.95)>拉鲁湿地(1.93) > 甘曲湿地(1.86)

均属于肥沃等级

影响湿地土壤综合肥力的指标是总钾

因各自然湿地形成条件相似

土壤综合肥力系数无显著差异。[结论] 研究结果明晰了拉萨河下游湿地土壤养分现状

为实现研究区湿地资源的可持续利用提供科学依据。

Abstract

[Objective] To explore the nutrient characteristics and fertility status of wetland soil in the lower reaches of Lhasa River. [Methods] A total of 69 soil samples were collected from the four representative regions of Ganqu Wetland

Baga Snow Wetland

Lalu Wetland and Chabalang wetland. The values of pH

total nitrogen

total phosphorus

total potassium

total salt

electrical conductivity

redox potential

cation exchange capacity and organic matter of the samples were determined. The improved Nemerow composite index method was used to evaluate the wetland soil fertility comprehensively. [Results] (1) The pH range of the soil in the study area was 5.77~7.78

with an average value of 6.62

which was neutral. The correlation between organic matter and total nitrogen was strong

and the distribution characteristics were similar. The contents of organic matter and total nitrogen were 61.82 and 3.13 g/kg

respectively

and both were very abundant

belonging to the first level. The contents of total phosphorus and total potassium were 0.75 g/kg and 18.05 g/kg

respectively

which were moderate and belonged to the tertiary level. The total salt content is 0.92 g/kg

and the electrical conductivity is 2.97 mS/m. On the whole

the soil in the study area had strong fertilizer retention ability. (2) The soil comprehensive fertility coefficient (P) of wetland was in the order of Chabalang Wetland (2.01) > Bagaoxue Wetland (1.95) > Lalu Wetland (1.93) > Ganqu Wetland (1.86)

all belonging to the fertility level. The index affecting the soil comprehensive fertility of wetland was TP

because the formation conditions of natural wetlands were similar. There was no significant difference in soil comprehensive fertility coefficient. [Conclusion] The present situation of wetland soil nutrients in the lower Lhasa River was clarified

which provides scientific basis for realizing the sustainable utilization of wetland resources in the the study area.

关键词

Keywords

references

冯广,艾训儒,臧润国,等.鄂西南亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林不同群落类型土壤特征分析[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(7):1173-1184. FENG G, AI X R, ZANG R G, et al. Soil characteristics under different community types in the subtropical evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest in southwest Hubei[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2016,31(7):1173-1184.

MARTINA M, LUCIANO C, CLAUDIO C, et al. Conventional versus organic management: Application of simple and complex indexes to assess soil quality[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2021,322:e107673.

RAIESI F, BEHESHTI A. Evaluating forest soil quality after deforestation and loss of ecosystem services using network analysis and factor analysis techniques[J].Catena,2022,208:e105778.

GUO L L, SUN Z G, OUYANG Z, et al. A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River[J].Catena,2017,152:135-143.

DE PAUL OBADE V, LAL R. A standardized soil quality index for diverse field conditions[J].The Science of the Total Environment, 2016,541:424-434.

YUAN P L, WANG J P, LI C F, et al. Soil quality indicators of integrated rice-crayfish farming in the Jianghan Plain, China using a minimum data set[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2020,204:e104732.

WANG D W, BAI J H, WANG W, et al. Comprehensive assessment of soil quality for different wetlands in a Chinese delta[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29(10):3783-3794.

YU P J, HAN D L, LIU S W, et al. Soil quality assessment under different land uses in an alpine grassland[J].Catena,2018,171:280-287.

WU C S, LIU G H, HUANG C, et al. Soil quality assessment in Yellow River Delta: Establishing a minimum data set and fuzzy logic model[J].Geoderma,2019,334:82-89.

SHEN Y F, LI J, CHEN F F, et al. Correlations between forest soil quality and aboveground vegetation characteristics in Hunan Province, China[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2022,13:e1009109.

RAHMANIPOUR F, MARZAIOLI R, ALI BAHRAMI H, et al. Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran[J].Ecological Indicators,2014,40:19-26.

ZHANG H S, YU Y, ZHA T G, et al. Assessing previous land-vegetation productivity relationships on mountainous areas hosting coming Winter Olympics Games in 2022[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2021,788:e147870.

ANDREWS S S, KARLEN D L, MITCHELL J P. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2002,90(1):25-45.

RAIESI F. A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions[J].Ecological Indicators,2017,75:307-320.

SWANEPOEL P A, DU PREEZ C C, BOTHA P R, et al. Soil quality characteristics of kikuyu-ryegrass pastures in South Africa[J].Geoderma,2014,232/234:589-599.

BI C J, CHEN Z L, WANG J, et al. Quantitative assessment of soil health under different planting patterns and soil types[J].Pedosphere,2013,23(2):194-204.

LI Q X, JIA Z Q, LIU T, et al. Effects of different plantation types on soil properties after vegetation restoration in an alpine sandy land on the Tibetan Plateau, China[J].Journal of Arid Land,2017,9(2):200-209.

刘畅, 张建军, 张海博, 等. 晋西黄土区退耕还林后土壤入渗特征及土壤质量评价[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):101-107. LIU C, ZHANG J J, ZHANG H B, et al. Characteristics of soil infiltration and soil quality evaluation after conversion of farmland to forest in loess region of western Shanxi Province[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,35(5):101-107.

LI C Z, ZHAO L H, SUN P S, et al. Deep soil C, N, and P stocks and stoichiometry in response to land use patterns in the loess hilly region of China[J].PLoS One,2016,11(7):e0159075.

VAN HALL R, CAMMERAAT L, KEESSTRA S, et al. Impact of secondary vegetation succession on soil quality in a humid Mediterranean landscape[J].Catena, 2017,149:836-843.

国家林业局.森林土壤调查技术规程:LY/T 2250—2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014. National Forestry and Grassland Administration. Technical regulations for forest soil survey: LY/T 2250—2014[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2014.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000. BAO S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.

邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006. SHAO M A, WANG Q J, HUANG M B. Soil physics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.

李鑫,张文菊,邬磊,等.土壤质量评价指标体系的构建及评价方法[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(14):3043-3056. LI X, ZHANG W J, WU L, et al.Advance in indicator screening and methodologies of soil quality evaluation[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2021,54(14):3043-3056.

ANDREWS S S, CARROLL C R. Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management[J].Ecological Applications,2001,11(6):1573-1585.

MA T S, DENG X W, CHEN L, et al. The soil properties and their effects on plant diversity in different degrees of rocky desertification[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2020,736:e139667.

NADAL-ROMERO E, CAMMERAAT E, PÉREZ-CARDIEL E, et al. Effects of secondary succession and afforestation practices on soil properties after cropland abandonment in humid Mediterranean Mountain areas[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2016,228:91-100.

DENG L, KIM D G, PENG C H, et al. Controls of soil and aggregate-associated organic carbon variations following natural vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau in China[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29(11):3974-3984.

MORRISON I K, FOSTER N W. Fifteen-year change in forest floor organic and element content and cycling at the Turkey Lakes watershed[J].Ecosystems,2001,4(6):545-554.

CHEN C F, LIU W J, JIANG X J, et al. Effects of rubber-based agroforestry systems on soil aggregation and associated soil organic carbon: Implications for land use[J].Geoderma,2017,299:13-24.

张晓曦,周雯星,李佳佳,等.早期分解中油松与阔叶树种凋落叶混合分解效应及其相互影响[J].植物科学学报,2019,37(3):303-311. ZHANG X X, ZHOU W X, LI J J, et al.Mixed decomposition and interspecific effects during early decomposition of litter mixtures of

Pinus tabuliformis Carrière

and broadleaved species[J].Plant Science Journal,2019,37(3):303-311.

ABANDA P A, COMPTON J S, HANNIGAN R E. Soil nutrient content, above-ground biomass and litter in a semi-arid shrubland, South Africa[J].Geoderma, 2011,164(3/4):128-137.

WANG S L, ZHANG W D, SANCHEZ F. Relating net primary productivity to soil organic matter decomposition rates in pure and mixed Chinese fir plantations[J].Plant and Soil,2010,334(1):501-510.

ZHOU L, SUN Y J, SAEED S, et al. The difference of soil properties between pure and mixed Chinese fir (

Cunninghamia lanceolata

) plantations depends on tree species[J].Global Ecology and Conservation,2020,22:e01009.

耿玉清,余新晓,岳永杰,等.北京山地森林的土壤养分状况[J].林业科学,2010,46(5):169-175. GENG Y Q, YU X X, YUE Y J, et al.Variation of forest soil nutrient content in mountainous areas, Beijing[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010,46(5):169-175.

王利彦,周国娜,朱新玉,等.凋落物对土壤有机碳与微生物功能多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2709-2718. WANG L Y, ZHOU G N, ZHU X Y, et al. Effects of litter on soil organic carbon and microbial functional diversity[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(7):2709-2718.

白占国,万国江.贵州碳酸盐岩区域的侵蚀速率及环境效应研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,12(1):1-7,46. BAI Z G, WAN G J. Study on watershed erosion rate and its environmental effects in Guizhou Karst region[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,12(1):1-7,46.

李世华,牛铮,路鹏,等.基于主成分分析红壤有效含水量估算模型[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(5):92-94. LI S H, NIU Z, LU P, et al.Red soil available water capacity statistical model based on principal component analysis[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2007,23(5):92-94.

欧阳帅,项文化,陈亮,等.南方山地丘陵区森林植被恢复对水土流失调控机制[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):1-9. OUYANG S, XIANG W H, CHEN L, et al. Regulation mechanisms of forest vegetation restoration on water and soil erosion in mountainous and hilly area of southern China[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,35(5):1-9.

浏览量

954

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

三峡水库消落带沉积泥沙与土壤的养分特征差异

鄱阳湖湿地不同环境条件土壤AM真菌群落特征及其影响因素

辽河三角洲湿地生态环境需水量变化研究

黄河口湿地土壤磷素动态分布特征及影响因素