不同生物炭对南疆盐渍土盐分离子淋洗效果的影响

孔芊芊; 朱连勇; 朱珠; 罗奇; 张磊; 姚宝林

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.041

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同生物炭对南疆盐渍土盐分离子淋洗效果的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同生物炭对南疆盐渍土盐分离子淋洗效果的影响
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Biochar in Leaching Salt Ions from Saline Soil in Southern Xinjiang
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第6期页码：325-332
- 作者机构：
  
  塔里木大学水利与建筑工程学院,新疆,阿拉尔,843300
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "孔芊芊(1998-),女,河南洛阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事高效节水灌溉研究。E-mail:kqq972547154@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(51969028);兵团重大科技项目(2018AA003)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.041
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
孔芊芊, 朱连勇, 朱珠, 等. 不同生物炭对南疆盐渍土盐分离子淋洗效果的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):325-332.

KONG Qianqian, ZHU Lianyong, ZHU Zhu, et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Biochar in Leaching Salt Ions from Saline Soil in Southern Xinjiang[J]. 2023, 37(6): 325-332.
孔芊芊, 朱连勇, 朱珠, 等. 不同生物炭对南疆盐渍土盐分离子淋洗效果的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):325-332. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.041.

KONG Qianqian, ZHU Lianyong, ZHU Zhu, et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Biochar in Leaching Salt Ions from Saline Soil in Southern Xinjiang[J]. 2023, 37(6): 325-332. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.041.

摘要

为探究不同生物炭添加对盐渍化土壤盐分及离子淋洗效果的影响。采用室内土柱模拟试验

在土壤表层(0-10 cm)添加比例为0.5%的猪粪(PMB)、棉秆(CSB)和玉米秸秆(MSB)生物炭

淋洗过程分为急降(P1)、缓降(P2)和稳定(P3)3个阶段

通过测定淋洗速率、流量、累积浸出阴阳离子浓度、土壤剖面含水率和土壤剩余可溶性离子的含量来探究不同生物炭对南疆盐渍土盐分离子的淋洗效果。结果表明:与未添加生物炭处理(CK)相比

生物炭的施用能提高各阶段淋洗液的流量和淋洗速率

在电导率快速下降阶段CSB处理流量提高20%

PMB处理淋洗速率提高29%

MSB处理最先使EC值降低到5 mS/cm

但对离子的去除能力提升较小。生物炭的施用对各阶段离子淋出先后顺序有一定影响

即促进Ca2+、Na+、SO42-和Cl-淋出

抑制K+淋出。淋洗结束时

生物炭均能显著降低土壤残余含盐量。CSB处理可提高表层土壤保水能力

使得钠吸附比(SAR)始终保持较低水平且对土壤中残余阴离子洗脱效果最好。表明CSB处理是一种非常有潜力的土壤改良剂。研究结果可为南疆盐渍化土壤改良提供理论参考。

Abstract

To explore the differences and characteristics of the effects of different biochar additions on salinity and ion leaching in saline soil. This study used indoor soil column simulation experiments to add 0.5% of pig manure (PMB)

cotton straw (CSB)

and maize straw (MSB) biochar to the soil surface (0-10 cm)

the leaching process was divided into three stages: rapid descent (P1)

slow descent (P2)

and stable descent (P3). To investigate the leaching effect of different biochar on salt ions in saline soil of southern Xinjiang

the infiltration rate

flow rate

cumulative leaching concentration of anions and cations

soil profile moisture content

and residual soluble ion content were measured. The results showed that compared to the treatment without adding biochar (CK)

the application of biochar could improve the flow rate and infiltration rate of the leachate at each stage. During the rapid decline in electrical conductivity stage

the flow rate of CSB treatment increased by 20%

and the infiltration rate of PMB treatment increased by 29%. MSB treatment first reduced the EC value to 5 mS/cm

but the improvement in ion removal ability was small. The application of biochar had a certain impact on the sequence of ion leaching at each stage

that was

it promoted the leaching of Ca2+

Na+

SO42-

and Cl-

and inhibited the leaching of K+. At the end of leaching

biochar can significantly reduce the residual salt content of soil. CSB treatment can improve the water retention capacity of topsoil

keeping the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) always at a low level and providing the best elution effect for residual anions in the soil. This shows that CSB treatment is a potential soil conditioner. The results provide theoretical reference for salinized soil improvement in southern Xinjiang.

关键词

Keywords

references

杨劲松.中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):837-845.

杨真,王宝山.中国盐渍土资源现状及改良利用对策[J].山东农业科学,2015(4):125-130.

Wong V N L, Dalal R C, Greene R S B. Salinity and sodicity effects on respiration and microbial biomass of soil[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2008,44(7):943-953.

徐少奇,陈文杰,解林奇,等.我国有机废弃物资源总量及养分利用潜力[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(8):1341-1352.

Yuan J H, Xu R K, Wang N, et al. Amendment of acid soils with crop residues and biochars[J].Pedosphere,2011,21(3):302-308.

杨懋,李燕妮,孙军娜,等.泥炭和生物炭深埋对滨海盐渍土水分入渗特性的影响[J].鲁东大学学报(自然科学版),2021,37(3):267-272.

李争争,屈忠义,王丽萍,等.絮凝黄河泥沙复配生物炭对盐碱土水盐运移及水力特征参数影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):326-331.

朱成立,吕雯,黄明逸,等.生物炭对咸淡轮灌下盐渍土盐分分布和玉米生长的影响[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(1):226-234.

唐珺瑶,赵永杰,曲东,等.生物炭对减弱土壤盐渍化的贡献及其机理探讨[J].西北农业学报,2017,26(2):294-303.

Dahlawi S, Naeem A, Rengel Z, et al. Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 625: 320-335.

He K, He G, Wang C P, et al. Biochar amendment ameliorates soil properties and promotes Miscanthus growth in a coastal saline-alkali soil[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2020,155:e103674.

Di Lonardo S, Baronti S, Vaccari F P, et al. Biochar-based nursery substrates: The effect of peat substitution on reduced salinity[J].Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2017,23:27-34.

Lashari M S, Ye Y X, Ji H S, et al. Biochar-manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution alleviated salt stress and improved leaf bioactivity of maize in a saline soil from central China: A 2-year field experiment[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2015,95(6):1321-1327.

Zheng H, Wang X A, Chen L, et al. Enhanced growth of halophyte plants in biochar-amended coastal soil: Roles of nutrient availability and rhizosphere microbial modulation[J].Plant, Cell and Environment,2018,41(3):517-532.

Xiao L A, Meng F D. Evaluating the effect of biochar on salt leaching and nutrient retention of Yellow River Delta soil[J].Soil Use and Management, 2020,36(4):740-750.

Chaganti V N, Crohn D M. Evaluating the relative contribution of physiochemical and biological factors in ameliorating a saline-sodic soil amended with composts and biochar and leached with reclaimed water[J].Geoderma,2015,259/260:45-55.

姚宝林.南疆免冬春灌棉田土壤水热盐时空迁移规律与调控研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2017.

Yue Y, Guo W N, Lin Q M, et al. Improving salt leaching in a simulated saline soil column by three biochars derived from rice straw (

Oryza sativa

L.), sunflower straw (

Helianthus annuus

), and cow manure[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,71(6):467-475.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

梁飞,李智强,张磊.盐碱地改良技术实用问答及案例分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2018.

Dos Santos W M, Gonzaga M I S, Da Silva A J, et al. Improved water and ions dynamics in a clayey soil amended with different types of agro-industrial waste biochar[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2022,223:e105482.

赵海成,郑桂萍,靳明峰,等.连年秸秆与生物炭还田对盐碱土理化性状及水稻产量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(9):1836-1844.

孟昭甫.预防土壤次生碱化的钠吸附比指标[J].农业管理科学,1998,15(1):26-28.

李韵珠,李保国.土壤溶质运移[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.

岳燕,郭维娜,林启美,等.加入不同量生物质炭盐渍化土壤盐分淋洗的差异与特征[J].土壤学报,2014,51(4):914-919.

王娟,陈安全,宋文瑾,等.生物炭种类与施量对新复垦区土壤水分入渗过程的影响[J].农业机械学报,2022,53(11):388-394.

李毅,冯浩,梁嘉平,等.土壤属性和作物生长对生物炭施用的响应和反馈研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(5):9-16.

浏览量

690

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

生物炭对冻融期盐渍化土壤水热肥效应的影响

生物炭-秸秆隔层协同改良对盐碱土壤水分入渗过程的影响

施用生物炭对果园土壤氮磷时空分布与流失阻控的影响

生物炭结合藓类植物对土壤稳定性的影响

生物炭配施硝化/脲酶抑制剂及秸秆覆盖对红壤茶园氮磷淋失影响