块石出露对喀斯特坡耕地土壤理化性质的影响

陈磊; 张卓栋; 李业桐

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.029

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

块石出露对喀斯特坡耕地土壤理化性质的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 块石出露对喀斯特坡耕地土壤理化性质的影响
- Effect of Rock Outcropping on Soil Physicochemical Properties on Karst Sloping Cropland
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第6期页码：228-237
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京,100875
  2. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京,100875
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "陈磊(1994-),男,博士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:202031051014@mail.bnu.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金重点项目(41730748)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.029
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈磊, 张卓栋, 李业桐. 块石出露对喀斯特坡耕地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):228-237.

CHEN Lei, ZHANG Zhuodong, LI Yetong. Effect of Rock Outcropping on Soil Physicochemical Properties on Karst Sloping Cropland[J]. 2023, 37(6): 228-237.
陈磊, 张卓栋, 李业桐. 块石出露对喀斯特坡耕地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):228-237. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.029.

CHEN Lei, ZHANG Zhuodong, LI Yetong. Effect of Rock Outcropping on Soil Physicochemical Properties on Karst Sloping Cropland[J]. 2023, 37(6): 228-237. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.029.

摘要

喀斯特坡面伴随有大量直径＞25 cm的块石出露

为探明块石出露对土壤理化性质的影响

以坡面4个块石出露的农地和1个对照组为研究对象

分析土壤理化性质空间变异特征。结果表明:(1)在块石出露的农地中

土壤容重、黏粒、粉粒和砂粒的变化分别为0.87~1.42 g/cm3

25.70%~41.80%

38.11%~51.60%

13.76%~27.54%

土壤容重、黏粒和粉粒空间变异性均为弱且高于对照组

砂粒空间变异性为中等且低于对照组。(2)土壤全碳、全氮、全磷、全钾变化分别为9.82~23.13

0.94~2.15

0.65~2.93

7.38~20.35 g/kg

土壤有效磷、速效钾的变化分别为1.44~2.63

7.35~106.02 mg/kg

空间变异性均为中等且高于对照组。(3)土壤容重、黏粒、粉粒与其他土壤理化性质的之间的关系总体上呈负相关

且相关性在块石出露的农地中比对照组更显著。砂粒与黏粒之间呈显著负相关

与其他土壤化学性质之间的关系总体上呈正相关。(4)块石出露数量、出露坡度、出露比率和出露高度

对土壤理化性质的影响具有复杂性

土壤理化性质的空间变异随块石出露特征不同而存在差异性。研究结果有助于深入理解喀斯特坡面块石出露对侵蚀过程和机制的影响

为土壤侵蚀和水土保持工作提供科学借鉴。

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of rock outcrops on soil physicochemical properties

four rock outcrops and one control group were used to analyse the spatial variability of soil physicochemical properties. The results showed that: (1) In the sloping cropland with rock outcropping

the variation range of soil bulk density

clay

silt

and sand was 0.87~1.42 g/cm3

25.70%~41.80%

38.11%~51.60% and 13.76%~27.54%

respectively. The spatial variation of soil bulk density

clay and silt was weak and higher spatial variability than that of the control. The spatial variability of sand grains was moderate and lower than that of the control. (2) The spatial variability of soil total carbon

total nitrogen

total phosphorus and total potassium ranged from 9.82 to 23.13

0.94 to 2.15

0.65 to 2.93 and 7.38 to 20.35 g/kg

respectively

while the spatial variability of soil effective phosphorus and fast-acting potassium ranged from 1.44 to 2.63 and 7.35 to 106.02 mg/kg

respectively

all with medium and higher spatial variability than the control group. (3) Soil bulk density

clay and silt were negatively correlated with other soil physicochemical properties

and the correlation was more significant in the sloping cropland with rock outcropping than that of the control group. There was a significant negative correlation between sand and clay

and a positive correlation between sand and other soil chemical properties. (4) The number

gradient

ratio

and height of rock outcropping had a complex impact on soil physical and chemical properties. The spatial variation of soil physicochemical properties varied with the characteristics of different rock outcropping. The research results contribute to a deeper understanding of the impact of rock outcropping on the erosion process and mechanism on karst slope

and provide scientific reference for soil erosion and soil conservation work.

关键词

Keywords

references

Goldscheider N, Chen Z, Auler A S, et al. Global distribution of carbonate rocks and karst water resources[J].Hydrogeology Journal,2020,28(5):1661-1677.

Yan Y J, Dai Q H, Wang X D, et al. Response of shallow karst fissure soil quality to secondary succession in a degraded karst area of southwestern China[J].Geoderma,2019,348:76-85.

Jiang Z C, Lian Y Q, Qin X Q. Rocky desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, causes, and restoration[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2014,132:1-12.

张殿发,欧阳自远,王世杰.中国西南喀斯特地区人口、资源、环境与可持续发展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2001,11(1):77-81.

Keesstra S D, Bouma J, Wallinga J, et al. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals[J].Soil,2016,2(2):111-128.

Wang H, Zhang G H. Temporal variation in soil erodibility indices for five typical land use types on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Geoderma,2021,381:e114695.

Tang J, Liu G, Xie Y, et al. Annual variation of ephemeral gully erosion in a cultivated catchment[J].Geoderma,2021,401:e115166.

Chen S Q, Zhang G H, Zhu P Z, et al. Impact of slope position on soil erodibility indicators in rolling hill regions of northeast China[J].Catena,2022,217:e106475.

Sheng M Y, Xiong K N, Wang L J, et al. Response of soil physical and chemical properties to Rocky desertification succession in South China Karst[J].Carbonates and Evaporites,2018,33(1):15-28.

Chen H S, Zhang W, Wang K L, et al. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen as affected by land use types in karst and non-karst areas of northwest Guangxi, China[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2012,92(5):1086-1093.

何宇,盛茂银,王轲,等.土地利用变化对西南喀斯特土壤团聚体组成、稳定性以及C、N、P化学计量特征的影响[J].环境科学,2022,43(7):3752-3762.

景宜然,邓湘雯,邓东华,等.湘西南不同石漠化程度土壤理化性质及相关性分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):189-195.

董玲玲,何腾兵,刘元生,等.喀斯特山区不同母质(岩)发育的土壤主要理化性质差异性分析[J].土壤通报,2008,39(3):471-474.

贾洪杰,甘凤玲,李振轮,等.岩层倾向对南方喀斯特地区坡耕地土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):6107-6113.

盛茂银,熊康宁,崔高仰,等.贵州喀斯特石漠化地区植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):434-448.

张伟,陈洪松,王克林,等.种植方式和裸岩率对喀斯特洼地土壤养分空间分异特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(7):1459-1463.

薛建辉,周之栋,吴永波.喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(6):135-145.

Gong T X, Zhu Y J, Shao M A. Effect of embedded-rock fragments on slope soil erosion during rainfall events under simulated laboratory conditions[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,563:811-817.

Lv J R, Luo H, Xie Y S. Effects of rock fragment content, size and cover on soil erosion dynamics of spoil heaps through multiple rainfall events[J].Catena,2019,172:179-189.

陈磊,张科利,杨志成,等.喀斯特坡面块石对土壤水分影响的坡度响应[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2022,20(5):1-9.

陈磊,张科利,李业桐,等.喀斯特坡耕地块石出露对土壤水分入渗的影响[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(10):111-118.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:14-1110.

Chaudhari K S, Singh R, Kundu K D. Rapid textural analysis for saline and alkaline soils with different physical and chemical properties[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2008,72(2):431-441.

Wang H, Zhang G H, Li N N, et al. Soil erodibility influenced by natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Geoderma,2018,325:18-27.

Niu Y B, Gao Z L, Li Y H, et al. Effect of rock fragment content on erosion processes of disturbed soil accumulation under field scouring conditions[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2019,19(4):1708-1723.

Haruna S I. Spatial and fractal characterization of selected soil nutrients along a catena[J].Catena,2021,204:e105443.

Liu L, Zhang K L, Zhang Z D, et al. Identifying soil redistribution patterns by magnetic susceptibility on the black soil farmland in Northeast China[J].Catena,2015,129:103-111.

杨威,彭旭东,戴全厚,等.石漠化山区露石岩面流对岩-土界面土壤氮磷淋溶与输入作用的研究.土壤学报:1-13.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detoil/32.1119.P.20230411.0847.002.html.

邓华,高明,龙翼,等.石盘丘小流域不同土地利用方式下土壤氮磷流失形态及通量[J].环境科学,2021,42(1):251-262.

杜映妮,李天阳,何丙辉,等.长期施肥和耕作下紫色土坡耕地土壤C、N、P和K化学计量特征[J].环境科学,2020,41(1):394-402.

Wang L L, Zhang G H, Zhu P Z, et al. Soil C, N and P contents and their stoichiometry as affected by typical plant communities on steep gully slopes of the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2022,208:e105740.

Wang X Y, Li Z X, Cai C F, et al. Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological response and soil loss from Regosols in a semi-humid environment in South-West China[J].Geomorphology,2012,151/152:234-242.

Cen L P, Peng X D, Dai Q H, et al. Creep leakage process of remaining soils in near-surface fissures in a karst area with bedrock outcrops[J].Catena,2023,221:e106802.

Wijdenes D O, Poesen J, Vandekerckhove L, et al. Chiselling effects on the vertical distribution of rock fragments in the tilled layer of a Mediterranean soil[J].Soil and Tillage Research,1997,44(1/2):55-66.

Hlaváčiková H, Novák V, Šimủnek J. The effects of rock fragment shapes and positions on modeled hydraulic conductivities of stony soils[J].Geoderma,2016,281:39-48.

浏览量

649

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

煤矿区复垦土壤磷有效性对解磷菌肥的响应

喀斯特地区林草地植被根系分布对优先流特征的影响

花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地植被恢复措施的水土保持调控效应

黄土高寒区典型小流域土壤团聚体稳定性及可蚀性空间变异特征

晋西北黄土区典型人工林草本多样性与土壤理化性质