1. 内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特,010018
2. 内蒙古巴彦淖尔市磴口县水利局,内蒙古,巴彦淖尔,015200
3. 内蒙古河套灌区水利发展中心解放闸分中心沙壕渠试验站,内蒙古,巴彦淖尔,015400
[ "杨舒雅(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事节水灌溉理论与新技术研究。E-mail:15848166613@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
杨舒雅, 史海滨, 苗庆丰, 等. 沈乌灌域深度节水改造前后地下水环境时空变化规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):170-179.
YANG Shuya, SHI Haibin, MIAO Qingfeng, et al. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Groundwater Environment Before and After Deep Water-saving Renovation in ShenWu Irrigated District[J]. 2023, 37(6): 170-179.
杨舒雅, 史海滨, 苗庆丰, 等. 沈乌灌域深度节水改造前后地下水环境时空变化规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):170-179. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.022.
YANG Shuya, SHI Haibin, MIAO Qingfeng, et al. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Groundwater Environment Before and After Deep Water-saving Renovation in ShenWu Irrigated District[J]. 2023, 37(6): 170-179. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.022.
为探究河套灌区沈乌灌域在深度节水改造前后地下水环境的演变规律
针对地下水埋深、矿化度以及二者关系
通过区域布井、定位长期监测方式
采用经典地统计学理论
分析地下水埋深和矿化度的时空变化规律。结果表明:(1)深度节水改造后
沈乌灌域地下水埋深呈增大趋势
平均地下水埋深由节水改造前1.83 m增大到节水改造后3.36 m
增长率为83.9%。灌域中心和南部埋深偏大
局部产生漏斗
最大埋深至9.37 m
灌域北部埋深变化为0.6 m以下。(2)节水改造工程实施
使地下水矿化度显著增高
由节水改造前的1 296 mg/L增长为节水改造后的2 634 mg/L
增长103.47%。沈乌灌域地下水矿化度在东南、西北地区表现较高
而在中部地区则表现较低
随着节水改造工程的实施
淡水面积逐渐减少
微咸水面积逐渐增大。(3)研究区内地下水埋深和矿化度的变化呈指数关系
地下水矿化度随着地下水埋深的增大而减小
二者的决定系数为0.170 8。从空间上看
地下水埋深较小的地区
对应地下水矿化度大
地下水埋深大的区域对应矿化度小
摸清灌区地下水水位和水质变化规律
为土壤盐渍化防治提供科学依据。
In order to explore the evolution law of groundwater environment before and after the deep water-saving reconstruction in ShenWu Irrigation District
aiming at the groundwater depth
salinity and their relationship
the spatial and temporal changes of groundwater depth and salinity were analyzed by using the method of regional well distribution
positioning and long-term monitoring
and the classical geostatistics theory. The results showed that: (1) After the deep water-saving reconstruction
the groundwater depth in Shen-Wu-irrigated area showed an increasing trend
and the average groundwater depth increased from 1.83 m before the water-saving reconstruction to 3.36 m after the water-saving reconstruction
with an increase rate of 83.9%. The buried depth in the center and south of the irrigation area is larger
and a funnel is generated locally. The maximum buried depth increases to 9.37 m
while the buried depth in the north of the irrigation area changes below 0.6 m. (2) The implementation of the water-saving reconstruction project significantly increased the salinity of groundwater
from 1 296 mg/L before the water-saving reconstruction to 2 634 mg/L after the water-saving reconstruction
an increase of 103.47%. The salinity of groundwater in ShenWu Irrigation District is higher in the southeast and northwest
but lower in the central area. With the implementation of the water-saving reconstruction project
the area of fresh water is gradually reduced
while the area of brackish water is gradually increased. (3) There is an exponential relationship between groundwater depth and salinity in the study area. Groundwater salinity decreases with the increase of groundwater depth
and the coefficient of determination of the two is 0.170 8. From the perspective of space
the area with small groundwater depth corresponds to the high salinity of groundwater
and the area with large groundwater depth corresponds to the low salinity of groundwater
so as to find out the change law of groundwater level and water quality in the irrigation area
so as to provide scientific basis for soil salinization prevention and control.
胡鑫,吴彬,高凡,等.呼图壁县地下水位动态对土地利用变化响应[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):227-234.
窦旭,史海滨,苗庆丰,等.盐渍化灌区土壤水盐时空变异特征分析及地下水埋深对盐分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):246-253.
Fu G B, Crosbie R S, Barron O, et al. Attributing variations of temporal and spatial groundwater recharge: A statistical analysis of climatic and non-climatic factors[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,568:816-834.
夏江宝,赵西梅,赵自国,等.不同潜水埋深下土壤水盐运移特征及其交互效应[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(15):93-100.
李彬,史海滨,张建国,等.节水改造前后内蒙古河套灌区地下水水化学特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(21):99-110.
高宏远,刘霞,高晓瑜,等.不同灌排模式下盐渍化土壤盐分及离子迁移规律及均衡分析[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):361-370.
张倩,全强,李健,等.河套灌区节水条件下地下水动态变化分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(增刊2):97-101.
杜军,杨培岭,李云开,等.河套灌区年内地下水埋深与矿化度的时空变化[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(7):26-31,391.
Xu X, Huang G H, Qu Z Y, et al. Assessing the groundwater dynamics and impacts of water saving in the Hetao Irrigation District, Yellow River Basin[J].Agricultural Water Management,2010,98(2):301-313.
Mustafa Ö, Ahmet İ, Hasan A. Analysis of the change in ground water depth of kırıkhan district with GIS[J].Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi,2018,23(2):158-164.
Zhang R, Wu J W, Yang Y, et al. A method to determine optimum ecological groundwater table depth in semi-arid areas[J].Ecological Indicators,2022,139:e108915.
Xiao D N, Li X Y, Song D M, et al. Temporal and spatial dynamical simulation of groundwater characteristics in Minqin Oasis[J].Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences,2007,50(2):261-273.
史志广,姜纪沂,赵振宏,等.基于地统计学的伊犁河谷西部霍城县平原区地下水特征空间变异性分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(10):71-76.
崔佳琪,李仙岳,史海滨,等.节水改造前后永济灌域地下水环境时空变化特征[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(3):841-852.
韩天凯,丁雪华,潘春洋,等.节水改造对沈乌灌域不同地貌浅层地下水埋深的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2019,36(5):620-629.
马欢.基于GIS的磴口县地下水埋深时空变化研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2018.
段倢.基于环境变化河套灌区沈乌灌域地下水时空动态变化分析与模拟[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021.
Awais M, Arshad M, Shah S H H, et al. Evaluating groundwater quality for irrigated agriculture: Spatio-temporal investigations using GIS and geostatistics in Punjab, Pakistan[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2017,10(23):e510.
姚玲,杨洋,孙贯芳,等.基于地统计分析的河套灌区地下水埋深与矿化度时空变异规律研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(8):111-121.
马贵仁,屈忠义,王丽萍,等.基于ArcGIS空间插值的河套灌区土壤水盐运移规律与地下水动态研究[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):208-216.
李仙岳,崔佳琪,史海滨,等.基于指示Kriging的土壤盐渍化风险与地下水环境分析[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(8):297-306.
闫志雲,曾妍妍,周金龙,等.新疆塔里木盆地灌区地下水水质空间变化及其影响因素[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(8):70-79.
Lu C P, Song Z Y, Wang W J, et al. Spatiotemporal variation and long-range correlation of groundwater depth in the Northeast China Plain and North China Plain from 2000—2019[J].Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies,2021,37:e100888.
刘阳.阜新地区1960—2020年地下水埋深变化特征分析[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2023,6(1):81-84.
周美玲.盐碱化灌区不同地类的地下水盐动态分析[J].地下水,2022,44(6):73-76.
0
浏览量
750
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621