基于三轴UU试验的土体含水率对根土复合体强度特性的影响

骆丕昭; 王云琦; 李通; 祁子寒; 何相昌; 李克文

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于三轴UU试验的土体含水率对根土复合体强度特性的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 基于三轴UU试验的土体含水率对根土复合体强度特性的影响
- Effect of Soil Moisture Content on Strength Characteristics of Root-soil Complex Based on Triaxial UU Test
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第6期页码：153-160
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院重庆三峡库区森林生态系统教育部野外科学观测研究站,北京,100083
  2. 北京林业大学水土保持学院重庆缙云山三峡库区森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "骆丕昭(1999-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持工程研究。E-mail:luopizhao@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(31971726)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.020
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
骆丕昭, 王云琦, 李通, 等. 基于三轴UU试验的土体含水率对根土复合体强度特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):153-160.

LUO Pizhao, WANG Yunqi, LI Tong, et al. Effect of Soil Moisture Content on Strength Characteristics of Root-soil Complex Based on Triaxial UU Test[J]. 2023, 37(6): 153-160.
骆丕昭, 王云琦, 李通, 等. 基于三轴UU试验的土体含水率对根土复合体强度特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):153-160. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.020.

LUO Pizhao, WANG Yunqi, LI Tong, et al. Effect of Soil Moisture Content on Strength Characteristics of Root-soil Complex Based on Triaxial UU Test[J]. 2023, 37(6): 153-160. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.020.

摘要

为研究自然边坡其强度特性随含水率的变化规律。通过设计不同体积含水率(20%

27%

35%

40%

45%)和2种含根量(RAR=0.1%

0.3%)的重塑土进行不固结不排水三轴试验

以研究含水率对土体破坏方式、抗剪强度和初始切线模量的影响。结果表明:(1)试样破坏模式多为剪切变形和剪胀变形

在含水率为20%

27%时

出现明显剪切贯穿面破裂带

其余含水率下表现为剪胀变形;(2)含水率对根土复合体抗剪强度主要体现在黏聚力上

含水率从20%升至45%时

2种含根量的根土复合体黏聚力分别降低67%

72%;含水率低于35%时

可用对数关系表示

随含水率升高

黏聚力明显降低;含水率达到35%以上时

可用线性关系表示

黏聚力下降速度减缓;含根量增加

抗剪强度提高;(3)不同含根量和围压下根土复合体初始切线模量与含水率关系可以用线性关系拟合

含水率从20%升至45%时

2种含根量的根土复合体初始切线模量平均分别降低43%和47%。综合考虑土体弹塑性和植物因素对土体位移或变形的影响

可提高边坡稳定性计算精度。研究结果可为植物边坡以及水土保持植被建设治理提供科学参考

丰富根系固土领域的科学理论。

Abstract

In order to study the variation of strength characteristics with moisture content of natural slopes. The influence of moisture content on soil failure

shear strength and initial tangent modulus was carried out by designing reconstituted soil with different volume moisture content (20%

27%

35%

40%

45%) and two root content (RAR=0.1%

0.3%). The results showed that: (1) The specimen rupture mode was mostly shear deformation and shear expansion deformation

and when the moisture content was 20% and 27%

the obvious shear penetration surface fracture zone appeared

and the rest of the moisture content was shear deformation. (2) The effect of moisture content on the shear strength of the root soil complex was mainly reflected in the cohesion

and when the moisture content increased from 20% to 45%

the cohesion of the two kinds of root-soil complex decreased by 67% and 72%; when the moisture content was lower than 35%

it could be expressed by logarithmic relationship

and the cohesion decreased significantly with the increase of moisture content; when the moisture content reached more than 35%

it could be expressed by linear relationship

and the decline rate of cohesion slowed down; the shear strength increased with the increase of root content. (3) The relationship between the initial tangential modulus and the moisture content of the root-soil complex under different root content and confining pressure could be fitted by linear relationship

and when the moisture content increased from 20% to 45%

the initial tangential modulus of the two root-soil complex with root content decreased by 43% and 47% on average. Comprehensively considering the influence of elastic-plasticity and plant factors on soil displacement or deformation

the accuracy of slope stability calculation could be improved. The research results can provide scientific reference for the management of plant slope and soil and water conservation vegetation construction

and enrich the scientific theory in the field of root soil consolidation.

关键词

Keywords

references

Stokes A, Norris J E, Van Beek L P H, et al. How vegetation reinforces soil on slopes[M].Slope Stability and Erosion Control: Ecotechnological Solutions.Dordrecht: Springer,2008:65-118.

Zhu H, Zhang L M, Xiao T, et al. Enhancement of slope stability by vegetation considering uncertainties in root distribution[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 85: 84-89.

Giadrossich F, Schwarz M, Cohen D, et al. Mechanical interactions between neighbouring roots during pullout tests[J].Plant and Soil,2013,367(1):391-406.

Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D. Root-soil mechanical interactions during pullout and failure of root bundles[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Earth Surface,2010,115(F4):e04035.

李云鹏, 王云琦, 王玉杰, 等. 重庆缙云山不同林地土壤剪切破坏特性及影响因素研究[J].土壤通报,2013,44(5):1074-1080.

Ghestem M, Veylon G, Bernard A, et al. Influence of plant root system morphology and architectural traits on soil shear resistance[J].Plant and Soil,2014,377(1):43-61.

左学龙.基于弹性本构关系的根—土复合体力学特性试验研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2016.

Zhu H, Zhang L M, Garg A. Investigating plant transpiration-induced soil suction affected by root morphology and root depth[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2018,103:26-31.

Kim J H, Fourcaud T, Jourdan C, et al. Vegetation as a driver of temporal variations in slope stability: The impact of hydrological processes[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,2017,44(10):4897-4907.

Wu T H, McKinnell W P, Swanston D N. Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1979,16(1):19-33.

Wu T H, Watson A.

In situ

shear tests of soil blocks with roots[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1998,35(4):579-590.

张晓明,王玉杰,夏一平,等.重庆缙云山典型植被原状土与重塑土抗剪强度研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(11):6-9.

Day R W. Surficial slope failure: A case study[J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,1993,7(4):264-269.

杨亚川,莫永京,王芝芳,等.土壤-草本植被根系复合体抗水蚀强度与抗剪强度的试验研究[J].中国农业大学学报,1996,1(2):31-38.

李绍才,孙海龙,杨志荣,等.坡面岩体-基质-根系互作的力学特性[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(12):2074-2081.

Jiang Y J, Alam M, Su L J, et al. Effect of root orientation on the strength characteristics of loess in drained and undrained triaxial tests[J].Engineering Geology,2022,296:e106459.

Lian B Q, Peng J B, Zhan H B, et al. Mechanical response of root-reinforced loess with various water contents[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2019,193:85-94.

徐华,袁海莉,王歆宇,等.根系形态和层次结构对根土复合体力学特性影响研究[J].岩土工程学报,2022,44(5):926-935.

王元战,刘旭菲,张智凯,等.含根量对原状与重塑草根加筋土强度影响的试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(8):1405-1410.

程平,李鹏程,钟彩尹,等.根土复合体根系依赖的力学特性及非线性破坏准则研究.长江科学院院报:1-9.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1171.tv.20221213.1610.008.html.

朱锦奇,苏伯儒,王云琦,等.荆条根系的固土功能随土壤含水率的变化[J].林业科学,2020,56(6):202-208.

Lu N, Godt J W. Hillslope hydrology and stability[M].New York: Cambridge University Press,2013.

李元松,王玉,朱冬林等.边坡稳定性评价方法研究现状与发展趋势[J].武汉工程大学学报,2021,43(4):428-435.

王玉平,曾志强,潘树林.边坡稳定性分析方法综述[J].西华大学学报(自然科学版),2012,31(2):101-105.

李广信.高等土力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.

Duncan J M, Chang C Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations division, 1970, 96(5): 1629-1653.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.土工试验方法标准: GB/T 50123—2019[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2019.

Zhu J Q, Mao Z, Wang Y Q, et al. Soil moisture and hysteresis affect both magnitude and efficiency of root reinforcement[J].Catena,2022,219:e106574.

杨璞,向志海,胡夏嵩,等.根对土壤加强作用的研究[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2009,49(2):305-308.

周跃峰,谭国焕,甄伟文.原状黄土剪缩性测试与理论分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(6):1242-1249.

李艳霞.黄土三轴剪切变形形态试验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.

董建国,李蓓,袁聚云,等.上海浅层褐黄色粉质粘土剪切带形成的试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2001,23(1):23-27.

李蓓,董建国.上海粘性土剪切带形成的机理分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2001,29(6):648-652.

邢鲜丽,李同录,李萍,等.黄土抗剪强度与含水率的变化规律[J].水文地质工程地质,2014,41(3):53-59,97.

齐剑峰,张成兵,宋雪琳,等.滑带土含水率与力学参数关系试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2013,30(7):91-94,100.

Tengbeh G T. The effect of grass roots on shear strength variations with moisture content[J].Soil Technology,1993,6(3):287-295.

习羽.基于常规试验的非饱和黄土强度参数的研究及应用[D].西安:长安大学,2014.

胡其志,周勇,马强,等.根系与格栅复合加筋土的力学特性试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2022,39(10):109-115.

Li Y P, Wang Y Q, Wang Y J, et al. Effects of root spatial distribution on the elastic-plastic properties of soil-root blocks[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7:e800.

王余靖,周利军,王云琦,等.直剪试验中土体含水率对根系失效方式的影响[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(2):43-51.

朱俊涛,刘杰,罗凯,等.加筋红土三轴试验与数值模拟研究[J].公路交通科技,2022,39(7):55-65,83.

浏览量

815

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

昭通烂泥箐滑坡源区原生状态根-土复合体抗剪特征

三峡水库消落带不同植被类型和坡位的土壤性状分异特征

层理结构对砒砂岩抗剪特性的影响

干湿循环效应固化黄土宏-微观演化特征函数

冻结对沙丘土壤抗风蚀能力的影响