外源添加物对土壤干缩裂缝特征的影响

陈上茂; 郭澎; 邓博; 卫磊嘉; 马泽; 陈丹; 毕利东

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

外源添加物对土壤干缩裂缝特征的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 外源添加物对土壤干缩裂缝特征的影响
- Effects of Exogenous Additives on the Characteristics of Soil Dry Shrinkage Cracks
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第6期页码：119-125
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河海大学农业科学与工程学院,南京,211100
  2. 中国电建集团中南勘测设计研究院有限公司,长沙,410014
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "陈上茂(1998-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤物理与水土保持研究。E-mai:1783391882@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划专项(2020YFD0900703)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.016
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈上茂, 郭澎, 邓博, 等. 外源添加物对土壤干缩裂缝特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):119-125.

CHEN Shangmao, GUO Peng, DENG Bo, et al. Effects of Exogenous Additives on the Characteristics of Soil Dry Shrinkage Cracks[J]. 2023, 37(6): 119-125.
陈上茂, 郭澎, 邓博, 等. 外源添加物对土壤干缩裂缝特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):119-125. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.016.

CHEN Shangmao, GUO Peng, DENG Bo, et al. Effects of Exogenous Additives on the Characteristics of Soil Dry Shrinkage Cracks[J]. 2023, 37(6): 119-125. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.016.

摘要

为研究外源添加物对土壤干缩裂缝特征的影响

选取水田、旱田、林地3种土地利用方式

添加生石灰(1 g/kg)、黄腐酸(10 g/kg)、鱼塘底泥(250 g/kg)、生物炭(15 g/kg)4种外源添加物

进行土壤干燥收缩试验。结果表明:除生石灰外

不同土壤外源添加物处理下各用地类型土壤干燥收缩裂缝特征变化趋势非常一致

裂缝面密度、长密度、平均宽度均呈现耕作层水田＞旱田＞林地、犁底层水田＞林地＞旱田。生石灰对土壤干燥收缩裂缝特征无显著影响;黄腐酸使土壤干缩裂缝面密度、裂缝平均宽度增加

但对土壤干缩裂缝长密度无显著影响;鱼塘底泥使土壤裂缝面密度、长密度增加

但对干缩裂缝平均宽度无影响;生物炭使土壤裂缝面密度、裂缝平均宽度降低

但使裂缝长密度增加。相对于空白对照

不同外源添加物对于土壤裂缝面密度影响程度表现为耕作层鱼塘底泥＞生物炭＞黄腐酸＞生石灰、犁底层黄腐酸＞鱼塘底泥＞生物炭＞生石灰;对于裂缝长密度影响程度表现为耕作层生物炭＞鱼塘底泥＞生石灰＞黄腐酸、犁底层生物炭＞鱼塘底泥＞黄腐酸＞生石灰。外源添加物对土壤裂缝特征产生重要影响

生石灰对于土壤裂缝发育影响不显著

黄腐酸、鱼塘底泥促进土壤裂缝发育

生物炭可以抑制土壤裂缝的发育。研究结果可为农业生产中使用改良土壤剂改良土壤理化性质提供参考。

Abstract

To investigate the effect of exogenous additions on the characteristics of soil drying and shrinkage crack. Three utilization types of soil samples were selected for paddy field

dry field and forest land and four exogenous additives including quicklime (1 g/kg)

fulvic acid (10 g/kg)

fish pond sediment (250 g/kg)

and biochar (15 g/kg)

were added to conduct soil drying and shrinkage tests. The results showed that

in addition to quicklime

the change trend of soil drying shrinkage crack characteristics of different land types under different soil amendment treatments was very consistent

and the surface density

length density and average width of crack showed the change trend of cultivated layer paddy field＞dry field＞forest land

and plow bottom paddy field＞forest land＞dry field. Quicklime has no significant effect on soil dry shrinkage crack characteristics; fulvic acid increased the surface density of soil dry shrinkage cracks and the average width

but had no significant effect on the length density of soil dry shrinkage cracks; fish pond sediment increased the surface density of soil cracks and the length density

but had no effect on the average width of dry shrinkage cracks; biochar reduced the surface density of soil cracks and the average width of cracks

but increased the average length density of cracks. Compared with the blank control

the degree of influence of different exogenous additives on the density of soil fracture surface were as follows: Cultivated layer fish pond sediment＞biochar＞fulvic acid＞quicklime

plow bottom fulvic acid＞fish pond sediment＞biochar＞quicklime; the degree of influence on fracture length density was as follows: Cultivated layer biochar ＞fish pond sediment＞quicklime＞fulvic acid

plow bottom biochar＞fish pond sediment＞fulvic acid＞quicklime in the plough bottom layer. Exogenous additives have an important effect on the characteristics of soil cracks. Quicklime has no significant effect on the development of soil cracks. Fulvic acid and fish pond sediment can promote the development of soil cracks

and biochar can inhibit the development of soil cracks. The results can be used to improve the physical and chemical properties of soil using improved soil agents in agricultural production.

关键词

Keywords

references

Yan J P, Chen X Y, Cai Y, et al. A review of genetic classification and characteristics of soil cracks[J].Open Geosciences,2021,13(1):1509-1522.

周明涛,杨森,秦健坤,等.土壤裂隙研究的回顾与展望[J].土壤通报,2017,48(4):988-995.

尤今,王树谦.土壤裂隙对农田土壤优先流的影响及其控制因子[J].节水灌溉,2022(9):71-75,80.

徐嘉惠,齐伟,刘俊,等.农田干缩裂隙对微润灌土壤水氮运移及分布的影响[J].节水灌溉,2022(7):15-21.

黄树辉,曾光辉.土壤裂缝产生过程中双氢胺对氮溶质运移的影响[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):25-27.

罗舒玉,邓羽松,陈洪松,等.干湿交替条件下喀斯特峰丛洼地土壤裂隙发育规律[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(2):387-395.

李叶鑫,吕刚,王道涵,等.煤矿复垦排土场裂缝区土壤团聚体分布及稳定性[J].灌溉排水学报,2023,42(6):104-110,134.

王玮,王辉,陈潇岳,等.再生水灌溉对亚热带典型土壤干缩裂缝演变特征的影响[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(13):55-65.

邢旭光,柳烨,马孝义.土壤添加物对土-水曲线和土体收缩的影响[J].水科学进展,2016,27(1):40-48.

Tang C S, Shi B, Cui Y J, et al. Desiccation cracking behavior of polypropylene fiber-reinforced clayey soil[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2012,49(9):1088-1101.

Izzo M Z, Mileti＇c M. Desiccation cracking behavior of sustainable and environmentally friendly reinforced cohesive soils[J]. Polymers, 2022, 14(7):e1318.

王凯,孙星星,秦光蔚,等.我国土壤改良修复工程技术研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(20):40-48.

张洁,李智燕,莫负涛,等.生物炭对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J].甘肃农业,2021(10):92-94.

吴军虎,李玉晨,邵凡凡,等.生化黄腐酸对土壤物理性质及水分运动特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):159-164,171.

褚琳琳,黄荣玉,赵燕,等.低山丘陵区不同土地利用方式田内-田埂土壤优先流特征[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(4):115-123.

王秋兵.中国土壤系统分类..https://www.zgbk.com/ecph/words?SiteID=1&ID=105409&SubID=67419.

张甘霖,龚子同. 土壤调查实验室分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.

李春英,刘添毅,刘奕平,等.酸性植烟土壤施用石灰的后效探讨[J].烟草科技,2001,34(7):38-41.

刘佳欢,王倩,罗人杰,等.黄腐酸肥料对小麦根际土壤微生物多样性和酶活性的影响[J].腐植酸,2020(1):93.

张中彬,彭新华.土壤裂隙及其优先流研究进展[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):477-488.

何电源.关于稻田施用石灰的研究[J].土壤学报,1992,29(1):87-93.

熊东红,周红艺,杜长江,等.土壤裂缝研究进展[J].土壤,2006,38(3):249-255.

Zhang Z B, Peng X, Wang L L, et al. Temporal changes in shrinkage behavior of two paddy soils under alternative flooding and drying cycles and its consequence on percolation[J]. Geoderma,2013,192:12-20.

Peng X, Horn R, Smucker A. Pore shrinkage dependency of inorganic and organic soils on wetting and drying cycles[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2007,71(4):1095-1104.

Kechavarzi C, Dawson Q, Leeds-Harrison P B. Physical properties of low-lying agricultural peat soils in England[J]. Geoderma,2010,154(3/4):196-202.

熊东红,杨丹,李佳佳,等.元谋干热河谷区退化坡地土壤裂缝形态发育的影响因子[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(1):102-108.

王娟,黄成真,冯绍元,等.生物炭对滨海滩涂区土壤理化特性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(10):125-130,138.

武玉,徐刚,吕迎春,等.生物炭对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(1):68-79.

赵迪,黄爽,黄介生.生物炭对粉黏壤土水力参数及胀缩性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(17):136-143.

文曼,郑纪勇.生物炭不同粒径及不同添加量对土壤收缩特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):46-50,5.

段赫,刘目兴,易军,等.干湿交替条件下稻田土壤裂隙开闭规律[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):370-376.

Gray C W, Allbrook R. Relationships between shrinkage indices and soil properties in some New Zealand soils[J]. Geoderma,2002,108(3/4):287-299.

浏览量

737

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于Meta分析的黄土高原苹果园土壤改良措施效果评价

干湿循环对崩岗土体稳定性的影响

滨海新围滩涂不同改良方式对土壤盐渍化调控效应及其主控因素

蚯蚓粪对黄土区坡耕地径流产沙和硝态氮流失特征的影响