气候变化及生态建设措施对宁夏典型入黄流域径流变化影响

于坤霞; 李雪; 徐丙翔; 李占斌; 李鹏; 张国军; 张晓明; 赵阳; 马文涛

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

气候变化及生态建设措施对宁夏典型入黄流域径流变化影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 气候变化及生态建设措施对宁夏典型入黄流域径流变化影响
- Impacts of Climate Change and Ecological Construction Measures on Runoff Changes in Yellow River Tributaries of Ningxia Section
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第6期页码：42-49
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安,710000
  2. 西安理工大学旱区生态水文与灾害防治国家林业和草原局重点实验室,西安,710048
  3. 安徽省交通勘察设计院有限公司,合肥,230000
  4. 宁夏回族自治区水土保持监测总站,银川,750000
  5. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京,100000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "于坤霞(1989-)女,博士,副教授,主要从事变化环境下流域水沙过程分析与模拟研究。E-mail:yukunxia@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金面上项目(52079104);宁夏水利科技项目(SBZZ-J-2021-12,SBZZ-J-2021-13);陕西省重点研发计划项目(2023-ZDLSF-60)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.006
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
于坤霞, 李雪, 徐丙翔, 等. 气候变化及生态建设措施对宁夏典型入黄流域径流变化影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):42-49.

YU Kunxia, LI Xue, XU Bingxiang, et al. Impacts of Climate Change and Ecological Construction Measures on Runoff Changes in Yellow River Tributaries of Ningxia Section[J]. 2023, 37(6): 42-49.
于坤霞, 李雪, 徐丙翔, 等. 气候变化及生态建设措施对宁夏典型入黄流域径流变化影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):42-49. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.006.

YU Kunxia, LI Xue, XU Bingxiang, et al. Impacts of Climate Change and Ecological Construction Measures on Runoff Changes in Yellow River Tributaries of Ningxia Section[J]. 2023, 37(6): 42-49. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.006.

摘要

为分析气候变化及植被和淤地坝等生态建设措施对径流变化的影响

选取宁夏典型入黄流域清水河和苦水河为研究对象

采用Pettitt突变方法分析研究流域气象水文和生态建设措施等要素的变异点

基于Budyko理论

通过建立水热耦合控制参数与生态建设措施的多元线性回归方程

构建耦合生态建设措施下的降水-径流模型

并对模型进行适用性评估

采用弹性系数法

量化不同生态建设措施对径流变化的贡献率。结果表明:研究流域径流均呈减小趋势

且年径流突变均发生在2000年;水热耦合控制参数与NDVI和淤地坝指数呈显著的正相关关系

引入NDVI和淤地坝指数构建的降水-径流模型模拟值接近实测值;清水河流域生态建设措施实施对径流减少的贡献率高达78.25%

其中

植被和淤地坝对径流减少贡献率分别为23.11%

46.50%

生态建设措施对径流的影响远大于气候变化对径流产生的影响。苦水河流域降水对径流减少贡献率可达47.30%

生态建设措施对苦水河径流减少贡献率为59.57%

植被和淤地坝贡献率分别为18.57%

13.96%

其他生态建设措施对径流减少贡献率为27.04%。生态建设是引起宁夏入黄流域径流变化的主要驱动因素。研究结果可为宁夏生态建设优化布局提供理论支撑。

Abstract

In order to analyze the impact of climate change and ecological construction measures such as vegetation and silt dams on runoff changes

the Qingshui River and Kushui River

typical watersheds into the Yellow River in Ningxia

were selected as the research objects. The Pettitt mutation method were used to detect the change points of meteorological

hydrological

and ecological construction measure series

and the multivariate linear regression equations between the land surface parameter and ecological construction measures were constructed

rainfall runoff model coupled ecological construction measures was derived based on the Budyko theory

the applicability of the model was evaluated

and the elastic coefficient method was used to quantify the contribution rate of different ecological construction measures to runoff changes. The results indicated that the runoffs in the study watersheds showed decreasing trends

and the change points of annual runoff occurred around 2000. The land surface parameters had significant positive correlations with the NDVI and silt dam index

and the simulated values from the rainfall-runoff model constructed by the introduction of the NDVI and the silt dam index are close to the observed values. The contribution rate of ecological construction measures to the reduction of runoff was as high as 78.5% in the Qingshui River basin

and vegetation and silt dams contributed 23.11% and 46.50%

respectively. The impact of ecological construction measures on runoff was much greater than that of climate change. The contribution rate of rainfall to runoff reduction in the Kushui River Basin can reach 47.30%

and the contribution rate of ecological construction measures was 59.57%

with vegetation and silt dams contributing 18.57% and 13.96% respectively

while the contribution rate of other ecological construction measures to the reduction of runoff was 27.04%. Ecological construction was the main driving factor causing changes in runoff in the Ningxia Yellow River Basin. The research results can provide theoretical support for optimizing the layout of ecological construction in Ningxia.

关键词

Keywords

references

李敏欣, 邹磊, 夏军, 等. Budyko框架下白河流域径流演变及其归因分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023, 32(4): 774-782.

Li Z Y, Huang S Z, Liu D F, et al. Assessing the effects of climate change and human activities on runoff variations from a seasonal perspective[J].Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2020,34(3):575-592.

Li H, Shi C, Sun P, et al. Attribution of runoff changes in the main tributaries of the middle Yellow River, China, based on the Budyko model with a time-varying parameter[J].Catena, 2021,206:e105557.

徐宗学,赵捷.生态水文模型开发和应用:回顾与展望[J].水利学报,2016,47(3):346-354.

Guo A J, Chang J X, Wang Y M, et al. Uncertainty analysis of water availability assessment through the Budyko framework[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,576:396-407.

杨大文,张树磊,徐翔宇.基于水热耦合平衡方程的黄河流域径流变化归因分析[J].中国科学:技术科学,2015,45(10):1024-1034.

赵香桂,黄生志,赵静,等.干旱与湿润区流域时变水热耦合参数的归因分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(24):9805-9814.

刘平,岳自慧,王文,等.宁夏压砂地水土流失风险及防治对策[J].中国水土保持,2022(2):21-22.

楼晓钦,牛锦凤,黄维.宁夏引黄灌区生态建设状况及保护措施研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2016,57(2):41-44.

Zhang J J, Gao G Y, Fu B J, et al. Formulating an elasticity approach to quantify the effects of climate variability and ecological restoration on sediment discharge change in the loess plateau, China[J].Water Resources Research,2019,55(11):9604-9622.

张树磊,杨大文,杨汉波,等.1960—2010年中国主要流域径流量减小原因探讨分析[J].水科学进展,2015,26(5):605-613.

雷泽鑫,傅健宇,罗俊杰,等.景观格局视角下晋西三川河流域径流变化归因分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(12):4946-4958.

中华人民共和国水利部.第一次全国水利普查水土保持情况公报[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):2/3,11.

宋晓猛,占车生,孔凡哲,等.大尺度水循环模拟系统不确定性研究进展[J].地理学报,2011,66(3):396-406.

赵吉麟.宁夏回族自治区森林立地类型划分及其生态功能重要性评价[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.

李占斌, 宁夏淤地坝运行风险研究[R]. 西安:西安理工大学,2017-01-20.

Yu K X, Zhang X, Xu B X, et al. Evaluating the impact of ecological construction measures on water balance in the Loess Plateau region of China within the Budyko framework[J].Journal of Hydrology,2021,601:e126596.

Budyko M I. Climate and life[M].New York:Academic Press,1974.

傅抱璞.论陆面蒸发的计算[J].大气科学,1981,5(1):23-31.

Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56[J].Fao, Rome,1998,300(9):e05109.

王蕾,王鹏新,田苗,等.效率系数和一致性指数及其在干旱预测精度评价中的应用[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(1):229-235,251.

Schaake J C. From climate to flow, Climate change and US water resources[J]. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1990:177-206.

Sankarasubramanian A, Vogel R M, Limbrunner J F. Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States[J].Water Resources Research,2001,37(6):1771-1781.

贾路,于坤霞,邓铭江,等.西北地区降水集中度时空演变及其影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(16):80-89.

刘昌明,张学成.黄河干流实际来水量不断减少的成因分析[J].地理学报,2004,59(3):323-330.

Zhang X P, Zhang L, Zhao J, et al. Responses of streamflow to changes in climate and land use/cover in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Water Resources Research,2008,44(7):eW00A07.

姬广兴,高慧珊,黄珺嫦,等.黄河上游流域径流变化特征与归因分析研究[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(1):12-19.

浏览量

810

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土高原典型流域基流变化规律及贡献率分析

岩溶地区主量元素地球化学特征及其迁移规律——以贵州双河洞为例

生物炭对豫西丘陵区农田土壤团聚体稳定性及碳、氮分布的影响