1. 西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西 杨陵,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "卢超(1995-),男,新疆伊犁人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持及土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:2350031627@nwafu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
卢超, 马周加态, 李佳辉, 等. 冻融条件下土壤侵蚀阻力影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):25-33.
LU Chao, MAZHOU Jiatai, LI Jiahui, et al. The Factors Influencing Soil Erosion Resistance Under Freeze-thaw Conditions[J]. 2023, 37(6): 25-33.
卢超, 马周加态, 李佳辉, 等. 冻融条件下土壤侵蚀阻力影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(6):25-33. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.004.
LU Chao, MAZHOU Jiatai, LI Jiahui, et al. The Factors Influencing Soil Erosion Resistance Under Freeze-thaw Conditions[J]. 2023, 37(6): 25-33. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.06.004.
为揭示季节性冻融区土壤侵蚀阻力的变化机制
确定影响土壤侵蚀阻力主控因子
通过室内冻融模拟、水槽冲刷和土壤抗剪试验
对黄绵土(SM粉质壤土)、风沙土(WS砂壤土)和黑土(KS黏壤土)侵蚀阻力影响因素进行研究。结果表明:(1)随着冻融循环次数增加
细沟可蚀性值逐渐升高
而临界剪切力降低。经历10次冻融循环后
SM粉质壤土、WS砂壤土和KS黏壤土的细沟可蚀性分别增加76%
63%
11%
临界剪切力分别减小37%
13%
91%。(2)细沟可蚀性随土壤抗剪强度、黏聚力和内摩擦角增大而减小
临界剪切力则呈相反趋势。与内摩擦角相比
黏聚力更适合用来表征土壤侵蚀阻力。采用黏聚力对SM粉质壤土、WS砂壤土和KS黏壤土的细沟可蚀性进行预测
决定系数(R2)分别为0.42
0.78
0.50
平均为0.57;对临界剪切力的预测效果较差
决定系数(R2)分别为0.16
0.14
0.18
平均仅为0.16。(3)根据皮尔逊相关分析结果
基于土壤的初始含水率、冻融循环次数、力学特性以及土壤参数等分别建立细沟可蚀性(R2=0.85)和临界剪切力(R2=0.79)预测模型表明
在季节性冻融区冻融循环作用对土壤侵蚀的影响巨大
结果可为各地区水土保持措施优化和土壤侵蚀防治提供参考。
In order to reveal the change mechanism of soil erosion resistance in seasonal freeze-thaw region and determine the main controlling factors affecting soil erosion resistance
the Loess soil (SM silty loam)
Aeolian sandy soil (WS sandy loam) and Black soil (KS clay loam) were studied by indoor freeze-thaw simulation
flume erosion test and soil shear test. The results showed that: (1) With the increase of freeze-thaw cycles
the value of rill erodibility gradually increased
while the critical shear stress decreased. After ten freeze-thaw cycles
the rill erodibility of SM silty loam
WS sandy loam and KS clay loam increased by 76%
63% and 11%
respectively
and the critical shear stress decreased by 37%
13% and 91%
respectively. (2) Rill erodibility decreased with the increase of soil shear strength
cohesion and internal friction angle
while the critical shear stress showed the opposite trend. Compared with the internal friction angle
cohesion was more suitable to characterize soil erosion resistance. The rill erodibility of SM silty loam
WS sandy loam and KS clay loam was predicted by cohesion
and the determination coefficients R2 were 0.42
0.78 and 0.50
respectively
with an average of 0.57. The prediction effect on the critical shear stress was poor
and R2 were 0.16
0.14 and 0.18
respectively
with an average of only 0.16. (3) According to the results of Pearson correlation analysis
the prediction models of rill erodibility (R2=0.85) and critical shear stress (R2=0.79) were established based on initial soil moisture content
freeze-thaw cycles
mechanical properties and soil parameters
respectively. Studies have shown that the effects of freeze-thaw cycles on soil erosion are enormous in areas with seasonal freeze-thaw region. The findings can serve as a reference for optimizing soil and water conservation practices and controlling soil erosion across different regions.
Zhao C H, Gao J E, Huang Y F, et al. Effects of vegetation stems on hydraulics of overland flow under water discharges[J].Land Degradation and Development,2016,27(3):748-757.
Prosdocimi M, Cerdà A, Tarolli P. Soil water erosion on Mediterranean vineyards: A review[J].Catena,2016,141:1-21.
翟子宁,苏备.土壤可蚀性研究进展[J].土壤通报,2016, 47(1):253-256.
Knapen A, Poesen J, De Baets S. Seasonal variations in soil erosion resistance during concentrated flow for a loess-derived soil under two contrasting tillage practices[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2007, 94(2):425-440.
Sheridan G J, So H B, Loch R J, et al. Estimation of erosion model erodibility parameters from media properties[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,2000,38(2):265-284.
Gilley J E, Elliot W J, Laflen J M, et al. Critical shear stress and critical flow rates for initiation of rilling[J].Journal of Hydrology, 1993, 142: 251-271.
Zhang G H, Liu G B, Tang K M, et al. Flow detachment of soils under different land uses in the loess plateau of China[J].Transactions of the Asabe,2008,51(3):883-890.
Lado M, Ben-Hur M, Shainberg I. Soil wetting and texture effects on aggregate stability, seal formation, and erosion[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2004,68(6):1992-1999.
Geng R, Zhang G H, Ma Q H, et al. Soil resistance to runoff on steep croplands in Eastern China[J].Catena,2017,152:18-28.
Su Z L, Zhang G H, Yi T, et al. Soil detachment capacity by overland flow for soils of the Beijing region[J].Soil Science,2014,179(9):446-453.
李强,刘国彬,许明祥,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒地土壤抗冲性及相关理化性质[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):153-159.
陈安强,张丹,范建容,等.元谋干热河谷沟壁崩塌的力学机制与模拟试验[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(3):29-35.
洪大林,缪国斌,邓东升,等.粘性原状土起动切应力与物理力学指标的关系[J].水科学进展,2006,17(6):774-779.
孙宝洋.季节性冻融对黄土高原风水蚀交错区土壤可蚀性作用机理研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.
范昊明,蔡强国.冻融侵蚀研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2003,1(4):50-55.
左小锋,王磊,郑粉莉,等.冻融循环和土壤性质对东北黑土抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):30-35,42.
王力, 李喜安, 洪勃, 等. 黏粒含量对黄土抗剪强度影响试验[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2019, 47(3):179-185.
Zhang H Y, Li M, Wells R R, et al. Effect of soil water content on soil detachment capacity for coarse- and fine-grained soils[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2019,83(3):697-706.
Henry H A L. Soil freeze-thaw cycle experiments: Trends, methodological weaknesses and suggested improvements[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2007,39(5):977-986.
郑郧,马巍,邴慧.冻融循环对土结构性影响的试验研究及影响机制分析[J].岩土力学,2015,36(5):1282-1287,1294.
Wang D D, Wang Z L, Shen N, et al. Modeling soil detachment capacity by rill flow using hydraulic parameters[J].Journal of Hydrology,2016, 535:473-479.
Abrahams A D, Parsons A J, Luk S H. Field measurement of the velocity of overland flow using dye tracing[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1986,11(6):653-657.
Zhang G, Tang K, Ren Z, et al. Impact of grass root mass density on soil detachment capacity by concentrated flow on steep slopes[J].Transactions of the Asabe,2013,56(3):927-934.
Yu Y C, Zhang G H, Geng R, et al. Temporal variation in soil detachment capacity by overland flow under four typical crops in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Biosystems Engineering,2014,122:139-148.
De Baets S, Poesen J, Knapen A, et al. Root characteristics of representative Mediterranean plant species and their erosion-reducing potential during concentrated runoff[J].Plant and Soil,2007,294(1):169-183.
Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: A discussion of principles[J].Journal of Hydrology,1970,10(3):282-290.
Geng R, Zhang G H, Li Z W, et al. Spatial variation in soil resistance to flowing water erosion along a regional transect in the Loess Plateau[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2015,40(15):2049-2058.
王彬.土壤可蚀性动态变化机制与土壤可蚀性估算模型[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.
郑郧,马巍,邴慧.冻融循环对土结构性影响的机理与定量研究方法[J].冰川冻土,2015,37(1):132-137.
Bissonnais Y L, Singer M J. Crusting, runoff, and erosion response to soil water content and successive rainfalls[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1992,56(6):1898-1903.
Shi Z H, Yan F L, Li L, et al. Interrill erosion from disturbed and undisturbed samples in relation to topsoil aggregate stability in red soils from subtropical China[J].Catena,2010,81(3):240-248.
Xia D, Deng Y S, Wang S L, et al. Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution of different weathering profiles of the collapsing gullies in the hilly granitic region, South China[J].Natural Hazards,2015,79(1):455-478.
Xie S B, Qu J J, Lai Y M, et al. Effects of freeze-thaw cycles on soil mechanical and physical properties in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Journal of Mountain Science, 2015, 12(4):999-1009.
朱龙祥,范昊明,郭成久,等.冻融作用对原状棕壤抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):55-60,67.
胡田飞,刘建坤,房建宏,等.冻融循环下含水率对粉质黏土力学性质影响试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2017,49(12):123-130.
0
浏览量
869
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621