基于径流小区实测的干热河谷土壤侵蚀荟萃分析

何敏怡; 钟荣华; 郭乾坤; 段兴武; 单志杰

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.035

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于径流小区实测的干热河谷土壤侵蚀荟萃分析

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 基于径流小区实测的干热河谷土壤侵蚀荟萃分析
- A Meta-analysis on Soil Erosion in the Dry-hot Valleys Based on Runoff-plot Data
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第5期页码：291-297
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院,昆明,650500
  2. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京,100048
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "何敏怡(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:Heminyi@mail.ynu.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42007068)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.035
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
何敏怡, 钟荣华, 郭乾坤, 等. 基于径流小区实测的干热河谷土壤侵蚀荟萃分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):291-297.

HE Minyi, ZHONG Ronghua, GUO Qiankun, et al. A Meta-analysis on Soil Erosion in the Dry-hot Valleys Based on Runoff-plot Data[J]. 2023, 37(5): 291-297.
何敏怡, 钟荣华, 郭乾坤, 等. 基于径流小区实测的干热河谷土壤侵蚀荟萃分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):291-297. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.035.

HE Minyi, ZHONG Ronghua, GUO Qiankun, et al. A Meta-analysis on Soil Erosion in the Dry-hot Valleys Based on Runoff-plot Data[J]. 2023, 37(5): 291-297. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.035.

摘要

为详细了解干热河谷地区的土壤侵蚀状况

通过对径流小区资料的广泛收集、整理和标准化分析

对干热河谷主要土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀模数和水土保持措施效益进行定量评价

并将当地主要土地利用类型平均坡度下的土壤侵蚀模数与容许土壤流失量进行对比分析。结果表明:(1)灌草地、农地、园地和裸地等主要土地利用类型标准坡长坡度条件下的土壤侵蚀模数分别为110.88

389.58

320.66

507.87 t/(km2·a)

呈现出裸地最大

农地和园地次之

灌草地最低的特点。(2)封禁、水平阶整地、梯田和植物篱等水土保持措施均能较好地发挥水土保持效益

平均可以减少72%的土壤侵蚀量。(3)各流域主要土地利用类型

特别是农地和园地在当地平均坡度下的土壤侵蚀模数明显高于容许土壤流失量

说明该地区土壤侵蚀状况仍相当严峻。研究结果将有助于进一步深化对干热河谷地区土壤侵蚀规律的认识

并为后续水土流失治理和水土保持措施优化配置提供技术支撑。

Abstract

In order to gain a detailed understanding of the soil erosion status in the dry-hot valley region

in this study

the measured data from runoff plots in dry-hot valleys were widely collected

organized and analyzed

thus the soil erosion modulus under the average slope of the local main land use types were estimated and compared with the allowable soil loss amount. The results indicated that:(1) The soil erosion modulus of shrub-grass land

agricultural land

orchard land and bare land under the standard slope length and slope gradient was 110.88

389.58

320.66 and 507.87 t/(km2·a)

respectively

indicating that soil erosion modulus in the bare land was the highest

followed by the agricultural land

orchard land and shrub-grass land. (2) Soil and water conservation measures such as lockdowns

horizontal terraces

terraces and hedgerows all played an important role in reducing soil erosion with the average reduction of 72%. (3) The soil erosion modulus of the main land use types

especially agricultural land and orchard land in all the dry-hot valleys

were significantly higher than the allowable soil loss under the local average slope

indicating that the soil erosion situation in the region was still quite severe. This study could help to further deepen the understanding of the soil erosion principles in the dry-hot valleys and provide important technical supports for subsequent soil erosion control and optimal allocation of soil and water conservation measures.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘宝元,杨扬,陆绍娟.几个常用土壤侵蚀术语辨析及其生产实践意义[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):9-16.

中华人民共和国水利部.中国水土保持公报(2021年).(2021-12-03).http://slgjd.mwr.gov.cn/pdfview/2022-09-23/331.html.

Renschler C S, Harbor J. Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional ccales:The role of geomorphologists in land management research and implementation[J].Geomorphology,2002,47(2/3/4):189-209.

Renard K G. Predicting soil erosion by water:A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal roil loss equation (RUSLE)[M].Washington D C:U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service,1997.

Guo Q K, Hao Y F, Liu B Y. Rates of soil erosion in China:A study based on runoff plot data[J].Catena,2015,124:68-76.

Xiong M Q, Sun R H, Chen L D. Global analysis of support practices in USLE-based soil erosion modeling[J].Progress in Physical Geography:Earth and Environment,2019,43(3):391-409.

Zhao J, Wang Z, Dong Y, et al. How soil erosion and runoff are related to land use, topography and annual precipitation:Insights from a meta-analysis of erosion plots in China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2022,802:e149665.

Liu B Y, Zhang K L, Xie Y. An empirical soil loss equation.Beijing:12th ISCO Conference,2002:21-25.

Xiong M Q, Sun R H, Chen L D. Effects of soil conservation techniques on water erosion control:A global analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,645:753-760.

Chen D, Wei W, Chen L D. Effects of terracing practices on water erosion control in China:A meta-analysis[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2017,173:109-121.

Arnqvist G, Wooster D. Meta-analysis:Synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,1995,10(6):236-240.

Koricheva J, Gurevitch J. Uses and misuses of meta-analysis in plant ecology[J].Journal of Ecology,2014,102(4):828-844.

张荣祖,郑度,杨勤业,等.横断山区干旱河谷[M].北京:科学出版社,1992.

何周窈,苏正安,王勇,等.干热河谷冲沟发育区土壤细沟可蚀性及主要影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):8-13,27.

张宝军,熊东红,杨丹,等.跌水高度对元谋干热河谷冲沟沟头侵蚀产沙特征的影响初探[J].土壤学报,2017,54(1):48-59.

纪中华,刘光华,段曰汤,等.金沙江干热河谷脆弱生态系统植被恢复及可持续生态农业模式[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(5):19-22.

纪中华,李建增,沙毓沧,等.元谋干热河谷退化坡地罗望子人工林水土保持效益[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(4):63-65,117.

方海东,潘志贤,岳学文,等.元谋干热河谷银合欢人工林水土保持功能研究[J].西南农业学报,2014b,27(1):387-390.

史亮涛,金杰,张明忠,等.云南干热河谷旱坡地南洋樱植物篱水土保持效益研究[J].草原与草坪,2010,30(4):76-80.

董莉,王克勤,陈志中.元谋干热河谷坡地水平阶整地的效益分析[J].中国水土保持,2011(10):7-9.

王震洪,段昌群,文传浩,等.滇中三种人工林群落控制土壤侵蚀和改良土壤效应[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(2):23-27.

陈奇伯,王克勤,刘芝芹,等.金沙江干热河谷封禁管护坡面的产流产沙特征[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(4):217-219.

何周窈,苏正安,熊东红,等.金沙江干热河谷人工林土壤水分研究[J].山地学报,2018,36(5):731-739.

田波,陈奇伯,王克勤.金沙江干热河谷不同处理坡面的产流产沙规律研究[J].西南林学院学报,2006,26(6):44-48.

王建文,熊文森,刘安平,等.元谋干热河谷坡面造林整地截流减沙作用研究[J].西南林业大学学报,2011,31(6):31-35.

张明忠,何光熊,方海东,等.元谋干热河谷优势乡土草群落水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):101-104.

王洪,孔祥周,李易,等.金沙江干热河谷地区坡地水土流失直接经济损失评估[J].四川农业大学学报,2014,32(1):103-106.

王建文,王克勤,任占远,等.元谋干热河谷坡面径流蓄积过程中的面源污染物变化[J].西南林业大学学报,2012,32(1):25-29.

杨子生.滇东北山区坡耕地土壤流失方程研究[J].水土保持通报,1999,19(1):1-9.

刘海,陈奇伯,王克勤,等.金沙江干热河谷典型区段水土流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):28-33.

游翔,张闻多,张素,等.攀枝花干热河谷区坡面产流产沙研究[J].中国水土保持,2020(6):28-30.

孙辉,唐亚,陈克明,等.固氮植物篱防治坡耕地土壤侵蚀效果研究[J].水土保持通报,1999,19(6):1-5.

南岭,郭芬芬,王小丹,等.云南元谋干热河谷区典型植被恢复模式的水土保持效应[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(9):5168-5171,5225.

王静,田波.金沙江干热河谷坡面水土流失系统动力学仿真模拟[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(1):95-98.

龙会英,金杰,张德,等.豆科牧草和灌木在元谋干热河谷小流域综合治理的应用研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(2):254-258.

方海东,潘志贤,岳学文,等.元谋干热河谷新银合欢林对降水截流的效应[J].热带生物学报,2014,5(2):147-152.

刘光华,纪中华,沙毓沧,等.罗望子林人工植被系统对元谋干热河谷退化生态系统的治理效应研究[J].西部林业科学,2006,35(2):1-8.

顾治家.红河流域土壤侵蚀时空分异研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2016.

刘芝芹,王克勤,李艳梅.云南干热河谷不同坡面产流产沙研究[J].山西水土保持科技,2009(4):14-18.

孟广涛,郎南军,方向京,等.滇中高原山地防护林体系水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(1):66-69.

杨子生.云南省金沙江流域土壤流失方程研究[J].山地学报,2002,20(增刊1):1-9.

杨子生,刘彦随, Liang L H,等.金沙江下游近40年来土壤侵蚀变化:以云南彝良为例[J].山地学报,2005,23(2):144-152.

刘海.金沙江干热河谷典型区段水土流失特征研究[D].昆明:西南林业大学,2012.

杨淏舟,王艳丹,岳学文,等.扭黄茅+三芒草群落对干热河谷区雨后径流的再分配作用[J].中国水土保持,2021(10):60-63.

王洪,孔祥周,张瑜,等.金沙江干热河谷地区降雨对水土流失的影响[J].西南林业大学学报,2014,34(4):70-74.

肖理,王章文,殷庆元,等.金沙江干热河谷坡改梯对水土保持的影响[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(12):2856-2861.

杨子生,谢应齐.滇东北坡耕地水土流失分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,1997(6):19-25.

杨子生,梁洛辉,王云鹏.云南省金沙江流域水土流失基本特征分析[J].山地学报,2002,20(增刊1):10-17.

胡斌,张瀚曰,李晓明,等.不同治理措施对坡地芒果园水土流失的治理效果[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):130-136.

拜得珍,纪中华,杨艳鲜,等.银合欢冲沟治理水土保持效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):226-228.

Lin Y M, Cui P, Ge Y G, et al. The succession characteristics of soil erosion during different vegetation succession stages in dry-hot river valley of Jinsha River, upper reaches of Yangtze River[J].Ecological Engineering,2014,62:13-26.

Xu X L, Ma K M, Fu B J, et al. Soil and water erosion under different plant species in a semiarid river valley, SW China:The effects of plant morphology[J].Ecological Research,2009,24(1):37-46.

刘宝元,毕小刚,符素华,等.北京土壤流失方程[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.

Maetens W, Poesen J, Vanmaercke M. How effective are soil conservation techniques in reducing plot runoff and soil loss in Europe and the Mediterranean?[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2012,115(1/2):21-36.

Nearing M A. A single, continuous function for slope steepness influence on soil loss[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1997,61(3):917-919.

Bagarello V, Ferro V, Giordano G. Testing alternative erosivity indices to predict event soil loss from bare plots in Southern Italy[J].Hydrological Processes,2010,24(6):789-797.

Nearing M A, Govers G, Norton L D. Variability in soil erosion data from replicated plots[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1999,63(6):1829-1835.

国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.水土保持术语:GB/T 20465-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains:Guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation[M].Agricultural Research Service,U.S. Department of Agriculture,1965.

中华人民共和国水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准:SL 190-2007[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2018.

Duan X W, Shi X N, Li Y B, et al. A new method to calculate soil loss tolerance for sustainable soil productivity in farmland[J].Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2017,37(1):1-13.

Van den Putte A, Govers G, Diels J, et al. Assessing the effect of soil tillage on crop growth:A meta-regression analysis on European crop yields under conservation agriculture[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2010,33(3):231-241.

Govers G, Van Oost K, Poesen J. Responses of a semi-arid landscape to human disturbance:A simulation study of the interaction between rock fragment cover, soil erosion and land use change[J].Geoderma,2006,133(1/2):19-31.

Maetens W, Vanmaercke M, Poesen J, et al. Effects of land use on annual runoff and soil loss in Europe and the Mediterranean[J].Progress in Physical Geography:Earth and Environment,2012,36(5):599-653.

米艳华,潘艳华,沙凌杰,等.云南红壤坡耕地的水土流失及其综合治理[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):17-21.

杨子生,贺一梅.中国西南边疆山区耕地水土流失研究:以云南省为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):1-7.

Rong L, Duan X W, Zhang G L,et al. Impacts of tillage practices on ephemeral gully erosion in a dry-hot valley region in southwestern China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2019,187:72-84.

张平仓,程冬兵.南方坡耕地水土流失过程与调控研究[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(3):35-39,49.

杨瑞珍.我国耕地水土流失及其防治措施[J].水土保持通报,1994(2):32-36.

和俊.云南省坡耕地水土流失综合治理的探索与实践[J].中国水土保持,2011(2):11-13.

伍俊年.金沙江干热河谷区热作资源开发利用研究:以攀枝花市为例[J].中国热带农业,2019(4):11-15.

浏览量

952

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

大别山区不同水土保持措施配置模式的效益评价

RUSLE模型对黄土高原退耕植被恢复坡面

小流域土壤侵蚀模型（SWEM）

秦岭水源地生态恢复下土壤全氮分布对侵蚀的响应

人工模拟降雨下高寒区坡面径流水动力特性对砾石覆盖的响应