1. 南昌工程学院,南昌,330099
2. 江西省林业科学院,南昌,330032
3. 南昌市城市规划设计研究总院,南昌,330013
4. 江西鄱阳湖南矶湿地国家级自然保护区管理局,南昌,330038
[ "王金平(1990-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事生态修复研究。E-mail:wangjp0107@nit.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
王金平, 袁继红, 任琼, 等. 鄱阳湖湿地不同环境条件土壤AM真菌群落特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):252-258.
WANG Jinping, YUAN Jihong, REN Qiong, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Community Under Different Environmental Conditions in Poyang Lake Wetland[J]. 2023, 37(5): 252-258.
王金平, 袁继红, 任琼, 等. 鄱阳湖湿地不同环境条件土壤AM真菌群落特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):252-258. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.030.
WANG Jinping, YUAN Jihong, REN Qiong, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Community Under Different Environmental Conditions in Poyang Lake Wetland[J]. 2023, 37(5): 252-258. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.030.
丛枝菌根(AM)真菌可以与湿地植物共生
并在湿地生态系统的修复与维护过程中具有重要作用。然而
不同环境条件下湿地土壤AM真菌群落分布特征及其影响因素仍然有待明晰。选择鄱阳湖湿地不同水位条件(高水位和低水位)2种典型植物群落(南荻和水蓼)为研究对象
运用高通量测序技术探究水位和植被类型对鄱阳湖湿地土壤AM真菌群落结构和多样性的影响
比较不同环境条件下AM真菌群落结构和多样性差异
分析其与土壤理化性质的关系。结果表明
AM真菌OTU数为21~38
水位和植被类型影响鄱阳湖湿地土壤AM真菌OTU数
高水位下AM真菌OTU数高于低水位
水蓼群落高于南荻群落。被鉴别出的菌属为Glomus、Claroideoglomus和Paraglomus
其中
Glomus是优势属
占比85%以上
其相对丰度在高水位下显著高于低水位(p<0.05)
南荻群落高于水蓼群落。AM真菌多样性指数(Simpson和Shannon指数)受水位和植被类型以及二者交互影响(p<0.01)
低水位下不同群落之间的AM真菌多样性指数无显著差异
而高水位下水蓼群落AM真菌多样性指数显著高于南荻群落(p<0.05)。水位对AM真菌群落结构的影响高于植被类型
只有在低水位下植被类型才显著影响AM真菌群落结构。相关性分析显示
AM真菌多样性指数(Shannon和Simpson指数)与土壤因子无显著关系
低水位下土壤含水量与Glomus和OTU数量呈显著负相关(p<0.05)
而高水位下pH与优势属Glomus数量呈显著正相关(p<0.05)。因此
湿地生态系统中土壤含水量对Glomus的影响存在阈值效应。研究结果能为退化湿地生态系统修复提供科学指导。
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can coexist with wetland plants and play an important role in the restoration and maintenance of wetland ecosystem. However
the distribution and influencing factors of soil AM fungal community under different environmental conditions in wetland ecosystem still need to be clarified. Therefore
this study used high-throughput sequencing technology to explore the effects of water level and vegetation type on the community structure and diversity of soil AM fungi in Poyang Lake wetland. Two typical plant communities (Triarrhena lutarioriparia and Persicaria hydropiper) under different water levels (high and low water level) were chosen to compare the difference of the community structure and diversity of AM fungi among different environmental conditions. The relationship between AM fungal community and soil physicochemical properties was analyzed. The results showed that the OTU number of AM fungi ranged from 21 to 38. Both water level and vegetation type affected the OTU number of AM fungi in Poyang Lake wetland. The OTU number of AM fungi was higher under high water level than that under low water level
and it was higher in P. hydropiper community than that in T. lutarioriparia community. The identified genera of AM fungi were Glomus
Claroidoglomus and Paraglomus. Among them
Glomus was the dominant genus
accounting for more than 85%. And the relative abundance of Glomus was significantly higher under high water level
compared with low water level
while it was significantly higher in T. lutarioriparia community
compared with P. hydropiper community (p<0.05). The AM fungal diversity indices (Simpson and Shannon index) were affected by water level
vegetation type and their interaction (p<0.01). Under low water level
there was no significant difference in AM fungal diversity indices between different communities
but under high water level
the AM fungal diversity indices in P. hydropiper community was significantly higher than that in T. lutarioriparia community (p<0.05). Water level had a higher effect on community structure of soil AM fungi than that of vegetation type
and vegetation type significantly affected AM fungal community structure only at low water level. Correlation analysis showed that there was no significant relationship between AM fungal diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson index) and soil factors. Dominant genera Glomus and OTU number were significantly and negatively correlated with soil water content at low water level (p<0.05)
while Glomus was significantly and positively correlated with soil pH at high water level (p<0.05). Hence
there was a threshold effect of soil water content on Glomus in wetland ecosystem. The results of the present study could provide scientific guidance for the restoration of degraded wetland ecosystem.
Carballar-Hernández S, Hernández-Cuevas L V, Montaño N M, et al. Species composition of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal consortia influences growth and nutrition of poblano pepper plants (
Capsicum annuum
L.)[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2018,130:50-58.
Wang Y H, Wang M Q, Li Y, et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and nitrogen uptake of
Chrysanthemum morifolium
under salt stress[J].PLoS One,2018,13(4):e0196408.
王幼珊,刘润进.球囊菌门丛枝菌根真菌最新分类系统菌种名录[J].菌物学报,2017,36(7):820-850.
Fusconi A, Mucciarelli M. How important is arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in wetland and aquatic habitats?[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2018,155:128-141.
Fabián D, Guadarrama P, Hernadez-Cuevas L, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a coastal wetland in Yucatan, Mexico[J].Botanical Sciences,2018,96(1):24-34.
Hu S S, Chen Z B, Vosátka M, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization and physiological functions toward wetland plants under different water regimes[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,716:e137040.
吴松,隋心,张童,等.湿地丛枝菌根真菌研究进展[J].国土与自然资源研究,2019,183:80-84.
Xu Z Y, Ban Y H, Jiang Y H, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in wetland habitats and their application in constructed wetland:A review[J].Pedosphere,2016,26(5):592-617.
Soteras F, Moreira B C, Grilli G, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in rhizosphere spores versus roots of an endangered endemic tree from Argentina:Is fungal diversity similar among forest disturbance types?[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2016,98:272-277.
Chen Y L, Zhang X, Ye J S, et al. Six-year fertilization modifies the biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2014,69:371-381.
李文彬,于建新,宁楚涵,等.青岛胶州湾四种类型湿地AM真菌多样性[J].菌物学报,2019,38(11):1865-1875.
王艳云,郭笃发.黄河三角洲盐碱地AM真菌多样性[J].分子植物育种,2016,14(8):2232-2238.
Miller S P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of semi-aquatic grasses along a wide hydrologic gradient[J].New Phytologist,2000,145(1):145-155.
Tan Z Q, Jiang J H. Spatial-temporal dynamics of wetland vegetation related to water level fluctuations in Poyang Lake, China[J].Water,2016,8(9):e397.
姚忠,戴年华,张杰,等.鄱阳湖的生态现状及其保护与管理[J].江西科学,2011,29(5):667-671.
马廷婷,熊丽黎,张大文,等.淹水条件下鄱阳湖3种湿地植物腐烂分解及其对水质的影响[J].湖泊科学,2021,33(5):1389-1399.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[J].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
林宇岚,李正昀,吴斐,等.不同品种油茶根际丛枝菌根真菌群落结构特征[J].林业科学研究,2020,33(5):163-169.
李聪聪,周亚星,谷强,等.三江源区典型高寒草地丛枝菌根真菌多样性及构建机制[J].草业学报,2021,30(1):46-58.
卢妮妮.杉木根际丛枝菌根真菌群落特征及对幼苗生长的影响[D].北京:北京林业大学,2020.
Liang Y M, He X Y, Chen C Y, et al. Influence of plant communities and soil properties during natural vegetation restoration on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in a karst region[J].Ecological Engineering,2015,82:57-65.
杨羽,夏品华,林陶,等.贵州草海湿地不同水位梯度土壤碳、氮、磷含量及其生态化学计量比分布特征[J].湖泊科学,2020,32(1):164-172.
Wang L, Wu J T, Ma F, et al. Response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to hydrologic gradients in the rhizosphere of
Phragmites australis
(Cav.) Trin ex. Steudel growing in the sun island wetland[J].Biomed Research International,2015,3:1-9.
向丹,徐天乐,李欢,等.丛枝菌根真菌的生态分布及其影响因子研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(11):3597-3606.
谢换换,叶志鸿.湿地植物根形态结构和泌氧与盐和重金属吸收、积累、耐性关系的研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(3):864-875.
Moora M, Öpik M, Davison J, et al. AM fungal communities inhabiting the roots of submerged aquatic plant Lobelia dortmanna are diverse and include a high proportion of novel taxa[J].Mycorrhiza,2016,26:735-745.
Deepika S, Kothamasi D. Soil moisture:A regulator of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community assembly and symbiotic phosphorus uptake[J].Mycorrhiza,2015,25:67-75.
0
浏览量
991
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621