基于CSLE-TLSD耦合模型的近40年洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀时空分异及归因分析

李忠武; 李嘉奇; 王凌霞; 李雅喆

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于CSLE-TLSD耦合模型的近40年洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀时空分异及归因分析

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 基于CSLE-TLSD耦合模型的近40年洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀时空分异及归因分析
- Spatial-temporal Variation and Attribution Analysis of Soil Erosion in Dongting Lake Basin in Recent 40 Years Based on CSLE-TLSD Coupling Model
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第5期页码：207-214
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 湖南师范大学地理科学学院,长沙,410081
  2. 湖南大学环境科学与工程学院,长沙,410082
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李忠武(1972-),男,博士,教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与碳循环研究。E-mail:lizw@hnu.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(U19A2047)大学生创新训练项目(2023111)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.025
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李忠武, 李嘉奇, 王凌霞, 等. 基于CSLE-TLSD耦合模型的近40年洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀时空分异及归因分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):207-214.

LI Zhongwu, LI Jiaqi, WANG Lingxia, et al. Spatial-temporal Variation and Attribution Analysis of Soil Erosion in Dongting Lake Basin in Recent 40 Years Based on CSLE-TLSD Coupling Model[J]. 2023, 37(5): 207-214.
李忠武, 李嘉奇, 王凌霞, 等. 基于CSLE-TLSD耦合模型的近40年洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀时空分异及归因分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):207-214. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.025.

LI Zhongwu, LI Jiaqi, WANG Lingxia, et al. Spatial-temporal Variation and Attribution Analysis of Soil Erosion in Dongting Lake Basin in Recent 40 Years Based on CSLE-TLSD Coupling Model[J]. 2023, 37(5): 207-214. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.025.

摘要

为了精确模拟洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀动态过程并定量评估其影响因素贡献

在中国水土流失方程(CSLE)的基础上耦合泥沙输送限制模型(TLSD)

实现对土壤分离-搬运-沉积全动态过程分析。在此基础上

采用趋势分析和地理探测器方法探究洞庭湖流域1980-2020年土壤侵蚀时空分异特征与影响机制。结果表明:(1)CSLE-TLSD耦合模型在各水文站的年输沙量模拟值和实测值拟合结果较好(R2=0.56);(2)1980-2020年洞庭湖流域年均土壤侵蚀模数为5.09 t/(hm2·a)

侵蚀模数和面积在整体上均呈下降趋势

其中侵蚀显著改善区域占流域总面积的22.60%

而显著加剧区域仅占2.69%;(3)年侵蚀总量以2005年为突变点

呈现出先下降后上升的趋势;(4)2005年前后导致土壤侵蚀变化的主导因子从地类变化转变为年降雨量变化。综上

洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀总体呈现侵蚀面积收缩、局地恶化的趋势

其中极端降雨事件和经果林开发是侵蚀加剧的主要原因。

Abstract

In order to accurately simulate the dynamic process of soil erosion in the Dongting Lake basin and quantitatively evaluate its contribution of influencing factors

the sediment transport restriction model (TLSD) was coupled on the basis of the Chinese soil erosion equation (CSLE) to realize the analysis of the whole dynamic process of soil separation-transport-sediment

and trend analysis and geographic detector methods were used to explore the spatial and temporal characteristics and influence mechanism of soil erosion in the Dongting Lake Basin from 1980 to 2020. The results showed that:(1) The simulation and measured values of annual sand transport in each hydrological station were well matched by the coupled CSLE-TLSD model (R2=0.56). (2) From 1980 to 2020

the average annual soil erosion modulus of Dongting Lake Basin was 5.09 t/(hm2·a)

and both the erosion modulus and area showed a downward trend on the whole. The areas with significant erosion improvement accounted for 22.60% of total basin area

while the area with significant erosion intensification accounted for only 2.69%. (3) With 2005 as the mutation point

the annual total erosion showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. (4) Around 2005

the dominant factor leading to soil erosion change changed from land type change to annual rainfall change. In conclusion

soil erosion in the Dongting Lake basin showed a general trend of erosion area shrinkage

while local deterioration trended

among which extreme rainfall events and fruit forest development were the main reasons for the intensification of erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

Quan X, He J J, Cai Q G, et al. Soil erosion and deposition characteristics of slope surfaces for two loess soils using indoor simulated rainfall experiment[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2020,204(1/2):e104714.

李子君,许燕琳,王海军,等.基于WaTEM/SEDEM模型的沂河流域土壤侵蚀产沙模拟[J].地理研究,2021,40(8):2380-2396.

Li N, Zhang Y, Wang T W, et al. Have anthropogenic factors mitigated or intensified soil erosion over the past three decades in South China?[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,302:e114093.

Amundson R, Berhe A A, Hopmans J W, et al. Soil and human security in the 21st century[J].Science,2015,348(6235):e1261071.

Liu B Y, Zhang K L, Yun X. An empirical soil loss Equation//proceedings of 12th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference,Vol.Ⅲ..Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2002:21-25.

李经纬.南方红壤区土壤侵蚀时空演变特征及主要驱动力分析[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2020.

李娜,王新军,卢刚,等.2000-2017年天山北坡西白杨沟流域土壤侵蚀时空变化分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(3):73-79.

Zhang J X, Wang N, Wang Y F, et al. Responses of soil erosion to land-use changes in the largest tableland of the Loess Plateau[J].Land Degradation and Development,2021,32(13):3598-3613.

Verstraeten G, Prosser I P, Fogarty P. Predicting the spatial patterns of hillslope sediment delivery to river channels in the Murrumbidgee catchment,Australia[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,334(3/4):440-454.

Lin J K,Guan Q Y,Tian J, et al. Assessing temporal trends of soil erosion and sediment redistribution in the Hexi Corridor region using the integrated RUSLE-TLSD model[J].Catena,2020,195:e104756.

I Garousi-Nejad I, Tarboton D G, Aboutalebi M, et al. Terrain analysis enhancements to the height above nearest drainage flood inundation mapping method[J].Water Resources Research,2019,55(10):7983-8009.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

王欢,高江波,侯文娟.基于地理探测器的喀斯特不同地貌形态类型区土壤侵蚀定量归因[J].地理学报,2018,73(9):1674-1686.

王睿.湖南省水土保持规划简介(2016-2030年)[J].中国水土保持,2018(2):73-74.

Li Z W, Ning K, Chen J, et al. Soil and water conservation effects driven by the implementation of ecological restoration projects:Evidence from the red soil hilly region of China in the last three decades[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,260:e121109.

史志华,杨洁,李忠武,等.南方红壤低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):6-9.

刘纪远.20世纪90年代中国土地利用变化的遥感时空信息研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.

水利部水土保持监测中心.区域水土流失动态监测技术规范(试行)[S].北京:水利部水土保持监测中心,2018.

中华人民共和国水利部.SL 190-2007 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles[J].Journal of Hydrology,1970,10(3):282-290.

Eingrüber N, Korres W. Climate change simulation and trend analysis of extreme precipitation and floods in the mesoscale Rur catchment in western Germany until 2099 using Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) and the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT model)[J].Science of the Total Environment,2022,838:e155775.

高艳丽,李红波.汉江流域景观格局变化对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(6):2248-2260.

Li X, Zhang Y F, Ji X D, et al. Effects of shrub-grass cover on the hillslope overland flow and soil erosion under simulated rainfall[J].Environmental Research,2022,214:e113774.

刘伟,安伟,杨敏,等.基于SWAT模型的三峡库区大宁河流域产流产沙模拟及土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):49-56.

李景保,秦建新,曾南雁.湖南省水土保持与生态环境建设[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(3):70-74.

Jiang Y, Xiang D X, Li Z, et al.Study on soil and water erosion of Xiang Xi Watershed based on 3S dynamic monitoring[J].International Journal of Environmental Science and Development,2018,7:173-177.

Borrelli P, Robinson D A, Fleischer L R, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion[J].Nature Communications,2017,8(1):2013-2026.

Lowe M A, Mcgrath G, Leopold M. The impact of soil water repellency and slope upon runoff and erosion[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2021,205:e104756.

朱丽琴,黄荣珍,李凤,等.南方红壤丘陵区经果林开发对水土流失的影响:以江西省为例[J].中国水土保持,2019(5):38-41,69.

郎燕,刘宁,刘世荣.气候和土地利用变化影响下生态屏障带水土流失趋势研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(13):5106-5117.

张俊,高雅琦,徐卫立,等.长江流域极端降雨事件时空分布特征[J].人民长江,2019,50(8):81-86,135.

Duan J, Liu Y J, Tang C J, et al. Efficacy of orchard terrace measures to minimize water erosion caused by extreme rainfall in the hilly region of China:Long-term continuous in situ observations[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2021,278:e111537.

彭浩,李忠武,刘春,等.湘中低山丘陵区坡面产流输沙对降雨、土壤类型及水保措施的综合响应特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):60-67.

浏览量

1176

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

天山北坡土壤水分时空变化及驱动力分析

基于InVEST模型的青弋江流域土壤侵蚀与影响因素研究

喀斯特区土壤侵蚀与石漠化协同演变及交互关系

小流域土壤侵蚀模型（SWEM）

秦岭水源地生态恢复下土壤全氮分布对侵蚀的响应