基于InVEST模型的青弋江流域土壤侵蚀与影响因素研究

黄振华; 余健; 房莉; 方凤满; 苗雨青; 支俊俊; 徐光来; 水恒涛; 曹雨

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.023

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于InVEST模型的青弋江流域土壤侵蚀与影响因素研究

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 基于InVEST模型的青弋江流域土壤侵蚀与影响因素研究
- Research on Soil Erosion and Influencing Factors in Qingyi River Basin Based on InVEST Model
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第5期页码：189-197
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院,安徽,芜湖,241003
  2. 江淮流域地表过程与区域响应安徽省重点实验室,安徽,芜湖,241003
  3. 资源环境与地理信息工程安徽省工程技术研究中心,安徽,芜湖,241003
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "黄振华(2000-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事生态环境保护与评价研究。E-mail:2692827747@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(41977402,42271060)安徽省高校工程技术研究中心重点项目(KJ2019A0508)安徽省教育厅科研项目(YJS20210183)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.023
  中图分类号： K903
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
黄振华, 余健, 房莉, 等. 基于InVEST模型的青弋江流域土壤侵蚀与影响因素研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):189-197.

HUANG Zhenhua, YU Jian, FANG Li, et al. Research on Soil Erosion and Influencing Factors in Qingyi River Basin Based on InVEST Model[J]. 2023, 37(5): 189-197.
黄振华, 余健, 房莉, 等. 基于InVEST模型的青弋江流域土壤侵蚀与影响因素研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):189-197. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.023.

HUANG Zhenhua, YU Jian, FANG Li, et al. Research on Soil Erosion and Influencing Factors in Qingyi River Basin Based on InVEST Model[J]. 2023, 37(5): 189-197. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.023.

摘要

为探究安徽省青弋江流域土壤侵蚀的演变规律和驱动因素

采用InVEST模型对该流域2000-2018年的土壤侵蚀特征开展了研究

量化了不同土地利用类型、海拔、坡度下土壤侵蚀状况

并借助地理探测器对流域土壤侵蚀影响因素进行分析。结果表明:(1)2000年、2010年、2018年该流域平均土壤侵蚀模数分别为15.29

14.14

10.74 t/(hm2·a)

侵蚀总量分别为1.08×107

1.00×107

0.76×107 t

呈现逐渐减小特征;(2)流域内土壤侵蚀空间差异显著

呈现"北低南高"的分布格局;(3)不同土地利用类型土壤侵蚀模数大小表现为裸地>草地>林地>耕地>建设用地>水体

全流域林地侵蚀量最大

占总侵蚀量的73.71%;(4)地形因子对流域内土壤侵蚀存在显著影响

坡度是青弋江流域土壤侵蚀主导因子

因子间交互作用对土壤侵蚀的解释力均大于单因子

其中坡度与年降水量和土地利用的协同作用解释力最强

分别达22.93%和22.29%;(5)坡地坡度降缓及增加草地和林地覆盖可以有效降低土壤侵蚀。研究结果为厘清青弋江流域土壤侵蚀分布格局和驱动因素

以及为青弋江流域推进水土保持治理工作和提高生态效益提供决策依据。

Abstract

To investigate the evolution pattern and drivers of soil erosion in the Qingyi River watershed of Anhui Province

the InVEST model was used to investigate the soil erosion characteristics of the watershed from 2000 to 2018

quantify the soil erosion conditions under different land use types

elevations

and slopes

and analyze the factors influencing soil erosion in the watershed with the help of a geographic probe. The results showed that:(1) The average soil erosion modulus in the watershed was 15.29

14.14

and 10.74 t/(hm2·a) in 2000

2010

and 2018

respectively

and the total erosion was 1.08×107

1.00×107

and 0.76×107 t

respectively

showing a gradually decreasing characteristic. (2) Soil erosion in the watershed varied significantly in space

showing a distribution pattern of low in the north and high in the south. (3) The size of soil erosion modulus of different land use types showed that bare land>grassland>forestland>cultivated land>construction land>water bodies

and the erosion of forest land in the watershed was the largest

accounting for 73.71% of the total erosion. (4) Topographic factors had significant effects on soil erosion in the watershed

and slope was the dominant factor of soil erosion in the Qingyi River watershed. The explanatory power of the interaction between factors on soil erosion was greater than that of single factors

among which the synergistic effect of slope with annual precipitation and land use was the strongest

reaching 22.93% and 22.29%. (5) Soil erosion could be effectively reduced by slowing the slope and increasing grassland and woodland cover in slope areas. The results of the study provide a basis for clarifying the distribution pattern and driving factors of soil erosion in the Qingyi River basin

and can provide a basis for decision making to promote soil and water conservation management and improve ecological benefits in the Qingyi River basin.

关键词

Keywords

references

Ahmad A, Younes I, Abbas S, et al. Impact assessment of land cover and land use changes on soil erosion changes (2005-2015) in Pakistan[J].Land Degradation and Development,2022,33(1):204-217.

Ni J R, Li X X, Borthwick A. Soil erosion assessment based on minimum polygons in the Yellow River basin, China[J].Geomorphology,2008,93(3/4):233-252.

水利部水土保持司司长刘震先生论:《全国水土保持规划(2015-2030年)》的主要内容及实施建议[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(6):3-5.

Zhu Q, Guo X, Guo J X, et al. The quality attribute of watershed ecosystem is more important than the landscape attribute in controlling erosion of red soil in southern China[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2022,10(3):507-517.

Zhang H Y, Fan J W,Cao W, et al. Response of wind erosion dynamics to climate change and human activity in Inner Mongolia, China during 1990 to 2015[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,639:1038-1050.

郝永佩,宋晓伟,徐仪红.Pu同位素示踪技术在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(6):1482-1488.

李聪,李鹏,李占斌,等.REE示踪坡面径流侵蚀演变过程试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):19-22.

Almasalmeh O, Saleh A A, Mourad K A. Soil erosion and sediment transport modelling using hydrological models and remote sensing techniques in Wadi Billi, Egypt[J].Modeling Earth Systems and Environment,2022,8(1):1215-1226.

程先富,余芬.安徽省土壤侵蚀空间分布及其与环境因子的关系[J].地理研究,2010,29(8):1461-1470.

Morgan R P C, Quinton J N, Smith R E, et al. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM):A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1998,23(6):527-544.

韩晶,崔金芳,杨威,等.基于InVEST模型的低山丘陵区土壤侵蚀变化与驱动因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):32-39.

张晓敏,张东梅,王莉,等.降雨、积雪以及土地利用复合影响下的额尔齐斯河流域土壤侵蚀分析[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(5):104-111.

杨洁,谢保鹏,张德罡,等.基于InVEST模型的黄河流域土壤侵蚀评估及其时空变化[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(5):650-658.

安徽省人民政府办公厅关于印发安徽省国土空间生态修复规划(2021-2035年)的通知[R].安徽省人民政府公报,2022(11):13-34.

章文波,谢云,刘宝元.中国降雨侵蚀力空间变化特征[J].山地学报,2003,21(1):33-40.

吴志俊,王永强,鄢波,等.基于InVEST模型的鄂尔多斯市土壤侵蚀及土壤保持功能研究[J].水电能源科学,2021,39(8):31-34.

宋阳,刘连友,严平,等.土壤可蚀性研究述评[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(1):124-131.

汪邦稳.安徽省土壤可蚀性

值及其分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(6):132-139.

杨勤科,郭伟玲,张宏鸣,等.基于DEM的流域坡度坡长因子计算方法研究初报[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):203-206.

冯强,赵文武.USLE/RUSLE中植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展[J].生态学报,2014,34(16):4461-4472.

Wischmeier W H. Predicting rainfall erosion losses-aguide to conservation planning[J].Agriculture Handbook,1978,537:285-291.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

中华人民共和国水利部.SL 190-2007 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2007.

王猛,王鹤松,姜超,等.基于RUSLE和地理探测器模型的西南地区土壤侵蚀格局及定量归因[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2021,29(6):1386-1402.

郭星星,吕春娟,陈丹,等.雨强和坡度对铁尾矿砂坡面复垦前后产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):8-13.

Li Z W, Zhang G H, Geng R, et al. Land use impacts on soil detachment capacity by overland flow in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2015,124:9-17.

曹美晨,辛艳,任正龑等.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用坡面的降雨侵蚀特征[J].泥沙研究,2022,47(6):43-50.

Sun W Y, Shao Q Q, Liu J Y, et al. Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China[J].Catena,2014,121:151-163.

何莎莎,朱文博,崔耀平,等.基于InVEST模型的太行山淇河流域土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(2):426-439.

浏览量

1061

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于InVEST与CA-Markov模型的窟野河流域水源涵养量时空演变与预测

基于PLUS-InVEST模型的三峡库区土地利用变化与土壤侵蚀多情景预测

基于CSLE-TLSD耦合模型的近40年洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀时空分异及归因分析

基于InVEST-PLUS模型的陕西省水源涵养量估算及预测

基于RUSLE模型的秦岭—大巴山地土壤侵蚀时空特征分析