1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 北京林业大学山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,北京,100083
3. 北京市水生态保护与水土保持中心,北京,100074
[ "张萌(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土资源高效利用研究。E-mail:zm815815@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
张萌, 关红杰, 王若水, 等. 水土保持措施对密云板栗林坡面产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):130-136.
ZHANG Meng, GUAN Hongjie, WANG Ruoshui, et al. Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Runoff and Sediment Yield on Slopes of Miyun Chestnut Forest[J]. 2023, 37(5): 130-136.
张萌, 关红杰, 王若水, 等. 水土保持措施对密云板栗林坡面产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):130-136. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.016.
ZHANG Meng, GUAN Hongjie, WANG Ruoshui, et al. Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Runoff and Sediment Yield on Slopes of Miyun Chestnut Forest[J]. 2023, 37(5): 130-136. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.016.
以北京市密云板栗林为研究对象
设置植物措施、工程措施和植物+工程措施处理(裸地作为对照)分析不同水土保持单一措施及其组合措施对坡面产流产沙及水沙关系的影响
以期为密云区板栗林水土保持措施的制定提供科学依据。结果表明:植物措施方面
卷柏处理的减流率和减沙率分别为62.8%
88.3%
减流减沙效果优于椰丝毯、狗牙根和结缕草处理;工程措施方面
水平阶处理的减流率和减沙率分别为83.2%
92.9%
减流减沙效果优于鱼鳞坑处理;组合措施方面
水平阶+卷柏处理的减流率和减沙率分别为86.7%
96.1%
水土流失防治效果最好。不同水土保持措施对径流量和产沙量的影响还取决于降雨量和降雨强度。综上
考虑到植物+工程组合措施的减流减沙效果略强于工程措施
但差异不显著
因此在综合考虑经济效益和生态效益的基础上
建议采用工程措施进行板栗林水土流失防治
具体采取水平阶作为研究区的主要水土保持措施。
Taking the chestnut forest in Miyun District of Beijing as the research object
plant measures
engineering measures
and plant + engineering measures were set up to analyze the impact of different single and combined soil and water conservation measures on the runoff and sediment yield and the relationship between runoff and sediment on the slope
with the aim of providing scientific basis for the formulation of soil and water conservation measures in chestnut forests in Miyun District. The results showed that in terms of plant measures
the runoff and sediment reduction rate of Selaginella tamariscina treatment was 62.8% and 88.3%
respectively. The reduction effect of runoff and sediment of S. tamariscina treatment was better than that of coconut silk blanket
Cynodon dactylon and Zoysia japonica treatment. In terms of engineering measures
the runoff and sediment reduction rate of level terrace treatment was 83.2% and 92.9%
respectively
which was higher than that of fish-scale pits treatment. In terms of the combined measures
the runoff and sediment reduction rate of level terrace + S. tamariscina treatment was 86.7% and 96.1%
respectively
indicating the best effect of soil erosion prevention and control. The impact of different measures on runoff and sediment also depended on rainfall amount and intensity. In summary
the combined measures plant + engineering measures had slightly stronger control effects of runoff and sediment than engineering measures
but the difference was not significant. Therefore
on the basis of comprehensive consideration of economic and ecological benefits
it was recommended that engineering measures should be adopted to prevent and control soil and water loss in chestnut forests in this study area. Specifically
level terrace should be taken as the main soil and water conservation measures in the study area.
中华人民共和国水利部.中国水土保持公报.2021.
北京市水务局.北京市水土保持公报.2021.
杨坪坪,李勇,宋涛,等.典型喀斯特区侵蚀性降雨特征及坡面生物措施水土流失防控效应[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(1):53-62.
戴育全,肖理,刘文虎,等.西南山区土质边坡防护措施的减流减沙效益评估[J].中国水土保持科学,2023,21(1):73-82.
Luo J, Zhou X L, Rubinato M, et al. Impact of multiple vegetation covers on surface runoff and sediment yield in the small basin of Nverzhai, Hunan Province, China[J].Forests,2020,11(3):e329.
Tu A G, Xie S H, Yu Z B, et al. Long-term effect of soil and water conservation measures on runoff, sediment and their relationship in an orchard on sloping red soil of Southern China[J].PLoS One,2018,13(9):e0203669.
Fang H Y. Impacts of soil conservation measures on runoff and soil loss in a hilly region, Northern China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2021,247:e106740.
安晨,方海燕,王奋忠.密云水库上游坡面产流产沙特征及降雨响应:以石匣小流域为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(5):43-51.
何杨洋,王晓燕,段淑怀.密云水库上游流域次降雨坡面产流产沙特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):134-141.
Zhang X X, Song J X, Wang Y R, et al. Effects of land use on slope runoff and soil loss in the Loess Plateau of China:A meta-analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,2021,755:e142418.
张嘉懿,汪军红,程先富,等.降雨对江子河小流域不同农作物措施坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):8-14.
王升,王全九,董文财,等.黄土坡面不同植被覆盖度下产流产沙与养分流失规律[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):23-27.
欧阳帅,项文化,陈亮,等.南方山地丘陵区森林植被恢复对水土流失调控机制[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):1-9.
王伦江,张兴昌.苜蓿影响砒砂岩陡坡侵蚀的水动力学机理研究[J].土壤学报,2020,57(2):284-295.
Vannoppen W, Vanmaercke M, De Baets S, et al. A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2015,150:666-678.
郭宇,王树森,马迎梅,等.植被毯对内蒙古清水河县黄土丘陵沟壑区黄土边坡产流产沙量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):61-71.
张平,王树森,马迎梅,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同草本植物生长期植物纤维毯对沟道边坡产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):49-55.
张杰,陈晓安,汤崇军,等.典型水土保持措施对红壤坡地柑橘园水土保持效益的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):165-173.
邵奕铭,高光耀,刘见波,等.自然降雨下黄土丘陵区草灌植物垂直覆盖结构的减流减沙效应[J].生态学报,2022,42(1):322-331.
汪邦稳,肖胜生,张光辉,等.南方红壤区不同利用土地产流产沙特征试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(2):239-243.
Zhao J L, Yang Z Q, Govers G. Soil and water conservation measures reduce soil and water losses in China but not down to background levels:Evidence from erosion plot data[J].Geoderma,2019,337:729-741.
张晓明,余新晓,武思宏,等.黄土区森林植被对流域径流和输沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(3):48-53.
李慧敏,张建军,徐佳佳,等.黄土高原不同下垫面小流域径流特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(10):90-93,113.
周宏飞,王大庆,马健,等.天山山区草地覆被和雨强对产流和产沙的影响研究:以天山天池自然保护区为例[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(5):26-29.
李广,黄高宝.雨强和土地利用方式对黄土丘陵区水土流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):85-90.
0
浏览量
1127
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621