水分胁迫和粉煤灰添加对风沙土颗粒分形维数及肥力的影响

朱晓月; 马灿; 方燕; 上官周平

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

水分胁迫和粉煤灰添加对风沙土颗粒分形维数及肥力的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 水分胁迫和粉煤灰添加对风沙土颗粒分形维数及肥力的影响
- Effects of Drought Stress and Fly Ash on Fractal Dimension and Fertility of Aeolian Sandy Soil
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第5期页码：103-110
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "朱晓月(1999-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事生理生态学研究。E-mail:zhuxy679@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(41807516)国家自然科学基金面上项目(42077452)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.013
  中图分类号： S156.92
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱晓月, 马灿, 方燕, 等. 水分胁迫和粉煤灰添加对风沙土颗粒分形维数及肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):103-110.

ZHU Xiaoyue, MA Can, FANG Yan, et al. Effects of Drought Stress and Fly Ash on Fractal Dimension and Fertility of Aeolian Sandy Soil[J]. 2023, 37(5): 103-110.
朱晓月, 马灿, 方燕, 等. 水分胁迫和粉煤灰添加对风沙土颗粒分形维数及肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):103-110. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.013.

ZHU Xiaoyue, MA Can, FANG Yan, et al. Effects of Drought Stress and Fly Ash on Fractal Dimension and Fertility of Aeolian Sandy Soil[J]. 2023, 37(5): 103-110. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.013.

摘要

探讨不同比例粉煤灰在水分胁迫下与风沙土复配对沙土颗粒分形维数及肥力的影响

为毛乌素沙地土壤肥力提升提供理论依据。采用盆栽控水方法

设置4个粉煤灰水平(F0、F1、F2、F3

分别占风沙土干重的0

10%)和3个水分梯度[W1、W2、W3

分别占田间持水量的(75±5)%

(55±5)%

(35±5)%]

采用分形维数反映在水分和粉煤灰作用下风沙土粒径分布特点

利用主成分分析结合聚类分析方法评价不同处理下风沙土肥力变化。结果表明:(1)在相同水分条件下

风沙土分形维数随着粉煤灰复配比例的增加而增加。(2)在相同粉煤灰复配比例下

风沙土中硝态氮(NO3--N)含量随着水分胁迫利用效率提高

呈现出增加的趋势。(3)粉煤灰和水分处理条件下风沙土中全氮(TN)含量均处于较低水平

在实际生产过程中应考虑配施氮肥。(4)对风沙土肥力综合评价结果表明

粉煤灰10%复配比例效果较好

且在干旱情况下有一定的适用性。

Abstract

In order to explore the effects of different proportions of fly ash composited with aeolian sandy soil on the fractal dimension and fertility of sand particles under drought stress and to provide a theoretical basis for fertility promotion of Mu Us sandy land

four fly ash levels (F0

and F3

accounting for 0

5% and 10% of dry weight of aeolian sandy soil

respectively) and three water levels[W1

W2 and W3

accounting for (75±5)%

(55±5)% and (35±5)% of the field water capacity

respectively] were set up in the experiments

and a pot cultivation method was used for water control. The fractal dimension was used to reflect the particle size distribution of aeolian sandy soil under the action of water and fly ash. And the principle component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis method were used to evaluate the fertility change of aeolian sandy soil under different treatments. The results showed that:(1) Under the same water condition

the fractal dimension of aeolian sandy soil increased with the increasing of fly ash proportion. (2) Under the same proportion of fly ash

the content of nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N) of aeolian sandy soil showed an increasing trend with the improvement of drought stress utilization efficiency. (3) The total nitrogen (TN) content of aeolian sandy soil was at low level under treatments of fly ash and drought stress. Nitrogen fertilizer application should be considered in the actual production process. (4) The comprehensive evaluation results of aeolian sandy soil showed that 10% composite ratio of 10% fly ash had good effect and it had certain applicability in drought situations.

关键词

Keywords

references

尹春艳,赵举,刘虎,等.水煤浆气化渣对毛乌素沙地土壤改良与菊芋生长的促进效应研究[J].土壤通报,2021,52(6):1411-1417.

赵吉,钱贵霞,杨志坚,等.沙区生态产业理论体系与实践模式[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(12):1-8.

Medina A, Gamero P, Querol X, et a1. Fly ash from a Mexican mineral coal I:Mineralogical and chemical characterization[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,181(1/2/3):82-90.

季慧慧,黄明丽,何键,等.粉煤灰对土壤性质改善及肥力提升的作用研究进展[J].土壤,2017,49(4):665-669.

武琳,郑永红,张治国,等.粉煤灰用作土壤改良剂的养分和污染风险评价[J].环境科学与技术,2020,43(9):219-227.

赵亮,唐泽军,刘芳.粉煤灰改良沙质土壤水分物理性质的室内试验[J].环境科学学报,2009,29(9):1951-1957.

郑鹏,党廷辉,薛江.粉煤灰、砒砂岩对煤矿排土场土壤水分特性改良的研究[J].土壤学报,2023,60(2):399-408.

孙红娟,曾丽,彭同江.粉煤灰高值化利用研究现状与进展[J].材料导报,2021,35(3):3010-3015.

Neuman S P. Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic media[J].Water Resources Research,1990,26(8):1749-1758.

谢贤健,韩光中.不同巨桉人工林土壤分形特征及抗蚀性分析[J].土壤,2014,46(4):725-731.

贾晓红,李新荣,张景光,等.沙冬青灌丛地的土壤颗粒大小分形维数空间变异性分析[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):2827-2833.

陈东.油蒿灌丛沙堆形态特征及其不同演化阶段土壤理化性质分析[D].北京:北京林业大学,2015.

程杰,王欢元,解建仓,等.不同配比下复配土的土壤颗粒组成、分形维数与质地变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):30-34.

高永,丁延龙,汪季,等.不同植物灌丛沙丘表面沉积物粒度变化及其固沙能力[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):135-142.

叶少萍,李铤,张俊涛,等.基于主成分分析的古树土壤肥力综合评价[J].生态科学,2022,41(1):196-205.

Singh V, Agrawal H M, Joshi G C, et al. Elemental profile of agricultural soil by the EDXRF technique and use of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method to interpret the complex data[J].Applied Radiation and Isotopes,2011,69(7):969-974.

陈玉芹,胡永亮,张丽萍,等.基于主成分和聚类分析的德宏橡胶林土壤肥力评价[J].热带作物学报,2019,40(8):1461-1467.

王陇,高广磊,张英,等.毛乌素沙地风沙土粒径分布特征及其影响因素[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(5):1003-1010.

白丽敏.关中塿土堆垫层厚度空间分布特征及其对土壤肥力质量的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

常海涛,赵娟,刘佳楠,等.退耕还林与还草对土壤理化性质及分形特征的影响:以宁夏荒漠草原为例[J].草业学报,2019,28(7):14-25.

Tyler S W, Wheatcraft S. Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions:Analysis and limitations[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1992,56(2):362-369.

唐贤慧,郭澎涛,罗微,等.基于主成分分析的海南橡胶园土壤化学肥力的评价[J].热带生物学报,2022,13(1):36-41.

刘雪强,南丽丽,郭全恩,等.黄土高原半干旱区种植不同绿肥作物对土壤理化性质的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2020,55(1):145-152.

Hillel D. Fundamentals of soil physics[M].New York:Academic Press,1980.

Peyton R L, Gantzer C J, Anderson S H, et al. Fractal dimension to describe soil macropore structure using X ray computed tomography[J].Water Resources Research,1994,30(3):691-700.

蒋嘉瑜,刘任涛,张安宁.干旱与半干旱荒漠草原区柠条灌丛土壤分形维数与理化性质对比分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):54-61,69.

Bai Y F, Qin Y, Lu X R, et al. Fractal dimension of particle-size distribution and their relationships with alkalinity properties of soils in the western Songnen Plain, China[J].Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):1-11.

Mohammadi M, Shabanpour M, Mohammadi M H, et al. Characterizing spatial variability of soil textural fractions and fractal parameters derived from particle size distributions[J].Pedosphere,2019,29(2):224-234.

Liu X, Zhang G C, Heathman G C, et al. Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution as affected by plant communities in the forested region of Mountain Yimeng, China[J].Geoderma,2009,154(1/2):123-130.

Singh, J S, Pandey, V C. Fly ash application in nutrient poor agriculture soils:Impact on methanotrophs population dynamics and paddy yields[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2013,89:43-51.

王丽丽,甄庆,王颖,等.晋陕蒙矿区排土场不同改良模式下土壤养分效应研究[J].土壤学报,2018,55(6):1525-1533.

胡锦昇,樊军,付威,等.保护性耕作措施对旱地春玉米土壤水分和硝态氮淋溶累积的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(4):1188-1198.

Cleveland C C, Liptzin D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil:Is there a "Redfield ratio" for the microbial biomass?[J].Biogeochemistry,2007,85(3):235-252.

Tian H Q, Chen G S, Zhang C, et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China's soils:A synthesis of observational data[J].Biogeochemistry,2010,98(1):139-151.

张立成,李娟,李志辉,等.基于主成分分析的不同轮作施肥模式下赤红壤肥力质量变化[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(10):79-84.

孟庆英,朱宝国,王囡囡,等.基于主成分分析法的白浆土土壤肥力评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021(10):32-36.

郝薛蕾.河北平原冬小麦/夏玉米农田耕层土壤肥力评价[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2020.

He H H, Dong Z G, Pang J Y, et al. Phytoextraction of rhenium by lucerne (

Medicago sativa

) and erect milkvetch (

Astragalus adsurgens

) from alkaline soils amended with coal fly ash[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,630:570-577.

He H H, Dong Z G, Peng Q, et al. Impacts of coal fly ash on plant growth and accumulation of essential nutrients and trace elements by alfalfa (

Medicago sativa

) grown in a loessial soil[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2017,197:428-439.

Ukwattage N L, LakmalieA U V, Gamage R P. Soil and plant growth response and trace elements accumulation in sweet corn and snow pea grown under fresh and carbonated coal fly ash amendment[J].Agronomy Journal,2021,113(4):3147-3158.

浏览量

1096

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

煤矸石与菌剂复配对风沙土理化性质及苜蓿生长的影响

江苏省空青山林地土壤物理性质对优先流的影响

三峡库区皇竹草植物篱对坡面土壤分形特征及可蚀性的影响

重庆四面山几种林地土壤颗粒分形特征及其影响因素

重庆四面山不同林地土壤颗粒特征及其与土壤侵蚀的关系