红壤丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮对水分入渗的影响

李雨晨; 平原; 澹腾辉; 张航宇; 郭忠录

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.009

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

红壤丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮对水分入渗的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 红壤丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮对水分入渗的影响
- Effects of Biocrust with Different Coverage on Water Infiltration in Red Soil Hilly Region
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第5期页码：71-77
- 作者机构：
  
  华中农业大学水土保持研究中心,武汉,430070
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李雨晨(1995-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与生态恢复研究。E-mail:625250301@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42077066)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.009
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李雨晨, 平原, 澹腾辉, 等. 红壤丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮对水分入渗的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):71-77.

LI Yuchen, PING Yuan, TAN Tenghui, et al. Effects of Biocrust with Different Coverage on Water Infiltration in Red Soil Hilly Region[J]. 2023, 37(5): 71-77.
李雨晨, 平原, 澹腾辉, 等. 红壤丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮对水分入渗的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):71-77. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.009.

LI Yuchen, PING Yuan, TAN Tenghui, et al. Effects of Biocrust with Different Coverage on Water Infiltration in Red Soil Hilly Region[J]. 2023, 37(5): 71-77. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.009.

摘要

为探究不同盖度生物结皮对入渗特征的影响

在红壤丘陵区咸宁选取第四纪黏土发育土壤(S型)和泥质页岩发育土壤(N型)上的生物结皮

设计6个盖度水平(裸地

1%~20%

20%~40%

40%~60%

60%~80%

80%~100%)

使用微型圆盘入渗仪(mini disk)测定土壤入渗过程

探究入渗过程的影响因素

同时采用3种常见的入渗模型对入渗过程进行拟合

并评价模型适用性。结果表明:(1)相对于裸地

生物结皮发育提高土壤有机质和黏粒含量

增加结皮厚度和生物量

降低砂粒含量。(2)第四纪黏土发育土壤水分入渗特征随生物结皮盖度的增加而逐渐降低

初始入渗速率、稳定入渗速率、平均入渗速率、非饱和导水率的变化范围分别为0.25~1.55

0.13~0.91

0.17~1.11

2.04~8.48 mm/min。泥质页岩发育土壤除40%~60%盖度砾石含量较高

土壤水分入渗也随盖度的增加而逐渐减小

80%~100%盖度的初始、平均和稳定入渗率较裸地分别降低91.14%

87.64%和91.30%

生物结皮的存在阻碍土壤水分入渗。冗余分析表明

对于第四纪黏土发育土壤

生物量(54.30%)对其入渗特征的解释度最高

泥质页岩发育土壤则为盖度(39.30%)和砾石含量(34.00%)。(3)Horton模型、Kostiakov模型、Philip模型3种主流入渗模型中Horton模型拟合效果最优。研究结果可为揭示湿润区生物结皮水分运移规律提供科学参考。

Abstract

In order to explore the influence of biocrust with different coverage on infiltration process

biocrust from quaternary clay developed red soil (S type) and argillaceous shale developed soil (N type) were selected in the red soil hilly area of Xianning. And six coverage levels (bare land

1%~20%

20%~40%

40%~60%

60%~80% and 80%~100%) were set. The Mini disk infiltration instrument was used to determine the soil infiltration process and explore the factors affected the infiltration process

meanwhile three common models were used to simulate the infiltration process and the suitability of the model were compared. The results showed that:(1) Compared with bare soil

the development of two types of biocrust increased soil organic carbon

clay content

crust thickness and biomass

while decreased sand content. (2) The water infiltration characteristics of S-type soil decreased gradually with the increasing of biocrust coverage. The initial infiltration rate

stable infiltration rate

average infiltration rate and unsaturated water conductivity varied from 0.25 to 1.55

0.13 to 0.91

0.17 to 1.11 and 2.04 to 8.48 mm/min

respectively. In N-type soil

the soil water infiltration decreased with the increasing of coverage except for 40% to 60% (high gravel content). The initial infiltration rate

average infiltration rate and stable infiltration rate of 80% to 100% coverage decreased by 91.14%

87.64% and 91.30%

respectively

compared with the bare soil. The presence of biocrust impeded the soil water infiltration. The RDA analysis showed that for S-type soil

biomass (54.30%) had the highest interpretation for its infiltration characteristics

while for N-type soil

they were coverage (39.30%) and gravel content (34.00%). (3) Among the three mainstream infiltration models

Horton model

Kostiakov model and Philip model

Horton model had the best fitting effect. The results could provide a useful reference for the study of water transport law of biological crusts in humid areas.

关键词

Keywords

references

李新荣,张元明,赵允格.生物土壤结皮研究:进展、前沿与展望[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(1):11-24.

Belnap J. The potential roles of biological soil crusts in dryland hydrologic cycles[J].Hydrological Processes,2006,20(15):3159-3178.

李新荣,谭会娟,回嵘,等.中国荒漠与沙地生物土壤结皮研究[J].科学通报,2018,63(23):2320-2334.

赵允格,许明祥,王全九,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮理化性状初报[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(8):1429-1434.

肖波,赵允格,邵明安.陕北水蚀风蚀交错区两种生物结皮对土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4662-4670.

高丽倩,赵允格,秦宁强,等.黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤可蚀性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(1):105-112.

冉茂勇,赵允格,陈彦芹.黄土丘陵水蚀区生物结皮土壤抗冲性试验研究[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(3):37-40,62.

Kakeh J, Gorji M, Sohrabi M, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on some physicochemical characteristics of rangeland soils of Alagol, Turkmen Sahra, NE Iran[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2018,181:152-159.

Guan H J, Liu X Y. Biocrust effects on soil infiltrability in the Mu Us Desert:Soil hydraulic properties analysis and modeling[J].Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics,2021,69(4):378-386.

Chamizo S, Cantón Y, Lázaro R, et al. Crust composition and disturbance drive infiltration through biological soil crusts in semiarid ecosystems[J].Ecosystems,2012,15(1):148-161.

Kakeh J, Gorji M, Mohammadi M H, et al. Biological soil crusts determine soil properties and salt dynamics under arid climatic condition in Qara Qir, Iran[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2020,732:e139168.

孙福海,肖波,姚小萌,等.黄土高原生物结皮斥水性及其沿降水梯度变化特征研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(7):304-312.

Wang X P, Li X R, Xiao H L, et al. Effects of surface characteristics on infiltration patterns in an arid shrub desert[J].Hydrological Processes,2007,21(1):72-79.

袁再健,马东方,聂小东,等.南方红壤丘陵区林下水土流失防治研究进展[J].土壤学报,2020,57(1):12-21.

Chamizo S, Cantón Y, Miralles I, et al. Biological soil crust development affects physicochemical characteristics of soil surface in semiarid ecosystems[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2012,49:96-105.

张轩铭,戴翠婷,李朝霞,等.三峡库区紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(4):92-98.

Bowker M A, Reed S C, Maestre F T, et al. Biocrusts:The living skin of the earth[J].Plant and Soil,2018,429(1):1-7.

王浩,张光辉,刘法,等.黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤入渗的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):117-123.

Jiang Z Y, Li X Y, Wei J Q, et al. Contrasting surface soil hydrology regulated by biological and physical soil crusts for patchy grass in the high-altitude alpine steppe ecosystem[J].Geoderma,2018,326:201-209.

Chamizo S, Belnap J, Eldridge D J, et al. The role of biocrusts in arid land hydrology[M].//Biological Soil Crusts:An Organizing Principle in Drylands Cham:Springer,2016:321-346.

Ortega-Morales B O, Narváez Zapata J, Reyes Estebanez M, et al. Bioweathering potential of cultivable fungi associated with semi-arid surface microhabitats of Mayan buildings[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2016,7:201.

Kidron G J, Vonshak A, Dor I, et al. Properties and spatial distribution of microbiotic crusts in the Negev Desert, Israel[J].Catena,2010,82(2):92-101.

Raddadi N, Giacomucci L, Marasco R, et al. Bacterial polyextremotolerant bioemulsifiers from arid soils improve water retention capacity and humidity uptake in sandy soil[J].Microbial Cell Factories,2018,17(1):83-94.

Li S L, Bowker M A, Xiao B. Impacts of moss-dominated biocrusts on rainwater infiltration, vertical water flow, and surface soil evaporation in drylands[J].Journal of Hydrology,2022,612:e128176.

吕刚,王婷,王韫策,等.辽西低山丘陵区坡地砾石含量及粒径对土壤入渗性能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):86-92.

张冠华,易亮,丁文峰,等.三峡库区苔藓生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1835-1842.

郝文静,陈晓燕,胡建新,等.紫色土区林地土壤入渗性能试验研究[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(24):204-209.

刘洁,李贤伟,纪中华,等.元谋干热河谷三种植被恢复模式土壤贮水及入渗特性[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2331-2340.

闫建梅,何丙辉,田太强,等.川中丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤入渗与贮水特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):53-57.

浏览量

996

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同有机物料对黄土高原治沟造地土壤水分运移的影响

坡度影响下的砒砂岩区裸露坡面水分入渗特征及模拟

生物炭-秸秆隔层协同改良对盐碱土壤水分入渗过程的影响

喀斯特区出露基岩对土壤水分入渗过程的影响

露天煤矿排土场覆土厚度对土壤水分入渗及植物水分利用的影响