1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 北京林业大学水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
3. 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司节能环保劳卫研究所,北京,100081
[ "于洋(1999-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:yuyang990211@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
于洋, 姜群鸥, 王紫璇, 等. 基于WEPP模型的工程建设中施工便道边坡水土流失特征——以林芝市巴宜区为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):31-39.
YU Yang, JIANG Qunou, WANG Zixuan, et al. Soil and Water Loss Characteristics of Construction Service Road Hillside in Engineering Construction Based on WEPP Model—Take Bayi District, Nyingchi City as An Example[J]. 2023, 37(5): 31-39.
于洋, 姜群鸥, 王紫璇, 等. 基于WEPP模型的工程建设中施工便道边坡水土流失特征——以林芝市巴宜区为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):31-39. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.004.
YU Yang, JIANG Qunou, WANG Zixuan, et al. Soil and Water Loss Characteristics of Construction Service Road Hillside in Engineering Construction Based on WEPP Model—Take Bayi District, Nyingchi City as An Example[J]. 2023, 37(5): 31-39. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.004.
工程建设中施工便道导致的水土流失与传统土壤侵蚀不同
施工便道改变原自然坡面形态及水文过程
致使植被破坏、地表裸露
并形成路面、挖填边坡等多个侵蚀产沙部位
结构松散的路堑及边坡对降雨的响应更强、速度更快
土质低等级道路所引起的土壤侵蚀问题占比很大
因此研究可为工程扰动中施工便道的水土流失防治提供基础依据。以林芝市巴宜区为研究对象
采用WEPP模型对工程扰动下不同降雨条件、不同坡度坡长情况下施工便道边坡径流量、土壤流失量进行模拟分析
揭示施工便道边坡水土流失特征规律和关键影响因素。结果表明:(1)开始产生径流的60 min最大雨强(I60)为11.16 mm/h
降雨量为12.40 mm;I60处于10~17 mm/h范围内径流量低于0.50 mm
土壤流失量低于0.010 kg/m2
当I60超过17 mm/h后
I60与径流量、土壤流失量具有线性关系。(2)径流量随坡度增加呈"快速增加-增速减慢-逐渐减小"3个阶段
坡度在5°以下时产生最低径流量56.98~58.00 mm
坡度在30°~35°时产生最高径流量76.19~77.01 mm;土壤流失量随坡度增加呈"先快速增加-后趋于稳定"2个阶段
坡度在5°以下边坡土壤流失量最小
坡度在50°后趋于稳定。(3)靠山边坡径流量随坡长增加而降低
不靠山边坡径流量则随坡长变化保持稳定
坡长在50 m后靠山边坡径流量低于不靠山边坡
且差异随坡长的增加而增大;靠山边坡土壤流失量随坡长的增加呈"先快速增加-后增速减小"趋势
不靠山边坡土壤流失量随坡长的增加基本保持匀速增加。研究结果用于高寒区工程扰动后边坡水土流失驱动机制分析。
The soil and water loss caused by the construction service road in engineering construction is different from the traditional soil erosion. The construction service road changes the original natural slope morphology and hydrological process
resulting in vegetation destruction
surface exposure
and has formed road surface
excavating and filling slope and other erosion and sand production sites. The road cut and slope of side with loose structure have stronger and faster response to rainfall. Soil erosion caused by soil low grade roads accounts for a large proportion
so the study provides a basis for the prevention and control of soil erosion in the construction of roadways. Taking Bayi District
Nyingchi City
as the research object
using WEPP model to simulate and analyze the runoff and soil loss of under different precipitation conditions
different slope and slope length under engineering disturbance
so as to reveal the characteristics and key influencing factors of water and soil loss. The results showed that:(1) When the maximum rain intensity in 60 min (I60) was 11.16 mm/h and the rainfall was 12.40 mm
runoff began to occur; When I60 was in the range of 10 to 17 mm/h
the runoff was less than 0.50 mm
and the soil loss was less than 0.010 kg/m2. When I60 was more than 17 mm/h
I60 had a linear relationship with the runoff and soil loss. (2) The runoff presented three stages of "rapid increase-slow down-gradual decrease" with the increase of slope. The lowest runoff was 56.98 to 58.00 mm when the slope was 5°
and the highest runoff was 76.19 to 77.01 mm when the slope was 30° to 35°. Soil loss presented two stages of "first rapid increase and then stable" with the increase of slope. When the slope was below 5°
the amount of soil and water loss was small
and the slope became stable after 50°. (3) With the increase of slope length
the runoff of backer slope decreases
while the runoff of non-backer slope remains stable. The runoff of backer slope was lower than that of non-backer slope after 50 m slope length
and the difference increases with the increase of slope length; With the increase of slope length
the soil loss of the backer slope showed a trend of "first rapid increase and then decrease"
and the soil loss of the non-backer slope basically kept a uniform increase. The results can be used to analyze the driving mechanism of soil and water loss in slope after engineering disturbance in high and cold region.
史志华,宋长青.土壤水蚀过程研究回顾[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):1-10.
Sun J M, Yu X X, Li H Z, et al. Simulated erosion using soils from vegetated slopes in the Jiufeng Mountains, China[J].Catena,2016,136:128-134.
冯君园,蔡强国,李朝霞,等.高海拔寒区融水侵蚀研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):331-335.
莫斌,朱世海,李峰,等.新形势下铁路工程水土流失防治探讨[J].中国水土保持,2022(3):28-31.
马涛.浅谈如何做好铁路建设项目水土保持管理工作[J].中国水土保持,2020(4):21-23.
高新才,魏丽华.新时代西部大开发的新格局[J].甘肃社会科学,2020,244(1):90-96.
沈开艳."一带一路"战略下西藏经济发展面临的几大难点[J].西藏民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,38(1):15-18,154.
张荣华,荆莎莎,张洪达,等.胶东铁路弃土弃渣体产流产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):80-85.
Lal R. Soil erosion research methods[M]. 2nd ed. U. S.:Soil and Water Conservation Society,1994:1-10,23-30.
MacDonald, Sampson L H, Robert W. et al. Runoff and road erosion at the plot and road segment scales, St John, US Virgin Islands[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms:The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group,2001,26(3):251-272.
Forman R T, Sperling D, Bissonette J A, et al. Road ecology:Science and solutions[M].Washington D C:Island Press,2003:128-190.
沈海鸥,刘健,王宇,等.降雨强度和坡度对黑土区土质道路路面侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):123-126.
刘窑军,王天巍,蔡崇法,等.植被措施与路面汇水对三峡库区土质道路边坡侵蚀影响[J].水科学进展,2014,25(1):98-105.
及莹,蔡体久.利用WEPP模型模拟凉水自然保护区部分道路侵蚀对河流泥沙含量影响特征[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(5):1479-1481,1519.
王恒松,熊康宁,张芳美.地形因子对喀斯特坡面水土流失影响的机理研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):1-7.
郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):48-59,116.
谢云,岳天雨.土壤侵蚀模型在水土保持实践中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):25-37.
Saghafian B, Meghdadi A R, Sima S. Application of the WEPP model to determine sources of run-off and sediment in a forested watershed[J].Hydrological Processes,2015,29(4):481-497.
李想,曾以禹,朱思雨,等.北京山区径流侵蚀过程及WEPP模型适用性评价[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):98-106.
秦隆宇.基于不同水土保持措施下径流小区降雨与产流产沙关系研究[J].黑龙江水利科技,2018,46(11):51-54.
谢林妤,白玉洁,张风宝,等.沙层厚度和粒径组成对覆沙黄土坡面产流产沙的影响[J].土壤学报,2017,54(1):60-72.
彭旭东,戴全厚,杨智,等.喀斯特山地石漠化过程中地表地下侵蚀产沙特征[J].土壤学报,2016,53(5):1237-1248.
李坤,姚文艺,肖培青,等.植被对土壤入渗和地表产流过程的影响研究进展[J].中国水土保持,2017(3):27-30.
刘畅,周毅,雷雪.陕北黄土高原水蚀沟谷多维度侵蚀特征量化研究[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(4):707-717.
刘志伟,李胜男,郭燕红,等.青藏高原色林错流域高寒草原坡面产流特征及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(8):2388-2399.
0
浏览量
971
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621