1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 中建一局集团第三建筑有限公司,北京,100161
3. 北京市八达岭林场,北京,102112
4. 北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心(北京林业大学),北京,100083
[ "张馨予(1999-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤退化与生态修复研究。E-mail:Zhang_xinyu_9@bjfu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
张馨予, 张晓霞, 王冬, 等. 土壤结皮对乌拉山矿山废弃地客土坡面侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):24-30.
ZHANG Xinyu, ZHANG Xiangxia, WANG Dong, et al. Effects of Soil Crusts on Erosion Characteristics of Alien Soil Slope in Mining Wasteland of Wula Mountain[J]. 2023, 37(5): 24-30.
张馨予, 张晓霞, 王冬, 等. 土壤结皮对乌拉山矿山废弃地客土坡面侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):24-30. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.003.
ZHANG Xinyu, ZHANG Xiangxia, WANG Dong, et al. Effects of Soil Crusts on Erosion Characteristics of Alien Soil Slope in Mining Wasteland of Wula Mountain[J]. 2023, 37(5): 24-30. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.05.003.
土壤结皮对坡面水分入渗及侵蚀产沙具有重要影响
但其具体作用过程和机理尚存在一定争论。以乌拉山矿山废弃地客土坡面为研究对象
采用原位冲刷试验
研究不同坡长(2
4
6
8
10 m)和产流产沙过程中
土壤结皮对径流泥沙的影响。结果表明:(1)2 m土壤结皮坡面总径流和泥沙量显著增加
分别是对照坡面的2.17
1.56倍;4~10 m土壤结皮坡面总径流量和总泥沙量降低
其中总径流量为对照坡面的67.17%~78.45%
总泥沙量为对照坡面的54.53%~83.56%。(2)土壤结皮坡面与对照坡面产流速率随产流时间变化基本一致
呈现波动稳定或略微提高趋势;产沙速率在对照坡面随产流时间呈下降趋势
而在结皮土壤坡面呈现下降与稳定2种趋势。(3)累积径流量、累积泥沙量与产流时间关系均可用线性函数和幂函数表达。随产流时间变化
土壤结皮坡面对累积径流量的影响可分为全程提高、全程降低、先提高后降低3种类型
对累积泥沙量的影响可分为提高与降低2种类型。因此
土壤结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的抑制或促进作用与坡长和侵蚀发生过程密切相关。
Soil crust has an important influence on water infiltration and erosion sediment production on slope
but its specific process and mechanism are still under debate. In this study
taking the alien soil slope in mining wasteland of Wula Mountain as the research object
the effects of soil crust on runoff and sediment were investigated by in situ scouring tests on the slopes with different slope lengths (2 m
4 m
6 m
8 m and 10 m) and during flow and sand production process.The results showed that:(1) The total runoff and sediment yield on the 2 m slope increased significantly
which were 2.17 and 1.56 times of that on the control slope. The total runoff and sediment yield on the 4 to 10 m slopes decreased
and the total runoff was 67.17% to 78.45% of that on the control slope and the total sediment yield was 54.53% to 83.56% of that on the control slope. (2) The changes of runoff rate with time on the soil crust slope and the control slope were basically the same
showing a fluctuating and stable or slightly increasing trend. The sediment yield rate on the control slope showed a decreasing trend with time
while on the soil crust slope showed two trends of decreasing and stabilizing. (3) The relationship between cumulative runoff
cumulative sediment yield and runoff generation time could be expressed by linear function and power function. With the change of runoff generation time
the effects of soil crust slope on the accumulated runoff volume could be divided into three types:increase
decrease
increase firstly and then decrease. And the effects on the accumulated sediment yield could be divided into two types:increase and decrease. Therefore
the inhibiting or promoting effect of soil crust on process of runoff and sediment yield on the slope surface was closely related to the slope length and erosion occurrence process.
吴秋菊,吴发启,王林华.土壤结皮坡面流水动力学特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):73-80.
路培,王林华,吴发启.不同降雨强度下土壤结皮强度对侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(8):141-146.
吴秋菊,吴佳,王林华,等.黄土区坡耕地土壤结皮对入渗的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(2):303-311.
马金龙,许欢欢,王兵,等.黄土高原坡耕地土壤物理结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):45-49.
程琴娟,蔡强国,李家永.表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(4):114-122.
高燕,郑粉莉,王彬,等.土壤结皮对黑土区坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):17-20.
Levy G J, Levin J, Shainberg I. Seal formation and interrill soil erosion[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1994,58(1):203-209.
唐泽军,雷廷武,张晴雯,等.雨滴溅蚀和结皮效应对土壤侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(4):632-635.
Leary D, Dicarlo D A, Hickey C J. Acoustic techniques for studying soil-surface seals and crusts[J].Ecohydrology,2009,2(3):257-262.
卜崇峰,蔡强国,张兴昌,等.土壤结皮的发育特征及其生态功能研究述评[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(2):26-31.
Bradford J M, Remley P A, Ferris J E, et al. Effect of soil surface sealing on splash from a single waterdrop[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1986,50(6):1547-1552.
Moore D C, Singer M J. Crust formation effects on soil erosion processes[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1990,54(4):1117-1123.
Tackett J L, Pearson R W. Some characteristics of soil crusts formed by simulated rainfall[J].Soil Science,1965,99(6):407-413.
程琴娟,蔡强国,廖义善.土壤表面特性与坡度对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(2):9-11,15.
王辉,王全九,邵明安,等.表土结皮影响坡地产流产沙及养分流失的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(4):35-38.
李永庚,蒋高明.矿山废弃地生态重建研究进展[J].生态学报,2004,24(1):95-100.
闫德民,赵方莹,孙建新.铁矿采矿迹地不同恢复年限的植被特征[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(1):1-6.
毕银丽,彭苏萍,杜善周.西部干旱半干旱露天煤矿生态重构技术难点及发展方向[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1355-1364.
张翔,高照良.不同坡长条件下塿土堆积体坡面产流产沙过程[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):79-84,93.
李玉亭婷,高照良,李永红,等.坡长对黄土区工程堆积体产流产沙影响的模拟试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):102-106.
谢亚茹,程金花,李语晨,等. 黄土区土壤结皮和垄高对坡面产流产沙的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2017,48(10):42-49.
路培.土壤结皮形成机制及空间分布对侵蚀的影响研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.
卜崇峰,蔡强国,张兴昌,等.黄土结皮的发育机理与侵蚀效应研究[J].土壤学报,2009,46(1):16-23.
付兴涛,姚璟.降雨条件下坡长对陡坡产流产沙过程影响的模拟试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):20-24.
刘冉,余新晓,蔡强国,等.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面侵蚀-沉积过程试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(2):31-37.
张馨予,查同刚,张泽宇,等.乌拉山废弃矿区坡长对客土坡面产流产沙与沟蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(6):8-15.
Lu P, Xie X, Wang L, et al. Effects of different spatial distributions of physical soil crusts on runoff and erosion on the Loess Plateau in China[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2017,42(13):2082-2089.
Yan Y C, Wu L H, Xin X P, et al. How rain-formed soil crust affects wind erosion in a semi-arid steppe in Northern China[J].Geoderma,2015,249/250:79-86.
毛旭芮,杨建军,曹月娥,等.土壤结皮面积与结皮分布对风蚀影响的风洞模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):1-7.
0
浏览量
1088
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621