四川农业大学资源学院,成都,611130
[ "陈兰(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤污染防控与安全生产研究。E-mail:chenlan202211@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
陈兰, 余海英, 王港, 等. 钙质钝化材料对四川盆地6种主要旱作土壤Cd的钝化效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):370-375.
CHEN Lan, YU Haiying, WANG Gang, et al. The Immobilizing Effects of Calcareous Amendment on Cd in Six Main Dry Soils in Sichuan Basin[J]. 2023, 37(4): 370-375.
陈兰, 余海英, 王港, 等. 钙质钝化材料对四川盆地6种主要旱作土壤Cd的钝化效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):370-375. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.045.
CHEN Lan, YU Haiying, WANG Gang, et al. The Immobilizing Effects of Calcareous Amendment on Cd in Six Main Dry Soils in Sichuan Basin[J]. 2023, 37(4): 370-375. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.045.
为针对性、定量化地利用钝化处理实现不同类型Cd污染土壤的安全利用
以四川盆地6种主要旱作土壤为研究对象
采用室内培养试验和土培试验探讨了6个剂量水平下
钙质钝化材料对土壤pH、CEC、有效Cd含量、Cd形态、小白菜生物量和Cd含量的影响。结果表明:(1)钙质钝化材料可提升6种土壤的pH和CEC
土壤CEC随用量的增加而持续增加
而土壤pH在提升至微碱性水平后
不再随用量的增加而增加;(2)6种土壤有效Cd含量随钝化材料用量的增加先显著降低
后趋于平稳
用量>2.5%后均无显著变化。该添加量下
有效Cd含量降幅为典型黄壤(63.32%)>酸性紫色土(46.65%)>漂洗黄壤(38.51%)>中性紫色土(34.97%)>石灰性紫色土(18.03%)>灰潮土(16.60%);土壤中可交换态Cd主要向碳酸盐结合态、铁锰氧化物结合态和残渣态形态转化;(3)除石灰性紫色土外
钙质钝化材料可显著提升其余5种污染土壤中小白菜的生物量并显著降低其可食部位Cd含量。用量为2.5%时
典型黄壤、漂洗黄壤和酸性紫色土中小白菜Cd含量降幅高达84.28%
79.90%
69.87%
显著优于中性紫色土、灰潮土和石灰性紫色土(5%用量时降幅仅为40.27%
31.13%
17.98%)。该研究揭示钙质钝化材料对6种Cd污染旱作土壤的剂量-效应差异
并在典型黄壤、漂洗黄壤和酸性紫色土中钝化效率较优
为不同土壤条件下钙质钝化材料的合理使用提供科学依据。
In order to realize the safe utilization of different types of Cd-contaminated soil by amendment treatment
the effects of calcium amendment material on soil pH
CEC
available Cd content
Cd fraction
biomass and Cd content of Chinese cabbage under different dosage levels were studied by laboratory culture and soil culture experiments. The results showed that: (1) The pH and CEC of the six soils were increased by calcium amendment material
and the CEC of the soil continued to increase with the increase of the amount of calcium amendment material
while the pH of the soil did not increase with the increase of the amount of calcium amendment material. (2) With the increase of amendment material dosage
the content of available Cd in the six soils decreased significantly at first and then stabilized
and there was no significant change when the amount of amendment material was greater than 2.5%. Under this addition level
the decrease of effective Cd content was as follows: typical yellow soil (63.32%) > acid purple soil (46.65%) > rinsed yellow soil (38.51%) > neutral purple soil (34.97%) > calcareous purple soil (18.03%) > lime-aquic soil (16.60%). The exchangeable Cd in soil mainly changed to carbonate binding state
Fe-Mn oxide binding state and residue state. (3) Except calcareous purple soil
calcareous amendment material significantly increased the biomass of Chinese cabbage in the other five contaminated soils and significantly decreased the content of Cd in the edible parts. When the dosage was 2.5%
the Cd content of Chinese cabbage in typical yellow soil
rinsed yellow soil and acid purple soil decreased by 84.28%
79.90% and 69.87%
which was significantly better than that in neutral purple soil
lime-aquic soil and callitic purple soil (the decrease was only 40.27%
31.13% and 17.98% when the dosage was 5%). This study revealed the dose-effect difference of calcium amendment material on six kinds of Cd polluted upland soils
and the immobilizing efficiency was better in typical yellow soil
rinsed yellow soil and acid purple soil
which provided a scientific basis for rational use of calcium amendment material under different soil conditions.
环境保护部,国土资源部.全国土壤污染状况调查公报[R].北京:环境保护部,2014.
Tang X, Li Q, Wu M, et al. Review of remediation practices regarding cadmium-enriched farmland soil with particular reference to China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2016,181:646-662.
Haider F U, Liqun C, Coulter J A, et al. Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2021,211:e111887.
农业农村部.轻中度污染耕地安全利用与治理修复推荐技术名录(2019年版).(2019-04-26).http://nynct.guizhou.gov.cn/zwgk/xxgkml/zdlyxx/nzccqk/201907/t20190710_25814041.html.
Hussain B, Umer M J, Li J, et al. Strategies for reducing cadmium accumulation in rice grains[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,286:e125557.
黄蕊,纪雄辉,王欣,等.土壤-水稻系统Cd-As同步钝化与吸收阻控研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(3):482-492.
李英,朱司航,商建英,等.土壤镉和砷污染钝化修复材料及科学计量研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(9):2011-2022.
魏忠平,朱永乐,赵楚峒,等.生物炭吸附重金属机制及其应用技术研究进展[J].土壤通报,2020,51(3):741-747.
安梅,董丽,张磊,等.不同种类生物炭对土壤重金属镉铅形态分布的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(5):892-898.
王芳婷,陈植华,包科,等.pH值对海陆交互相土壤镉纵向迁移转化的影响[J].中国环境科学,2021,41(1):335-341.
四川省土壤普查办公室.四川省第二次土壤普查数据资料汇编[M].成都:四川省农牧厅,1992.
关连珠.普通土壤学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2016.
四川省环境保护厅,四川省国土资源厅.四川省土壤污染状况调查公报[R].成都:四川省环境保护厅,四川省国土资源厅,2014.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
农业部环境保护科研监测所.GB/T 23739-2009土壤质量有效态铅和镉的测定原子吸收法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
Tessier A, Campbell P G C, Bissom M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals[J].Analytical Chemistry,1979,51(7):844-851.
上海市卫生防疫站.GB 5009.15-2014食品安全国家标准食品中镉的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015.
谢霏.Cd污染土壤钝化材料的筛选及钝化效应研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2016.
Wan M X, Qu M K, Hu W Y, et al. Estimation of soil pH using PXRF spectrometry and Vis-NIR spectroscopy for rapid environmental risk assessment of soil heavy metals[J].Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2019,132:73-81.
Wan W J, Tan J D, Wang Y, et al. Responses of the rhizosphere bacterial community in acidic crop soil to pH: Changes in diversity, composition, interaction, and function[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,700:e134418.
费杨,阎秀兰,李永华.铁锰双金属材料在不同pH条件下对土壤As和重金属的稳定化作用[J].环境科学,2018,39(3):1430-1437.
He L L, Huang D Y, Zhang Q, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of liming on soil pH and cadmium accumulation in crops[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2021,223:e112621.
郭京霞,冯莲莲,张起佳,等.不同钙质钝化剂对稻田土壤溶液中Cd浓度的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(10):1984-1991.
Suda A, Makino T. Functional effects of manganese and iron oxides on the dynamics of trace elements in soils with a special focus on arsenic and cadmium: A review[J].Geoderma,2016,270:68-75.
周卫,汪洪,李春花,等.添加碳酸钙对土壤中镉形态转化与玉米叶片镉组分的影响[J].土壤学报,2001,38(2):219-225.
Chen W, Peng L, Hu K, et al. Spectroscopic response of soil organic matter in mining area to Pb/Cd heavy metal interaction: A mirror of coherent structural variation[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2020,393:e122425.
陈莹,刘汉燚,刘娜,等.农地土壤重金属Pb和Cd有效性测定方法的筛选与评价[J].环境科学,2021,42(7):3494-3506.
0
浏览量
913
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621