成渝地区双城经济圈生态空间区划及管控机制

骆佳玲; 赵伟; 李燕辉; 张正伟

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.040

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

成渝地区双城经济圈生态空间区划及管控机制

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 成渝地区双城经济圈生态空间区划及管控机制
- Research on Ecological Spatial Zoning and Control Mechanism of Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第4期页码：327-335
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆工商大学长江上游经济研究中心,重庆,400067
  2. 重庆工商大学环境与资源学院,重庆,400067
  3. 重庆工商大学公共管理学院,重庆,400067
  4. 重庆市南岸区规划与自然资源局,重庆,401336
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "骆佳玲(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事环境规划与管理研究。E-mail:2362524793@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  重庆市社科规划重点项目(2022MZD09);重庆工商大学"学习贯彻党的二十大精神"专项研究重点项目(ctbuesd36);重庆市教委哲学社会科学重大理论研究项目(19SKZDZX10)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.040
  中图分类号： X821
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
骆佳玲, 赵伟, 李燕辉, 等. 成渝地区双城经济圈生态空间区划及管控机制[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):327-335.

LUO Jialing, ZHAO Wei, LI Yanhui, et al. Research on Ecological Spatial Zoning and Control Mechanism of Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle[J]. 2023, 37(4): 327-335.
骆佳玲, 赵伟, 李燕辉, 等. 成渝地区双城经济圈生态空间区划及管控机制[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):327-335. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.040.

LUO Jialing, ZHAO Wei, LI Yanhui, et al. Research on Ecological Spatial Zoning and Control Mechanism of Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle[J]. 2023, 37(4): 327-335. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.040.

摘要

成渝地区双城经济圈生态空间是我国西南地区生态文明建设重要组成部分。以成渝地区双城经济圈生态空间为研究对象

基于复合生态系统、山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和治理等理论

从政策目标、公众需求等方面综合选取评价指标

采用变异系数法、判断矩阵法开展生态空间区划并提出相应管控机制。结果表明:(1)10年间ESQ表现出稳中向好趋势

空间上呈中部低

四周高的"盆地型"分布格局

质量等级变化呈"中部向好、四周持稳"特点

以不变和变好为主;(2)ESQ处于弱变异和中等变异之间

且弱变异面积占比大

ESQ整体较稳定;(3)综合质量变化特征和稳定性分析

将生态空间划分为重点保护区、潜在修复区、重点修复区和生态保育区

对重点保护区重点实施原生态保护

开展封禁自然保育;重点修复区主要为人工生态系统

重点实施人工修复

开展生态修复和治理工程;潜在修复区应以保护优先

自然恢复为主

努力提升整体生态状态;生态保育区是研究区生态空间的主要类型

应实施生态保育

在生态保护的基础上

可合理进行生产开发建设

该区域可为研究区未来城市发展提供战略方向并作为发展预留空间。对生态空间分区管控研究可方便决策者对生态保护修复空间进行识别和管理

为未来成渝地区双城经济圈发展方向提供新思路。

Abstract

The ecological space of Chengdu-Chongqing Twin Cities Economic Circle is an important part of ecological civilization construction in southwest China. Taking the ecological space of Shuangcheng economic circle in Chengdu-Chongqing region as the research object

based on the theories of composite ecosystem

integrated protection and management of mountains

water forests

fields

lakes

grass and sand

this study comprehensively selected evaluation indicators from the aspects of policy objectives and public demand

used the coefficient of variation method and judgment matrix method to carry out ecological spatial zoning and proposes corresponding control mechanisms. The results showed that: (1) ESQ showed a stable and positive trend in the past 10 years

with a "basin-type" distribution pattern of low central space and high four weeks

and the quality grade change showed the characteristics of "good in the middle and stable in all around"

mainly unchanged and improving; (2) ESQ was between weak variation and medium variation

and the proportion of weak variation area was large

and ESQ was relatively stable as a whole; (3) Based on the analysis of quality change characteristics and stability

the ecological space was divided into key protected areas

potential restoration areas

key restoration areas and ecological conservation areas. Implemented original ecological protection in key protected areas

and carryed out closed nature conservation; the key restoration areas were mainly artificial ecosystems

focusing on the implementation of artificial restoration

and carrying out ecological restoration and treatment projects; potential restoration areas should give priority to protection

focused on natural restoration

and strive to improve the overall ecological state; ecological conservation area was the main type of ecological space in the research area

ecological conservation should be implemented

on the basis of ecological protection

production development and construction could be reasonably carried out

and this area could provide strategic direction for the future urban development of the research area and reserve space for development. The study of zoning management and control of ecological space can facilitate decision-makers to identify and manage ecological protection and restoration space

and provide new ideas for the future development direction of the Chengdu-Chongqing Twin Cities Economic Circle.

关键词

Keywords

references

陈新闯,李锋,李小倩,等.珠三角城市群生态空间分区方法与管控对策[J].生态学报,2021,41(13):5233-5241.

张磊,马超前,王艳霞,等.适宜性与冲突双重约束下生态空间管制分区研究:以天津市宝坻区为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2022,38(2):96-102.

熊善高,秦昌波,于雷,等.基于生态系统服务功能和生态敏感性的生态空间划定研究:以南宁市为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(22):7899-7911.

王甫园,王开泳,陈田,等.城市生态空间研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(2):207-218.

王世豪,黄麟,徐新良,等.特大城市群生态空间及其生态承载状态的时空分异[J].地理学报,2022,77(1):164-181.

赵伟,邹欣怡,蒲海霞.成渝地区双城经济圈生态安全格局构建[J].中国环境科学,2021,41(5):2423-2433.

田立鑫.莱州湾海岸带生态空间划分及其时空演变研究[D].济南:山东师范大学,2021.

陈新闯,李小倩,吕一河,等.区域尺度生态修复空间辨识研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8717-8724.

孙新章,周海林,谢高地.中国农田生态系统的服务功能及其经济价值[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(4):55-60.

李恒凯,李淑芳,郑春燕,等.基于生态系统服务功能的东江流域关键性生态空间识别[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(3):257-266,323.

王李睿,邓西鹏,王晨,等.基于生态系统服务重要性与生态敏感性的生态空间划设:以福建省永春县为例[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(1):166-173.

田浩,刘琳,张正勇,等.天山北坡经济带关键性生态空间评价[J].生态学报,2021,41(1):401-414.

黄心怡,赵小敏,郭熙,等.基于生态系统服务功能和生态敏感性的自然生态空间管制分区研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(3):1065-1076.

Chen J, Wang S S, Zou Y T. Construction of an ecological security pattern based on ecosystem sensitivity and the importance of ecological services: A case study of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration, China[J].Ecological Indicators,2022,136:e108688.

张斯源,樊逸飞,颜礼,等.基于长时序MODIS的陕西省近20年生态质量时空变化及其驱动力研究[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):111-119,198.

吴小波,范晓雨,刘晓敬,等.基于Google Earth Engine云平台的成渝城市群生态环境质量时空变化[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(3):759-768.

李佳,赵伟,骆佳玲.成渝地区双城经济圈人口-经济-环境系统协调发展时空演化[J].环境科学学报,2023,43(2):528-540.

Chen X C, Li F, Li X Q, et al. Mapping ecological space quality changes for ecological management: A case study in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration, China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,267:e110658.

Dai X A, Gao Y, He X W, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern evolution and driving force analysis of ecological environment vulnerability in Panzhihua City[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2020,28:7151-7166.

Ouyang X H, Wang J B, Chen X, et al. Applying a projection pursuit model for evaluation of ecological quality in Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2021,133:e108414.

王煦然,邹琴英,师学义.基于生态系统服务功能及生态敏感性的遵化市生态空间划定研究[J].山西大学学报,2022,45(1):247-256.

Han X Y, Cao T Y. Study on ecological environment quality evaluation of the energy consumption pollution treatment in industrial parks[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021,28:28038-28057.

王文静,逯非,欧阳志云.国土空间生态修复与保护空间识别:以北京市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(6):2074-2085.

Yan Y, Chai Z, Yang X, et al. The temporal and spatial changes of the ecological environment quality of the urban agglomeration on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain and the influencing factors[J].Ecological Indicators,2021,133(2):e108380.

仇实,于强,杨林哲,等.甘肃省土地沙化敏感性及生态空间网络优化[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(5):114-122,150.

中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 21010-2017,土地利用现状分类[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.

王国玉,白伟岚,熊筱,等.京津冀城市群生态空间受损识别研究[J].城市规划,2021,45(8):9-19,41.

孟猛,宗美娟.利用de Martonne方法对我国20世纪干旱化趋势的研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):128-132.

周文英,何彬彬.四川省若尔盖县生态环境质量评价[J].地球信息科学学报,2014,16(2):314-319.

赵海乐,徐艳,周翼,等.生态空间定量识别及时空演变特征分析:以呼伦贝尔市为例[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(8):2153-2168.

Kang P, Chen W P, Hou Y, et al.Linking ecosystem services and ecosystem health to ecological risk assessment: A case study of the Beijing Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018,636:1442-1454.

林文豪,温兆飞,吴胜军,等.成渝地区双城经济圈生态安全格局识别及改善对策[J].生态学报,2023,43(3):973-985.

浏览量

1033

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据