1. 郑州大学地热与生态地质研究中心,郑州,450001
2. 郑州大学水利与土木工程学院,郑州,450001
3. 郑州大学生态与环境学院,郑州,450001
4. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,西安,710048
5. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京,100038
6. 宁夏回族自治区水土保持监测总站,银川,750002
[ "范德政(1997-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水文与水资源研究。E-mail:1719522202@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
范德政, 梅雪梅, 李鹏, 等. 生态水文平衡状态下宁夏地区植被承载力模拟[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):166-172.
FAN Dezheng, MEI Xuemei, LI Peng, et al. Simulation of Vegetation Carrying Capacity in Ningxia Under Eco-hydrological Balance[J]. 2023, 37(4): 166-172.
范德政, 梅雪梅, 李鹏, 等. 生态水文平衡状态下宁夏地区植被承载力模拟[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):166-172. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.022.
FAN Dezheng, MEI Xuemei, LI Peng, et al. Simulation of Vegetation Carrying Capacity in Ningxia Under Eco-hydrological Balance[J]. 2023, 37(4): 166-172. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.022.
基于Eagleson的生态水文最优性理论
从区域尺度上
综合多种环境变量
模拟宁夏地区生态水文平衡状态下植被最优盖度
进而确定植被承载力
并研究在不过分消耗土壤水分的前提下不同植被类型的最优盖度。结果表明:(1)在研究期内(2000—2019年)
基于Eagleson生态最优性理论得到的平衡植被覆盖度与实际植被覆盖度相关关系为0.86
模型模拟良好
除去农田
宁夏地区的多年平均植被盖度为0.048~0.984
模拟的平衡植被覆盖度为0.153~0.840
植被盖度在空间上具有较好的一致性
南部地区较高
呈现由南向北逐渐降低的趋势。(2)从植被承载力空间分布来看
绝大部分区域实际植被覆盖度与模拟的平衡植被覆盖度的差值小于0.05
未处于超载状态
植被超载区主要位于泾源县。(3)乔灌草3种土地利用类型的模拟植被最优盖度均表现为从南到北逐渐减少
从多年平均来看
草地的模拟植被最优盖度为0.223~0.841
灌木林地的模拟植被最优盖度为0.186~0.659
而乔木林地的模拟植被最优盖度为0.153~0.635。研究结果有助于科学指导当地生态环境建设
为同类地区生态恢复建设提供理论支撑。
Based on the eco-hydrological optimality theory of Eagleson
from the regional scale
a variety of environmental variables were integrated to simulate the optimal vegetation coverage under the eco-hydrological balance in Ningxia
and then determine the vegetation carrying capacity and study the optimal coverage of different vegetation types under the premise of not consumption of soil moisture. The results showed that: (1) During the study period (2000—2019)
the correlation between the balanced vegetation coverage and the actual vegetation coverage based on Eagleson’s ecological optimality theory was 0.86
indicating that the model was well simulated. Excluding farmland
the average annual vegetation coverage in Ningxia was 0.048~0.984
and the simulated balanced vegetation coverage was 0.153~0.840. The vegetation coverage had a good spatial consistency
and the southern region was higher
showing a trend of decreasing gradually from south to north. (2) From the perspective of spatial distribution of vegetation carrying capacity
the difference between actual vegetation coverage and simulated equilibrium vegetation coverage in most regions was less than 0.05
indicating that they were not in overload state
and the vegetation overload area was mainly located in Jingyuan County. (3) The optimal coverage of simulated vegetation for the three land use types of grassland
shrubland and woodland decreased gradually from south to north. From the perennial average
the optimal coverage of simulated vegetation was 0.223~0.841 for grassland
0.186~0.659 for shrub land
and 0.153~0.635 for woodland. The research results are helpful to scientifically guide the local ecological environment construction and provide theoretical support for the ecological restoration construction in similar areas.
樊亚鹏,张军,扈花,等.宁夏六盘山叠叠沟小流域典型华北落叶松林植被承载力研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2019,60(6):42-46,63.
王延平,邵明安.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区杏林地土壤水分植被承载力[J].林业科学,2009,45(12):1-7.
李小燕,任志远,张翀,等.中国植被覆盖气候限制性分区及时空变化[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(3):76-81.
高海东,庞国伟,李占斌,等.黄土高原植被恢复潜力研究[J].地理学报,2017,72(5):863-874.
韩新生,王彦辉,邓莉兰,等.六盘山叠叠沟华北落叶松林不同生长特征的土壤水分植被承载力的指示作用[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):43-51.
曹恭祥,王彦辉,熊伟,等.基于土壤水分承载力的林分密度计算与调控:以六盘山华北落叶松人工林为例[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(2):133-141.
徐军,牛健植,许陈韩,等.华北土石山区基于水分承载力的植被结构配置分析[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(3):15-22.
王延平,邵明安.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区人工草地的土壤水分植被承载力[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(18):134-141.
茹豪,张建军,李玉婷,等.晋西黄土高原水资源植被承载力分析及对策建议[J].环境科学研究,2015,28(6):923-929.
王宁,毕华兴,郭孟霞,等.晋西黄土残塬沟壑区刺槐人工林土壤水分植被承载力研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):213-219.
苏同宣.黑河上游植被动态对径流变化和生态的影响研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2021.
闫伟兄,张永霞,朱永宁,等.宁夏土壤水文参数空间分布及干旱指标改进研究[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(2):266-274.
季波,谢应忠,何建龙,等.宁夏典型温性天然草地固碳特征[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(11):3657-3664.
莫康乐,丛振涛.考虑植被对降雨变化响应的流域水量平衡[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2017,57(8):851-856.
Cong Z T, Li Q S, Mo K L, et al. Ecohydrological optimality in northeast China Transect[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions,2017,21(5):2449-2462.
邵薇薇.中国非湿润地区植被与流域水循环相互作用机理研究[D].北京:清华大学,2009.
李沁书.中国东北样带生态水文最优性研究[D].北京:清华大学,2016.
张树磊.中国典型流域植被水文相互作用机理及变化规律研究[D].北京:清华大学,2018.
Eagleson P S. Ecohydrology:Darwinian expression of vegetation form and function[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
Dai Y J, Shangguan W, Duan Q Y, et al. Development of a China dataset of soil hydraulic parameters using pedotransfer functions for land surface modeling[J].Journal of Hydrometeorology,2013,14(3):869-887.
Zhang Y X, Zhao T N, Shi C Q, et al. Simulation of vegetation cover based on the theory of ecohydrological optimality in the Yongding River Watershed, China[J].Forests,2021,12(10):e1377.
赵广举,穆兴民,田鹏,等.黄土高原植被变化与恢复潜力预测[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):205-212.
皮泓漪,张萌雪,夏建新.黄土高原退耕区土地利用变化及土壤侵蚀分析:以宁夏泾源县为例[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(3):522-534.
董镱,尹冬勤,李渊,等.黄土高原植被的时空变化及其驱动力分析研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2020,25(8):120-131.
王宇航,赵鸣飞,康慕谊,等.黄土高原地区NDVI与气候因子空间尺度依存性及非平稳性研究[J].地理研究,2016,35(3):493-503.
张含玉,方怒放,史志华.黄土高原植被覆盖时空变化及其对气候因子的响应[J].生态学报,2016,36(13):3960-3968.
0
浏览量
959
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621