红壤坡地新开发果园土壤有机碳迁移对不同管理措施的响应

常梦琦; 胡瑞; 徐佳文; 梁宽; 陈伏生; 肖胜生

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

红壤坡地新开发果园土壤有机碳迁移对不同管理措施的响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 红壤坡地新开发果园土壤有机碳迁移对不同管理措施的响应
- Response of Soil Organic Carbon Migration to Different Management Measures in Newly Developed Orchards in Red Soil Slope
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第4期页码：124-131
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 江西农业大学国家林业和草原局鄱阳湖流域森林生态系统保护与修复实验室,南昌,330045
  2. 江西省土壤侵蚀与防治重点实验室,南昌,330029
  3. 江西省水利科学院鄱阳湖流域生态水利技术创新中心,南昌,330029
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "常梦琦(1998-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事森林培育与生态恢复研究。E-mail:changmengqi0327@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(41761063);江西省重点研发计划项目(20202BBGL73097);江西省自然科学基金项目(20212BAB203027)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.017
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
常梦琦, 胡瑞, 徐佳文, 等. 红壤坡地新开发果园土壤有机碳迁移对不同管理措施的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):124-131.

CHANG Mengqi, HU Rui, XU Jiawen, et al. Response of Soil Organic Carbon Migration to Different Management Measures in Newly Developed Orchards in Red Soil Slope[J]. 2023, 37(4): 124-131.
常梦琦, 胡瑞, 徐佳文, 等. 红壤坡地新开发果园土壤有机碳迁移对不同管理措施的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):124-131. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.017.

CHANG Mengqi, HU Rui, XU Jiawen, et al. Response of Soil Organic Carbon Migration to Different Management Measures in Newly Developed Orchards in Red Soil Slope[J]. 2023, 37(4): 124-131. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.017.

摘要

为探究在南方红壤区不同管理措施对于新开发果园土壤有机碳迁移的影响

以典型红壤坡地柑橘园(建园2年)为研究对象

监测评估自然降雨背景下清耕(CB)、稻草全覆盖(CS)、萝卜花生轮作(CRP)、三叶草条带覆盖(CCS)、三叶草全覆盖(CC)和苔藓覆盖(CT)6种管理措施对开发初期果园水土流失和土壤有机碳迁移的影响。结果表明:(1)6种管理措施CB、CS、CRP、CCS、CC和CT的径流量分别为7.88

4.45

4.64

3.24

3.25

4.70 m3

与CB相比

CS、CRP、CCS、CC和CT措施下截流效益分别为43.51%

41.10%

58.94%

58.82%

40.38%

产沙量分别为71.35

21.27

31.03

14.24

14.18

35.05 kg

产沙量与CB相比分别减少70.18%

56.51%

80.04%

80.13%

50.87%;(2)泥沙有机碳流失强度分别为CB(20.75 g/m2)

CS(4.78 g/m2)

CRP(8.68 g/m2)

CCS(3.52 g/m2)

CC(3.38 g/m2)

CT(9.94 g/m2)

相比于对照组CB分别减少76.94%

58.16%

83.01%

83.71%

52.11%;(3)泥沙有机碳和DOC流失强度均与径流量呈显著正相关关系(R2分别为0.412和0.419)。地面管理措施主要通过调控地表径流的产生来影响红壤坡地新开发果园土壤有机碳的迁移。综合来看

三叶草条带覆盖和全覆盖在抑制土壤侵蚀和土壤有机碳迁移损失方面效果较明显。研究结果可为南方红壤区新开发果园水土流失和土壤有机碳迁移损失的防控提供科学依据。

Abstract

In order to explore the impacts of different management measures on soil organic carbon migration in newly developed Citrus reticulate-based orchards in southern red soil regions

the effects of six management measures on soil erosion and soil organic carbon migration in orchards under the background of natural rainfall were monitored and evaluated

including clear tillage (CB)

straw mulch (CS)

radish peanut rotation intercropping (CRP)

Trifolium strip mulch (CCS)

Trifolium mulch (CC) and Bryophyta mulch (CT) in the young Citrus reticulate-based orchards (two years old) located in red soil slope land. Our results showed that: (1) The runoff production of 6 management measures CB

CRP

CCS

CC and CT were 7.88

4.45

4.64

3.24

3.25 and 4.70 m3

respectively. Compared with CB

the runoff reduction benefits under CS

CRP

CCS

CC and CT measures were 43.51%

41.10%

58.94%

58.82% and 40.38%

respectively; the sediment production was 71.35

21.27

31.03

14.24

14.18 and 35.05 kg

and the sediment yield was reduced by 70.18%

56.51%

80.04%

80.13% and 50.87%

respectively. (2) The loss intensity of sediment organic carbon was CB (20.75 g/m2)

CS (4.78 g/m2)

CRP (8.68 g/m2)

CCS (3.52 g/m2)

CC (3.38 g/m2) and CT (9.94 g/m2)

respectively

which decreased by 76.94%

58.16%

83.01%

83.71% and 52.11% compared with CB. (3) The loss intensity of sediment organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon was positively correlated with runoff production (R2=0.412 and 0.419

respectively). Surface management measures affected the migration of soil organic carbon in newly developed orchards in red soil slope mainly by regulating surface runoff generation. In conclusion

both the Trifolium strip mulch (CCS) and Trifolium mulch (CC) had obvious effects on inhibiting soil erosion and soil organic carbon migration loss. This study can provide a scientific basis for controlling soil erosion and soil organic carbon migration loss in newly developed orchards in red soil region of Southern China.

关键词

Keywords

references

林金石,黄炎和,范胜龙,等.经不同措施治理的侵蚀红壤肥力质量综合评价[J].福建农林大学学报,2011,40(2):192-197.

涂安国,谢颂华,李英,等.红壤坡地柑橘园长期试验下水沙动态变化特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):160-165.

刘鹤龄,饶良懿,图尔荪,等.北方土石山区水蚀及水保措施对土壤有机碳的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(4):646-655.

林杰,张相,姜姜,等.水力侵蚀过程中土壤有机碳循环研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报2022,46(6):187-194.

秦东远,肖培青,郝仕龙,等.黄丘区野外坡面产流产沙过程对不同植被覆盖结构的响应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):73-78.

高泽超.秸秆覆盖对桂西北坡地幼龄橘园产流产沙的影响[D].广西桂林:桂林理工大学,2021.

刘润,申家琛,张朝晖.4种苔藓植物在喀斯特石漠化地区的生态修复意义[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):141-148.

郭太龙,谢金波,孔朝晖,等.华南典型侵蚀区土壤有机碳流失机制模拟研究[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(8):1266-1273.

Hua K K, Zhu B, Wang X G, et al. Forms and fluxes of soil organic carbon transport via overland flow, interflow and soil erosion in a hillslope cropland of Regosol China[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2016,80(4):1011-1019.

肖胜生,汤崇军,王凌云,等.自然降雨条件下红壤坡面有机碳的选择性迁移[J].土壤学报,2017,54(4):874-884.

Mahmoodabadi M, Zamani S, Yazdanpanah N. Enrichment of soil organic carbon in the eroded sediments due to the simultaneous occurrence of rain and wind[J].Geoderma,2021,386(1):e114926.

霍云梅,毕华兴,朱永杰,等.QYJY-503C人工模拟降雨装置降雨特性试验[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(2):31-36.

乔胜英.土壤理化性质实验指导书[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2012:10-28.

秦伟,左长清,郑海金,等.赣北红壤坡地土壤流失方程关键因子的确定[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(21):115-125.

中国气象局.GB/T 28592-2012中国气象局关于降水量等级的气象国家标准[S].北京:气象出版社,2012:40-42.

Team R D C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing[J].R Foundation for Statistical Computing,2019,1(1):2-12.

艾宁,魏天兴,朱清科,等.基于通径分析的陕北黄土坡面径流产沙影响因素[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(6):77-84.

周怡雯,戴翠婷,刘窑军,等.耕作措施及雨强对南方红壤坡耕地侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):49-54.

杨洁,郭晓敏,宋月君,等.江西红壤坡地柑橘园生态水文特征及水土保持效益[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(2):468-474.

武松伟,梁珊珊,胡承孝,等.我国柑橘园"因土补肥"与化肥减施增效生态分区[J].华中农业大学学报,2022,41(2):9-19.

邓从,陈为峰,王文中,等.表土堆置体不同覆盖措施坡面流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):92-96.

卫伟,温智,陈利顶,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区土壤结皮的地表水文效应[J].环境科学,2012,33(11):3901-3904.

赵海燕,郭荣慧,段宇涛,等.苔藓植物护坡及固土作用试验研究[J].兰州大学学报,2018,54(3):364-368.

刘润,申家琛,张朝晖.4种苔藓植物在喀斯特石漠化地区的生态修复意义[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):141-148.

杨冬艳,郭文忠,曲继松,等.套种三叶草对日光温室樱桃番茄生长及根际土壤环境的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(6):108-111.

张运林,孙萍,满子源.室内模拟降雨对蒙古栎和红松凋落物床层饱和含水率的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2020,40(9):1-10.

陈文庆,李鹏.黄土区农业种植措施的选择及优化[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1):115-117.

白怡婧,刘彦伶,李渝,等.长期不同轮作模式对黄壤团聚体组成及有机碳的影响[J].土壤,2021,53(1):161-167.

苟小梅,王昌全,李冰,等.玉米种植制度对红壤磷素形态及其有效性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(3):883-889.

蔡慕天.云南2种类型森林地面苔藓去除对土壤有机碳的影响[D].昆明:云南大学,2019.

王雅婷,郑景明,彭霞薇.极端环境中苔藓植物的生态功能研究进展[J].植物生理学报,2022,58(1):101-108.

涂娜,严友进,戴全厚,等.喀斯特石漠化区典型生境下石生苔藓的固土持水作用[J].生态学报,2021,41(15):6203-6214.

李素丽. 亚热带森林植物凋落叶源溶解有机碳特征和生物可降解性[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2022.

Wang Z, Govers G, Oost K V,et al. Soil organic carbon mobilization by interrill erosion: Insights from size fractions[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface,2013,118:348-360.

张兴昌,刘国彬,付会芳.不同植被覆盖度对流域氮素径流流失的影响[J].环境科学,2000,21(6):16-19.

Massey H F, Jackson M L. Selective erosion of soil fertility constituents[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1952,16:353-356.

聂小东,李忠武,王晓燕,等.雨强对红壤坡耕地泥沙流失及有机碳富集的影响规律研究[J].土壤学报,2013,50(5):900-908.

Jin K, Cornelis W M, Gabriels D, et al. Residue cover and rainfall intensity effects on runoff soil organic carbon losses[J].Catena,2009,78(1):81-86.

王传飞,王小萍,龚平,等.植被富集持久性有机污染物研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(10):1555-1566.

王义祥,叶菁,王成己,等.不同经营年限对柑橘果园土壤有机碳及其组分的影响[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(10):1574-1580.

李娜,张哲,白伟,等.耕作方式下坡面土壤侵蚀对有机碳流失的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2022,53(2):82-90.

林盛.南方红壤区水土流失治理模式探索及效益评价[D].福州:福建农林大学,2016.

龙鹏.基于不同用地类型土壤允许流失量的小流域生产力退化风险研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2022.

浏览量

812

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

玉米与毛叶苕子及黑麦间作对土壤有机碳及其组分的影响

水力侵蚀驱动下土壤有机碳动态模型研究进展

生物结皮对植被混凝土边坡土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响

1990—2020年中国东北地区土地利用变化对SOC储量的影响

藏东南干旱河谷土壤有机碳组分空间分布及稳定性特征