1. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
4. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "伍林(1997-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事坡面土壤侵蚀过程研究。E-mail:wulin20@mails.ucas.ac.cn" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
伍林, 张风宝, 申楠, 等. 自然降雨雨型变化对坡面细沟间侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):31-37.
WU Lin, ZHANG Fengbao, SHEN Nan, et al. Influence of Natural Rainfall Pattern Variation on Interrill Erosion[J]. 2023, 37(4): 31-37.
伍林, 张风宝, 申楠, 等. 自然降雨雨型变化对坡面细沟间侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):31-37. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.005.
WU Lin, ZHANG Fengbao, SHEN Nan, et al. Influence of Natural Rainfall Pattern Variation on Interrill Erosion[J]. 2023, 37(4): 31-37. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.005.
通过野外微小区原位观测试验
基于降雨过程中降雨的集中时段对2017—2021年34次侵蚀性降雨雨型进行划分
系统分析雨型变化对黄土坡面细沟间侵蚀的影响及坡度效应。结果表明:研究区以前期型降雨为主
占总场次的52%
中期型和后期型降雨各占24%。中期型降雨对总产流量的贡献(25.56%±3.83%)显著低于前期型(36.70%±2.07%)和后期型(37.74%±4.01%)(p<0.05)。不同雨型场均径流量依次为后期型>中期型>前期型
后期型和中期型降雨显著高于前期型。而降雨的场均产沙量则表现为后期型>前期型>中期型
且后期型降雨显著高于中期型(p<0.05)。雨型对细沟间侵蚀影响的坡度效应变化不明显
但随着坡度增大
后期型降雨的场均径流量和产沙量均大于前期型和中期型
说明后期型降雨的产流产沙对坡度变化相对较为敏感。次降雨径流量、坡度和降雨参数组合与次降雨产沙非线性拟合中
方程决定系数后期型(0.939~0.942)>中期型(0.776~0.845)>前期型(0.220~0.537)
说明区分雨型模拟可提高模拟精度。
Through in situ observation experiment in the field micro-plots
the 34 erosive rainfall patterns from 2017—2021 were classified based on the concentrated periods of rainfall during the rainfall process
and the effects of rainfall pattern variation on the interrill erosion on loess slopes and slope effects were systematically analyzed. The results showed that the advanced rainfall pattern was dominant
accounting for 52% of the total rainfall
while the intermediate rainfall pattern and delayed rainfall pattern each accounted for 24%. The contribution of intermediate rainfall pattern to total runoff yield (25.56%±3.83%) was significantly lower than that of the advanced rainfall pattern (36.70%±2.07%) and delayed rainfall pattern (37.74%±4.01%) (p<0.05). The average runoff yield of different rainfall patterns was in the order of delayed rainfall pattern > intermediate rainfall pattern > the advanced rainfall pattern
and the delayed rainfall pattern and intermediate rainfall pattern was significantly higher than that of advanced rainfall pattern. The average sediment yield of different rainfall patterns was in the order of delayed rainfall pattern > advanced rainfall pattern > intermediate rainfall pattern. The rainfall of the delayed rainfall pattern was significantly higher than that of the intermediate rainfall pattern (p<0.05). The variation of slope effect of rainfall pattern on the effect of interrill erosion is not obvious
but with the increase of slope
the average runoff and sediment yield of delayed rainfall pattern were larger than that of advanced and intermediate rainfall pattern
indicating that the sediment yield of delayed rainfall pattern was relatively sensitive to the variation of slope. In the nonlinear fitting models of runoff
slope and rainfall parameter combination and sediment yield
the equation decision coefficients were delayed rainfall pattern (0.939~0.942) > the intermediate rainfall pattern (0.776~0.845) > the advanced rainfall pattern (0.220~0.537)
indicating that the classification of rainfall pattern could improve model simulation accuracy.
Zhang X C. Determining and modeling dominant processes of interrill soil erosion[J].Water Resources Research,2019,55(1):4-20.
Alavinia M, Saleh F N, Asadi H. Effects of rainfall patterns on runoff and rainfall-induced erosion[J].International Journal of Sediment Research,2019,34(3):270-278.
Zhang Q W, Wang Z L, Guo Q, et al. Plot-based experimental study of raindrop detachment, interrill wash and erosion-limiting degree on a clayey loessal soil[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,575:1280-1287.
Zhang Q W, Wang Z L, Wu B, et al. Identifying sediment transport capacity of raindrop-impacted overland flow within transport-limited system of interrill erosion processes on steep loess hillslopes of China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2018,184:109-117.
Vaezi A R, Eslami S F, Keesstra S. Interrill erodibility in relation to aggregate size class in a semi-arid soil under simulated rainfalls[J].Catena,2018,167:385-398.
Nearing M A, Yin S Q, Borrelli P, et al. Rainfall erosivity: An historical review[J].Catena,2017,157:357-362.
Liu J B, Gao G Y, Wang S, et al. Combined effects of rainfall regime and plot length on runoff and soil loss in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh,2019,109(3/4):397-406.
郭凯,李玄添,张风宝,等.雨型和坡长对侵蚀泥沙粒径特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(2):50-57,66.
Wang W T, Yin S Q, Xie Y, et al. Effects of four storm patterns on soil loss from five soils under natural rainfall[J].Catena,2016,141:56-65.
温磊磊,郑粉莉,杨青森,等.雨型对东北黑土区坡耕地土壤侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].水利学报,2012,43(9):1084-1091.
陈晓鹏,周蓓蓓,陶汪海,等.变雨强对黄土坡地水土养分流失机制研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):33-37.
任瑞雪,张风宝,杨明义,等.坡面侵蚀过程中泥沙有机碳流失特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):15-19.
李元元.生物炭添加对黄绵土坡面土壤侵蚀的影响及机制研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
Dhaliwal G S, Gupta N, Kukal S S, et al. Standardization of automated vario EL Ⅲ CHNS analyzer for total carbon and nitrogen determination in soils[J].Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2011,42(8):971-979.
卜晓燕,米文宝,许浩,等.宁夏平原不同类型湿地土壤碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量学特征[J].浙江大学学报,2016,42(1):107-118.
司海丽,纪立东,刘菊莲,等.有机肥施用量对玉米产量、土壤养分及生物活性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2022,35(4):740-747.
刘涛,高晓飞.激光粒度仪与沉降-吸管法测定褐土颗粒组成的比较[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):16-18,22.
Nikolaos E, Evdoxia L, Emmanouil P. Inherent relationship of the USLE, RUSLE topographic factor algorithms and its impact on soil erosion modelling[J].Hydrological Sciences Journal,2020,65(11):1879-1893.
Boglarka K, Csaba C, Alexandra S J, et al. Comparison of the applicability of different soil erosion models to predict soil erodibility factor and event soil losses on loess slopes in hungary[J].Water,2021,13(24):e3517.
Mohamadi M A, Kavian A. Effects of rainfall patterns on runoff and soil erosion in field plots[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2015,3(4):273-281.
殷水清,王杨,谢云,等.中国降雨过程时程分型特征[J].水科学进展,2014,25(5):617-624.
De Lima J L M P, Carvalho S C P, De Lima M I P. Rainfall simulator experiments on the importance of when rainfall burst occurs during storm events on runoff and soil loss[J].Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie,2013,57(1):91-109.
王月月,吴元芝,范雯华,等.不同降雨条件下沂蒙山区耕层土壤团聚体特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(1):92-99.
Bu C F, Wu S F, Yang K B. Effects of physical soil crusts on infiltration and splash erosion in three typical Chinese soils[J].International Journal of Sediment Research,2014,29(4):491-500.
Chamizo S, Canton Y, Rodriguez-Caballero E, et al. Runoff at contrasting scales in a semiarid ecosystem: A complex balance between biological soil crust features and rainfall characteristics[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,452:130-138.
Wu X L, Wei Y J, Wang J G, et al. Effects of erosion degree and rainfall intensity on erosion processes for Ultisols derived from quaternary red clay[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2017,249:226-236.
冯志倩,娄永才,齐星圆,等.汇流强度、坡度及侵蚀泥沙颗粒分形对工程堆积体坡面侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):127-134.
谭贞学,王占礼,王莎,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀过程[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(6):1-5.
任柯蒙,卫伟,赵西宁,等.基于水蚀预报模型的黄土高原水平阶减流阻蚀效应模拟[J].生态学报,2018,38(14):5067-5077.
Kateb H E, Zhang H F, Zhang P C, et al. Soil erosion and surface runoff on different vegetation covers and slope gradients: A field experiment in Southern Shaanxi Province, China[J].Catena,2013,105:1-10.
马金龙,许欢欢,王兵,等.黄土高原坡耕地土壤物理结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):45-49.
Zhang F B, Wang Z L, Yang M Y. Validating and improving interrill erosion equations[J].PLoS One,2014,9(2):e88275.
Kinnell P I A. A comparison of the abilities of the USLE-M, RUSLE2 and WEPP to model event erosion from bare fallow areas[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,596/597:32-34.
0
浏览量
943
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621