1. 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "付世琳(2000-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:750403695@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
付世琳, 姚冲, 余倩, 等. 不同坡度和不同生育期的谷子坡耕地入渗特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):23-30.
FU Shilin, YAO Chong, YU Qian, et al. Infiltration Characteristics of Millet Slope Farmland with Different Slope Gradient and Different Growth Period[J]. 2023, 37(4): 23-30.
付世琳, 姚冲, 余倩, 等. 不同坡度和不同生育期的谷子坡耕地入渗特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):23-30. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.004.
FU Shilin, YAO Chong, YU Qian, et al. Infiltration Characteristics of Millet Slope Farmland with Different Slope Gradient and Different Growth Period[J]. 2023, 37(4): 23-30. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.004.
坡度和作物生育期是影响坡耕地土壤入渗性能的关键因素
作物生长导致土壤特性及根系变化进而影响坡面入渗过程。通过人工模拟降雨试验
设计4个坡耕地坡度(3°
5°
10°
15°)及2个降雨强度(40
80 mm/h)
在谷子4个生育期(拔节初期、拔节中期、抽穗初期、灌浆初期)开展试验
探究坡度和生育期对谷子坡耕地土壤入渗特征的影响机制
并结合入渗模型(Horton、Kostiakov、Philip模型)对谷子坡耕地土壤水分入渗过程进行拟合并评价其适用性。结果表明:(1)随坡度增加土壤入渗能力下降
与3°相比
15°坡耕地土壤稳定入渗速率、平均入渗速率及累积入渗量分别减小30.76%~52.38%
21.28%~37.50%和22.51%~43.55%。(2)随着谷子生育期的延长
土壤入渗能力显著增加
与拔节初期相比
灌浆初期时土壤稳定入渗速率、平均入渗速率及累积入渗量分别增加23.81%~80.00%
20.83%~40.00%
17.84%~54.10%
表现为拔节初期
Slope and crop growth period are the key factors affecting the soil infiltration performance of sloping farmland
and crop growth can result in soil characteristics and root changes
which further affect the slope infiltration process. Through artificial simulated rainfall experiments
the slopes (3°
5°
10° and 15°) and 2 rainfall intensities (40 and 80 mm/h) of four slope cultivated land were designed
and the experiments were carried out in four growth stages of millet (early jointing period
middle jointing period
early heading period
early pustulation period) to explore the influence mechanism of slope and growth period on soil infiltration characteristics of millet slope farmland
and combined with the infiltration model (Horton
Kostiakov and Philip models) to evaluate the applicability of soil moisture infiltration process in cultivated land of millet slope. The results showed that: (1) The soil infiltration capacity decreased with the increase of slope
and compared with the slope of 3°
the stable infiltration rate
average infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration rate of the soil in farmland of 15° slope decreased by 30.76%~52.38%
21.28%~37.50% and 22.51%~43.55%
respectively. (2) With the extension of millet growth period
soil infiltration capacity increased significantly
and compared with the early jointing stage
the stable infiltration rate
average infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration amount of soil in the early filling stage increased by 23.81%~80.00%
20.83%~40.00% and 17.84%~54.10%
respectively
showing that the early jointing period < the middle jointing period < the early heading period < the early pustulation period. (3) By fitting the measured values of infiltration rate
the Horton model could best fit the soil infiltration process of slope farmland
and the fitting parameters of the model had physical significance. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for increasing rainfall infiltration
improving water use efficiency and reducing water and soil loss in sloping farmland.
程艳辉.红壤区坡面径流调控关键技术与模式的适用性研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2010.
刘金荣,谢晓蓉.河西走廊生态环境特征与可持续农业发展对策[J].农业环境与发展,2001(3):38-39.
魏瑶瑶,王俊,张永旺,等.黄土高原不同植被类型土壤入渗特征研究[J].延安大学学报,2021,40(2):16-20.
Parchami-Araghi F, Mirlatifi S M, Dashtaki S G, et al. Point estimation of soil water infiltration process using Artificial Neural Networks for some calcareous soils[J].Journal of Hydrology,2013,481:35-47.
肖婧,王兵.黄土丘陵区不同坡度撂荒草地入渗特征影响因素试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):136-142.
Vaezi A R, Ahmadi M, Cerda A. Contribution of raindrop impact to the change of soil physical properties and water erosion under semi-arid rainfalls[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,583:382-392.
Zheng J, Fan J L, Zhang F C, et al. Throughfall and stemflow heterogeneity under the maize canopy and its effect on soil water distribution at the row scale[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,660:1367-1382.
李莉,孟杰,杨建振,等.不同植被下生物结皮的水分入渗与水土保持效应[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(5):105-109.
张侃侃,卜崇峰,高国雄.黄土高原生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(5):808-812.
王国梁,刘国彬,周生路.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域植被恢复对土壤稳定入渗的影响[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(5):529-535.
赵西宁,吴发启.土壤水分入渗的研究进展和评述[J].西北林学院学报,2004,19(1):42-45.
傅斌,王玉宽,朱波,等.紫色土坡耕地降雨入渗试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(7):39-43.
吴发启,赵西宁,佘雕.坡耕地土壤水分入渗影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):16-18,78.
李明森.藏北高原草地资源合理利用[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4):335-339.
阿茹·苏里坦,常顺利,张毓涛.天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J].生态学报,2019,39(24):9111-9118.
刘畅,张建军,张海博,等.晋西黄土区退耕还林后土壤入渗特征及土壤质量评价[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):101-107.
陈科兵,吴发启,姚冲.黄土高原南部地区人工模拟暴雨条件下不同坡度谷子坡耕地产流产沙过程[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):90-95,103.
成婧,吴发启,路培,等.玉米苜蓿间作的蓄水保土效益试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):54-57.
孙从建,侯慧新,陈伟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型农作物产流产沙效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):99-103,111.
杨晓芬,吴发启,马波,等.黄土坡耕地玉米作物的防蚀作用研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(10):97-102.
黄俊,金平伟,李敏,等.径流小区尺度土壤入渗率影响因子与估算模型研究[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):171-178.
Franzluebbers A J. Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2002,66(2):197-205.
Angers D A, Caron J. Plant-induced changes in soil structure: Processes and feedbacks[J].Biogeochemistry,1998,42(1/2):55-72.
徐敬华,王国梁,陈云明,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地土壤水分入渗特征及影响因素[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(2):19-25.
吴佳,王林华,李占斌,等.中小雨强下谷子坡地的降雨入渗特征模拟[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(6):228-234.
刘战东,高阳,段爱旺,等.麦田降雨产流过程的影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):38-44.
马波,耿晓晨,马璠,等.模拟降雨条件下谷子和冬小麦植株对降雨再分配过程的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2014,32(6):207-214.
王幼奇,阮晓晗,白一茹,等.不同种植年限压砂地土壤水分入渗过程及模型分析[J].排灌机械工程学报,2022,40(10):1048-1055.
王幼奇,包维斌,白一茹,等.生物炭对黑垆土土壤水分运移特征参数影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2020,38(3):292-297.
0
浏览量
950
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621