淤地坝保碳、减排、增汇作用与其能力评估

李智广; 成辉; 方怒放; 曾奕

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

淤地坝保碳、减排、增汇作用与其能力评估

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 淤地坝保碳、减排、增汇作用与其能力评估
- The Role of Yudiba Dams in Protecting Carbon, Reducing Carbon Emission and Enhancing Carbon Sequestration and Its Capability Assessment
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第4期页码：1-6
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 水利部水土保持监测中心,北京,100053
  2. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  4. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李智广(1966-),男,博士,正高级工程师(二级),主要从事水土保持监管、监测、信息化、项目建设管理和科技研究。E-mail:lizhiguang@mwr.gov.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42077071,42207405);全国水土流失动态监测和水土保持信息系统更新维护项目(126216229000200002)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.001
  中图分类号： S157.3
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李智广, 成辉, 方怒放, 等. 淤地坝保碳、减排、增汇作用与其能力评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):1-6.

LI Zhiguang, CHENG Hui, FANG Nufang, et al. The Role of Yudiba Dams in Protecting Carbon, Reducing Carbon Emission and Enhancing Carbon Sequestration and Its Capability Assessment[J]. 2023, 37(4): 1-6.
李智广, 成辉, 方怒放, 等. 淤地坝保碳、减排、增汇作用与其能力评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(4):1-6. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.001.

LI Zhiguang, CHENG Hui, FANG Nufang, et al. The Role of Yudiba Dams in Protecting Carbon, Reducing Carbon Emission and Enhancing Carbon Sequestration and Its Capability Assessment[J]. 2023, 37(4): 1-6. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.001.

摘要

淤地坝是黄土高原地区重要的沟道治理措施

也是陆地生态系统中重要的储碳场所。评估淤地坝的碳汇作用与能力

可为研究其他水土保持措施碳汇提供重要借鉴

也为我国碳达峰、碳中和目标提供科学依据。以黄土高原淤地坝为研究对象

系统探讨淤地坝的碳汇效应与机理

提出淤地坝碳汇能力估算方法。结果表明:淤地坝具有保土保碳、减蚀减排和增绿增汇作用。在过去50年中黄土高原淤地坝保碳能力为2.16×107 t C

减排能力为4.33×106~8.66×106 t C

增汇能力为6.84×105 t C。淤地坝产生积极的碳汇效益

对提升生态系统碳中和能力、降低碳达峰的峰值发挥重要作用。淤地坝与其他主要水土保持措施都具有保土、减蚀等多种水土保持效益

可充分发挥保碳、减排、增汇等多种碳汇作用。推行碳汇水土保持工作、实施水土保持增汇行动

既可全面巩固陆地生态系统碳汇作用

又能持续提升生态系统增汇能力

对碳达峰与碳中和作出水土保持贡献。

Abstract

Analyzing the carbon sequestration function and evaluating the carbon sequestration capacity of Yudiba dams is a crucial prerequisite for determining the carbon sequestration effects of Yudiba dams and other soil and water conservation measures

and can provide valuable data references for achieving carbon emission peak and carbon neutralization. Here

we take the Yudiba dams on the Chinese Loess Plateau as the research object

systematically exploring the carbon sequestration effect and mechanism of Yudiba dams

and propose an estimation method for their carbon sequestration capacity. The results show that Yudiba dams effectively protect soil and carbon

mitigate erosion and carbon emission

and promote vegetation and carbon sequestration. In the past 50 years

the carbon conservation

carbon emission reduction

and carbon sequestration capacity of Yudiba dams on the Chinese Loess Plateau are 2.16×107

4.33×106~8.66×106 and 6.84×105 t C

respectively

which can enhance the carbon neutralization capacity of the ecosystem and reduce the carbon peak value. Yudiba dams and other significant soil and water conservation measures have demonstrated a variety of positive ecological restoration benefits

such as soil conservation

erosion reduction

and vegetation restoration

which fully promote the comprehensive role of carbon sequestration in carbon conservation

carbon emission reduction

and carbon sequestration increase. The implementation of soil and water conservation that focus on enhancing carbon sequestration not only reinforces the significance of terrestrial ecosystems in carbon sequestration

but also leads to a continual improvement of the carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems

and plays a significant role in achieving carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality within the sphere of soil and water conservation.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华人民共和国水利部.第一次全国水利普查水土保持情况公报[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):2-3.

Fang N F, Zeng Y, Ran L S, et al. Substantial role of check dams in sediment trapping and carbon sequestration on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Communications Earth and Environment,2023,4(1):65-74.

李勇,白玲玉.黄土高原淤地坝对陆地碳贮存的贡献[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):1-4,19.

Wang Y F, Chen L D, Gao Y, et al. Carbon sequestration function of check-dams: A case study of the Loess Plateau in China[J].Ambio,2014,43(7):926-931.

Ran L S, Tian M Y, Fang N F, et al. Riverine carbon export in the arid to semiarid Wuding River Catchment on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Biogeosciences Discussions,2018,15(12):3857-3871.

Zeng Y, Fang N F, Shi Z H. Effects of human activities on soil organic carbon redistribution at an agricultural watershed scale on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2020,303:e107112.

Zhang H C, Liu S G, Yuan W P, et al. Loess Plateau check dams can potentially sequester eroded soil organic carbon[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences,2016,121(6):1449-1455.

王震,刘颖,杨明义,等.坝地剖面泥沙有机碳分解特征及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(10):2635-2643.

Zeng Y, Fang N F, Shi Z H, et al. Soil organic carbon redistribution and delivery by soil erosion in a small catchment of the Yellow River basin[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences,2020,125(5):1-16.

周仕轩,夏彬,郝旺林,等.黄土高原坝地深层土壤有机碳稳定性研究[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(4):284-289,298.

Lü Y H, Sun R H, Fu B J, et al. Carbon retention by check dams: Regional scale estimation[J].Ecological Engineering,2012,44:139-146.

Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget[J].Environment International,2003,29(4):437-450.

Lugato E, Smith P, Borrelli P, et al. Soil erosion is unlikely to drive a future carbon sink in Europe[J].Science Advances,2018, 4(11):e3523.

Yue Y, Ni J R, Ciais P, et al. Lateral transport of soil carbon and land-atmosphere CO

flux induced by water erosion in China[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2016,113(24):6617-6622.

Leithold E L, Blair N E, Perkey D W. Geomorphologic controls on the age of particulate organic carbon from small mountainous and upland rivers[J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2006,20(3):1-11.

Bouchez J, Beyssac O, Galy V, et al. Oxidation of petrogenic organic carbon in the Amazon floodplain as a source of atmospheric CO

.Geology,2010,38(3):255-258.

文雯,周宝同,汪亚峰,等.黄土高原羊圈沟小流域土地利用时空变化的土壤有机碳效应[J].生态学报,2015,35(18): 6060-6069.

马安利.淤地坝增产效益监测分析[J].人民黄河,2012,34(10):92-93,96.

Jacinthe P A, Lal R, Kimble J M. Carbon dioxide evolution in runoff from simulated rainfall on long-term no-till and plowed soils in southwestern Ohio[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2002,66(1):23-33.

Wang X, Cammeraat E L H, López C D, et al. Mineralization of eroded organic carbon transported from a loess soil into water[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2014,78(4):1362-1367.

Ran L, Lu X X, Xin Z. Erosion-induced massive organic carbon burial and carbon emission in the Yellow River Basin, China[J].Biogeosciences,2014,11(4):945-959.

李智广,王楠,王英顺,等.大中型淤地坝安全度汛"四预"模型的重点主题及其算据[J].中国水利,2022(9):30-33.

Deng L, Liu S G, Kim D G, et al. Past and future carbon sequestration benefits of China’s grain for green program[J].Global Environmental Change,2017,47:13-20.

Zeng Y, Ran L S, Fang N F, et al. How to balance green and grain in marginal mountainous areas?[J].Earth’s Future,2022,10(5):1-15.

浏览量

1227

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

海南屯昌砂质壤土橡胶林水土保持措施生态产品能值分析

黄土丘陵区不同水土保持措施坡面小区侵蚀性降雨标准

黄土坡面溶解性碳流失特征及其对水土保持措施的响应

基于径流小区实测的干热河谷土壤侵蚀荟萃分析

黄土高原地区淤地坝拦沙分析方法研究进展