四川农业大学农学院农业农村部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,成都,611130
[ "李俊积(1998—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事肥料高效利用研究。E-mail:2544073538@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
李俊积, 马海艳, 马宏亮, 等. 配施增效助剂对四川旱地小麦的减氮效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):312-318.
LI Junji, MA Haiyan, MA Hongliang, et al. Research on Nitrogen Reducing Effect of Synergist on Dryland Wheat in Sichuan Province[J]. 2023, 37(3): 312-318.
李俊积, 马海艳, 马宏亮, 等. 配施增效助剂对四川旱地小麦的减氮效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):312-318. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.040.
LI Junji, MA Haiyan, MA Hongliang, et al. Research on Nitrogen Reducing Effect of Synergist on Dryland Wheat in Sichuan Province[J]. 2023, 37(3): 312-318. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.040.
为探究增效助剂对四川旱地小麦的减氮效应
设置空白对照(CK0)、常规施氮不追肥(CK1
施氮量187.5 kg/hm2)、常规施氮量下底追比6∶4(CK2
施氮量187.5 kg/hm2)、增效助剂拌常规复合肥
减氮20%(jf—20%)
减氮30%(jf—30%)、增效助剂螯合脲甲醛减氮20%(jn—20%)
减氮30%(jn—30%)
减氮40%(jn—40%)、增效助剂螯合脲甲醛肥+卵磷脂有机肥3 000 kg/hm2减氮27%(jny—27%)等9个处理
分析测定不同处理下土壤氮素动态、小麦叶绿素含量、叶面积指数动态
生长速率、氮素积累与转运、产量及其构成、氮肥利用率等。结果表明:增效助剂处理后显著降低开花期和成熟期土壤中硝态氮与铵态氮含量
较CK1开花期降幅分别为6.8%~9.8%和8.7%~14.5%
成熟期降幅分别 为14.9%~20.8%和15.9%~20.0%。花后30天叶面积指数以jn—20%与jny—27%最高
分别较CK1、CK2提高5.3%和5.8%
jn—20%与jny—27%处理下
叶面积指数较CK1提高5.83%和5.24%;jf、jn、jny模式花后氮素积累量较CK1、CK2显著增加
幅度分别为33.7%~73.1%和29.8%~68.0%
花后氮素转运量提升幅度分别为116.1%~217.8%和 107.1%~204.0%。jf、jn、jny模式小麦开花—成熟期生长速率较CK1提高13.2%~33.8%。配施增效助剂后减氮不减产
jf—20%、jn—20%、jny—27%增产幅度为0.2%~2.9%
以jn—20%和jny—27%处理产量最高
较CK1分别增产2.6%和2.9%
但与CK1和CK2差异不显著。jn、jf、jny模式显著提高氮肥利用率与氮肥偏生产力
较CK1分别增加6.7%~24.0%和10.3%~25.8%。增效助剂通过促进养分吸收减少土壤中氮素残留来提高肥料利用率
实现减氮不减产
施用增效助剂拌肥、增效助剂螯合脲甲醛可以实现减氮20%
增效助剂螯合脲甲醛配合卵磷脂有机肥3 000 kg/hm2可实现减氮27%。
In order to explore the nitrogen reducing effect of synergists on dryland wheat in Sichuan
the following 9 treatments were set up in this study: blank control (CK0); Conventional nitrogen application without topdressing (CK1
nitrogen application amount 187.5 kg/hm2); The ratio of basal dressing to topdressing under conventional nitrogen application rate is 6∶4 (CK2
nitrogen application rate is 187.5 kg/hm2); Synergistic auxiliary mixed with conventional compound fertilizer
reducing nitrogen by 20% (jf—20%) and 30% (jf—30%); Synergistic auxiliary chelating urea formaldehyde reduces nitrogen by 20% (jn—20%)
30% (jn—30%) and 40% (jn—40%); Synergistic auxiliary chelated urea formaldehyde fertilizer + lecithin organic fertilizer 3 000 kg/hm2 reduced nitrogen by 27% (jny—27%); The dynamics of soil nitrogen
wheat chlorophyll content
leaf area index
growth rate
nitrogen accumulation and transport
yield and its composition
and nitrogen utilization efficiency were analyzed and measured under different treatments. The results showed that each treatment of jf
jn and jny model significantly reduced the content of ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in soil at flowering and mature stages
which were 6.8%~9.8% and 8.7%~14.5% lower than that of CK1 at flowering stage
and 14.9%~20.8% and 15.9%~20.0% lower at mature stage
respectively. At 30 days after anthesis
the leaf area index of jn—20% and jny—27% was the highest
5.3% and 5.8% higher than that of CK1 and CK2
respectively. The leaf area index of jn—20% and jny—27% was 5.83% and 5.24% higher than that of CK1; Each treatment of jf
jn and jny mode significantly increased the post anthesis nitrogen accumulation compared with CK1 and CK2
with the amplitude of 33.7%~73.1% and 29.8%~68.0% respectively
and the post anthesis nitrogen transport increased by 116.1%~217.8% and 107.1%~204.0% respectively. The growth rate of each treatment of jf
jn and jny in flowering maturity stage was higher than that of CK1
and the range was 13.2%~33.8%. Moreover
wheat yield will not decrease after nitrogen fertilizer reduction and synergist application. The yield increase of jf—20%
jn—20% and jny—27% was 0.2%~2.9%
and the yield of jn—20% and jny—27% treatment was the highest
2.6% and 2.9% higher than that of CK1
however
there is no significant difference with CK1 and CK2. jn
jf and jny modes significantly improved nitrogen utilization efficiency and partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer
which were 6.7%~24.0% and 10.3%~25.8% higher than CK1 respectively. According to the research
the synergists can improve the fertilizer utilization rate by promoting nutrient absorption and reducing nitrogen residues in the soil
so as to reduce nitrogen without reducing production. The application of synergists to mix fertilizer and synergists to chelate urea formaldehyde can reduce nitrogen by 20%
and synergists to chelate urea formaldehyde with lecithin organic fertilizer 3 000 kg/hm2 can reduce nitrogen by 27%.
韩一军,韩亭辉."十四五"时期我国小麦增产潜力分析与实现路径[J].农业经济问题,2021(7):38-46.
乔祥梅,王志龙,蒋欣彤,等.云南旱地小麦新品种产量和品质对减量施氮的响应[J].西南农业学报,2022,35(6):1365-1370.
唐汉,王金武,徐常塑,等.化肥减施增效关键技术研究进展分析[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(4):1-19.
吕金岭,王小非,李太魁,等.不同施肥方式下砂姜黑土冬小麦-夏玉米轮作农田氨挥发特征及排放系数[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(12):1869-1879.
刘宇辉,田秀平,张晴雯,等.复合菌肥部分替代化肥对冬小麦氮素吸收的影响[J].华北农学报,2019,34(2):178-186.
张祥,梁济,李接励,等.腐殖酸肥料对小麦氮素吸收利用的影响[J].化肥工业,2019,46(3):61-66.
庄振东,李絮花.腐植酸氮肥对玉米产量、氮肥利用及氮肥损失的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(5):1232-1239.
袁嫚嫚,邬刚,孙义祥,等.缓释尿素对两种土壤小麦氮素运转、产量和土壤无机氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):233-239.
张明伟,马泉,陈京都,等.缓控释肥在冬小麦上的应用研究进展及展望[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(2):15-21.
马泉,王亚华,王梦尧,等.缓控释肥的发展应用与评价体系研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(18):24-29.
徐汉虹.植物化学保护学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2018:22-23.
孔祥吉,韦笑,王娜,等.聚氧乙烯型非离子表面活性剂类农药增效助剂的环境行为特性综述[J].农业资源与环境学报,2017,34(3):197-206.
王亮亮,韩效钊,杨静芳,等.生物表面活性剂对水溶肥料润湿性能的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2014(8):1253-1255.
罗东洋,彭昌家,王明文,等.农药增效助剂"激健"在小麦条锈病防治中的应用效果[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(11):113-117.
朱丹,祖英治,胡亚军,等.大豆田应用激健减量增效田间试验及分析[J].黑龙江粮食,2021(1):67-69.
张文超,吕亮,陈展鹏,等.激健复合肥和激健增效助剂对水稻减肥减药增产效应研究[J].湖北农业科学,2022,61(1):30-34.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
谭凯炎,张心如,耿金剑,等.北方冬小麦越冬前后生物量消长规律[J].中国农业气象,2022,43(4):276-284.
全智,刘轩昂,刘东.土壤可溶性有机氮研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(1):277-288.
刘微,赵同科,王丽英.不同水分、施氮量对土壤中硝态氮含量分布的影响[J].华北农学报,2006(3):27-30.
彭瑞雪,朱建强,吴启侠,等.不同氮肥运筹对直播稻田氮素损失与利用的影响.农业资源与环境学报,1-12.
乔月,朱建强,吴启侠,等.不同氮肥对不同种植方式稻田径流氮流失与氨挥发的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2021,40(2):32-41.
毛积磊,彭守华.不同浓度的表面活性剂处理萝卜幼苗产生的生物学效应分析[J].农业科技通讯,2022(10):137-139,144.
刁静茹,赵保卫,马锋锋,等.螯合型表面活性剂强化黑麦草修复Cd污染水体[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(5):2238-2245.
苏锦武,陈遇春,张舒,等.稻田施用激健肥和农药加激健助剂减肥减药增产效果示范[J].湖北植保,2020(1):28-30.
0
浏览量
1009
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621