1. 内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,呼和浩特,010018
2. 内蒙古自治区水利事业发展中心,呼和浩特,010020
[ "郭月峰(1982—),女,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:guoyuefeng0525@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
郭月峰, 张志强, 祁伟. 砒砂岩区不同灌木根系构型及根系抗拉对比[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):273-280.
GUO Yuefeng, ZHANG Zhiqiang, QI Wei. Comparison of Root Structure and Root Tensile Resistance of Different Shrubs in Arsenic Sandstone Area[J]. 2023, 37(3): 273-280.
郭月峰, 张志强, 祁伟. 砒砂岩区不同灌木根系构型及根系抗拉对比[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):273-280. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.035.
GUO Yuefeng, ZHANG Zhiqiang, QI Wei. Comparison of Root Structure and Root Tensile Resistance of Different Shrubs in Arsenic Sandstone Area[J]. 2023, 37(3): 273-280. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.035.
对砒砂岩区各主要灌木树种根系形态进行定量研究
探究哪种水土保持植物可以有效地抵抗砒砂岩区的复合型侵蚀
以该区分布较广的灌木树种沙棘(Hippophae rhamnoides L.)、酸枣(Ziziphusjujuba M.)、连翘(Forsythia suspensa V.)、文冠果(Xanthoceras sorbifolium B.)、黄刺玫(Rosaxanthina L.)和蒙古扁桃(Amygdalus mongolica R.)单株个体为研究对象
对其根系分布范围、几何形态
拓扑指数、单根力学特性
降维进行综合分析
筛选出在砒砂岩地区固土效果较好的灌木植物。结果表明:(1)文冠果和连翘以倾斜根为主
沙棘、酸枣、黄刺玫和蒙古扁桃以水平根为主;细根长文冠果(2 368.54 cm)>沙棘(1 746.12 cm)>黄刺玫(1 463.15 cm)>蒙古扁桃(1 162.81 cm)>酸枣(928.69 cm)>连翘(817.45 cm);文冠果拓扑指数0.54且根系呈叉状分支结构;连翘拓扑指数0.71且呈鱼尾型分支结构。(2)根系平均抗拉强度文冠果(30.45 MPa)>黄刺玫(18.21 MPa)>连翘(17.03 MPa)>蒙古扁桃(16.62 MPa)>酸枣(16.34 MPa)>沙棘(15.35 MPa)。基于主成分分析法对不同灌木树种根系固土效应进行对比
其中
文冠果的综合主成分指标最高达到2.28
则综合固土效果最好。研究结果可为砂岩地区选出适宜的土保持灌木
同时为灌木林的可持续发展提供理论参考。
The root morphology of the main shrub species in the arsenic sandstone area was quantitatively studied to explore which soil and water conservation plants could effectively resist the composite erosion of the arsenic sandstone area
and the shrub species Hippophae rhamnoides L.、Ziziphusjuba M.、Forsythia suspensa V.、Xanthoceras sorbifolium B.
Rosaxanthina L. and Amygdalus mongolica R. was the research object
and the root distribution range
geometric morphology
topological index
mechanical characteristics of a single root
and dimensionality reduction were comprehensively analyzed
and shrub plants with good soil consolidation effect in arsenic sandstone area were screened. The results showed that: (1) Oblique roots were the main ones for Xanthoceras sorbifolium B. and Forsythia suspensa V.
while horizontal roots were dominated by Hippophae rhamnoides L.
Ziziphusjuba M.
Rosaxanthina L. and Amygdalus mongolica R.; Thin roots and long roots
Xanthoceras sorbifolium B. (2 368.54 cm)>Hippophae rhamnoides L. (1 746.12 cm)>Rosaxanthina L. (1 463.15 cm)> Amygdalus mongolica R. (1 162.81 cm)> Ziziphusjuba M. (928.69 cm)> Forsythia suspensa V. (817.45 cm)
longythia topological index of 0.54 and fork-shaped branch structure
forsythia topological index of 0.71 and fishtail-shaped branching structure. (2) Average tensile strength of roots
Xanthoceras sorbifolium B. (30.45 MPa)>Rosaxanthina L. (18.21 MPa)>Forsythia suspensa V. (17.03 MPa)>Amygdalus mongolica R. (16.62 MPa)>Ziziphusjuba M. (16.34 MPa)>Hippophae rhamnoides L. (15.35 MPa). Based on the principal component analysis method
the root soil consolidation effect of different shrub species was compared
and the comprehensive principal component index of theXanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge.reached 2.28
which was the best comprehensive soil consolidation effect
which could selectsuitable soil conservation shrubs for sandstone areas and provide theoretical reference for the sustainable development of shrub forests in this area.
辛军伟,尚振坤,王俊鹏,等.砒砂岩区典型坡面土壤水分空间分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(1):52-59.
姚文艺,李长明,张攀,等.砒砂岩侵蚀机理研究与展望[J].人民黄河,2018,40(6):1-7,65.
聂呈荣,骆世明,章家恩,等.现代集约农业下基塘系统的退化与生态恢复[J].生态学报,2003,23(9):1851-1860.
钟荣华,鲍玉海,贺秀斌,等.三峡水库消落带4种草本根系抗拉特性及根系粘聚力[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):188-194.
吴徵镒.苏联植物学研究工作概况[J].Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,1953(4):476-523.
薛建辉,王智,吕祥生.林木根系与土壤环境相互作用研究综述[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(3):79-84.
伍红燕.模拟边坡条件下不同植物根构型及其单根抗拉特性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2020.
田佳,卞莹莹,于江珊,等.贺兰山3种乔木单根及根土复合体力学特性[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):123-129.
吴美苏,周成,王林,等.根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J].岩土力学,2019,40(增刊1):519-526,534.
肖本林,罗寿龙,陈军,等.根系生态护坡的有限元分析[J].岩土力学,2011,32(6):1881-1885.
Tardio G, Gonzalez-Ollauri A. A non-invasive preferential root distribution analysis methodology from a slope stability approach[J].Ecological Engineering,2016,97:46-57.
李长暄.林木单根力学性能及其影响因素研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.
嵇晓雷,杨平.夹竹桃根系分枝角度对边坡稳定性影响[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(12):1966-1970.
嵇晓雷,杨平.夹竹桃根系形态参数及其对边坡稳定的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2013,41(4):71-75.
李贺鹏,岳春雷,陈友吾,等.浙南山区6种优势乔木植物根系的力学特性研究[J].浙江林业科技,2010b,30(3):6-11.
朱锦奇,苏伯儒,王云琦,等.荆条根系的固土功能随土壤含水率的变化[J].林业科学,2020,56(6):202-208.
奚灵智,王龙威,王颖,等.植被根系固土抗剪强度试验研究[J].河北工程大学学报(自然科学版),2019,36(4):84-89.
伍红燕,赵倩,宋桂龙,等.平地与边坡条件下野生胡枝子根构型特征研究[J].草业科学,2019,36(7):1725-1733.
朱广龙,邓荣华,魏学智.酸枣根系空间分布特征对自然干旱梯度生境的适应[J].生态学报,2016,36(6):1539-1546.
Bischetti G B,Chiaradia E A,Simonato T, et al. Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy (Northern Italy)[J].Plant and Soil,2005,278:11-22.
李姜瑶,缪晓星,王延秀,等.西宁盆地黄土区不同草本植物和坡形条件下坡面产流产沙特征[J].盐湖研究,2022,30(1):33-45.
张扬,李程远,韩少杰,等.典型黑土区主要树种根系构型特征及其对固土能力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1726-1734.
黄广杰,段青松,李建兴,等.三江并流区水库消落带5种草本根系形态及抗拉特性[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):389-395.
刘亚斌,余冬梅,付江涛,等.黄土区灌木柠条锦鸡儿根-土间摩擦力学机制试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(10):198-205.
李云鹏,张会兰,王玉杰,等.针叶与阔叶树根系对土壤抗剪强度及坡体稳定性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(1):40-45.
0
浏览量
902
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621