陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安,710119
[ "孟晓璐(1999—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事生态、遥感研究。E-mail:mxl0902@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
孟晓璐, 张艳芳. 景观格局变化下陕西汉江流域生态价值与风险的相关性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):190-200.
MENG Xiaolu, ZHANG Yanfang. Study on Correlation Between Ecological Value and Risk of Hanjiang River Basin in Shaanxi Province Under Landscape Pattern Change[J]. 2023, 37(3): 190-200.
孟晓璐, 张艳芳. 景观格局变化下陕西汉江流域生态价值与风险的相关性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):190-200. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.025.
MENG Xiaolu, ZHANG Yanfang. Study on Correlation Between Ecological Value and Risk of Hanjiang River Basin in Shaanxi Province Under Landscape Pattern Change[J]. 2023, 37(3): 190-200. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.025.
陕西汉江流域是"南水北调"中线工程的主要水源地
属于国家重点生态功能区。研究流域内景观格局的时空变化特征、生态系统服务价值和景观生态风险的相关性
对保持流域内生态系统稳定性、保障流域生态安全具有指导意义。基于2000年、2005年、2010年、2015年、2020年陕西汉江流域5期土地利用数据
采用景观格局指数计算、生态系统服务价值评估、景观生态风险评估等方法
研究景观格局变化下生态系统服务价值、景观生态风险的时空演变机制及空间相关关系。结果表明:(1)2000—2020年
流域内景观格局斑块破碎程度降低、异质性和连通性减弱、多样性增加
各地类景观向复杂化方向发展;(2)研究时域内
研究区ESV总体增加5.23亿元
气候调节价值最高
占比41.70%
以较低和中等价值等级为主
占比约61.62%;(3)研究时域内
研究区ESR整体呈小幅减少趋势
降幅1.40%
以较低和中等生态风险等级为主
占比约61.55%;(4)陕西汉江流域生态系统服务价值与生态风险之间存在显著负向空间相关性。景观格局变化使陕西汉江流域生态系统服务功能升高
生态风险降低
两者空间自相关性减弱。
The Hanjiang River basin in Shaanxi Province is the main water source of the middle route project of "South to North Water Transfer"
and belongs to the national key ecological functional area. The study of the spatial and temporal characteristics of landscape pattern
the correlation between ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk in the basin has guiding significance for maintaining ecosystem service function in the basin and ensuring ecological security in the basin. Based on the five phases of land use data of the Hanjiang River Basin in Shaanxi Province in 2000
2005
2010
2015 and 2020
the spatio-temporal evolution mechanism and correlation of ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk under landscape pattern change were studied by using the methods of landscape pattern index calculation
ecosystem service value assessment
landscape ecological risk assessment
etc. The results showed that: (1) From 2000 to 2020
the fragmentation of landscape patches in the watershed was reduced
heterogeneity and connectivity were weakened
and diversity was increased
and various types of landscape developed towards complexity; (2) In the study time domain
the ESV in the study area had increased by 523 million yuan in general
of which the value of climate regulation is the highest
accounting for 41.70%
mainly in low and medium value grades
accounting for about 61.62%; (3) In the study time domain
the ESR in the study area decreased slightly by 1.40%
mainly at low and medium ecological risk levels
accounting for 61.55%; (4) There was a negative spatial correlation between ecosystem service value and ecological risk in the Hanjiang River Basin of Shaanxi Province. The change of landscape pattern makes the ecosystem service function of the Hanjiang River basin in Shaanxi Province increases
the ecological risk decreases
and the spatial autocorrelation between them weakens.
Kreuter U P, Haris H G C, Malock M D, et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area,Texas[J]. Eological Econonics,2001,39:333-346.
郑博福,黄琼瑶,陶林,等.赣南地区景观格局变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(15):5940-5949.
傅伯杰,田汉勤,陶福禄,等.全球变化对生态系统服务的影响研究进展[J].中国基础科学,2020,22(3):25-30.
陈利顶,景永才,孙然好.城市生态安全格局构建:目标、原则和基本框架[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4101-4108.
彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677.
王晓峰,吕一河,傅伯杰.生态系统服务与生态安全[J].自然杂志,2012,34(5):273-276.
曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,等.景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架:ESRISK[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):843-855.
秦晓楠,卢小丽,武春友.国内生态安全研究知识图谱:基于Citespace的计量分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(13):3693-3703.
景培清,张东海,艾泽民,等.基于格局-过程生态适应性循环三维框架的自然景观生态风险评价:以黄土高原为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(17):7026-7036.
Xing L, Hu M S, Wang Y. Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment:A case study of Hubei province, central China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,740(4):e140126.
万慧琳,王赛鸽,陈彬,等.三江平原湿地生态风险评价及空间阈值分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(16):6595-6606.
李俊翰,高明秀.滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7815-7828.
靳甜甜,张云霞,朱月华,等.黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性:以子午岭区为例[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1623-1632.
李辉,周启刚,李斌,等.近30年三峡库区生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空变化及相关性研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(3):654-666.
欧阳晓,朱翔,贺清云.基于生态系统服务和生态系统健康的生态风险评价:以长株潭城市群为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5478-5489.
Zhang D H, Jing P Q, Ren H H, et al. The non-significant correlation between landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services in Xi'an Metropolitan Area, China[J].Ecological Indicators,2022,141:e109118.
Gong J, Cao E J, Xie Y C, et al. Integrating ecosystem services and landscape ecological risk into adaptive management:Insights from a western mountain-basin area, China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2021,281:e111817.
Bian J J, Chen W X, Zeng J. Ecosystem services, landscape pattern, and landscape ecological risk zoning in China.Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2022,DOI:10.1007/S11356-022-23435-5.
Peng J, Liu Y X, Corstanje R, et al. Promoting sustainable landscape pattern for landscape sustainability[J].Landscape Ecology,2021,36:1839-1844.
王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
李亚娇,沈昞昕,李家科,等.汉江流域上游景观格局变化及水沙响应关系.西安理工大学学报:1-17.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1294.N.20220406.1508.002.html.
陕西省统计局.陕西统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2021.
国家统计局农村社会经济调查司.中国农村统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2021.
谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
徐丽芬,许学工,罗涛,等.基于土地利用的生态系统服务价值当量修订方法:以渤海湾沿岸为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(10):1775-1784.
Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA[J].Geographical Analysis,2010,27:93-115.
张新胜,蔡明勇,邰文飞,等.陕西秦岭地区生态干扰风险空间分异规律研究.水土保持研究,2023,1-8.DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.053.
0
浏览量
770
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621