坝上地区人工林和草地生长季土壤水势动态

张益; 王渝淞; 武昱鑫; 余新晓; 樊登星; 贾国栋; 王春华

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.024

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

坝上地区人工林和草地生长季土壤水势动态

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 坝上地区人工林和草地生长季土壤水势动态
- Dynamics of Soil Water Potential in Growing Season of Plantation and Grassland in Bashang Area
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第3期页码：181-189
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
  2. 北京林业大学国家林业和草原局水土保持重点实验室,北京,100083
  3. 北京市河湖流域管理事务中心,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "张益(1998—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤水文、水土保持研究。E-mail:1491329925@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC05008)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.024
  中图分类号： S152.7
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张益, 王渝淞, 武昱鑫, 等. 坝上地区人工林和草地生长季土壤水势动态[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):181-189.

ZHANG Yi, WANG Yusong, WU Yuxin, et al. Dynamics of Soil Water Potential in Growing Season of Plantation and Grassland in Bashang Area[J]. 2023, 37(3): 181-189.
张益, 王渝淞, 武昱鑫, 等. 坝上地区人工林和草地生长季土壤水势动态[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):181-189. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.024.

ZHANG Yi, WANG Yusong, WU Yuxin, et al. Dynamics of Soil Water Potential in Growing Season of Plantation and Grassland in Bashang Area[J]. 2023, 37(3): 181-189. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.024.

摘要

为研究坝上地区人工林土壤水势动态

以结缕草(Zoysia japonica)为对照

选取坝上地区典型人工林小叶杨(Populus simonii Carr.)和樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)

研究其生长季不同时间、空间土壤水势和变异系数及晴天和降雨下土壤水势变化。结果表明:(1)人工林和草地土壤水势变化趋势相同

在生长季前期和后期土壤水势较高

中期土壤水势进入波动下降期

但不同植被进入波动期时间不同

樟子松晚于小叶杨和结缕草。小叶杨、樟子松、结缕草土壤水势最低值分别出现在70

30 cm处

最低值分别为-1 257.24

-747.97

-830.11 kPa。小叶杨、樟子松和结缕草土壤水势变异系数最大值分别在9月10 cm、7月10 cm、7月30 cm处

其值分别为-155.9%

-208.0%

-183.6%。总体上

变异系数生长季中期大于前期和后期

表层大于深层。(2)晴天人工林和草地土壤水势差的最大值与日均温度之间存在显著的相关关系

随着日均温度升高

水势差最大值也增大。典型晴天大气温度在日内上下波动

土壤水势呈现滞后波动

在生长季浅层土壤最为明显。(3)不同降雨量与土壤水势差呈现相关关系

随着降雨量升高

土壤水势差也随之升高。典型降雨事件下

中雨和大雨剖面土壤水势迅速上升

小雨事件下主要呈现波动变化。从不同植被来看

草地土壤水势较人工林波动更为剧烈。综上

生长季樟子松土壤水势进入波动期最晚

波动幅度最大。而土壤水势对于大气温度和降雨的响应方面

结缕草最为敏感。研究结果对于指导当地人工林建设与水资源高效管理具有重要意义。

Abstract

In order to study the dynamics of soil water potential of plantations in Bashang area

in this experiment

Zoysia japonica was taken as control

Populus simonii Carr. and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica

which were typical plantations in Bashang area

were selected to study the soil water potential value and variation coefficient in different time and space in growing season

and the soil water potential variation under sunny days and rainfall in growing season. The results showed that: (1) The change trend of the soil water potential of plantation and grass was the same

the soil water potential was higher at the early and late stages of growing season

and the soil water potential entered the fluctuating and declining period at the middle stage

but different vegetation entered the fluctuating period at different time

and that of P. sylvestris var. mongolica was later than that of P. simonii Carr. and Z. japonica. In addition

the lowest soil water potential of P. simonii Carr. was -1 257.24 kPa at 70 cm

that of P. sylvestris var. mongolica was -747.97 kPa at 10 cm

and that of Z. japonica was -830.11 kPa at 30 cm. The maximum variation coefficient of soil water potential of P. simonii Carr.

P. sylvestris var. mongolica and Z. japonica appeared at 10 cm in September

10 cm in July and 30 cm in July

with values of -155.9%

-208.0% and -183.6%

respectively. On the whole

the variation coefficient was greater in the middle of growing season than that at early and late stages

and that in surface layer was greater than that in deep layer. (2) In sunny days

there was a significant correlation between the maximum value of soil water potential difference of plantations and grasslands and the daily mean temperature. With the increasing of daily mean temperature

the maximum of soil water potential difference also increased. In typical sunny days

the atmospheric temperature fluctuated up and down in the day

and the soil water potential fluctuated with a lag

which was most obvious in the shallow soil during the growing season. (3) There was a correlation between different rainfall and soil water potential difference. With the increasing of rainfall

the soil water potential difference also increased. Under typical rainfall events

the soil water potential of moderate and heavy rainfall profiles rose rapidly

and fluctuated under light rainfall events. From the perspective of different vegetation

grass was more intense than artificial forest. To sum up

the soil water potential of P. sylvestris var. mongolica in the growing season entered into the fluctuating period at the latest

with the largest fluctuating range. The response of soil water potential of Z. japonica was the most sensitive to atmospheric temperature and rainfall. The results were of great significance for guiding the construction of local plantations and efficient management of water resources.

关键词

Keywords

references

吕振豫,刘姗姗,秦天玲,等.土壤入渗研究进展及方向评述[J].中国农村水利水电,2019(7):1-5.

雷志栋,杨诗秀,谢森传.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1987:8-18.

杨湘,苏学德,李鹏程,等.不同土壤水势对克瑞森葡萄光合生理及果实品质的影响[J].西南农业学报,2020,33(7):1429-1434.

吴沿友,胡林生,谷睿智,等.两种土壤含水量与水势关系[J].排灌机械工程学报,2017,35(4):351-356.

李奕然,马英,宋献方,等.华北山区典型人工林土壤水势动态和水分运移规律[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5622-5631.

袁佳丽,温国胜,张明如,等.毛竹快速生长期的水势变化特征[J].浙江农林大学学报,2015,32(5):722-728.

杨湘,苏学德,李鹏程,等.不同覆盖物对夏黑葡萄关键生育期土壤温度和土壤水势的影响[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(20):59-65.

任涛,贾志峰,王智,等.毛乌素沙地地膜/地布覆盖下土壤水势动态[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):78-84.

Wang X P, Berndtsson R, Pan Y X, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of soil water potential and its significance to water balance for a desert shrub area[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2022,224:e105506.

党宏忠,却晓娥,冯金超,等.土壤水分对黄土区苹果园土壤-植物-大气连续体(SPAC)中水势梯度的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(3):829-836.

Zhu L J, Ke Y H, Hong J M, et al. Assessing degradation of lake wetlands in Bashang Plateau,China based on long-term time series Landsat images using wetland degradation index[J].Ecological Indicators,2022,139:e108903.

Lozano P J, Schnabel S, Ceballos B A. The role of vegetation covers on soil wetting processes at rainfall event scale in scattered tree woodland of Mediterranean climate[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,529:951-961.

邵明安.土壤物理与生态环境建设研究文集[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2000:145-148.

刘亚玲,信忠保,李宗善,等.河北坝上樟子松人工林径向生长及其对气候因素的响应[J].生态学报,2022,42(5):1830-1840.

付强,马梓奡,李天霄,等.覆盖物对冻融土壤热量空间分布与传递效率的影响[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(2):292-298.

赵玉峰,罗专溪,于亚军,等.京津冀西北典型区域地下水位时空演变及驱动因素[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(6):1301-1313.

何志明,李月臣,金贤锋,等.考虑太阳辐射修正的重庆山地气温空间化模拟[J].资源科学,2019,41(6):1131-1140.

马稚桐,王文科,张在勇,等.浅层包气带土壤水昼夜分布变化规律模拟研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(2):245-251,260.

Sun L B, Chang X M, Yu X X, et al. Effect of freeze-thaw processes on soil water transport of farmland in a semi-arid area[J].Agricultural Water Management,2021,252:e106876.

张旭,塔娜,甄琦,等.寒旱区双层膜日光温室南侧不同保温结构土壤水热试验与模拟[J].中国农业大学学报,2022,27(8):175-185.

田梦,高伟达,任图生,等.条带覆盖免耕下吉林南部玉米行间土壤水分和温度的时空动态[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(7):1297-1307.

Zhang R, Wang D, Yang Z Q, et al. Changes in rainfall partitioning and its effect on soil water replenishment after the conversion of croplands into apple orchards on the Loess Plateau[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2021,312:e107342.

王轶浩,王彦辉,李振华,等.重庆铁山坪马尾松天然次生林降雨截持与贮水特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(16):6542-6551.

张鹏飞,王融融,戴燕燕,等.山西榆次不同植被土壤水分有效性与干燥化效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):192-198.

奚宏,唐继斗,史东梅,等.坡度对紫色土坡耕地产流产沙特征的影响[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2022,20(4):19-25.

浏览量

707

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

晋西北黄土区典型人工林草本多样性与土壤理化性质

不同坡度条件下连续降雨及汇流对黑土坡面侵蚀的影响

草被覆盖、雨强和坡度对黄土坡面径流含沙量的影响

亚热带不同林龄次生林与杉木林土壤氮淋溶损失特征

不同坡度和植被覆盖黄土对降雨入渗的响应规律