1. 西北大学城市与环境学院,西安,710127
2. 陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安,710127
3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
4. 浙江水利水电学院水利与环境工程学院,杭州,310018
[ "师卫钊(2001—),男,陕西咸阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态水文与水土保持研究。E-mail:202221174@stumail.nwu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
师卫钊, 何毅, 邵祎婷. 嘉陵江上游径流变化及其影响因素归因分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):124-131.
SHI Weizhao, HE Yi, SHAO Yiting. Attribution Analysis of Runoff Change and Its Influencing Factors in the Upper Reaches of Jialing River[J]. 2023, 37(3): 124-131.
师卫钊, 何毅, 邵祎婷. 嘉陵江上游径流变化及其影响因素归因分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):124-131. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.017.
SHI Weizhao, HE Yi, SHAO Yiting. Attribution Analysis of Runoff Change and Its Influencing Factors in the Upper Reaches of Jialing River[J]. 2023, 37(3): 124-131. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.017.
近年来
受气候变化与人类活动的双重影响
许多国内外河流的河川径流都受到强烈影响。以嘉陵江上游西汉水的礼县水文站控制流域为研究区
在对1960—2016年研究区年径流量进行突变点分析和趋势分析的基础上
使用8种基于Budyko假设的气候弹性系数法的水量平衡方程式进行流域径流变化归因分析。结果表明:(1)研究区潜在蒸散发呈显著增加趋势(p<0.01)
径流量呈显著减小趋势(p<0.01)
降水量呈不显著减少趋势(p>0.1)
径流量的突变点发生在1994年
并以此为界
把研究时段划分为基准期和变化期;(2)8种基于Budyko假设的方法得出的气候变化对于径流减少的贡献率为40%~50%
人类活动贡献率为50%~60%
占主导作用。在气候变化中
8种方法得出的流域降水的敏感性系数为2~3
流域蒸散发的敏感性系数为-1~-3;(3)人类活动对于径流减少的主要作用形式是通过改变下垫面来表现的。由于植被保护措施实施
1990—2010年研究区域的林地面积增加68.42 km2
在所有土地类型中变化最大
表明人类活动对于下垫面的影响显著。
In recent years
due to the dual impact of climate change and human activities
the runoff in many domestic and foreign rivers has been strongly affected. The control basin of Lixian Hydrologic Station in the Xihanshui River basin of the upper reaches of Jialing River was taken as the study area. On the basis of abrupt change point analysis and trend analysis of annual runoff from 1960 to 2016
eight water balance equations of climate elasticity based on the Budyko frame were used to analyze the attribution of runoff changes. The results showed that: (1) The potential evapotranspiration in the study area showed a significant increasing trend (p<0.01)
the runoff showed a significant decreasing trend (p<0.01)
and the precipitation showed a non-significant decreasing trend (p>0.1). The abrupt change of runoff occurred in 1994
and the study period was divided into the base period and the change period. (2) The contribution rate of climate change to runoff reduction by 8 methods based on Budyko hypothesis ranged from 40% to 50%
the contribution of human activities is between 50% and 60%
taking the leading role. In climate change
the sensitivity coefficient of precipitation obtained by the eight methods is between 2 and 3
and the sensitivity coefficient of evapotranspiration is between -1 and -3. (3)The main effect of human activities on the reduction of runoff is represented by changing the underlying surface. Due to the implementation of vegetation protection measures
the forest area in the study area increased by 68.42 km2 from 1990 to 2010
the largest change among all land types
indicating that the significant impact of human activities on the underlying surface.
Shao Y T, He Y, Mu X M, et al. Contributions of climate change and human activities to runoff and sediment discharge reductions in the Jialing River, amain tributary of the upper Yangtze River, China[J].Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2021,145(3/4):1437-1450.
范利杰,穆兴民,赵广举.近50年嘉陵江流域径流变化特征及影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(1):12-17.
宫渊波,张君,陈林武,等.嘉陵江上游不同植被类型小流域典型降雨产流特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):35-39.
关春晖.嘉陵江上游茨坝水文站水文特性分析[J].甘肃科技,2016,32(18):53-54.
叶婷,石朋,钟华,等.基于Budyko假设和微分方程的淮河上中游径流变化归因分析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(5):25-32.
杜嘉妮,蔡宜晴,刘希胜,等.基于Budyko假设的湟水径流变化归因识别[J].中国农村水利水电,2022(7):116-121.
周珍.基于Mann-Kendall的嘉陵江流域降水量时空分布规律研究[J].水资源开发与管理,2021(3):25-28,42.
段文明,穆兴民,高鹏,等.嘉陵江流域近50年降水量演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):97-101.
王涛,王进,吴彦昭.60年来西汉水流域降水径流演变特征及影响分析[J].人民长江,2020,51(6):89-94.
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage Paper 56[M].Rome:FAO,1998.
Schreiber P. Uber die beziehungen zwischen dem niederschlag und wasserfuhrung der flu βe in mitteleuropa[J].Meteorologische Zeitschrift,1904,21(10):441-452.
Ol'dekop E M. On evaporation from the surface of river basins[M].Transactions on meteorological observations(in Russian).Tarm,Estonia:University of Tartu,1911:200-201.
Budyko M I. Evaporation under Natural Conditions[M].English Translation by IPST:Leningrad,Gidrometeorizdat,Jerusalem,1948:120-121.
Pike J G. The estimation of annual run-off from meteorological data in a tropical climate[J].Journal of Hydrology,1964,2(2):116-123.
Fu G B, Charles S P, Chiew F H S. A two-parameter climate elasticity of streamflow index to assess climate change effects on annual streamflow[J].Water Resources Research,2007,43(11):2578-2584.
Zhang L, Dawes W R, Walker G R. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale[J].Water Resources Research,2001,37(3):701-708.
Choudhury B J. Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model[J].Journal of Hydrology,1999,216(1/2):99-110.
Wang D B, Tang Y. A one-parameter Budyko model for water balance captures emergent behavior in darwinian hydrologic models[J].Geophysical Research Letters,2014,41(13):4569-4577.
章诞武,丛振涛,倪广恒.基于中国气象资料的趋势检验方法对比分析[J].水科学进展,2013,24(4):490-496.
Pettitt A N. A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series C,1979,28(2):126-135.
Schaake J C, Waggoner P E. From climate to flow[J].Climate Change and US Water Resources,1990,8:177-206.
Arora V K. The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff[J].Journal of Hydrology,2002,265(1/4):164-177.
张棋,郑水明,叶雪珠,等.浙江省生态循环农业发展实践模式和对策[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(8):4900-4901,4904.
李小根,段小芳,付景保,等.基于GIS的丹江口水库土地利用/覆被动态变化特征分析[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(3):90-98.
董梁蕴,董好刚,牛瑞卿,等.基于遥感的郑州市近十年土地利用时空变化及驱动力分析[J].华南地质,2021,37(4):398-405.
0
浏览量
745
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621