丹江口库区典型小流域生物结皮驱动土壤性质变化及分离响应

平原; 澹腾辉; 李雨晨; 曾建辉; 宓桂音; 谭林芳; 郭忠录

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

丹江口库区典型小流域生物结皮驱动土壤性质变化及分离响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 丹江口库区典型小流域生物结皮驱动土壤性质变化及分离响应
- Soil Properties Change and Soil Detachment Response Driven by Biocrusts in Typical Small Watershed of DanJiangkou Reservoir Area
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第3期页码：87-94
- 作者机构：
  
  华中农业大学水土保持研究中心,武汉,430070
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "平原(1998—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀机理研究。E-mail:pingyuan@webmail.hzau.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42077066)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.012
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
平原, 澹腾辉, 李雨晨, 等. 丹江口库区典型小流域生物结皮驱动土壤性质变化及分离响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):87-94.

PING Yuan, TAN Tenghui, LI Yuchen, et al. Soil Properties Change and Soil Detachment Response Driven by Biocrusts in Typical Small Watershed of DanJiangkou Reservoir Area[J]. 2023, 37(3): 87-94.
平原, 澹腾辉, 李雨晨, 等. 丹江口库区典型小流域生物结皮驱动土壤性质变化及分离响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):87-94. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.012.

PING Yuan, TAN Tenghui, LI Yuchen, et al. Soil Properties Change and Soil Detachment Response Driven by Biocrusts in Typical Small Watershed of DanJiangkou Reservoir Area[J]. 2023, 37(3): 87-94. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.012.

摘要

为探究生物结皮发育驱动下土壤水蚀特征及机理

选取苔藓发育为优势种的退耕样地

设计5个盖度等级(1%~20%

20%~40%

40%~60%

60%~80%

80%~100%)

以裸地为对照

在不同水流剪切力(6.12~19.64 Pa)下进行冲刷试验。结果表明:结皮发育显著影响土壤养分含量

且高盖度结皮覆盖下养分表聚效应更加明显。生物结皮发育显著影响土壤分离能力

裸地土壤分离能力为生物结皮的3.58~348.95倍

裸地细沟可蚀性(0.293 5 s/m)为生物结皮(0.001 0~0.082 2 s/m)的3.57~293.50倍。相对土壤分离能力及细沟可蚀性均随结皮盖度增加呈指数函数衰减

结皮冲破时间随结皮盖度增加呈指数函数增长;非线性回归分析表明

土壤分离能力可用水流剪切力、生物结皮盖度和土壤黏结力进行模拟(NSE=0.749)。综上

生物结皮发育显著提升土壤抗侵蚀性能

研究结果可为半湿润区水土流失防治及生物结皮管理利用提供理论参考。

Abstract

In order to explore the characteristics and mechanism of soil water erosion driven by biological crust development

five coverage grades (1%~20%

20%~40%

40%~60%

60%~80%

80%~100%) were designed for the abandoned farmland plots with moss development as the dominant species in Wulongchi small watershed in Danjiangkou Reservoir area

and the bare soil was used as the control to collect samples. Soil detachment text was studied under different flow shear forces (6.12~19.64 Pa). The results showed that: The development of biocrusts significantly affected soil nutrient content

and nutrient surface aggregation was more obvious under the high coverage of crust; The development of biocrusts significantly affected the soil detachment capacity. The soil detachment capacity of bare soil was 3.58~348.95 times that of biological crust . The rill erodibility of bare soil (0.293 5 s/m) was 3.57~293.50 times that of biological crust (0.001 0~0.082 2 s/m). The relative soil detachment ability and rill erodibility decreased exponentially with the increase of crust coverage

and the crust breaking time increased exponentially with the increase of crust coverage. Nonlinear regression analysis showed that the soil detachment ability could be simulated by water flow shear force

biological crust coverage and soil bonding force (NSE=0.749). In conclusion

the development of biocrusts significantly improved soil erosion resistance. The results can provide scientific basis and theoretical reference for soil and water loss control and biocrusts management and utilization in subhumid area.

关键词

Keywords

references

史志华,宋长青.土壤水蚀过程研究回顾[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):1-10.

Eldridge D, Greene R. Assessment of sediment yield by splash erosion on a semi-arid soil with varying cryptogam cover[J].Journal of Arid Environments,1994,26(3):221-232.

庞景文,卜崇峰,郭琦,等.毛乌素沙地区域尺度生物结皮有机碳空间分布特征及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1755-1763.

Belnap J, Weber B, Büdel B. Biological soil crusts:An organizing principle in drylands[J].Ecological Studies,2016,11:3-13.

Gao L Q, Bowker M A, Sun H, et al. Linkages between biocrust development and water erosion and implications for erosion model implementation[J].Geoderma,2020,357(C):e113973.

Chamizo S, Cantón Y, Miralles I, et al. Biological soil crust development affects physicochemical characteristics of soil surface in semiarid ecosystems[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2012,49:96-105.

Rodríguez-Caballero E, Cantón Y, Chamizo S, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on surface roughness and implications for runoff and erosion[J].Geomorphology,2012,145/146:81-89.

Liu Y M, Li X R, Xing Z S, et al. Responses of soil microbial biomass and community composition to biological soil crusts in the revegetated areas of the Tengger Desert[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2013,65:52-59.

张冠华,易亮,丁文峰,等.三峡库区苔藓生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1835-1842.

Xiao B, Sun F H, Hu K, et al. Biocrusts reduce surface soil infiltrability and impede soil water infiltration under tension and ponding conditions in dryland ecosystem[J].Journal of Hydrology,2019,568:792-802.

Elbert W, Weber B, Burrows S, et al. Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen[J].Nature Geoscience,2012,5(7):459-462.

Belnap J, Walker B J, Munson S M, et al. Gill. Controls on sediment production in two U.S. deserts[J].Aeolian Research,2014,14:15-24.

Liu F, Zhang G H, Sun L, et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on soil detachment process by overland flow in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2016,41(7):875-883.

张冠华,易亮,丁文峰,等.三峡库区生物结皮对土壤分离过程的影响及其机制[J].土壤,2021,53(3):610-619.

Bowker M A, Belnap J, Chaudhary V B, et al. Johnson. Revisiting classic water erosion models in drylands:The strong impact of biological soil crusts[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(9):2309-2316.

Gao L Q, Bowker M A, Xu M X, et al. Biological soil crusts decrease erodibility by modifying inherent soil properties on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,105:49-58.

Liu F, Zhang G H, Sun F B, et al. Quantifying the surface covering, binding and bonding effects of biological soil crusts on soil detachment by overland flow[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2017,42(15):2640-2648.

李宁宁,张光辉,王浩,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区生物结皮对土壤抗蚀性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(1):42-48.

Cheng C, Gao M, Zhang Y D, et al. Effects of disturbance to moss biocrusts on soil nutrients, enzyme activities, and microbial communities in degraded karst landscapes in southwest China[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2021,152:e108065.

赵允格,许明祥,王全九,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮理化性状初报[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(8):1429-1434.

王芳芳,肖波,李胜龙,等.黄土高原生物结皮对土壤养分的表层聚集与吸附固持效应[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(9):1592-1602.

张光辉.退耕驱动的近地表特性变化对土壤侵蚀的潜在影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(4):143-154.

冉茂勇,赵允格,刘玉兰.黄土丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮土壤抗冲性研究[J].中国水土保持,2011(12):43-45.

张显强,刘天雷,从春蕾.贵州5种喀斯特石生藓类成土及保土生态功能研究[J].中国岩溶,2018,37(5):708-713.

Wang B, Zhang G H, Shi Y Y, et al. Effect of natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on soil detachment by overland flow in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2013,38(14):1725-1734.

浏览量

772

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

模拟降雨下植物篱-草沟系统茎秆直径对紫色土区泥沙粒径与氮磷迁移的影响

水力条件对不同地表粗糙度土壤分离能力的影响

红壤丘陵区植被恢复对土壤分离能力的影响及机制

基于SfM近景摄影测量技术的藓结皮坡面土壤侵蚀空间分布特征

北方土石山区小麦与玉米秸秆还田年限对棕壤细沟侵蚀阻力的影响