围栏封育对荒漠草原灌丛草地土壤优先流的影响研究

徐苗苗; 孟晨; 王兴; 朱志昊; 王丽; 宋乃平; 杜灵通

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

围栏封育对荒漠草原灌丛草地土壤优先流的影响研究

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 围栏封育对荒漠草原灌丛草地土壤优先流的影响研究
- Study on the Effect of Grazing and Enclosure on the Preferential Flow of Soil in Desert Grassland and Shrub Grassland
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第3期页码：81-86
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 宁夏大学农学院,银川,750021
  2. 宁夏大学生态环境学院,银川,750021
  3. 宁夏大学西北土地退化与生态系统恢复国家重点实验室培养基地,银川,750021
  4. 西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室,银川,750021
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "徐苗苗(1998—),女,宁夏中卫人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与土壤水文研究。E-mail:3036649605@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  宁夏自然科学基金项目(2021AAC05005,2022AAC03102);宁夏重点研发计划项目(2021BEB04012,2022BEG02003,2019BFG02010)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.011
  中图分类号： S152.7
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
徐苗苗, 孟晨, 王兴, 等. 围栏封育对荒漠草原灌丛草地土壤优先流的影响研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):81-86.

XU Miaomiao, MENG Chen, WANG Xing, et al. Study on the Effect of Grazing and Enclosure on the Preferential Flow of Soil in Desert Grassland and Shrub Grassland[J]. 2023, 37(3): 81-86.
徐苗苗, 孟晨, 王兴, 等. 围栏封育对荒漠草原灌丛草地土壤优先流的影响研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):81-86. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.011.

XU Miaomiao, MENG Chen, WANG Xing, et al. Study on the Effect of Grazing and Enclosure on the Preferential Flow of Soil in Desert Grassland and Shrub Grassland[J]. 2023, 37(3): 81-86. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.011.

摘要

为探究围封对灌丛草地土壤优先流的影响

以宁夏吴忠市盐池县典型荒漠草原区为研究区

通过野外入渗染色试验、图像处理分析等方法

对围封荒漠草原灌丛草地土壤优先流的影响进行评价。结果表明:(1)围栏封育与放牧管理样地土壤水分入渗特征存在差异

在围栏封育样地

草地、天然柠条林地、人工柠条林地的入渗染色图像分别在0—125

0—115

0—105 cm呈现均匀分布

而在125—240

115—150

105—140 cm呈现染色分支

在放牧管理样地

草地、天然柠条林地、人工柠条林地入渗染色图像分别在0—80

0—70

0—80 cm呈现均匀分布

围栏封育导致土壤优先流发生深度更大;(2)土壤剖面染色面积比表现为围栏封育草地＞围栏封育天然柠条林地＞围栏封育人工柠条林地＞放牧管理人工柠条林地＞放牧管理天然柠条林地＞放牧管理草地

土壤染色深度表现为围栏封育草地＞围栏封育天然柠条林地＞放牧管理草地＞放牧管理天然柠条林地＞围栏封育人工柠条林地＞放牧管理人工柠条林地

围栏封育管理会导致土壤剖面染色面积比及染色深度增大;(3)土壤优先流变异系数表现为放牧管理天然柠条林地＞放牧管理人工柠条林地＞围栏封育天然柠条林地＞放牧管理草地＞围栏封育人工柠条林地＞围栏封育草地

放牧管理导致土壤优先流程度增加

而围栏封育降低灌木林地及草地的优先流程度。因此

在荒漠草原等干旱半干旱地区

围栏封育可作为提升土壤水分均匀入渗深度、降低优先流发生程度、提高土壤水分利用效率的重要管理方式。

Abstract

In order to explore effect of the enclosure of shrub grassland on soil preferential flow

typical desert area in Ningxia province

Wuzhong city was taken as the study area

field infiltration dyeing test and image processing analysis were used. The results showed that: (1) In the fenced and enclosed plots

the infiltration staining images showed obvious difference. In the fenced and enclosed plots

grassland

natural Caragana korshinskii forest and artificial C. korshinskii forest showed uniform distribution at 0-125

0-115 and 0-105 cm

respectively

and branching at 125-240

115-150 and 105-140 cm. While in the grazing management plots

the infiltration staining images of grassland

natural C. korshinskii forest and artificial C. korshinskii forest showed uniform distribution in 0-80

0-70 and 0-80 cm

respectively. The depth of soil preferential flow was deepened due to fencing. (2) The area ratio of soil profile staining was as follows: fenced grassland > fenced natural C. korshinskii forest > fenced artificial C. korshinskii forest > grazing management artificial C. korshinskii forest > grazing management natural C. korshinskii forest > grazing management grassland. The depth of soil staining was as follows: fenced grassland > fenced natural C. korshinskii forest > grazing managed grassland > grazing managed natural C. korshinskii forest > fenced artificial C. korshinskii forest > grazing managed artificial C. korshinskii forest. Fenced management would lead to the increase of soil profile staining area ratio and depth. (3) Soil preferential flow variation coefficient of performance was as follows: grazing management natural C. korshinskii woodland > grazing management artificial C. korshinskii > enclosure cultivating natural C. korshinskii woodland > grazing management grassland > grazing management cultivating artificial C. korshinskii forest land > enclosures fence grassland. Grazing management will lead to increment of soil preferential flow. Cultivating and enclosures will reduce the degree of preferential flow shrub forest and grass. Therefore

in arid and semi-arid areas such as desert steppe

fencing can be an important management method to improve the uniform infiltration depth of soil water

reduce the occurrence of preferential flow

and improve the efficiency of soil water use.

关键词

Keywords

references

卢华兴,段旭,赵洋毅,等.滇中磨盘山典型林分土壤优先流特征及其归因分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(7):48-62.

王佩佩,苏雪萌,周正朝,等.黄土丘陵区典型植被群落坡面土壤优先流特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):16-23.

张中彬,彭新华.土壤裂隙及其优先流研究进展[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):477-488.

Suzanne E A, Stéphanie R, Allan J C. Quantifying preferential flow in soils:A review of different techniques[J].Journal of Hydrology,2009,378(1/2):179-204.

Sukhija B S, Reddy D V, Nagabhushanam P, et al. Recharge processes:Piston flow vs preferential flow in semi-arid aquifers of India[J].Hydrogeology Journal,2003,11(3):387-395.

任泽莹,赵勇钢,吕银彦,等.汾河流域下游不同土地利用方式下优先流区与基质流区土壤团聚体稳定性分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):59-64.

刘蕾,王鹤雄,张国印,等.设施土壤优先流特征及其影响因素研究[J].河北农业科学,2021,25(2):46-52,71.

聂明鹤,沈艳,陆颖,等.宁夏盐池县荒漠草原区不同群落优势植物叶片:土壤生态化学计量特征[J].草地学报,2021,29(1):131-140.

Wang R, Dong Z B, Zhou Z C, et al. Temporal variation in preferential water flow during natural vegetation restoration on abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Land,2019,8(12):186.

Tang Q C, Duncan J M, Guo L, et al. On the controls of preferential flow in soils of different hillslope position and lithological origin[J]. Hydrological Processes,2020,34(22):4295-4306.

孙会,赵允格,刘广亮,等.放牧强度对黄土丘陵区草地植物群落特征的影响[J].草地学报,2022,30(4):810-817.

谷康民,赵允格,张子辉,等.模拟放牧干扰对黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面土壤水分入渗的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1827-1834.

王悦骅,靳宇曦,王忠武,等.8年围封对内蒙古荒漠草原植物和土壤的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(10):2339-2345.

姚喜喜,才华,李长慧.封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(增刊1):128-136.

张婧.土壤入渗与优先流测量方法研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2017.

Hu X, Li Z C, Li X Y, et al. Influence of shrub encroachment on CT-measured soil macropore characteristics in the Inner Mongolia grassland of northern China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2015,150:1-9.

王晓芳,马红彬,刘杰,等.放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(2):569-576.

金兆梁.不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤优先流特征[D].辽宁阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2019.

杜满聪,李江涛,李淑玲,等.不同耕作方式对华南坡耕地土壤孔隙结构和抗穿透强度影响[J].广州大学学报(自然科学版),2018,17(6):74-80.

陈晓冰,严磊,陈廷速,等.西南岩溶区粉垄耕作和免耕方式下甘蔗地土壤优先流特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):58-66.

王晓芳,马红彬,刘杰,等.放牧对草原植物功能性状影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(2):569-576.

程杰,刘永辉,田瑛.宁夏半干旱区柠条锦鸡儿灌木林生长特征.水土保持通报,2016,36(1):332-336.

牛钰杰,杨思维,王贵珍,等.放牧作用下高寒草甸群落物种分布与土壤因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(12):3891-3898.

Köhne J M, Köhne S, Šimůnek J. A review of model applications for structured soils:Water flow and tracer transport[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2009,104(1/4):4-35.

浏览量

765

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

荒漠草原不同退化程度土壤优先流发育特征

黄土丘陵沟壑区植物根系对土壤优先流的影响机理

喀斯特地区林草地植被根系分布对优先流特征的影响

黄土高塬沟壑区不同植被恢复方式对降雨入渗的影响

江苏省空青山林地土壤物理性质对优先流的影响