不同人为管理措施坡面地表微地形变化特征及其对渗流的响应

杨斐雄; 郑子成; 李廷轩; 王永东

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.010

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同人为管理措施坡面地表微地形变化特征及其对渗流的响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同人为管理措施坡面地表微地形变化特征及其对渗流的响应
- Variation Characteristics of Slope Surface Microtopography and Its Response to Seepage Under Different Artificial Management Measures
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第3期页码：73-80
- 作者机构：
  
  四川农业大学资源学院,成都,611130
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "杨斐雄(1996—),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事紫色土土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:feixiongyang8048@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(42177316)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.010
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨斐雄, 郑子成, 李廷轩, 等. 不同人为管理措施坡面地表微地形变化特征及其对渗流的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):73-80.

YANG Feixiong, ZHENG Zicheng, LI Tingxuan, et al. Variation Characteristics of Slope Surface Microtopography and Its Response to Seepage Under Different Artificial Management Measures[J]. 2023, 37(3): 73-80.
杨斐雄, 郑子成, 李廷轩, 等. 不同人为管理措施坡面地表微地形变化特征及其对渗流的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):73-80. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.010.

YANG Feixiong, ZHENG Zicheng, LI Tingxuan, et al. Variation Characteristics of Slope Surface Microtopography and Its Response to Seepage Under Different Artificial Management Measures[J]. 2023, 37(3): 73-80. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.010.

摘要

探究不同人为管理措施坡耕地地表微地形变化特征

阐明地表微地形变化对渗流响应

以期为紫色土坡耕地水土流失的有效防治与人为管理措施的合理布设提供科学依据。以平整坡面、穴播坡面和垄作坡面为研究对象

基于室内人工模拟渗流试验

开展5°和15°紫色土坡面微地形变化特征研究。结果表明:(1)渗流试验前后平整坡面、垄作坡面和穴播坡面微地形半方差函数在0~135°和180°~315°方向上呈中心对称分布

随地表坡度的增加分布范围逐渐缩小

且具有明显的方向性。渗流条件下

平整坡面和穴播坡面微地形各向异性的变化趋势较为一致

而垄作坡面微地形空间变异性较强。(2)渗流条件下

3种人为管理措施坡面高程均集中于-20~0 mm的变化区域

穴播坡面和垄作坡面高程值的分布较平整坡面离散。(3)与5°坡面相比

15°平整坡面地表糙度的变化对渗流的响应更为明显

且糙度变化率呈平整坡面＞穴播坡面＞垄作坡面;渗流作用下

各坡面中、下坡位地表糙度变幅较大。坡面初始起伏程度越剧烈

微地形对渗流侵蚀作用的骤变响应越明显。地表糙度可作为刻画坡面微地形响应渗流变化的指标

可较好地实现中、下坡位土壤侵蚀—沉积空间分布的表征

以期为阐明紫色土坡面微地形变化与渗流侵蚀的耦合关系提供理论依据。

Abstract

In order to explore the characteristics of slope surface microtopography(SSM) change of slope farmland under different artificial management measures

and clarify the response of SSM change to seepage

so as to provide a scientific basis for the effective prevention and control of soil erosion and the reasonable layout of artificial management measures

this study took the flat slope (CK)

artificial digging slope (AD) and ridge tillage slope (RT) as the research object. Based on simulated seepage experiment

the variation characteristics of SSM on 5° and 15° purple soil slopes were studied. The results showed that (1) The semivariogram of SSM on the three slopes showed a central symmetric distribution in the directions of 0~135° and 180°~315° before and after the seepage test

and the distribution range gradually decreased with the increasing of slope gradients and exhibited obvious directivity. Under seepage condition

the variation trend of SSM anisotropy on CK and AD was relatively consistent

while the spatial variability of SSM on RT was strong. (2) Under seepage condition

the range of elevation variation on the three kinds of slopes was mainly concentrated in -20 mm to 0 mm

and the distribution of slope elevation of relative rough slopes (AD and RT) was more dispersal compared with CK. (3) Compared with 5° slope

the response of soil surface roughness (SSR) change to seepage was more obvious on 15° flat slope. The change rate of SSR followed the order of CK>AD>RT. Under seepage condition

the SSR varied greatly at the midslope and downslope. The more intense the initial fluctuation of slope surface was

the more obvious the abrupt change response of SSM to seepage erosion. In this study

soil surface roughness could be used as an indicator for describing the response of SSM changes to seepage condition

which could efficiently characterize the spatial distribution of soil erosion-deposition at the middle and downslope

so as to provide a theoretical basis for clarifying the coupling relationship between the variation of SSM and seepage erosion on purple soil slope.

关键词

Keywords

references

Huang Y H, Li F H, Wang W, et al. Rill erosion processes on a constantly saturated slope[J].Hydrological Processes,2020,34(20):3955-3965.

李彦海,陈晓燕,韩珍,等.紫色土细沟水流输沙能力对近地表水流作用的响应[J].土壤学报,2021,58(3):657-664.

Nouwakpo S K, Huang C H, Bowling L C, et al. Impact of vertical hydraulic gradient on rill erodibility and critical shear stress[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2010,74(6):1914-1921.

中华人民共和国水利部.2021年中国水土保持公报[R/OL].(2022-07-13).http://www.mwr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/zgstbcgb/202207/t20220713_1585301.html

安娟,殷小琳,李国会,等.雨滴打击与壤中流交互作用对横坡垄作坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):50-55.

赵龙山,梁心蓝,张青峰,等.裸地雨滴溅蚀对坡面微地形的影响与变化特征[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(19):71-77.

Zhao L S, Fang Q, Hou R, et al. Effect of rainfall intensity and duration on soil erosion on slopes with different microrelief patterns[J].Geoderma,2021,396:e115085.

Han Z, Wang X Y, Song D D, et al. Response of soil erosion and sediment sorting to the transport mechanism on a steep rocky slope[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2019,44(12):2467-2478.

Li L, Nearing M A, Polyakov V O, et al. Evolution of rock cover, surface roughness, and flow velocity on stony soil under simulated rainfall[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,75(5):651-668.

郑良勇,李占斌,李鹏,等.坡面侵蚀泥沙来源立体分布研究[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):58-61.

唐辉,李占斌,李鹏,等.模拟降雨下坡面微地形量化及其与产流产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):127-133.

王莹,郑子成,李廷轩,等.水蚀过程中玉米生长季横垄坡面地表糙度变化及其与侵蚀量的关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(6):31-37.

Wang F C, Xu G C, Li L, et al. Response relationship between microtopographic variation and slope erosion under sand-cover[J].Water,2019,11(12):e2488.

Li D D, Chen X Y, Han Z, et al. Determination of rill erodibility and critical shear stress of saturated purple soil slopes[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2022,10(1):38-45.

安娟,陈新军,宋红丽.近地表水文条件对横坡垄作坡面褐土团聚体流失的影响[J].土壤学报,2020,57(6):1411-1421.

Fox G A, Chu-Agor M L M, Wilson G V. Erosion of noncohesive sediment by bround water seepage:Lysimeter experiments and stability modeling[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2007,71(6):1822-1830.

Nouwakpo S K, Huang C H. The role of subsurface hydrology in soil erosion and channel network development on a laboratory hillslope[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2012,76(4):1197-1211.

汤国安,李发源,刘学军.数字高程模型教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.

Fielding E J. Tibet uplift and erosion[J].Tectonophysics,1996,260(1/3):55-84.

Chu-Agor M L, Fox G A, Cancienne R M, et al. Seepage caused tension failures and erosion undercutting of hillslopes[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008,359(3/4):247-259.

Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L L, et al. An experimental study of rill erosion and morphology[J].Geomorphology,2015,231:193-201.

吴淑芳,刘政鸿,霍云云,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀发育过程与模拟[J].土壤学报,2015,52(1):48-56.

王红兰,蒋舜媛,崔俊芳,等.紫色土坡耕地土壤大孔隙流的定量评价[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):167-174.

冯小杰,郑子成,李廷轩,等.暴雨条件下紫色土区玉米季坡耕地氮素流失特征[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(4):738-749.

王晨沣,马超,王玉杰,等.水力梯度影响下WEPP模型估计细沟侵蚀参数的可行性分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(8):126-133.

罗键,尹忠,郑子成,等.不同降雨条件下紫色土横垄坡面地表微地形变化特征[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(16):3162-3173.

Liu L, Liu Q J, An J, et al. Rill morphology and deposition characteristics on row sideslopes under seepage conditions[J].Soil Use and Management,2015,31(4):515-524.

Luo J, Wang N N, Zheng Z C, et al. Tillage-induced microtopography alters time-dependent intrinsic correlation of runoff and sediment yield[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2022,221:e105423.

梁心蓝,赵龙山,吴佳,等.模拟条件下不同耕作措施和雨强对地表糙度的影响[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(24):4840-4849.

顾小杰,陈晓燕,韩珍,等.紫色土细沟剥蚀率对近地表水流作用的响应[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):16-22.

Römkens M J M, Helming K, Prasad S N. Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes[J].Catena,2002,46(2/3):103-123.

郑子成,秦凤,李廷轩.不同坡度下紫色土地表微地形变化及其对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):168-175.

赵龙山,侯瑞,吴发启,等.不同农业耕作措施下坡耕地填洼量特征与变化[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(12):249-254.

张建文,李鹏,高海东,等.覆沙坡面微地形变化与侵蚀产沙的响应关系[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(3):757-764.

浏览量

738

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

模拟降雨下植物篱-草沟系统茎秆直径对紫色土区泥沙粒径与氮磷迁移的影响

黄土高寒区典型小流域土壤团聚体稳定性及可蚀性空间变异特征

长江三峡山地集水区土壤水分空间变异特征

块石出露对喀斯特坡耕地土壤理化性质的影响

低分子量有机酸浸提对紫色土金属阳离子