西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400716
[ "谭文浩(1997—),男,湖南宜章人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:twh17774969415@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
谭文浩, 陈晓燕, 陶婷婷, 等. 重庆饱和紫色土坡面片流与细沟流水力学特性及临界条件试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):66-72.
TAN Wenhao, CHEN Xiaoyan, TAO Tingting, et al. Experiment Study of Sheet and Rill Flow Hydraulic Characteristics and the Critical Conditions on Saturated Purple Soil Slopes in Chongqing[J]. 2023, 37(3): 66-72.
谭文浩, 陈晓燕, 陶婷婷, 等. 重庆饱和紫色土坡面片流与细沟流水力学特性及临界条件试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):66-72. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.009.
TAN Wenhao, CHEN Xiaoyan, TAO Tingting, et al. Experiment Study of Sheet and Rill Flow Hydraulic Characteristics and the Critical Conditions on Saturated Purple Soil Slopes in Chongqing[J]. 2023, 37(3): 66-72. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.009.
为比较饱和紫色土坡面片流与细沟流水力学特征并明确其临界水力学特性
进行5个坡度(2°
5°
10°
15°
20°)和3个雨强(30
60
90 mm/h)组合 条件下的室内人工模拟降雨试验
在测得坡面片流、细沟流及其转变的临界流速的基础上
计算得到片流、细沟流及其转变的临界水力学参数
包括水深、雷诺数、弗劳德数和达西阻力系数。结果表明:在不同侵蚀阶段
片流流速为0.064~0.151 m/s
细沟流流速为0.175~0.350 m/s
雨强和坡度在不同侵蚀阶段对流速和水深的影响程度存在差异。片流均为层流
<10°坡时
片流为缓流
片流多居缓层流流态;中、大雨强条件下
细沟流均为过渡流
>5°坡时细沟流均为急流
细沟流多为急过渡流流态。片流达西阻力系数与坡度和雨强呈负相关关系
细沟流达西阻力系数与坡度和雨强呈正相关关系。坡面径流由片流转为细沟流的临界流速为0.100~0.165 m/s。流速改变坡面形态
导致细沟侵蚀发生的临界水流流态和水流阻力随坡度和雨强变化的规律不同。研究结果对于认识饱和土壤条件下坡面不同侵蚀阶段径流水力学特性
进一步明确由片流转为细沟流的临界水力条件具有一定参考价值。
In order to compare the hydraulic characteristics of sheet flow and rill flow on saturated purple soil slope and clarify their critical hydraulic characteristics
indoor artificial simulated rainfall experiments were conducted under the combined conditions of five slope gradients (SGs: 2°
5°
10°
15°
20°) and three rainfall intensities (RIs: 30
60
90 mm/h). On the basis of measuring the velocity of sheet flow
rill flow and critical velocity of shee flow transform to rill flow
the corresponding hydraulic parameters were calculated
including water depth
Reynolds number
Froude number and Darcy resistance coefficient. The results showed that: In different erosion stages
the velocity of sheet flow was between 0.064 and 0.151 m/s and rill flow was between 0.175 and 0.350 m/s. The influence degree of SGs and RIs on velocity and water depth of sheet and rill flow was different. The sheet flow was all laminar and was tranquil when the slope gradient was < 10°. The sheet flow was mostly in the state of tranquil laminar flow. The rill flow was transitional under the conditions of moderate and heavy rain and was rapid when the slope gradient was > 5°. The rill flow was mostly in the state of rapid transitional flow. The Darcy resistance coefficient of sheet flow was negatively correlated with SGs and RIs
while that of rill flow was positively. The critical velocity of sheet flow transform to rill flow was between 0.100 and 0.165 m/s. The velocity would change the slope shape
resulting in the difference of the critical flow pattern and flow resistance with SGs and RIs. This study is of great significance to understand the hydraulic characteristics of sheet flow and rill flow on saturated soil slope
and to further clarify the critical hydraulic conditions for the sheet flow to rill flow transition.
何毓蓉.中国紫色土(Ⅱ)[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:2211.
刘纪根,丁文峰,黄金权.长江流域水土保持科学研究进展及展望[J].长江科学院院报,2021,38(10):54-59.
邢行,陈晓燕,韩珍,等.饱和与非饱和黄绵土细沟径流水动力学特征及侵蚀阻力对比[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):92-97.
唐克丽.中国土壤侵蚀与水土保持学的特点及展望[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(2):3-8.
刘俊娥,王占礼,高素娟,等.黄土坡面片蚀过程动力学机理试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(7):144-149.
Zhang G H, Hu J J. Effects of patchy distributed artemisia capillaris on overland flow hydrodynamic characteristics[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2019,7(1):81-88.
Sun J M, Fan D X, Yu X X, et al. Hydraulic characteristics of varying slope gradients, rainfall intensities and litter cover on vegetated slopes[J].Hydrology Research,2018,49(2):506-516.
Wang J W, Zhang K D, Yang M Y, et al. The effect of roughness and rainfall on hydrodynamic properties of overland flow[J].Hydrology Research,2019,50(5):1324-1343.
Zhuang X H, Wang W, Ma Y M, et al. Spatial distribution of sheet flow velocity along slope under simulated rainfall conditions[J].Geoderma,2018,321:1-7.
郑粉莉.发生细沟侵蚀的临界坡长与坡度[J].中国水土保持,1989(8):23-24.
李君兰,蔡强国,孙莉英,等.细沟侵蚀影响因素和临界条件研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(11):1319-1325.
辜婧瑶,李梦雨,魏玉杰,等.降雨条件下闽西花岗岩红壤坡面细沟发生临界水动力学特性[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(4):62-72.
Brunton D A, Bryan R B. Bill network development and sediment budgets[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2000,25(7):783-800.
Merz W, Bryan R. Critical conditions for rill initiation on sandy loam Brunisols:Laboratory and field experiments in southern Ontario, Canada[J].Geoderma,1993,57(4):357-385.
Salman M, Manochehr G, Ali J. Effect of rock fragments cover on distance of rill erosion initiation and overland flow hydraulics[J].International Journal of Soil Science,2012,7(3):100-107.
吴克宁,赵瑞.土壤质地分类及其在我国应用探讨[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):227-241.
Huang Y H, Chen X Y, Li F H, et al. Velocity of water flow along saturated loess slopes under erosion effcets[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,564:304-311.
Han Z, Chen X Y, Li Y H, et al. Quantifying the rill-detachment process along a saturated soil slope[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2020,204(1):e104726.
陈鹏,周盈颖,冯萍,等.重庆短时强降水时空特征分析[J].气象科技进展,2021,11(2):39-45.
蔡强国.坡面细沟发生临界条件研究[J].泥沙研究,1998(1):54-61.
Abrahams A, Parsons A, Luk S. Field measurement of the velocity of overland flow using dye tracing[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1986,11(6):653-657.
Liu H Q, Yang J H, Diao Y F, et al. The hydrodynamic mechanism of rainfall runoff from loess slopes treated with incorporated straw[J].Land Degradation and Development,2021,32(14):3812-3822.
王志刚,郑粉莉,李靖.不同近地表水文条件下紫色土坡面土壤侵蚀过程研究[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(6):9-11,79.
温永福,高鹏,穆兴民,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区梯田边坡侵蚀过程对雨强的响应[J].泥沙研究,2017,42(6):46-51.
吴淑芳,张永东,卜崇峰.黄土细沟侵蚀演化过程及其水力学特性试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2015(6):72-80.
张科利,秋吉康宏.坡面细沟侵蚀发生的临界水力条件研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998(1):42-47.
雷阿林,唐克丽.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀的动力条件[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998(3):40-44.
Tao T T, Chen S Q, Chen X Y. Rill flow velocity affected by the subsurface water flow depth of purple soil in Southwest China[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2022,19(3):704-714.
陶婷婷,陈晓燕,陈仕奇,等.饱和紫色土初始态和稳定态细沟水力学特征研究[J].土壤学报,2022,59(1):129-138.
0
浏览量
829
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621