模拟降雨下林下覆被结构对产流产沙过程的影响

朱方方; 秦建淼; 朱美菲; 张友焱

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

模拟降雨下林下覆被结构对产流产沙过程的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 模拟降雨下林下覆被结构对产流产沙过程的影响
- Effect of Mulch Structure on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulation Rainfall
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第3期页码：10-18
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
  2. 中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所,北京,100091
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "朱方方(1993—),女,博士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:Fangf0506@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  十四五国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1302504)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.002
  中图分类号： 157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱方方, 秦建淼, 朱美菲, 等. 模拟降雨下林下覆被结构对产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):10-18.

ZHU Fangfang, QIN Jianmiao, ZHU Meifei, et al. Effect of Mulch Structure on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulation Rainfall[J]. 2023, 37(3): 10-18.
朱方方, 秦建淼, 朱美菲, 等. 模拟降雨下林下覆被结构对产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(3):10-18. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.002.

ZHU Fangfang, QIN Jianmiao, ZHU Meifei, et al. Effect of Mulch Structure on Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Simulation Rainfall[J]. 2023, 37(3): 10-18. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.03.002.

摘要

植被具有良好的水土保持效益

深入了解覆被结构特征与产流产沙关系是研究植被防蚀功能的基础。以鄂中地区典型森林植被为对象

通过人工模拟降雨试验研究5种覆被结构(灌木、草本、枯落物、灌木+草本、灌木+草本+枯落物)和侵蚀性降雨(60

120 mm/h)对坡面侵蚀产沙过程的影响。结果表明:(1)坡面产流率、产沙率随降雨时间先迅速增大

后缓慢增大

最后达到稳定趋势。降雨强度是坡面侵蚀产沙的主导因素

与产流时间、产流率和产沙率呈显著正相关关系(p＜0.01)。(2)在有/无枯落物存在的情况下

植被覆盖度、植株密度分别是坡面产流产沙的主要影响因素。径流含沙量在不同覆被结构覆盖下表现为:草本＞灌木＞枯落物＞灌木+草本＞灌草枯。(3)结构特征参数对产流产沙影响的优先等级为覆盖度、生物量、植株密度、多样性指标

即水平结构＞竖直结构＞物种组成＞空间格局。研究结果旨在揭示覆被结构对坡面侵蚀产沙的作用机理

为南方林地土壤侵蚀模型的构建提供科学参考。

Abstract

Vegetation has good function of soil and water conservation. Careful understanding the relationship between the structural characteristics of vegetation and the production of runoff is the basis for studying the erosion control function of vegetation. In this paper

the effects of five vegetation structures (shrubs

herbs

litter

shrubs + herbs

shrubs + herbs + litter) and erosive rainfall (60

120 mm/h) on the process of erosion were investigated by artificial simulated rainfall experiments with typical forest vegetation in Central Hubei. The results showed that: (1) The runoff and sediment yield increased rapidly at first

then increased slowly with the rainfall time

and finally reach a stable trend. Rainfall intensity was the dominant factor of slope erosion and sand production

and showed a significant positive correlation with flow production time

flow production rate and sand production rate (p < 0.01). (2) With or without litter

vegetation coverage and plant density were the main factors affecting runoff and sediment yield on the slope. The sediment concentration of runoff under different covering structures was as follows: herb > shrub > litter > herb+shrub > shrub and grass withered. (3) The priority of structural characteristic parameters on runoff and sediment yield was: coverage

biomass

plant density

diversity index

that was

horizontal structure > vertical structure > species composition > spatial pattern. The results of the study aim to reveal the mechanism of the role of vegetation structure on slope erosion

and provide scientific reference for the construction of soil erosion models in southern woodlands.

关键词

Keywords

references

黄凯,刘瑞禄,覃莉,等.不同降雨条件下坡长对喀斯特坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(1):271-280.

Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L, et al. Impacts of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on rill erosion processes at loessial hillslope[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,155:429-436.

朱燕琴,赵志斌,齐广平,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被类型次降雨产流产沙特征[J].草地学报,2019,27(1):28-34.

霍云梅,毕华兴,朱永杰,等.模拟降雨条件下南方典型粘土坡面土壤侵蚀过程及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):23-26.

黄萱.植被覆盖和降雨变化对流域水沙过程的影响机制[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2019.

张黎明,于东升,史学正,等.不同降雨类型下的南方典型土壤侵蚀量差异研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(4):1-6.

赵炯昌,卫伟,段兴武.模拟降雨下黄土坡面水沙过程对3种灌草植被垂直结构变化的响应[J].生态学报,2021,41(21):8602-8611.

吴蕾,穆兴民,高鹏,等.黄土高原地区植被盖度对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):133-138.

丛月,张洪江,程金花,等.华北土石山区草本植被覆盖度对降雨溅蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(5):59-62.

黄健熙,吴炳方,曾源,等.水平和垂直尺度乔、灌、草覆盖度遥感提取研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(8):871-881.

赵志斌,朱燕琴,齐广平.植被结构类型对产流产沙特征的影响[J].甘肃科技,2018,34(22):139-140,138.

陶宇,温仲明,朱朵菊,等.黄土丘陵区植物群落功能多样性/物种多样性与产流产沙响应关系[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):120-128.

Zhu H X, Fu B J, Wang S, et al. Reducing soil erosion by improving community functional diversity in semi-arid grasslands[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,52(4):1063-1072.

李盼盼,李彬彬,王兵,等.模拟氮沉降对白羊草地群落特征及其坡面流水动力特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(16):52-61.

陈科兵,吴发启,姚冲.黄土高原南部地区人工模拟暴雨条件下不同坡度谷子坡耕地产流产沙过程[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):90-95.

张科利,蔡强国,柯奇画.中国土壤侵蚀研究重大成就及未来关键领域[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):373-380.

Ben-Hur M, Faris J, Malik M, et al. Polymers as soil conditioners under consecutive irrigations and rainfall[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2015,53(4):1173-1177.

Clark P J, Evans F C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations[J].Ecology,1954,35(4):445-453.

Mason N W H, Mouillot D, Lee W G, et al. Diversity functional richness, functional evenness and functional dvergence:The primary components of functional diversity[J].Oikos,2005,111(1):112-118.

Liu J E, Wang Z L, Yang X M, et al.The impact of natural polymer derivatives on sheet erosion on experimental loess hillslope[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2014,139:23-27.

李瑞栋,王文龙,娄义宝,等.模拟降雨条件下砾石含量对塿土工程堆积体坡面产流产沙的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(11):3027-3036.

陈泽勋,刘廷玺,王怡璇,等.模拟降雨条件下典型草原坡面初始产流时间及产流产沙量[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(7):1316-1323.

Liu X N, Fan D X, Yu X X, et al. Effects of simulated gravel on hydraulic characteristics of overland flow under varying flow discharges, slope gradients and gravel coverage Degrees[J].Scientific Reports,2019,9:e19781.

朱慧鑫,胡晓静,程金花,等.草被覆盖下坡面流土壤侵蚀水动力学特征[J].东北农业大学学报,2018,49(7):48-57.

杨坪坪,李勇,宋涛,等.典型喀斯特区侵蚀性降雨特征及坡面生物措施水土流失防控效应[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(1):53-62.

浏览量

793

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

小流域土壤侵蚀模型（SWEM）

秦岭水源地生态恢复下土壤全氮分布对侵蚀的响应

人工模拟降雨下高寒区坡面径流水动力特性对砾石覆盖的响应

水力条件对不同地表粗糙度土壤分离能力的影响

三峡库区生态屏障区土壤侵蚀时空变化特征与驱动因素